iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

High-Deductible Health Insurance Pinches Workers From Both Sides

Health Insurance

First Posted: 02/20/2012 9:05 am Updated: 02/20/2012 10:23 am

Like many Americans, Debbie Bass' health insurance policy is utterly confounding: It's more expensive than it used to be, but the coverage is worse and the rules just seem to get more arcane.

Last year, her health plan paid for surgery, chemotherapy and radiation to treat her colorectal cancer. This year, her employer switched to a new plan, which won't even pay for a $39 box of ostomy bags.

Bass, a 57-year-old school bus driver from Hazlehurst, Ga., is among a rising number of Americans with shrinking health benefits and expanding deductibles. Bass said her new plan costs $333 per month to cover her and her husband, up from $210. The plan also comes with a staggering $3,000 deductible. Though her employer put $1,000 into an account to help pay for medical bills, Bass has already spent half of it on prescription drugs and other expenses. She'll soon need to find an extra $2,000 before her insurance kicks in.

Easier said than done. Bass takes home $395 a month. Her husband's disability benefits bring in another $1,285. "We are completely broke," she said. Her oncologist ordered a PET scan to check whether the cancer has stayed away, but she doesn't know how much it costs or whether her plan will cover it. She's going in for the test anyway.

High-deductible health insurance is becoming more common, according to survey data reported by the Employee Benefit Research Institute last December. In 2011, 27.7 million working-age people were enrolled in a health plan with a deductible of at least $1,000 for individuals and $2,000 for families. The proportion of insured Americans who have this type of coverage has more than doubled since 2005, the report says.

A trip to the local drugstore to pick up ostomy supplies led to a rude awakening: The debit card for Bass' medical expense account was rejected. She was told she couldn't use those funds for the supplies, but has not been able to get a clear explanation from her insurer as to why. "They keep giving me different excuses," she said. "They make things so complicated." She has applied for financial aid from the Virginia-based Patient Advocate Foundation to help pay for the supplies.

Employers opt for high-deductible health insurance for a simple reason: cost. The average annual cost of employer-sponsored health benefits has more than doubled since 2001, reaching $15,073 for the company and employee combined last year, according to a survey by the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation and the American Hospital Association's Health Research and Educational Trust. By contrast, family coverage through a high-deductible plan with a health savings account costs an average of $13,704. The shift mirrors the move away from pension benefits to 401(k) plans, which also allow employers to limit costs.

The trend is likely to continue, said Paul Fronstin, the director of the Health Research and Education Program at the Employee Benefit Research Institute. Fronstin likened the current evolution of the health insurance market to the sea change that brought HMOs to dominance in the 1980s and 1990s. "There's no reason not to expect that to happen here," he said.

High-deductible health insurance plans will be eligible to be sold starting in 2014 on the insurance "exchanges" created by the health reform law that passed in 2010. With their lower monthly price tags, these plans could prove popular, especially among younger and healthier people betting they won’t have to go to the doctor or the hospital or need costly prescription drugs.

The upside is that these plans provide coverage against catastrophic medical expenses for lower monthly premiums. Individuals and their employers can put money into tax-free health savings accounts that accumulate over time. It's a great deal for high-income earners who have the cash to spare and can maximize the tax benefits.

People with this type of insurance should set aside enough money, in a health savings account or otherwise, to cover their deductibles, said Jody Dietel, the chief compliance officer for WageWorks, a California company that administers employee benefits. The insurance is there to "protect you from catastrophic financial ruin," not to pay all medical bills, she said. Coverage for preventive services like flu shots and cholesterol screenings often isn't subject to the deductible.

Studies suggest that people put off care because they cannot afford it. Patients with chronic conditions who had high-deductible insurance were three to four times more likely to say they delayed or went without medical care because of cost, according to the findings of a Harvard University-Children's Hospital Boston survey published in the Journal of General Internal Medicine last month. Lower-income respondents were even more likely to go without, the study says.

