iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Self-Driving Cars Get First Green Light As Nevada Approves Requirement Regulations

Selfdriving Cars

By SANDRA CHEREB   02/16/12 04:56 PM ET  AP

CARSON CITY, Nev. -- Nevada is envisioning a day when taxicabs might shuttle fares without a driver, or people with medical conditions that make them ineligible for a license could get around with a virtual chauffeur.

The concept took a big step when Nevada became the first state to approve regulations that spell out requirements for companies to test driverless cars on state roads.

"Then they have to take us out and prove that they can do it," Bruce Breslow, director of the Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles, said of the autonomous vehicles. "They're not ready to go to market yet."

But Nevada intends to be ready when they are, and officials hope to stay ahead of other states such as Florida and Hawaii that are considering similar testing regulations, Breslow said.

Gov. Brian Sandoval took a test ride in a self-driving Toyota Prius in July. The car being developed by Google Inc. uses radar, sensors and computers that allow the vehicle to drive itself, though human drivers can override the autopilot function.

Companies that want to conduct testing in Nevada will need a bond of $1 million to $3 million, depending on the number of cars they plan to test. Firms also must lay out their specific intentions, such as testing a vehicle on urban roadways, or its ability to operate in the fog, rain or snow, and provide testing data to the state.

The cars must have two people in them at all times, with one able to take control. The new regulations approved last week also require companies to detail license requirements for people to operate them when they become available.

Cars must be equipped with separate data collectors – similar to the "black box" on an aircraft – that will "capture and store the autonomous technology sensor data for at least 30 seconds before a collision."

The regulations go beyond testing procedures, anticipating the day when driverless cars become a reality on highways.

If a vehicle is certified as capable of being driven in autonomous mode without a driver, a person can operate the vehicle "without being physically present," one provision says.

Whether there's a human driver or not, the regulations hold the operator responsible regardless of whether the person is physically present in the autonomous vehicle.

The only exception to traffic laws is texting or talking on a hand-held cellphone. A law passed by legislators last year to ban texting while driving included a specific exemption for operators of self-driving cars on autopilot.

But the vehicles won't be a substitute for a designated driver after a night on the town, Breslow said.

"There is no exemption for drinking and driving," he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

CARSON CITY, Nev. -- Nevada is envisioning a day when taxicabs might shuttle fares without a driver, or people with medical conditions that make them ineligible for a license could get around with a v...
CARSON CITY, Nev. -- Nevada is envisioning a day when taxicabs might shuttle fares without a driver, or people with medical conditions that make them ineligible for a license could get around with a v...
Filed by Ramona Emerson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 694
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (16 total)
06:16 AM on 05/29/2012
I know we have some now and I've heard Nevada is the first state to legalise self driving cars and I was wondering. How many decades are we all going to have some automated driving system?

There is not way I will ever trust my life to a machine that is only as good as the programmer. Programing nerds do not know how to drive if they did they would not spend so much time inventing something that takes away something that should be enjoyed.
To me this would be like asking me to buy ice cream that is self eating!

http://newcars.indiandrives.com
02:04 PM on 05/10/2012
what about the beard? a self-shaving razor?
photo
drp103
SYSTEM ON
09:32 AM on 02/21/2012
I can think of a million reasons to have self-driving cars. But the main reason is that humans are dumb and for the most part cannot operate machinery safely.

I say HSR would be even better but hey that's just me!

Some legal questions:

1) How much lobbying by auto insurance companies will there be to BLOCK this technology?

2) How much will lawmakers block this in order to keep DUI finds flowing in?

