iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Climate Change Killing Yellow Cedar Trees In Alaska

Yellow Cedar

First Posted: 02/18/2012 11:31 am Updated: 02/18/2012 6:51 pm

ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) — U.S. Forest Service researchers have confirmed what has long been suspected about a valuable tree in Alaska's Panhandle: Climate warming is killing off yellow cedar.

The mighty trees can live more than 1,000 years, resisting bugs and rot and even defending themselves against injury, but their shallow roots are vulnerable to freezing if soil is not insulated by snow. And for more than a century, with less snow on the ground, frozen roots have killed yellow cedar on nearly a half-million acres in southeast Alaska, plus another 123,000 acres in adjacent British Columbia.

The detective work on the tree deaths will help forest managers decide where yellow cedar is likely to thrive in the future. But the yellow cedar experience also underscores the increasing importance that climate change will play in managing forests, said Paul Schaberg, a USFS plant pathologist from Burlington, Vt., one of five authors of a paper on the tree that appeared this month in the journal Bioscience.

"As time goes on and climates change even more, other species, other locations, are likely to experience similar kinds of progressions, so you might do well to understand this one so you can address those future things," Schaberg said.

Yellow cedar and western red cedar are not the most common trees found in Alaska's coastal rainforest, but they were high-value commodities long before loggers arrived.

Tlingit, Haida and Tsimshian people used the rot-resistant wood for canoe paddles and totem poles. They could remove a lengthwise strip of bark from a living tree to use for weaving baskets and hats, and as backing in blankets. The remarkable tree could compartmentalize the injury and continue growing.

Yellow cedar is still valued for boat-building, but the bulk of the Alaska commercial harvest is sold in Asian markets, said Paul Hennon, a USFS forest pathologist from Juneau and one of the lead authors of the research paper. In Japan, it's valued for its age, tight grain and light color, Hennon said.

The slow-growing yellow cedar has trouble competing with western hemlock or Sitka spruce on well-drained, nutrient-rich soils. However, it was found a niche in soils with poor or moderate drainage — as long as its shallow, fine roots were covered by snow.

Those roots turned into an Achilles heel as snow patterns changed. Elevated mortality began around 1880-1890 and peaked in the 1970s and 1980s, according to the USFS study.

The yellow cedar's durability allowed dead trees to stand 100 years after they died but the cause of death was perplexing for years. Tree pathologists eliminated organisms or fungi as the primary cause and turned to physical factors such as hydrology and soil temperature, eventually linking yellow cedar decline to snow accumulation and duplicating results with seedlings.

"It's ironic that a species might be dying due to freeze-induced mortality when the climate signal is warming," Schaberg said. "So the world is getting warmer and these things are freezing? What's up with that?"

The conclusions have important implications for forest managers. They can predict where yellow cedar will thrive and the areas with poor drainage where yellow cedar has little chance to survive as snow patterns shift.

"That may seem counterintuitive to some folks, but one response is, you see a tree dying, you say, 'Oh, let's plant more,' without necessarily analyzing, well, why is it dying?" Schaberg said. "And if it really is a site that won't sustain the species, does it make any sense to put it there anymore?"

On the other hand, planting yellow cedar in areas that have good drainage, which would allow for deeper root growth, also would make sense. That would take some traditional forest management by eliminating competitors until yellow cedar had established itself.

"We can plant the tree on those sites, and also thin for it," Hennon said. "This is a place where active management can give yellow cedar a little bit of competitive edge, and then it does very well there."

Researchers also know that yellow cedar may thrive in areas where it has not yet migrated, leading to the possibility of "assisted migration."

"That gets some people pretty nervous, the idea of planting a species outside its range," Hennon said, because the tree could be considered an invasive species. The Forest Service conducted a trial planting near Yakutat, a coastal community northwest of Juneau, and saw a first-year survival rate of more than 90 percent. Since yellow cedar has already been found farther to the northwest in Prince William Sound, he doesn't consider the trial planting to be assisted migration.

In any case, climate change is likely to be more of a consideration for forest managers.

