More

HuffPost Social Reading

Obama Administration To Propose Cutting Corporate Tax Rate From 35 Percent To 28 Percent

By By JIM KUHNHENN 02/22/12 06:01 PM ET AP

Barack Obama Corporate Taxes
President Barack Obama delivers remarks before signing legislation into law that will provide business tax credits to help put veterans back to work during a ceremony at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building November 21, 2011 in Washington, DC. (File photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama rolled out a corporate tax overhaul plan Wednesday that lowers rates but also eliminates loopholes and subsidies cherished by the business world. A long-shot for action in an election year, the plan nevertheless stamps Obama's imprint on one of the most high-profile issues of the presidential campaign.

The president's plan to lower the corporate tax rate to 28 percent came on the same day Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney called for a 20 percent across-the-board cut in personal income tax rates, underscoring the potency of taxes as a political issue, especially during a modest economic recovery.

Obama has not laid out a plan for overhauling personal income taxes. But he has called for Bush era tax cuts to end on individuals making more than $200,000, thus increasing their taxes, and for a 30 percent minimum tax on taxpayers who make $1 million or more.

Obama decried the current corporate tax system as outdated, unfair and inefficient. "It's not right and it needs to change," he said in a statement.

The president would reduce the current 35 percent corporate tax, which is the highest in the world after Japan but which many corporations avoid by taking advantage of deductions, credits and exemptions. Under his plan, manufacturers would receive incentives so that they would pay an even lower effective tax rate of 25 percent.

His plan would eliminate corporate tax benefits like oil and gas industry subsidies and special breaks for the purchase of private jets – two provisions that Obama has long targeted – and do away with certain corporate tax shelters.

In addition, Obama also would impose a minimum tax on foreign earnings, a move opposed by multinational corporations and perhaps the most contentious provision in the president's plan.

"It's a framework that lowers the corporate tax rate and broadens the tax base in order to increase competitiveness for companies across the nation," Obama said.

Romney has also called for a 25 percent corporate tax rate, in line with what some congressional Republicans want. Campaigning in Arizona, the former Massachusetts governor said that if elected president he would propose lowering the top personal income tax rate to 28 percent from the current 35.

In Congress, Republican reaction was mixed. House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp, R-Mich., said he appreciated the administration's plan, though it set a corporate tax rate that is higher than the 25 percent he has proposed. He faulted Obama, however, for not offering a wholesale overhaul of the tax system for businesses and individuals.

"While this is a good step by the administration, I will borrow from the president's own words to Congress from just yesterday: `Don't stop here. Keep going,'" Camp said in a statement. But Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, the top Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, dismissed the president's plan as a "set of bullet points designed more for the campaign trail than an actual blueprint for fixing our tax code."

The issue of taxation has been a recurrent theme throughout Obama's presidency. He has reduced some taxes for small businesses and has pressed Congress to temporarily cut payroll taxes on American workers to help prime the weak economy.

But he has also called for reducing the nation's long-term deficits with a mix of tax increases and spending cuts. Republicans have flatly rejected tax increases. And Romney on Wednesday criticized Obama's proposal for corporations, saying they would result in higher taxes.

Under the framework proposed by the administration, the rate cuts, closed loopholes and the minimum tax on overseas earning would result in no increase to the deficit.

That means that many businesses that slip through loopholes or enjoy subsidies and pay an effective tax rate that is substantially less than the 35 percent corporate tax could end up paying more under Obama's plan. Others, however, would pay less while some would simply benefit from a more simplified system.

Obama's plan would result in about $250 billion in additional revenue over the next 10 years. But that money would be used to pay business tax credits that are currently temporary and that Obama would make permanent, administration officials said.

Corporate income taxes have been shrinking as a share of overall federal taxes for decades. In 2010, corporate income taxes made up just 12 percent of all federal tax receipts, down from 24 percent in 1960, according to the IRS.

Reducing the corporate tax rate to 28 percent would reduce tax revenues by about $700 billion over the next decade, according to an estimate prepared in October by the Joint Committee on Taxation, the official scorekeeper for Congress.

That means lawmakers would have to find about $70 billion a year in tax increases to keep the package from adding to the budget deficit, hardly an easy task.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, who presented Obama's plan, acknowledged that the debate "will be politically contentious."

