iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Libya Free Elections In Misrata First Since Fall Of Gaddafi

Libya Free Elections

First Posted: 02/20/2012 1:39 pm Updated: 02/21/2012 11:21 am

MISRATA, Libya (AP) — Four months after the death of Moammar Gadhafi, the people of Misrata were frustrated by stalled reforms. They played a key role in overthrowing the Libyan dictator of 42 years, and were impatient to see the changes they shed blood for.

Revolutionaries accused the self-appointed city council that came to power early in the uprising of deeply rooted corruption, allegations which the council head denied. They staged a sit-in on the council's steps, got the members to resign and call new elections, which were held on Monday.

The vote was the first experiment in real democracy anywhere in Libya, and the fact that it happened here only demonstrated the newfound clout of Misrata, Libya's third-largest city, on the national political scene.

It was also another example of how Libya is splintering into largely autonomous city-states, with powerful local militias and emerging local governments that at best have loose ties to the Tripoli-based central government known as the National Transitional Council.

"This is a turn in Libya from suppression and dictatorship to democracy," said Abdullah al-Kabir, a political commentator in Misrata. "Libya has never known real elections."

So far, cities like Misrata are pushing ahead even faster with the transition to democracy than the national government is.

The National Transitional Council says elections for the 200-member national assembly will be held in June but no date has been set. The assembly will name a new government and select a panel to write a constitution.

But many Libyans are frustrated with what they call a slow pace of political transformation. The coastal city of Benghazi, which was the rebel capital during the uprising, has also sacked its council and called for elections next month.

The rebellious coastal city of Misrata, with about 300,000 residents, suffered horribly during last year's revolution. Gadhafi's forces shelled the city for weeks, and fierce street battles left thousands dead, missing or injured. Mothers sent their sons to the front lines, while selling their gold jewelry to finance arms purchases.

The inexperienced but tenacious Misrata rebels managed to push Gadhafi's forces out of the city in late April, a turning point that left the regime increasingly isolated in the capital and a few other cities in the western half of Libya.

Then the Misratan rebels pushed out of the city. Working with insurgents from the western mountains along the border with Tunisia, they converged from two sides on the regime stronghold of Tripoli and brought the capital down in a few days.

A few months later in October, it was rebels from Misrata who captured Gadhafi in his hometown and final stronghold of Sirte and killed him. They hauled him back to Misrata and put his rotting body on public display in a vegetable cooler for days, while the city's residents gleefully lined up to see it.

Reminders of those vicious battles were all around Monday as Misratans gathered at the polls to vote for the 28-member local council.

Banners hung on the walls of bullet-gouged houses, which were scrawled with the names of martyrs who died during the uprising. Voters wrapped themselves in Libyan flags as they stood in line to cast their ballot.

Residents of the Mediterranean coastal city had grown increasingly impatient with a lack of guidance from the National Transitional Council based in Tripoli, 125 miles (200 kilometers) to the northwest. The council was supposed to be the country's central authority during the transition period.

Misratans drew once again on their independent streak and decided to forge ahead with a local election on their own.

"The (city) council was not up to the level of what the city accomplished during the revolution," said Abdel-Basit Boum Zariq, the deputy head of the city's human rights commission.

At one school where voters cast their ballots, the smell of fresh paint wafted through the halls. Gamela al-Tohami, the school director, waved her purple ink-stained finger which has become the universal sign for voting across the Middle East. She said Gadhafi forces shelled the school during the fighting and only recently holes in the walls that had been used by snipers had been refilled.

"This is the first time we have seen real democracy in my entire life. Before we were being monitored and terrorized," she said.

Even before Gadhafi came to power in September 1969, elections were widely rigged.

During Gadhafi's era, the closest thing to democracy were elections held for local bodies called "people's committees" but the vote was generally regarded as a farce to rubber-stamp regime candidates.

As Gadhafi's control began to disintegrate last year, councils composed of judges, lawyers and businessmen were formed in cities around the country. But many council members were members of the old regime with little legitimacy.

After the fighting died down in Misrata, many residents grew angry at what they said was corruption among the council members. Tarek bin Hameda, one candidate running for city council, said the outgoing council was not transparent.

He alleged that aid sent to the city council for local associations was not fairly distributed.

"The council head was part of the old regime, and he works with the same Gadhafi mentality. The mechanism was the same and that led the street to explode," bin Hameda said. "The youth want new blood."

Khalifa al-Zawawi, head of the outgoing city council, responded to the allegations by saying: "I defy anybody to prove that a single cent has been put in the wrong place," he said. "We documented everything and we have our proof for transparency," he added.

Al-Kabir, the political commentator, attributed part of their problems to inexperience.

Only one member of the outgoing council is running for re-election, while the rest stayed away.

"We thought that we have to give a chance for new faces," al-Zawawi said.