Employers could do more to help workers adjust during the transition from a managed care plan with simple co-payments for doctor visits and prescription drugs to a new model requiring financial planning and comparison shopping, Fronstin said.

Health insurance companies provide a variety of tools on their websites and through call centers that are designed to help by offering up information on the prices for medical services and prescription drugs and on medical providers' quality ratings.

Bass' employer brought workers together for a meeting last year in which a representative explained how the new health benefits worked. "When she got through," Bass said, "I still didn't understand."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

Like many Americans, Debbie Bass' health insurance policy is utterly confounding: It's more expensive than it used to be, but the coverage is worse and the rules just seem to get more arcane. Last...
Like many Americans, Debbie Bass' health insurance policy is utterly confounding: It's more expensive than it used to be, but the coverage is worse and the rules just seem to get more arcane. Last...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,834
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (22 total)
07:36 PM on 12/15/2012
My employer used to offer us an insurance no one could afford on the slave level wage they pay us. Then the day after Obama got re-elected, they offered us United Heath Care for $5 a week. I thought, "Wow! Finally health insurance I can afford!" But now it turns out the insurance has a $10,000 (yes, TEN THOUSAND) deductible! Doctor visits have a $40 co-pay. So in other words, it's worthless and a waste of my weekly $5. This is NOT socialized medicine. In the UK, they pay ZERO and are covered for everything. And there's also private health care if you prefer. My employer is trying to get out of the $3000 fine that he'll get when we start getting our insurance out of the exchange...but it ain't gonna happen. Cheap bastards.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
greeneyes51654m
Retired, finally...
02:07 PM on 03/08/2012
Ah yes, the miracle of Obamacare, isn't it great?
04:43 PM on 03/01/2012
I am a Registered Nurse. If high deductible insurance will continue to rise then why should anyone pay for it? Is the Insurance Companies forcing us to move to what they want for us-Universal Health Care? When our representative was at our hospital it was all double speak. It was so obvious I was giggling. I hate fakes, liars, thieves. I feel I am being deceived by American Insurance Companies and I'm mad! Americans are going to have to take control of these corrupt insurance companies or get what we deserve, used once again. I'm tired of our leaders all together!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chaz
05:13 PM on 02/27/2012
Hate to say I told you so.

Universal Health care is the only answer.

Keep electing republicans,conservatives and especially tbaggers and keep getting ******
04:44 PM on 03/01/2012
sorry but universal healthcare is like throwing humans in a ditch.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chaz
05:21 PM on 03/01/2012
Roshea1956,

Ya I know my mothers ninety years old and she's been on government health care for years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom S Cedar Mill
This ain't no party, this ain't no disco.
10:46 AM on 02/23/2012
With premiums, co-pays and deductibles, it seems we pay out-of-pocket what medical care SHOULD cost if insurance and medical costs weren't so inflated. I think medical costs are so outrageously high now because insurance companies have paid the bills all these years, and just raised premiums to cover it. I had about a 1 hour surgery and the "bill" was $15,000. The insurance company didn't cover so much of it so they settled for $384. "We'll write off the rest," they told me. If the insurance company would have paid $15,000 they would have gladly taken it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
stuart100s
I started with nothing, & still have most of it.
05:59 PM on 02/23/2012
I pay my insurance premiums because the insurance company negotiates lower prices for services than I could get from the dr's or hospitals. The Hospital takes an xray, I get a bill for $375 submit it to the insurance company, their negotiated price on an xray is $75, they apply it to my deductible (which I have never reached) and deny the payment. I get a new bill from the hospital for $75 and I pay it. This is the HC reform that I hoped would occur. O' insisted that single payer was the only way and the rest got lost in the disagreement that resulted.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MSROADKILL612
love auto biographys. any appS to write mine?
03:32 PM on 02/22/2012
can we talk bottom line for a moment here guys

i did economics badly at a top uni - but unlike many i kept up & maintained my interest - so maybe that evens things up a bit

there are certain natural monopolies - & u can pretend all u like that they are better privatised, but it aint so - water - rail - phone - sewer - health - the list goes on - but the bottom line remains

history is also instructive - those monopolies used to be sold off - even taxation & customs & it still happens today - rabbis in israel bid at auction for begging rights among the diaspora