"I'm looking out my window and we have a dusting of snow at best," Schaberg said from his Vermont office. "And the soils are frozen all over the place, which is not the norm at all. So even just this one component of changing climate — reduced snow packs, its influence on soils and the things that are living in soils, like roots — that is not limited to the yellow cedar story and Alaska. That's pertinent to many locations."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) — U.S. Forest Service researchers have confirmed what has long been suspected about a valuable tree in Alaska's Panhandle: Climate warming is killing off yellow cedar. ...
ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) — U.S. Forest Service researchers have confirmed what has long been suspected about a valuable tree in Alaska's Panhandle: Climate warming is killing off yellow cedar. ...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 537
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
Norge
Rolf K. Artist, worker of metal, writer of poems
02:29 PM on 03/12/2012
Yes it is a massive die off which I also saw 5 years ago when I was in that area. Also if one uses the ferry system from Juneau into skagway, one will clearly see the die off and invasion of an insect which 15 years ago could not survive in those parts.
Though nature has its' ways and perhaps will replace much of the die off with birch trees.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BachmannPalinOverdrive
Supplying xenophobes with facts.
12:58 AM on 03/04/2012
It's too bad that people think they're discrediting scientific research by simply saying it's wrong without the faintest clue of what they speak of. Those people, even if they are scientists, are utterly absurd. They know about as much of the inner workings of a project -- it's scope and details -- as you know about why across town a married couple, of which you only are familiar with their names, are getting a divorce. Unless you are working on the project or have done similar work, you do not have enough information to make a negative judgment. That goes for you, too, Judith Curry.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Brian Davis
How is my micro-bio empty, I'm a microbiologist?
08:29 PM on 02/21/2012
Below the typical fight between AGW is a scam and AGW is not a scam folks.
I don't have all the answers.
I worked for NOAA for 5 years, and chose science as my career since 1987.
If you doubt their (NOAA's) position on this topic, visit the *.gov website, the data is interpreted as conclusive. The augmentation of natural solar radiation increase is real, although the effects are highly complex and not easy to quantify.
Starley Thompson was at Texas A&M. He was the first expert I learned from. Few here would discount his expert opinion.
I worked with Gilbert Zamora and Dennis Emiliani at NOAA as a GS-9. Clearly taught lessons you just don't forget.
Someone below says the government is all corrupt and funds all studies supporting climate change. Not true and I resent the implication of corruption cast on MY career. The truth is complex enough (albedo, clathrate, energy models) not to be conveyed in a few posts. However, one thing ignored is the effect the Haber-Bosch alkyne nitrogen bond splitting process has had on the atmosphere over the past 100years, in addition the liberation of methane, a more dramatic effect on EMR transmission/absorption than CO2. Without Fritz Haber and Karl Bosch, 2 billion people would already have died. We can use fossil fuels and vent them to the lower atmosphere. However, just as atomic bombs detonated in our atmosphere created MANMADE changes to the environment, reduced greenhouse gas emission is important.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
B Wood
09:32 PM on 02/21/2012
Thank you for your post.

Those who accuse dedicated, credible scientists as corrupt are the corrupt ones. They have little science to challenge AGW, so they must rely on painting a grand conspiracy of scientists doing what it takes to win grants. Meanwhile, they will reference links to websites funded by interests seeking to create doubt about the science.

If AGW was such a scam, why do energy companies hire "think tanks", lobbyists and rely on bloggers who don't even have a college degree (Anthony Watts comes to mind) to spread logical fallacies, ad homs and such? Given their vast R&D resources, why can't they hire away the best and the brightest climate scientists to show how this is all a scam?? Seems more simple and straighforward than contributing to Republican leaders to mumble that AGW is a hoax.
ubrew12
that crazy uncle from Amarcord
12:56 PM on 02/23/2012
Haber-Bosch : no one who worries about global warming is suggesting we get rid of industrial fertilizer, not in the context of global warming, anyway. A lot of the same people worry about industrial agriculture for other reasons, but none of us wants to starve to death either. In America, anyway, the success of modern agriculture is well represented in the girth of most Americans: they may be a victim of that success, actually. (can you tell I'm on a diet?)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Brian Davis
How is my micro-bio empty, I'm a microbiologist?
03:48 PM on 02/23/2012
The increased reactivity of an inert component which comprises 79% of the gas which we breath is something no one has studied, and technology may not yet allow. Nonetheless, since this technology was required and having been developed and implemented so long ago, one would think that those who happily chortle-on about "CO2" and the effect on the environment being minimal would reconsider their position on man-made environmental effect if the other mechanisms that are anthropogenic are included in the discussion. I honeymooned in New Orleans so I need a diet too...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ccairnes
"Pessimism of the intellect, optimism of the will"
01:43 PM on 02/21/2012
I don't see an author credit on this article. I live in this area and know these issues pretty well. Anchorage is not where the yellow cedar grows, so who is writing this?

