iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Gabe Watson Trial Update: Diver Doug Milsap Contradicts Husband About Tina Thomas Watson's Death

Tinawatsonscuba

First Posted: 02/17/2012 6:30 pm Updated: 02/17/2012 7:01 pm

An experienced scuba diver who was there when Tina Thomas Watson died cast doubt on her husband's version of what happened on the day she drowned off Australia's Great Barrier Reef in 2003.

Dr. Doug Milsap testified for the prosecution that Watson told him two stories about how Tina died -- neither of which he believed.

In one version, Milsap recalled, Watson told him that his wife panicked, knocked off his mask, making him unable to help her. In another, he said he was holding her, but that she was too heavy to carry to the surface.

The tale wasn't plausible to Milsap, because underwater, a person's weight is the equivalent of 10 to 20 pounds.

"I got angry - like I feel now - and said, that's bulls---," Milsap said, according to The Courier Mail. "I tend not to have much tact, I tell it like it is."

Prosecutors argue that the defendant, a 36-year-old bubble wrap salesman, who had married his wife 10 days earlier, had planned her death to cash in on her life insurance.

The Alabama man served 18 months in an Australian prison for manslaughter. If convicted in a Birmingham courtroom, he faces life behind bars.

To preempt a possible move by the defense, prosecutors aired a taped deposition of Tina's doctor about a heart condition she had in 2001. Tina had a procedure two years before she died to correct an irregular heartbeat. Dr. Farrell Mendelsohn testified in a Birmingham courtroom that he considered her cured.

The defense contends that Tina's death was accidental and perhaps was gearing up to argue that her medical history put her at risk in diving, The Associated Press says.

SEE PHOTOS FROM THE GABE WATSON CASE: (Story continues below)

Tina Watson Scuba Diving
1  of  18
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
This photo was taken in Oct. 2003 and inadvertently shows Tina Thomas Watson (right) in distress on the ocean floor while scuba diving off the Great Barrier Reef. Her husband, Gabe Watson, was charged by the Alabama Attorney General's office with drowning her for insurance money, but was acquitted by a judge on Feb. 23, 2012.

One of Watson's friends -- a fellow scuba diver -- testified on the fifth day of the case. Although Watson was certified as a rescue diver, his pal Michael Moore said the certificate was awarded by an instructor who cut corners, The Birmingham News says.

Testimony from the human resources manager at Tina's job was deemed beneficial to the defense by the Birmingham newspaper. The Alabama Attorney General's office says Watson plotted his wife's murder, because he thought he was the beneficiary of an insurance package worth as much as $210,000. But the human resources manager said that Tina's policy through her employer was worth only $33,000 and that her father was the recipient.

In a police interview already played in court, Watson admitted that he "hung out" with the crew and asked for hugs while others performed 40 minutes of CPR on Tina, The Daily Telegraph reports.