The us has privatised to the max from the outset - & is paying the consequence now
08:58 PM on 02/21/2012
HSA'a are a great plan if you are relatively healthy. The higher the deductible the lower the monthly premium. That is a trade off. You pay $10,000 for health insurance or you pay $5,000 for health insurance with a $5,000 deductible. Don't need medical treatment and you come out ahead. I do wonder where they get the figures from - $13,704 for family coverage yet the woman cited above spends only $333? The 2 plans cannot be comparable. Our $5,000 deductible premium just jacked up to $335 from $270 for family coverage. We luckily don't use it. To cover the deductibles we put the maximum (6,150 last year) in the HSA savings account. It has almost $50,000 in it. That's 10 years worth of deductibles now. If you are healthy and you are interested in being a consumer of medical services on your own terms knowing it is your money you are saving by not running to the doctor for minor issues then a high deductible HSA plan is the best choice. Additionally the insured pool costs remain under control as the plan has like minded individuals in the plan. Our premium was flat for 4 years until 2012. Some people must have gotten catastrophically sick. We will unfortunately have to switch soon to get into a healthier pool. Choose to spend what you want on medical care and take care of yourself. Once you have a medical condition you are tainted.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Martha Fair
Professional RepubliBilly Factchecker
04:38 PM on 02/21/2012
Reading through these comments is like hearing a broken record from the voices of the American people. When oh when are they going to wake up and smell the coffee? The Americans want single payer tax based healthcare without any for profit insurance company dictating what our doctor should and should not be doing for us. How many times do these RepubliCONS have to be told that we no longer believe that socialist crap they dreamed up. Obamacare is soon going to give us what we want whether you like it or not because soon all employer based insurance premiums will become cost prohibitive, expediate the inevitable and I can't wait.
pistol13
Don't sweat the guard dog, worry about the Smith&W
12:36 PM on 02/22/2012
Seems like Great Britain is having second thoughts about National Healthcare. It is too expensive. The Prime Minister recently suggested that Britain privatize some of its health coverage. I agree that National Health care is needed, but Obamacare ain't the answer and once the Federal Government starts to mandate we purchase something we are really in trouble. What's next MANDATE we purcahes American made cars? I don't think so.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom S Cedar Mill
This ain't no party, this ain't no disco.
11:03 AM on 02/23/2012
"Obamacare" is Bizarro health care because they knew they could never get what they/we really want: Medicare for all. It will take a mandate from Americans to let their representatives know what we want. And yes, health care is too expensive, whether government or privately run.
04:47 PM on 03/01/2012
we will see how you DON'T like it soon enuf American. You won't!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jstrate
03:16 PM on 02/21/2012
Why don't we just create a health care system like Canada has and be done with all the b.s.? Sure, it's not perfect, but that's not what were aiming for. We've got health care providers that want to do everything, for everybody, always (so long as your insured) and health insurance companies that want to do nothing, for nobody, never.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Martha Fair
Professional RepubliBilly Factchecker
04:40 PM on 02/21/2012
Yes why can't we? Simple...reason = RepubliCONS

REPUBLICANS - KEEPING AMERICA POOR, STUPID AND UNHEALTHY SINCE 1981
demsrsilly
Proud supporter of workplace freedom.
09:20 PM on 02/21/2012
Uh oh, wonder if the plaintiff's bar will go along with other changes that will be required, such as in the area of medical malpractice:

Lower medical liability costs in Canada can be attributed to many factors, among them:
fewer claims in Canada, due in part to the fact that the loser pays the legal costs to the winner;

lower compensation levels for harm and relatively small punitive damage awards
(sounds an AWFUL like tort reform!!!)

