iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Rand Paul, In Ongoing Opposition To Synthetic Drugs Ban, Cited Threat Of 'Radical Islam'

Posted: 02/21/12 01:59 PM ET

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), as part of an ongoing effort to block a federal ban of synthetic drugs, once cited the threat of "radical Islam" as a reason for opposition.

The warning was mentioned in a December letter obtained by the Bowling Green Daily News to Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), who have authored efforts to block synthetic drugs. The Kentucky senator warns of the difficulties of people finding employment after being released from prison.

He then says, "In addition, there has been much discussion in the Senate regarding combatting radical Islam. Notably, Islam is currently the fastest-growing religion among prisoners in the United States. Sending people -- often young people -- who may already come from broken homes and difficult family situations into a brutal prison environment is potentially a breeding ground for radicalization."

Paul told the Daily News that he stood by his comments but that that threat was not his reason for opposition. Paul's spokesman has said that he thinks drug enforcement is a state and local issue.

Paul, the son of GOP presidential candidate Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), is singlehandedly blocking bills that would outlaw synthetic drugs with a Senate hold. The parliamentary move prevents the bill from reaching the Senate floor, but could be overridden by 60 senators.

The House of Representatives voted on Dec. 8 to ban synthetic drugs by a 317-98 vote. The measure also bans chemical compounds in the drugs that have been marketed as substitutes for marijuana and narcotics.

Critics of the bill, including Paul, have also cited the restriction of chemical compounds as a reason to oppose the bill, saying that it could hinder legitimate medical and pharmaceutical research on them.

The AP reported last year that the drugs -- marketed by names such as "K2" and "Spice" -- have been responsible for thousands of hospital visits. Military officials have also been alarmed by the rise of usage of synthetic marijuana by U.S. troops.

More than 40 states have banned some of the chemicals in the drugs.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), as part of an ongoing effort to block a federal ban of synthetic drugs, once cited the threat of "radical Islam" as a reason for opposition. The warning was mentioned in a D...
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), as part of an ongoing effort to block a federal ban of synthetic drugs, once cited the threat of "radical Islam" as a reason for opposition. The warning was mentioned in a D...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 253
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
photo
itsavividdream
...and so goes the glory of the world
12:21 PM on 12/09/2012
....I think it is really funny a tea party guy talking" breeding grounds for radicalization"....if that just isn't the pot calling the kettle.....
06:23 AM on 04/15/2012
Bravo, Rand Paul! These nanny state laws stop NO ONE from abusing drugs and result in obscene incarceration rates (America jails more of its population than ANY NATION ON EARTH, yet we have one of the highest rates of drug abuse/addiction. Go figure).

Our best bet for preventing unhealthy drug use is through honest, fact-based drug education and sensible drug policy. When kids can see responsible drug use modeled in the way responsible alcohol use is modeled (i.e. a glass of wine with dinner), they will learn how to use these substances more safely.

As it stands, any child can purchase illegal drugs and research chemicals. Not so with alcohol and tobacco, which have legal age restrictions and warnings printed on the package. Many of the social ills blamed on drugs are actually products of drug prohibition. (You don't see people dealing beer on street corners and killing each other over tobacco turf). Our politicians need to focus on the REAL threat to American society--the prison-industrial complex that profits off the free labor of non-violent drug offenders...a.k.a. slavery.

In the end, I don't care WHY Rand voted down these unconstitutional bills--I'm just glad he did. Unlike a lot of you, I couldn't care less whether my elected officials and I would get along as friends, or whether they're likable people--only that their votes reflect my views and the views they use to get elected in the first place.
04:44 AM on 04/03/2012
"Paul, the son of GOP presidential candidate Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), is singlehandedly blocking bills..."

He's Rand Mutherf@$%ing Paul. That's practically his job.
02:57 PM on 02/29/2012
I support the "ends" of his argument (no ban on the chemicals), but come on Rand, radical Islam is your defense? Seriously...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeremy Echols
08:53 PM on 02/24/2012
Go, Rand!