There is nothing in this article that is inaccurate, but people need to understand that there is more to climate change than global warming. In fact, it would be more accurate the talk about change in the balance of atmospheric gases. When you put it in the perspective of changes to the atmosphere of the only planet we know of that we can live on, people might take it a bit more seriously. Think of it this way: You're one of the 3 astronauts on the Apollo 13 mission.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueagle8u
01:02 PM on 02/21/2012
Wait a minute?! Climate change is REAL? lol
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
El Duderino 791
The Dude minds, man.
01:51 PM on 02/21/2012
Has anybody SEEN some global warming come along and kill a tree?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
kareemachan
watashi ha tororu ga oroka da to omoi masu。
03:08 PM on 02/21/2012
It sneaks out at night and does it then.
photo
mbkeefer
Elder Amateur Scientist
03:09 PM on 02/21/2012
Know of some property in Virgina many miles from the ocean, but very flat. A stream runs along it, that in the summer will flow backwards during spring tides. 30 years ago one pine close to the stream had died from salt water reaching the roots. Since then the spring tide level of the stream has risen 4 inches (Global warming raising sea levels) and most of the trees that were on that property have died.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
12:24 PM on 02/21/2012
"Elevated mortality began around 1880-1890 and peaked in the 1970s and 1980s, according to the USFS study." Source: Above

"Yellow-cedar decline is now viewed as one of the best documented examples of the effect of climate change on a forest tree species. Our reconstruction of cedar epidemiology established the onset of decline in about 1880, a date that coincided with the end of the Little Ice Age." Source: USFS
http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/research/climate-change/yellow-cedar/

"Collectively, these various sources of information lead to the following hypothesis to explain the cause of yellow-cedar decline. Reduced snowpack at the end of the Little Ice Age is the environmental change that may have triggered the onset of this forest decline. Yellow-cedar remains healthy in areas that have adequate snowpack in late-winter and spring."
The Little Ice Age enabled yellow cedar to live at lower elevations. Source: USFS
http://www.fs.fed.us/r10legacy/spf/fhp/cedar/onset.html

No one really blames the Industrial Revolution for the change in mortality that occurred in 1880.
ubrew12
that crazy uncle from Amarcord
01:24 PM on 02/21/2012
Little Ice Age was over by 1850
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
01:32 PM on 02/21/2012
Exactly. Then temperatures began to increase. Then the snowpack began to decline at lower elevations. Then the yellow cedar began to decline at lower elevations.
09:44 AM on 02/21/2012
"...And for more than a century, with less snow on the ground,...."

So this article is proof that 'man-made' climate change is nonsense.

Man didn't start burning massive amounts of fossil fuels until 1960.

OK, you folks can now stop all your whining. No amount of human sacrifice that you demand will stop climate change.

It's funny, for supposedly educated people, all you AGW alarmists and environmental nutsies want nothing more than to sacrifice humans to your 'sky dragon god' to stop climate change.

Funny.

Not funny ha ha. Funny Sad.
ubrew12
that crazy uncle from Amarcord
12:01 PM on 02/21/2012
the Newcomen steam engine was invented in 1712
12:35 PM on 02/21/2012
Wouldn't this be related to the worlds population, which was about 20% or less of what it is today in the 1880s?
03:56 PM on 02/21/2012
So you're suggesting that a handful of steam engines altered the planetary climate?

Wow. Just Wow.

{running away from nonsense now.....}
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueagle8u
01:04 PM on 02/21/2012
So by YOUR ignorance,we should just KEEP ENDANGERING the Land,Air and Water?
03:55 PM on 02/21/2012
Your statement is proof of your ignorance. YOu should consider graduating the 3rd grade before you post on this topic again. It is obvious you don't have the education to actually participate in the discussion.
photo
StephenBP
What's he building in there?
05:31 AM on 02/21/2012
The yellow cedar is but one example of the unexpected consequences of a warming or changing climate.

Another unexpected consequence of climate change consists of a chain of actions and reactions starting with fossil fuel corporations trying to protect their profits and ending with the science of climatology being ruthlessly attacked.

A civilization whose science is not up to the demands its environment puts on it is doomed.

So worship of the very useful profit ideology can end up in very un-useful consequences for future generations of humans.
09:45 AM on 02/21/2012
Thank goodness that this article proves that man made climate change is nonsense.
photo
StephenBP
What's he building in there?
05:58 AM on 02/22/2012
Why?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robco1
02:46 PM on 03/07/2012
Thank goodness this article proves that the rantings of online denier operatives is nonsense.