fewer lawyers, and contingency fees are either discouraged or prohibited in Canada;
(this will never happen here in the US)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jstrate
03:10 PM on 02/21/2012
The complexity of health care insurance is a deliberate attempt to create a situation where the seller (insurance company) knows far more about the value of the product than the consumer (the person buying the insurance). It's called information asymmetry and it's a source of market failure and a reason for governmental intervention. Perhaps nothing will be done about it. I'd sign a petition for an initiative that eliminated health coverage for elected public officials. They can then learn about the problem first hand.
FaceReality2
Democracy in the U.S. is an illusion
04:14 PM on 02/21/2012
"I'd sign a petition for an initiative that eliminated health coverage for elected public officials. They can then learn about the problem first hand. "

That's the only way anything will change. Let them try to buy coverage in the "individual market."

"The complexity of health care insurance is a deliberate attempt to create a situation where the seller (insurance company) knows far more about the value of the product than the consumer (the person buying the insurance)­. It's called informatio­n asymmetry and it's a source of market failure and a reason for government­al interventi­on."

Great point.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anne Rutherford
01:49 PM on 02/21/2012
Inexpensive major medical plans are perfect for the younger and healthier population and a near death-sentence for someone with a chornic condition. While I have a chronic condition (asthma) my health is well-controlled and I have avoided hospitalization and emergency room visits for about 10 years. On the other hand, my husband has MS. He requires IV medications once a month to prevent further progression, he has a permanent super pubic cathether because of neurogenic bladder problems, and the list goes on. Needless to say, the high deductible plan with catastrophic coverage would be a death sentence for him. I am fortunate because my employer offers several types of coverage, and I am able to make the best choice for us. Please bear in mind that many employers offer only one type of coverage and you take what you can get or nothing. Why in the world should "catastrophic" only coverage cost $13,000 per year? The fiducairy duty to investors (from pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, insurance companies all drive costs of services, as does the cost of medical education, paying for the uninsured, covering losses when reserve funds are invested poorly and more).
03:19 PM on 02/21/2012
Ah yes, so more of the "please take money from someone else to give to us" crowd.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Martha Fair
Professional RepubliBilly Factchecker
03:30 PM on 02/21/2012
No you are one of those who like your employer to become your welfare teat and provide you with cradle to grave health insurance for free right? You make me sick parasite.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anne Rutherford
03:32 PM on 02/21/2012
Not what I said and you are making an inference that isn't true. I said that this type of insurance is practical for someone younger and healthier. I select and pay for the insurance that suits my needs and offers my family the best coverage. I am fortunate that I have more than one option and can do that. There are reasons that cost control is difficult in the healthcare system in general. It isn't always over consumption or not enough skin in the game. Structually, the system is failing - from limited slots and the cost of medical school to uneven access to healthcare in rural and inner city areas, as well as the administrative costs. It isn't about me or my own situation. It is about an entire system that is in deep trouble. Being smug won't solve that, or assuming that someone who points it out wants money from someone else.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Equinator
Shovels manure daily
01:40 PM on 02/21/2012
Single payer
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Drama Llama
01:32 PM on 02/21/2012
$3000? deductible? Mine went to $8000 last year.

It is getting worse because not only are insurance companies giving way less coverage for higher premiums Dr's are trying to profit as well.

My family DR now does CAT scans in office.. I had a sinus infection the other day and the nurse said " the Dr wants you to get a CAT scan to make sure it is not anything more serious" Please.. stuffy nose. yellow green nasty sinus discharge.. what we cant try a week of antibiotics before we do a $1000 CAT scan?

This country needs universal care , if anything for BASIC MEDICAL AILMENTS.. I cant even go to the DR anymore without them pulling bloodwork or giving Xrays.
03:19 PM on 02/21/2012
Bullsh!t.

No family medicine doctor has a CT in their office, for an incredibly long list of reasons.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Drama Llama
04:07 PM on 02/21/2012
It is a group of about 10 Family practitioners in one office.. They have their own Xray equipment, They do all their own lab work onsite, and now they do CT scans and last time the Dr said they were considering an open MRI machine as well. They not only use that equipment for themselves but other smaller practices in the area send people there for MRI's and bloodwork..