Earlier on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CRIME

An experienced scuba diver who was there when Tina Thomas Watson died cast doubt on her husband's version of what happened on the day she drowned off Australia's Great Barrier Reef in 2003. Dr. Dou...
An experienced scuba diver who was there when Tina Thomas Watson died cast doubt on her husband's version of what happened on the day she drowned off Australia's Great Barrier Reef in 2003. Dr. Dou...
Filed by Michael McLaughlin  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 746
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jonathanzimmel
08:55 PM on 02/22/2012
i'm always leary of someone who tells me they are a bubble wrap salesman
07:58 PM on 02/21/2012
Knowing someone who knew Tina and hearing from her friends, Tina did not want to learn how to scuba dive much less go diving on her honeymoon. So, from the get go, this all smells!!! And then being a scuba diver, you should never leave your dive buddy. He should know that being the "experienced diver" they said he was. And oh, and he wanted her to increase her life insurance before the wedding of which she did not. Probably why the policy was small and still in her dad's name. He was surely surprised when he went to her employers to check on the policy. So, am I missing something here
photo
lisaman
I am a liberal American so get over it
02:08 PM on 02/21/2012
As an advanced certified scuba diver, I can unequivocally say, the guy is full of it. Just to be certified one of the things you have to be able to do is remove and replace your mask, being able to purge the water from the mask. Also, as the man said, even the heaviest person weighs nothing under water. I remember growing up we had a pool and as kids we used to play around carrying each other through the water. A child could carry their parent, he could certainly have been able to carry his wife. He really must think everyone is as dumb as he apparently is.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
TXfemmom
Grandma with eye on the future
12:50 PM on 02/20/2012
I don't think this man even had to have a motive other than finding it enjoyable to kill this woman.  Anyone who would do this is just a perverse, corrupt and vile person.  They don't even need insurance money or other things to have the drive to do something such as this...he probably just thoroughly enjoyed feeling the life go out of her.  They should really, really look into his background, as there may well be some other people who have suffered at his hands.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Gronkie
Radical Independent
11:39 AM on 02/20/2012
The guy seems completely guilty to me, but I'm wondering about the legality of another trial. If he was already convicted and then served a sentence in Australia, where the crime happened, doesn't holding a second trial in America constitute double jeopardy? How does an American court even have jurisdiction in this case? I can understand a civil case brought by her parents (a la OJ), but criminal?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
TXfemmom
Grandma with eye on the future
12:52 PM on 02/20/2012
The U. S. can prosecute anyone for the death of a citizen, wherever it occurs in the world, in certain circumstances.  They have used that against terrorists and it can be used in other situations, as well.  Double jeopardy only applies in cases which are prosecuted here.
photo
lisaman
I am a liberal American so get over it
02:04 PM on 02/21/2012
He planned the death here. I think they can use that to justify trying him here. Also, not sure but if he was convicted of manslaughter in Australia and charged with murder here, is that still double jeopardy? He wasn't acquitted so it isn't like he is being tried a second time after being found not guilty.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
juliana1217
08:36 PM on 02/19/2012
even if he didn't kill her, he didn't swim down to where she was, and try to give her his airhose. And he didn't go down there and try to bring her to the surface before she drowned. That's one thing it's clear he's guilty of . Isn't there some law that makes it illegal to watch your spouse die of an accident and not do anything to help him/ her ?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:12 AM on 02/20/2012
That speaks to intent, which speaks to he had a role in her death. A juror will not separate that fact from intent. Why would he go to such lengths to avoid helping her, putting on a Show above surface, Because he didn't think anyone saw much, or took photos.. If it was a stranger, I guarantee he would of helped, he would need to be the Hero."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pcs5141
cut the crap
01:11 PM on 02/19/2012
Wanna get rid of your wife,just take to foreign country and go diving.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tall coolone
Professional know-it-all
12:13 PM on 02/19/2012
Bubble wrap salesmen are evil.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sanfran55
12:01 PM on 02/19/2012
This man's changing stories, plus that he was already found guilty of manslaughter, indicates some culpability in his wife's death. Will be interesting to see how the American court handles this case and their conclusion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
madisonhack
I prefer not to......
08:52 AM on 02/19/2012
Old school diving rules were to not be out of reach of your buddy. Things have changed, I guess. Now people dive alone or wander off to explore by themselves. I liked the old way better. Equipment is much better these days, but it seems people are less prepared for the unthinkable.
GraceNotes
We live for books.
11:29 AM on 02/19/2012
It helps to have a buddy you can trust.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sanfran55
12:01 PM on 02/19/2012
True that!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
madisonhack
I prefer not to......
01:52 AM on 02/22/2012
That's why I never understood blind people diving or caving. How could they help their buddies?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jonathanzimmel
08:54 PM on 02/22/2012
maybe her husband was her buddy and he sabotaged her equipment?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
madisonhack
I prefer not to......
09:44 PM on 02/23/2012
Nonsense. She was diving at the edge of her profciency and past her endurance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
maybesomeday
If you take short cuts your always gonna come up s
06:21 AM on 02/19/2012
As much as I love the ocean and I do love it, grew up near it and live minutes away from it, diving for some reason never interested me. Reading all the comments from people with years of experience make me think I made the right decision.

I'm sure what's beneath the surface is fascinating and beautiful at times but not if it has to be so complicated.

What I don't understand about this case is why he is being tried for a 2nd time. Doesn't it say he plead guilty for manslaughter in Australia?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Dude67
Nobody told me there'd be days like these
11:11 AM on 02/19/2012
When a U.S. citizen is suspected of killing another U.S. citizen, it doesn't matter where in the world it happened or what punishment was meted out by a foreign government - they still have to stand trial in the U.S..  This of course depends on whether the U.S. can win an extradition.  In this case Australia refused until Alabama agreed to take the death penalty off the table.
04:13 PM on 02/20/2012
Oh ja well we had an aquaintance that lost his wife in a CAVE DIVING ACCIDENT IN MEXICO he inherited TONS of money MOTIVE ? However as faith would have it Him being a Cave Diver he did not live very long there after either , as he DIED IN A DIVING ACCIDENT IN FLORIDA COINCEDENCE ?
02:13 AM on 02/19/2012
It's all just a little too fishy for me.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sanfran55
12:01 PM on 02/19/2012
No pun intended? ;)
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
08:03 PM on 02/18/2012
This man has already pleaded guilty once in Australia, that's not going to help his case here. His friend claims the man that certified him is known to cut corners, well, if his friend knew it, I'm guessing he did too. So that won't really help him. If he is found guilty based on the evidence the jury has to go by and not the media, there is this lighthouse in NY not far from NYC where they used to take the worst of criminals and chain them to rocks at low tide so that the convict has a slow, torturous death by the time the high tides come in. It usually takes about 12 hours which would give him time to reflect and understand the fear he put into his first wife.
12:38 AM on 02/19/2012
like your method of justice
01:12 PM on 02/20/2012
;)
07:36 PM on 02/18/2012
Cock a doodle doooooooooooo! liar