--After I last wrote about online astroturfing, in December, I was contacted by a whistleblower. He was part of a commercial team employed to infest internet forums and comment threads on behalf of corporate clients, promoting their causes and arguing with anyone who opposed them. Like the other members of the team, he posed as a disinterested member of the public. Or, to be more accurate, as a crowd of disinterested members of the public: he used 70 personas, both to avoid detection and to create the impression that there was widespread support for his pro-corporate arguments. --
http://www.monbiot.com/2011/02/23/robot-wars/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joshmcdonald
05:16 PM on 02/20/2012
OK, so the climate appears to be changing to the extent that it is causing reduced snowfall or increased snow melt which is causing these trees to die due to their shallow roots freezing...got it.

So now everyone in the comments section wants to argue about whether this is AGW or cyclical warming. Why? Does it matter?

Look, if there really is an AGW issue (and I firmly believe that there is) then, frankly, we're not going to be able to stop it. The inertia of our modern lifestyles (in the US especially but increasingly so in China and India) is just too great. I know I sound like a pessimist (or even a defeatist) but at this point I simply do not see global consensus for action coming any time soon and it may already be too late in any case.

On the other hand, if AGW is a hoax perpetrated by liberals (which I do not believe and, frankly, don't even understand what agenda that idea even possibly promotes) then there isn't anything we can do about it anyway.

So, the real question is NOT "Are we causing this?" but rather "How do we continue to live our lives in a warming world?" This is the great question of our time.
ubrew12
that crazy uncle from Amarcord
05:56 PM on 02/20/2012
"How do we continue to live our lives in a warming world?" We don't. We can try, but the do nothing alternative doesn't exist. Global warming may be transitioning the planet to a new equilibrium climate, but our best estimates are that it'll destroy our economies, and quite likely ourselves. Al Gore gets a lot of flak for predicting 100ft sea level rises. But the truth is, that's the eventual equilibrium (it may be 200 years out, but its still where 'normal' is headed).

This problem WILL be taken care of. If necessary, by nuclear war. In about 20 years EVERYBODY is going to see what the stakes are (survival), and will position themselves accordingly. Ironically, the threat of war always gains the interest of conservatives, which may be why they've taken the position on this obvious threat that they have.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joshmcdonald
06:29 PM on 02/20/2012
It's really too bad that we are such effective parasites. If only we hadn't multiplied so fast and were able to have used up all the oil before we reached current population levels then we would be dealing with climate change as a somewhat isolated problem; likely a massively devastating problem, of course, but one devoid of the additional issues we now face: over-fished and polluted seas, depleted farmlands and decreased crop yields, radically diminished watersheds and polluted above-ground source waters. We might have been able to make the move to less harmful power sources (sun, wind, water, fusion, ??) and migrate to a smaller more communal lifestyle. As it is, I too see mass migration, chaos, economic and political turmoil/collapse and violence (both statist [meaning wars] and random [meaning civil disorder]) as the most likely outcome...and soon.
07:21 AM on 02/21/2012
I have no doubt that humans will survive as a species. We will experience a die off as fuel. water and food shortages occur, but there are simply too many humans and we have an extreme capacity for adaptation.
The real danger is going to be the rise of the tribalist in response. Tribalism, in the form of religious and political extremism, will retard progress in much the same what that it does now. Religion is particularly effective in this because of its tendency to view things as punishments for human imperfections. The believers will see this as just another punishment for sins by the divine and seek to cleanse those that it perceives as at fault.
The end result of climate change won't be the end of humanity. I think the most likely result will be the rise of religious extremism which will target the people which it thinks caused the problem ... scientist. We are already seeing a major rise in anti-science across the globe from the Conservatives in the United States to the Islamist in other countries.
12:40 PM on 02/21/2012
We adapt and overcome as we always have. The dinosaurs lived for millions of years and we will likely do the same, man has a great abilty to adapt to changing enviroments.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robco1
11:15 AM on 03/08/2012
Dinosaurs. Good analogy. BTW, what ever happened to them...

Ain't just a river in Egypt.

http://skepticalscience.com/Can-animals-and-plants-adapt-to-global-warming.htm

http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2011/09/04/311718/labor-day-2040-endless-summer/

So why is the "Hudson Institute" spreading this manure?

http://www.merchantsofdoubt.org/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
05:01 PM on 02/20/2012
As Hennon's study shows, the Yellow Cedar moved into these locations during the Little Ice Age. The Little Ice Age is over and the trees are now struggling. Prior to the Little Ice Age, the Yellow Cedar was limited to higher elevations. I suppose they need to go back to higher elevations.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
B Wood
06:28 PM on 02/20/2012
We will probably say something similar about many people who will need to relocate as the places they live become inhabitable or unable to support the same population.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
06:55 PM on 02/20/2012
Right, the Little Ice Age made many places uninhabitable. History of the Vikings taught us that.
09:50 AM on 02/21/2012
A warming planet causes more places to be livable.