Prohibiting every possible compound that might lead to getting somebody high is stupid and won't do anything to stop use.

You want to actually stop K2? Legalize the real, safe pot and the more dangerous cousins go away all on their own.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:01 AM on 02/22/2012
rand the space ship is ready for take off with your dad on board
05:55 PM on 02/22/2012
People as ignorant as you don't understand that when they ban those chemicals, they also banned white chocolate, motor oil, and a whole slew of other things that have synthetic, banned chemicals. So in other words, if they bust a kid for having a banned chem like AM-2201, they have to bust Wal-Mart for selling Tylenol being that it turns into AM-404 when you take it, another banned chemical.
09:56 PM on 02/22/2012
What I am wondering is how much monetary kickbacks Sen. Paul is getting from this new drug industry. I am on the frontlines in treatment and it is killing and permanently damaging people. Anyone with firsthand knowledge of the destructiveness of the synthetics would not make such an asinine defense. We finally have the government willing to do something and this joker is blocking life-saving legislation. What is his ulterior motive?
12:53 PM on 04/08/2012
Read the comment above yours.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kelley Smith
Mother, Veteran, IT Geek
12:47 AM on 02/22/2012
Logic would dictate that Paul's argument would best serve the cause of legalization than the banning of certain chemicals. Why ban chemicals? This is just stupid.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RevRayGreen
Here to make cannabis legal worldwide again
11:55 PM on 02/21/2012
Aqua Budda Baby.........make it legal make it green make it 2012

Audio only AFROMAN performance recorded by Rev Ray Green in Mankato Minnesota. March 27 2006 ...also some after show parking lot soundbytes to kick it off.......enjoy Hush, Mississippi,Tall Cans, Palmdale,Tumbleweed,Caddy Hop + more....make it legal make it now make it 2012...LOOK FOR PT 1 HIGHJACKED 2006 recorded 3/27/06

http://youtu.be/-CFPNlQj2LQ
photo
skifastbadly
Since when is "Liberal" a bad word?
11:28 PM on 02/21/2012
The apple doesn't fall far from the horse.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rodger leMonde
I call them as I see them.
07:28 PM on 02/21/2012
Sounds like a promotion of drug tourism. What a clever way to take the seasonal problem out of tourism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NoPartyCharlie
06:47 PM on 02/21/2012
Liberals whom for some reason want everything banned even though they believe in liberalism, and to republicans that want everything banned as well, you do not have the power to ban chemicals and substances, especially if tested they can provide positive results. If you want to go after SPICE or K2, then prosecute them. But don't make their actions, a template of banning chemicals they use as a whole.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Josh RageLyfe
rage life party it up
06:46 PM on 02/21/2012
legalize and recognize my right to regulate my own brain chemistry, NOW!
07:40 PM on 02/21/2012
Thank you!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WDHAMMER1
06:35 PM on 02/21/2012
How come this punk has never severed in the US military? He should be over in Afghanistan fighting his beliefs .. You know why he's not , yellow that's why . He fits in with the rest of the right wing yellow bellies.
07:40 PM on 02/21/2012
and Obama. When did he serve?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WDHAMMER1
08:45 PM on 02/21/2012
Last time I heard he wasn't talking the tough guy rhetoric the phony punks on the right talk. Oh and by the way your beloved Rush was also a draft dodger...
09:02 PM on 02/21/2012
He isn't starting new wars that is the point. If belong to the gop war party he should have--or run with the Liberterian party.
05:56 PM on 02/22/2012
Hmmm like his dad who DID serve in Vietnam? Maybe his place is here, making fools like you look even MORE foolish.
06:33 PM on 02/21/2012
Drug laws, like all other criminal laws, are to be handled at the state level. What is it about this concept of federalism that is so difficult for everyone to grasp? The federal government doesn't even have a national policing power, how are they even considering the enactment of more federal drug laws.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WDHAMMER1
06:33 PM on 02/21/2012
you get what you vote for..