iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Religion And Politics Don't Mix, Major Religious Groups Tell Presidential Candidates

Religion Politics

First Posted: 02/21/2012 4:09 pm Updated: 02/22/2012 10:32 am

After Rick Santorum ignited controversy over the weekend by saying President Barack Obama has a "phony" and "different theology" that's not "based on the Bible," and amid ongoing discomfort among some politicians and religious figures over Mitt Romney's Mormon faith, a coalition of major religious organizations is calling on presidential candidates to keep religion out of politics.

On Tuesday, the Anti-Defamation League, the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty and the Interfaith Alliance released a "statement of principles" on religion in political campaigns that calls on candidates vying for office to feel comfortable explaining their religious conviction to voters but also warn that "there is a point when an emphasis on religion becomes inappropriate and even unsettling in a religiously diverse society such as ours.”

The call has been endorsed by 14 major Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Hindu and Sikh organizations, and asks candidates to:

  • Attempt to fulfill the promise of America by seeking to serve and be responsive to the full range of constituents, irrespective of their religion.
  • Conduct their campaigns without appeals, overt or implicit, for support based upon religion.
  • Reject appeals or messages to voters that reflect religious prejudice, bias, or stereotyping.
  • Engage in vigorous debate on important and disputed issues, without deliberately encouraging division in the electorate along religious lines, or between voters who characterize themselves as religious and voters who do not.

“Candidates do not have to check their religion at the door of the offices they seek. But they need to understand that they serve people of other faiths and of no faith. Resorting to religious language that sets people of faith against each other harms political discourse and sows religious discord,” said J. Brent Walker, executive director of the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty, in a statement.

Anti-Defamation League national director Abraham Foxman encouraged candidates to "avoid overt appeals for support on the basis of religion" and set a "proper tone" when it comes to discussing their beliefs and those of others.

The Rev. Dr. C. Welton Gaddy, president of Interfaith Alliance, said he has been "deeply disturbed by the disproportionate role religion has played during recent election cycles with some candidates seeming to be running for ‘pastor-in-chief’" and that "a line is crossed when a candidate implies that they should receive your vote because of their faith."

Religion has played a significant role in the race for the Republican presidential nomination, with appeals to evangelicals propelling former Senator Santorum (R-Pa.) and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) to wins in places such as Iowa and South Carolina. Polls have shown that many voters are uncomfortable with electing a president who is a Mormon, such as former Massachusetts Gov. Romney. Mormons believe in Jesus Christ and see themselves as Christians, although many other Christians question the church's theology.

The recent controversy over federal requirements for employers to provide contraception coverage under health insurance plans has fueled accusations that the Obama administration has a war on religion. After Santorum's comments on Obama's theology, the Rev. Franklin Graham appeared on television Tuesday and said that Obama is seen as a "son of Islam." Inaccurate rumors that Obama is secretly a Muslim have persisted since he was a senator.

"Religion in Political Campaigns -- An Interfaith Statement of Principles" was signed by: the American Islamic Congress; American Jewish Committee; Anti-Defamation League; Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty; Interfaith Alliance; Islamic Society of North America; Hindu American Foundation; Muslim Advocates; National Council of Churches USA; Sikh American Legal Defense and Education Fund; Sikh Coalition; Union for Reform Judaism; The United Methodist Church General Board of Church and Society; and the United Church of Christ Justice and Witness Ministries.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

After Rick Santorum ignited controversy over the weekend by saying President Barack Obama has a "phony" and "different theology" that's not "based on the Bible," and amid ongoing discomfort among som...
After Rick Santorum ignited controversy over the weekend by saying President Barack Obama has a "phony" and "different theology" that's not "based on the Bible," and amid ongoing discomfort among som...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,824
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (53 total)
Clevelandinwi
Progressive is good; regressive, not so much.
12:55 PM on 03/28/2012
Between God on your sleeve sanctorum and 'ignore your religion' roMONEY, there really isn't a choice. They are both hypocrites.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eegaadzoooks
07:56 PM on 04/07/2012
Clevelandinwi: But there IS a choice; a good choice! Obama 2012
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
soma77
Author, Speaker, Retreat Facilitator
12:13 AM on 03/17/2012
Do we want the finger he is pointing at us to be on the button to eternity?
photo
CainStain
Tea Party's Over...Time To Brush Your Tooth
11:10 PM on 02/29/2012
Sorry Rick,

2000 plus years and no proof? I'm calling it. Official Time 2/29/12 2307 hours.

Dignity Rick, Dignity.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peter010908
The easiest way to control people is through fear.
10:20 PM on 02/29/2012
Ref: "The call has been endorsed by 14 major Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Hindu and Sikh organizations, and asks candidates to"... looks like they have more common sense than the politicians.
09:50 PM on 02/29/2012
Rick Santorum has pushed the right wing so far to the right that instead of running for office I think he should START A CHURCH...NOT RUN FOR PRESIDENT!!!!!!!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VinZenTexaN
God welcomes his victims
04:59 PM on 02/29/2012
Calling on presidential candidates to keep religion out of politics out schools out of TV out of U S and the rest of the world. All of them ! We become irresponsible as a human beings, the moment we become a believers.

God and religion are neither necessary nor sufficient for man to be good.

The worst hell is a mind controlled by religion.

Without God, life is everything.

Stop lying to children - Break the cycle of religion
02:25 PM on 02/29/2012
Religion out of campaigns? So much for freedom of religion.

When Obama was talking about his faith, he didn't impose it on anyone and it was nice to hear about how it played a major part of his life and gave him certain values. I can't see where it is going wrong in this case.