So far, you and your friends have predicted death and destruction from global warming.

The only death and destruction in the Maldives is from political unrest.

Ocean risings? Eh, not so much.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robco1
02:52 PM on 03/07/2012
The ole "Its changes before" cannard. Debunked: http://skepticalscience.com/climate-change-little-ice-age-medieval-warm-period.htm

This PR talking point comes courtesy of one Richard Linzen, the Merchant of Doubt that shilled for Big Tobacco before his new favorite client, the fossil fuel lobby. http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Richard_Lindzen

And who is benefiting from this dishonesty? http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2010/04/02/205749/david-koch-industrations-acid-rain-climate-denial-polluter-front-groups/

BTW, Heartland is a PR firm.
http://ijish.livejournal.com/29235.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
03:39 PM on 03/07/2012
Funny, are you a science denier?

Hennon is the source for the article. I'm quoting Hennon too. As Hennon says, the Yellow Cedar would even be there if it weren't for the Little Ice Age a few hundred years ago.

What does Linzen and Heartland got to do with this? Are they your buddies?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Independentproud
Your vote is cancelled by a far right winger.
12:46 PM on 02/20/2012
" Elevated mortality began around 1880-1890 and peaked in the 1970s and 1980s, according to the USFS study."

There is a difference between climate change and man-made climate change. I guess those people in the 1800's shouldn't have driven those cars around.
ubrew12
that crazy uncle from Amarcord
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
01:25 PM on 02/20/2012
Are you really that simple? What were people burning in 1880 during the height of the Industrial Revolution? Hint: something that is at least10X a more potent source of GHG's than gasoline.
photo
Counterglow
Werner Heisenberg may have been right.
10:11 AM on 02/20/2012
It's obvious Al Gore is paying the trees to fake it.

:-\
ubrew12
that crazy uncle from Amarcord
12:50 PM on 02/20/2012
dem cedars is jest yeller...

I'm uncertain about your microbio
photo
Counterglow
Werner Heisenberg may have been right.
12:57 PM on 02/20/2012
Fanned, because you seem to be one of those lager then life characters.
09:53 AM on 02/21/2012
Al Gore isn't a scientist. He has ZERO credibility.

Besides, Al Gore told us all this was MAN MADE.

This article PROVES that his man made 'sky dragon god' isn't' man made.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:01 AM on 02/20/2012
Wow. Who would have guessed it was climate change? That is just shocking news.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClimateHawk
Think before posting.
08:21 AM on 02/20/2012
It's a good thing when researchers figure out the cause of large-scale ecological events.

Not really cause for sarcasm.
09:54 AM on 02/21/2012
It is when the researcher PROVES that this isn't man made climate change and you folks crow about how 'climate change is real'.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
01:26 PM on 02/20/2012
Go back to the food threads, Pappy. You make more sense there.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:10 PM on 02/20/2012
I go where I please milk boy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andrew Harvey
Don't F with the Jesus
03:20 AM on 02/20/2012
And trees in the far north are actually doing better.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/11/11/shock-news-trees-grow-better-in-a-warmer-climate-with-more-carbon-dioxide/

Go figure. Looks like the soylent-green scenario will have to wait.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alteredstory
Hold on to the center
08:06 AM on 02/20/2012
Oh yes. Try eating those trees.
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
08:20 AM on 02/20/2012
Great reference. WUWT, complete with mysterious links to propaganda central, the Heartland Institute. There is nothing that watts prints that is credible. nothing.

Heartland/Wattsupwiththat/ScottWalker/Kochbrothers
St Valentines Day 2012
lying and denying for hire
12:35 PM on 02/20/2012
Except that it links to a peer reviewed study.

Speaking of propaganda gallon, which Big Green PR outfit (which spends orders of magnitude more cash on pushing agendas than Heartland) pays you to sit here and post on every eco-story Huffpo pushes? BTW, Koch brothers did not provide Heartland with money to fight AGW hysteria. It was in their financial statements - for healthcare issues. Spin by omission.

"There is nothing that watts prints that is credible. nothing" The irony is as priceless as you are hopeless.
09:56 AM on 02/21/2012
There is nothing you post that is credible either.
photo
liberalbug
do you want fries with that?
02:09 AM on 02/20/2012
ceder fever.