The candidates in Misrata have mostly focused their platforms on general themes such as improving education, security and health care.

"The priority in my program is to build the human being before building the state," bin Hameda said.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

MISRATA, Libya (AP) — Four months after the death of Moammar Gadhafi, the people of Misrata were frustrated by stalled reforms. They played a key role in overthrowing the Libyan dictator of 42 years...
MISRATA, Libya (AP) — Four months after the death of Moammar Gadhafi, the people of Misrata were frustrated by stalled reforms. They played a key role in overthrowing the Libyan dictator of 42 years...
Filed by Ryan Craggs  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 205
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lambdin1
What's this?
06:06 PM on 02/21/2012
Good for them! Democracy is messy! It will gel soon. Hopefully. It takes time. Look at us in the United States. We've been at it for more than 2 hundred years!!!
03:25 PM on 02/21/2012
So one city will have an elected city council and the entire country will remain fractured. How's that for progress...
03:20 PM on 02/21/2012
I predicted the rise of the city state the moment the protests began. And now…
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Bradley Greig Smith
Endless war is endless debt.
02:27 PM on 02/21/2012
"The vote was the first experiment in real democracy anywhere in Libya"

This is a 100% false.

Why does the media feel the need to make things up?

Libya had hundreds of gathering sights all over the place. Everyone came to them and not only got to vote but have their say. It did not matter what race, gender or tribe you belonged to either.

The place is now a complete mess. This vote was forced on the new "government" because they have NO control over the hundreds of militias that are running around. Torture and murder is still going on all over the place.

Just face it, this was the #1 nation in Africa for the standard of living. They had free health care and education for all. Free housing, next to free food and gas, cars were subsidized, they had the largest water works program in the world, zero debt etc etc etc. Now it's a mess. It will take generation to even stand a chance of getting back to were they were if they ever do.
09:48 PM on 02/21/2012
"This is a 100% false."

It's you again with more bovine scatology. Right, you're in Libya observing things. Did you get free lunch with your Libyan election monitoring?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
omobob
left coast, usa
01:59 PM on 02/21/2012
The key to any free society is self-determination. Libya is taking it’s first steps towards independence. Libya is also on the brink of civil war.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:45 AM on 02/21/2012
Why are we trying to build "perfect " WORLD?
04:41 PM on 02/21/2012
Who says we're doing that? I'd settle for movement in the right direction. Democracy over dictatorship is a good step.
photo
Roommate
Compounding Money, Cause Seed > Effect Tree
08:37 AM on 02/21/2012
It's good that they borrowed over $800 million from china to give to libya. It's not like we can use that money to pay off the $15.4 trillion in debt
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:07 AM on 02/21/2012
A report from Amnesty International details widespread torture in the prisons and makeshift detention facilities in Libya, under the auspices of the regime established by the US-NATO war that overthrew and murdered Colonel Muammar Gaddafi. In at least 12 cases, prisoners were tortured to death, the group found.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:52 AM on 02/21/2012
AMNESTY = TRAVESTY !
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:28 PM on 02/21/2012
For you. Have you inked your finger and reported to the elders?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:01 AM on 02/21/2012
Democracy is not something that Libyans have experienced before. They spent decades with an authoritaian "lunatic". Smell the roses and be constructive. Amnesty Intl did nothing for Libya during Gaddaffi.US/NATO is not perfection but is a 1000% improvement over Ghaddaffi.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:27 PM on 02/21/2012
Nonsense.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Bradley Greig Smith
Endless war is endless debt.
02:30 PM on 02/21/2012
You are 100% wrong. they had a direct democracy. Each person voted on all new laws.

The country is now a complete mess. They had the highest standard of living of any nation in Africa, Free Health care for all, free education and housing. Next to free food and gas, cars were subsidized. I could go on and on.

Why don't people ever bother to actually research a topic before they comment?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paperless Tiger
07:52 AM on 02/21/2012
They won't be voting in neighboring Tawergha, because the Misrata Brigade cleansed the whole town of 30,000 men, women and children.
photo
Truthahn
Strictly 3rd party.
08:26 AM on 02/21/2012
Don't worry, I'm sure the Misrata militias will cheerfully submit to the authority of the mighty city council. LOL.
photo
thereisonlyoneparty
more amazing than you
10:44 AM on 02/21/2012
What are the deaths and disappearances of thousands in the context of a great victory like the overthrowing of a leader that had pretty much an equal amount of support and opposition?

Libyans are now free!  Free from torture and killing.  Free from a tyrannical regime.  Free!

Those who died should have been honored to give up their lives for a better Libya.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter007
07:46 AM on 02/21/2012
The reason the US has been pushing for democracy in the middle east is because politicians know how easy it is to buy elections.