How can you exclude faith out of campaigns when it obviously seems to be a major part of who these candidates are.

I am just thankful for the first amendment to safeguard this sort of thing.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
gsj612
05:16 AM on 03/20/2012
I think the difference is that many candidates are running to be Christian In Chief, as opposed to Commander in Chief. Also, many of the candidates are claiming that they will make laws based on what their particular sect of religion believes. That is discriminatory to those of us who believe differently.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anne Rutherford
02:21 PM on 05/11/2012
What these organizations are suggest to allow your faith to inform you political decisions. That absolutely isn't threatened by anything I read here. What these faiths call for is to respect the essence of faith by not using it to pander (strong word, I know) to specific groups of people at the expense of fellow citizens. Why is it o.k. to say, "I believe X therefore I am justified to subvert the rights of Y because they don't hold the same faith?" It has no place in politics - NONE. Everyone should determine for themselves the candidate that best reflects their values.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cole 33
Careful. We don't want to learn from this.
12:43 PM on 02/29/2012
The two most divisive motivations in the history of man, the two things that are responsible for every conflict in history, has been Religion and Politics, they are reflections of each other, one is a secular religion - Political Ideology, the other is a super-natural religion - Religious Ideology.

In their most severe forms they are incredibly dangerous.

Extreme Political Religion ends up manifesting as North Korea, and Stalinist Soviet Union and others Extreme Super-Natural Religion ends up manifesting as Al Qaeda, The Witch Trials, The westboro church, science denial, anti-intellectualism, intolerance, the mutilation of babies genitals, animal sacrifice, cults, suicide bombers, and terrorists.

When extreme super natural religious ideology acquires and merges with extreme political religious ideology, you end up with Hitler and the Nazis, The Crusades, The Dark Ages, Iran, The Christian Right, The Millennium old Middle East Conflict, The Genocide in Darfur, The Slave Trade, and the oppression of vast swaths of people.

This is exactly why the founding fathers, who all believed in God decided to make clear that Politics and Religion should be separated, to protect religious belief, and protect the Government from merging two strong ideologies.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wakeupyouall
08:33 PM on 02/29/2012
Christ refused to take political power when he was tested by Satan in the desert and he said render unto Ceasar. Pretty clear to me how he felt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cole 33
Careful. We don't want to learn from this.
02:05 PM on 03/01/2012
Jesus didn't say "Render under Caesar..." to an evil being named Satan.

He said that to local authorities, who were questioning him about the accusation that he was telling people it was ok to not pay taxes or rent on land, after he came back to town the day after throwing over the moneychangers tables and the stands of people selling goods in the temple.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
solar diablo
Est nunquam molestum lupo quot oves existant
11:11 AM on 02/29/2012
Wishful thinking. Tossing red meat to the partisan base is a time-tested means of winning votes, and for conservatives that red meat is always flavored with the spice of religion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
trekie70
Lifelong bibliophile and political junkie
07:35 PM on 02/28/2012
These 14 groups represent a wide range of faiths, both conservative and liberal. Santorum would do well to heed their request.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Mamma Roma
Contrarian and proud of it
01:33 PM on 02/28/2012
I don't see where the VATICAN signed on. And, Santorum ignored all of them and turned around the next day and called President Kennedy a puke.

When is he going to be called off the campaign as not a political candidate but rather a religious zealot? Franklin Graham agrees with him, but look where that family spawned from. Lunatics all. And the worst part is, those who see nothing wrong with it. They ignore the Constitution like they ignored Prohibition.

This man should be run out on a rail, not given money and television time. The people of Pennsylvania got rid of him once, it's time to be rid of him once and for all. He's NON-COMPOS MENTIS.
photo
dubbleplusgood
turned off CNN, turned on CurrentTV
04:15 PM on 02/26/2012
Keep religion out of campaigns and government.
12:48 PM on 02/26/2012
Just as we're not interested in the government telling us what we can, and can not, say or do as free people, we aren't interested in your group telling us what we can and can not talk about.

If someone running for public office wants to talk about his spiritual beliefs they're free to do so. If people don't like what someone talks about, they won't vote for them.

This is a free country.
03:05 AM on 02/28/2012
Yes, JoeHurley, the religious groups that signed this statement of principles agree with you: "If someone running for public office wants to talk about his spiritual beliefs they're free to do so." That is also their stated position.

What they are discouraging is the rating of anyone else's spiritual beliefs or any implication that certain spiritual beliefs are a requirement for being a legitimate candidate, or the implication that without a desire to implement certain religious rules, a candidate is lacking in moral principles.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kmgraham11
12:03 PM on 02/29/2012
Great response.
12:03 PM on 02/26/2012
Religion and politics have never mixed well yet all threw history they've been mashed together like potatoes and rancid gravy. Governments have always used religion as a social control system. Here is a trick question, barring shamanism, what came first religion or government? Answer: they were one and the same thing in ancient times. Tradition hard to stop.
In modern times the twain can't meet because we know better, or should. Religion has no place in empirical solutions for real world problems. Religions cause more problems then they solve-as always- but now it is better understood.
Paradigm shifts are never fast or painless. Conservative hang on to the past- that's what they do. Progressive are fighting an up hill war with the weight of history on their backs.
photo
Warren Harrison
Defending All The Good America Stands For
01:16 AM on 02/26/2012
This is all simply about politics not religion. The GOP has been pushing and so has the christian right, the infusion of church and state. It has backfired on them. So now they are issuing statements
there should be caution used. Such statements are tantamount to how out of touch the GOP has been with the American Populace. Americans are not interested in the religious faith of an individual.
They are interested in attaching and voting for a candidate who can shape the future for our country.