"Some will say these proposals are too tough on business, and others will say that they're not tough enough," he said.

Indeed, several liberal-leaning groups criticized Obama's plan for being "revenue neutral" and not generating more tax money to pay for government programs. "We can and should collect more tax revenue from corporations," said Bob McIntyre, the director of Citizens for Tax Justice.

But the business groups objected to Obama's plan to impose a minimum tax on foreign earnings, insisting instead that the administration embrace a "territorial" system of taxation.

The United States taxes U.S.-based multinational corporations on foreign profits, once that money is returned to the United States. In a territorial system, the U.S. would only tax profits made in the U.S. By taxing the foreign profits of U.S.-based multinationals, the U.S. has a worldwide system of taxation.

Those foreign profits are not taxed unless they are brought to the United States. And, in many cases, they are simply reinvested overseas, so they are never subjected to U.S. taxes. Administration officials said that under Obama's plan, multinational corporations would continue to receive a tax credit for any taxes they pay overseas.

Among critics of his plan were the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the high-tech industry, a group Obama has been eager to court.

"The framework would punish successful companies and push investments out of the United States," said Dean Garfield, president and CEO of the Information Technology Industry Council, which represents firms such as Cisco Systems Inc., Google, Apple Inc., and Intel Corp.

___

Associated Press writers Martin Crutsinger and Stephen Ohlemacher in Washington and Kasie Hunt in Mesa, Ariz., contributed to this report.

Contribute to this Story:
FOLLOW BUSINESS

WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama rolled out a corporate tax overhaul plan Wednesday that lowers rates but also eliminates loopholes and subsidies cherished by the business world. A long-shot for a...
WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama rolled out a corporate tax overhaul plan Wednesday that lowers rates but also eliminates loopholes and subsidies cherished by the business world. A long-shot for a...
Filed by Jade Walker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,866
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (78 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DANIELISTICALL
HISTORY IS BUT A FABLE AGREED UPON,,NAPOLEON
01:49 PM on 02/23/2012
TEST
07:47 AM on 02/23/2012
Go for it - as long as the loopholes and write-offs are taken back. If the current "effective" rate is 15-20% AND they clsoe these holes making the rate 25%, do it! Bet the article is correct about one thing though. THIS won't see the floor of congress this year!
10:42 PM on 02/22/2012
Really sick of the notion that everything Obama does is campaigning. Any politician starts campaigning the very day they are elected for the the next campaign. Otherwise they are out of a job. It's how it works for all of them and all that came before Obama. Of course he's campaigning! That doesn't mean he is not doing his job, you may not like his job preformance. He wants another term, just like any other politician does. Sick of all of them. Why not just admit the lobbyist run the whole thing, on both parties.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
itzfatcat
Conservative voter – Small Gov FOOTPRINT
07:42 PM on 02/22/2012
There is no tax cut here. It is a 0-sum game with the off sets mentioned. An election year gimmick. I guess he thought people would not notice. I hear the UK raised income taxes to generate more revenue. Guess what the net result was less revenue. Go figure. Oh yes Obama continue class warfare, raise taxes, and lose revenue in the process.
08:52 PM on 02/22/2012
The right wing purpose even bigger cuts with a huge mass of off sets and under the table deals to boot,a matter of such comes down to 6 in one basket and a half dozen in the other,rater done by Obama or the re pub's it does not benefit the common man,so to try and make the current administration look bad with a ploy that is common place in american politics makes one seem a little desperate to boost one's on party.so now whats your point?
11:45 PM on 02/22/2012
Currently 49.5 5 of the 'common' man ( men) don't pay any federal income taxes!! So if there is a tax cut and I get to keep more of my earning and someone that pays no federal taxes doesn't get anything - well, why should they?? Meanwhile, the combined fed and state tax is taking nearly 40 cents of each extra $ my wife and I make and I am not a millionaire. So , stop the class warfare crap. People and their choices determine where they end up. It isn't the government, and it isn't the governments role to try and even things up by redistributing my income, though some think it is.
09:47 AM on 02/23/2012
READ THE FACTS. To start, Oil and gas companies will no longer get subsidies and still pay a fair share. Not a bad thing for companies that record billions in record profits. Yet, watch the gas prices jump even higher to punish Obama for doing the right thing. Make sure you direct your ire where it belongs....
04:34 PM on 02/24/2012
Make sure you direct your ire where it belongs....