Not BS dude.. you need a Cat scan? I can give you the number

it is not that uncommon in Texas.. My last GP even had an open MRI clinic he owned that was adjacent to his clinic and shared staff and a waiting area
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Drama Llama
04:26 PM on 02/21/2012
"Generating tens of billions of dollars in billing each year, CT scanning has become an economic engine for hospitals and doctors, and the once-exotic million-dollar devices are starting to be found in private practices."

http://articles.latimes.com/2008/sep/07/science/sci-ctscan7

and that was 2008.. It is very scary due to the radiation they admit but they are there in small practices
FaceReality2
Democracy in the U.S. is an illusion
04:50 PM on 02/21/2012
"I cant even go to the DR anymore without them pulling bloodwork or giving Xrays."

I had to submit to an unnecessary physical, complete with digital prostate exam, in order to get my prescriptions for high blood pressure renewed.

Why your experience and mine? Because doctors here get paid for doing things--performing exams, ordering tests, making incisions, etc., not for thinking or for writing prescriptions. There's a reason why the WHO rates our health care system at #37.
01:18 PM on 02/21/2012
Personally I'd much prefer an inexpensive major medical plan rather than a more expensive plan that covers "everything". Either way you are going to, on average, pay out more than you get but at least with major medical you don't have to fight with the insurance company over every little thing. A few years ago my wife broke her collar bone while mountain biking. It was a Sunday and the walk in clinics didn't have a radiologist on duty so we went to the ER. No problem, the ER was part of our plan. Who would have guessed however that the actual doctor at that ER was NOT covered? The whole thing, including 2 surgeries ended up costing thousands out of pocket.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
OldJazzyGirl
Sick of the fracked up righties.
02:44 PM on 02/21/2012
Something is seriously wrong with that scenario. It sounds like the hospital should be liable for having outsourced staff that is not covered by the same insurance plans the hospital is covered by. If the admitting desk of the ER says, yes, we take your insurance, and then it is a NOT REALLY, it sounds like fraud. If hospitals are getting away with this, they should have a big sign at the front door explaining that, even though it looks like you are entering a large medical facility, you are actually entering a fractured series of assorted medical providers who may or may not accept your insurance. Being allowed to operate like that makes you a potential victim of fraud by expecting you to be conscious and able to ask every single person you encounter, like the lab tech, the doctor, the x-ray tech if they accept your insurance. You were fleeced.
03:03 PM on 02/21/2012
Yep. They've since changed the law in our state but it was really eye opening. Don't get me started on the radiologist, we got a separate bill from him too (which was covered thankfully). As best I can tell the hospital works pretty much like a shopping mall with some (most?) of the doctors being separate businesses. I wouldn't be surprised if the the doctors actually paid the hospital for the privilege of operating there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aviandonn
My micro-bio is empty
03:29 PM on 02/21/2012
I agree. Although I am happy we are finally making progress towards universal coverage, I'm not sure the ACA is the right way to go. Every time I hear that they are adding something else to the required coverage, I see the price of coverage going up. I don't see how the ACA is really going to result in affordable coverage. It's a boondoggle for pharmaceutical companies and insurance providers with not much that I can see that actually curtails their ability to keep raising premiums to maintain their considerable profits.

I too wish the ACA included an inexpensive major medical only option. And some low cost plans with high deductibles. Keep the comprehensive plans for those who can afford it or are fortunate enough to be able to stick their employers with the cost. I would much rather have a lower cost plan that kicks in after I've hit an-out of pocket limit. In my case it could be a pretty hefty out of pocket limit, which should enable me to buy a low cost plan. But there should be more options.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Martha Fair
Professional RepubliBilly Factchecker
01:04 PM on 02/21/2012
REPUBLICANS - KEEPING AMERICA POOR, STUPID AND UNHEALTHY SINCE 1981
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Drama Llama
01:23 PM on 02/21/2012
Cant forget that little trip through the 70's either.. With what Nixon did to empower HMO's and give us LESS CARE FOR MORE MONEY!