There is a lot of excess cash laying around looking for a politician to support that will be friendly to US interests.
09:42 AM on 02/21/2012
Correct, in the US we call it lobbying.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:03 AM on 02/21/2012
That's how u do foreign policy, poopy. What do u have to say about China & Russia in Syria?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Obama cares about all of U.S.
07:42 AM on 02/21/2012
Before you rush to criticize,

Please keep in mind that the British joked that we were 13 separate nations following

the Revolutionary War.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lynwood Walker
08:52 AM on 02/21/2012
It wasn't a joke. That is effectively how our first constitution, the Articles of Confederation, functioned. Everybody even had different currency! The reason for these new elections are clear, most of the Libyans did not support the "rebels". This was a Western Coup, to bring capitalism to a socialist country. They are too busy making oil contracts to deal with the suffering, genocides, and terror that now pervades Libya.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:04 AM on 02/21/2012
I know you are a strong supporter of Gaddaffi.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stefan Bast
Just a punk from Hamburg, Germany.
11:19 AM on 02/21/2012
yes, a western coup. to stop western and eastern tanks, that had once been sold to a crook, to make him happy, from running those tanks over the neighborhoods in a show of bravado..
capitalism socialism divide, my a**, there are only real existing mixed economic models on the globe today, anyway..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stagleap03
07:41 AM on 02/21/2012
All these revolutions will be in vain, like in Egypt, unless they have a leader now. Movements cannot survive without a person to lead.
04:51 PM on 02/21/2012
While you are standing there waiting to be told what to do the rest of us will move on as a group of individuals with common cause.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stagleap03
11:09 PM on 02/21/2012
good luck with that "collective unity." it's never happened before and will never happen. humans aren't a colony species like ants or bees. put two people in a room together and you'll get a million different points of view; we differ on too many things. a single leader organizes the thoughts and speaks for the whole. otherwise, it's just a chaotic mess. look at the occupy mov't. started out good, then too many people had too many things to say. the cacophony was deafening...
photo
Truthahn
Strictly 3rd party.
07:32 AM on 02/21/2012
Great. People get to vote for powerless officials in a powerless government. Until the militias are disarmed there will only be a figurehead government in Libya, just as there is in Afghanistan.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Bradley Greig Smith
Endless war is endless debt.
02:33 PM on 02/21/2012
Yep Fanned for getting it.
07:10 AM on 02/21/2012
So far so good.
Things are moving smoothly and in the right direction, I wish the best to the Libyans.
A special though to Drs Najib, Youssef, Mabrouk and all those who had to live away from their homeland, because of Gaddafi’s regime.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Bradley Greig Smith
Endless war is endless debt.
02:34 PM on 02/21/2012
It would be nice if you actually read up on the subject before commenting. It's not running smoothly it's a complete and total mess.
05:42 AM on 02/21/2012
Elections & Freedom -
Democracy and elections are good, but real power rests in the hands of those who own and control the central bank, own and control the resources and other major assets.
Before the revolution, Libya owned and controlled it's central bank, owned and controlled it's resources and other assets. Today, foreign banks and corporations own the Libyan central bank and the countries resources. Did the Libyan people fight and die, to hand over ownership of their country to foreign banks and corporation? Do elections really matter, when you don't have real power?
The Libyan people may have as many elections as they want, but are they really free? Can any people be really free, when they don't own and control, their own central bank, and they don't own and control their resources and other assets? Is freedom and elections without power, real democracy?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lynwood Walker
08:56 AM on 02/21/2012
The answer to your question is No. It is not real democracy. Elections do not make you free. Especially when you are at the barrel of a gun; by now we all have seen what has happened in Libya to anyone supporting of the Gaddafi regime or its ideological aims.

But in the US, our elections are entertainment more akin to Jersey Shore than a real political debate. Our leaders are bought and paid for, and function as corporate spokespersons. Yet most people desperately cling to the assumption they are free. This has always been our operating procedure for regime change. We throw out on government, and replace it with one even more repressive, with fewer economic freedoms, and seize all the assets. It's called Freedom! We just rarely like to define for whom...
12:32 PM on 02/22/2012
Boo hoo. Stop whining crybaby. If corporate money bought politicians, we'd have one Republican president and legislature after another. If money bought elections weirdo Michael Huffington would have trounced Dianne Feinstein years ago; Ross Perot would have been President.

You apparently think American voters are a herd of brainless sheep and you're the only wise man in the room. Memo to Lynwood: your more-cynical-than-thou pose doesn't make you the smartest guy in the room. It just makes you look bitter, sour, and cranky. If it improves your self esteem, round up some like you and form your Hate America Club. You'll have plenty of fellow sourpusses eager to enroll.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Abraxas79
09:36 AM on 02/21/2012
Excellent points ! To give people an illustration of the west agenda in Libya, I believe it was the first time in recorded history a central bank was formed in the middle of a civil war !