3) What's MADD have to say about this technology?
04:26 PM on 02/20/2012
As more devices are connected to the internet and more automation becomes the norm we are going to have a lot of troubles. Do we know the experience of the developers automating these cars? Suppose the car is driving along at 60mph and hits a bug in the code that causes it to swerve into a crowd? Suppose the car is internet connected with some service and a hacker decides to send it someplace else or to slam on its brakes in the left lane of a freeway. We need to make sure we secure the vehicles and have qualified developers and standards. http://networkingexchangeblog.att.com/enterprise-business/licensed-to-code/
photo
KarmaPatrol
Riverboat Gambler, satellite whisperer. Independe
11:13 AM on 02/20/2012
With all the texting while driving, every state already has 'self-driving' cars ....
09:22 AM on 02/20/2012
BREAKING NEWS 100 People dead on Nevada highway after computer blows a microchip.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mumi009
"The truth will set you free"
08:30 AM on 02/20/2012
I guess the driverless car frees up the would have been driver to make calls or text on his cellphone, write emails on his computer, read the newspaper, have breakfast, touch up the makeup and w**ck off without having to concentrate on distractions like traffic.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ProgressivesWin
TeaParty? We don' need no steenkin' TeaParty
05:03 PM on 02/19/2012
I guess they'll be declared "people" by the Supreme Court soon, just like corporations.
02:15 AM on 02/19/2012
I want to know when they come out with driverless police cars?
J
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
J0E1
Don't blame me, I'm not a republicrat.
10:31 AM on 02/19/2012
Don't worry, the unions will insist there is two police officers in every driverless car.  They can just sit there snoozing with doughnut crumbs running down their shirt while their car takes radar and pulls people over.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
revko
07:46 PM on 02/18/2012
At a time when we need to ween ourselves off of fossil fuels and the car fetish we invent one that doesn't even need anyone in it to drive around town and burn gas.

We are such an adorable species.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anthony Dodd
Pssst THE GOP IS OVER
04:03 PM on 02/18/2012
I was driving on a major Los Angeles highway about two months ago. On my way through downtown, where onramp merging is tricky, this small car (which is supposed to yield to me on the highway) decided not to and pushed forward at an odd pace. Most people gun it at that point but this car merged as if I wasn't right behind it. I had to slow way down not to hit it.

As I passed the car, I did what any of us would do and took a glance at the buttnut who nearly caused an accident. What I saw where the driver was supposed to be looked like a big garbage bag with a basketball for a head and a mop top as a wig and no arms.

I'm not kidding.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ProgressivesWin
TeaParty? We don' need no steenkin' TeaParty
05:02 PM on 02/19/2012
I LOVE L.A.!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
authorized-user
macho macho man
08:38 AM on 02/18/2012
This is the perfect car for cell phone addicts who can't stop texting while driving.
photo
Mitchman57
I might be indecisive. But... maybe not.
08:07 AM on 02/18/2012
The first time an insurance company either pays a claim, or declines a claim for a computer's accident - it's over.

The first time a driver is charged with vehicular manslaughter while a computer was driving - it's over.

"But ladies and gentlemen of the jury, the sun was in it's lens."

Computer-driven cars.... Won't ever, ever happen.
03:00 PM on 02/18/2012
Computer-driven cars will happen. Just because the laws of today are not adequate to accommodate every possible outcome does not mean it won't happen. This happens with every piece of new technology. The laws adapt. I seriously doubt that legislator are going to say there can't be computer-driven cars when those cars can prove to save 40,000 lives every year in the US alone (up to 1 million worldwide).
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
06:37 PM on 02/18/2012
I tend to agree. We have lots of unemployed, ya think we might tap them for driving folks around?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
J0E1
Don't blame me, I'm not a republicrat.
07:36 AM on 02/18/2012
"There is no exemption for drinking and driving," he said.

This will make for an interesting court case.  As it stands now, police will part outside bars, follow people, and pull them over for no reason.  This is highly illegal, yet if an officer says you were "driving too close to the car in front" or "changed lanes without a turn signal" there isn't a judge in this country that will believe you over them.  Now take this a step further to a self driving car that doesn't break any laws.  Uh oh...
03:55 AM on 02/18/2012
Could this replace the designated driver?