You bet I will, start rehearsing now....President Romney. Has a nice ring to it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tc71087
07:41 PM on 02/22/2012
Well, its a start.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sophie M
ANTI WAR./animal rescue
07:16 PM on 02/22/2012
why should we care?
the repubs want to cut more than that?
it is all a big entitled: SUCKERS.
we lose, no matter what.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
adoseofsanity
Recovering liberal.
06:45 PM on 02/22/2012
The notion of taxing income earned elsewhere (FOREIGN EARNINGS) is STUPID. We would still have an absurdly high corporate rate and the overall result of Obama's idea (should it be implemented) would be to DRIVE companies even faster out of this country.

We need a simpler tax code that, if the deductions are eliminated, has a rate much lower than 28% so as to be ATTRACTIVE to business to be HERE vs any place else. Somehow libs think raising taxes will do nothing but raise more public revenue. Not only does this not happen, it leads to LOWER tax revenue as businesses and individuals go to places that are MORE PRO-BUSINESS/GROWTH. This has been clearly illustrated/proven via differences in state taxation, and how global entities operate. Nonetheless, libs will just call what I have stated as "right wing propaganda".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
itzfatcat
Conservative voter – Small Gov FOOTPRINT
07:43 PM on 02/22/2012
Good post. But the libs are set on their path with their heads in the sand.
photo
johngary66
Accused of heresy and decided to go with that.
02:23 AM on 02/23/2012
No, that's the Obama Democrats. Real liberals are appalled that people are looking the other way or as you suggest sticking their heads in the sand and ignoring what Obama is really doing. Must have been the kool aid. It's probably partisans in general who never question their leaders. I mean look at the clowns you teabaggers have running for President.
11:28 PM on 02/22/2012
No its not a good post
What was the tax rate under Clinton when our economy was thriving??? It was much higher
Higher taxes do NOT affect the economy
That is the coolaid the GOP propaganda machine has been pumping out.
What kills jobs and disincentivises companies from hiring and spending is too low taxes and low taxes on Dividends
Companies right now are hoarding cash on the side while they claim higher company profits from the lower taxes. Then they send these earnings to wealthy stock holders who only use dividends as income and thus only pay 15% taxes on them ( I.e. Mitt and Warren B)
So quit drinking the coolaid. Higher taxes never has and never will hurt the economy
04:39 PM on 02/24/2012
Higher taxes never has and never will hurt the economy

You are insane...but it's not just the high taxes that kills jobs, it's also extreme regulation on business.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rational Voice
A voice of reason in a world gone insane
06:28 PM on 02/22/2012
I think the GOP has it's nominee! And his name is Obama...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:56 PM on 02/22/2012
This is another Obama con job. This is really a tax increase.Mmany business tax deductions that Obama hates are eliminated. When deductions are eliminated, its a tax increase. What a scam. He knows this will never pass and he will use it as a campaign ploy, and many people will buy the ruse.

Just like the $40.00 "tax cut." This money used to help fund Social Security. Social Security raided now just as Obamacare cut 500 Billion from Medicare Advantage. Social Security has now been raided. I thought Democrats were never for Social Security and Medicare cuts? But, things are different in an election year when Obama is desperate. He sure can't run on his record as it is.
11:30 PM on 02/22/2012
Soo you want GE to continue to pay NO TAXES
Geese quit drinking the coolaid and try thinking for yourself
04:46 PM on 02/24/2012
First off GE's (Immelt) is Obama's buddy. Second, corporations don't pay taxes...you do. If you increase taxes on a corp, they simply raises prices on their product or services. A tax is just another line item of expenses, like cost of materials or labor. The corp simply serves as a collection agency for government. So by raising taxes on corporations you just raised taxes on yourself. It's all class warfare. But you're right, lay off the coolaid and think for yourself.
05:54 PM on 02/22/2012
All you liberals need to call your representatives and scream at them about this - because the Democrats were supposed to raise taxes - right? Obama is looking more like George Bush every day! Like I've said many times, he's a chamelion - ready to change into whatever he thinks you want him to be to get re-elected.
07:50 PM on 02/22/2012
It worked for Bill Clinton.
11:34 PM on 02/22/2012
Read the bill Sherlock, He is drastically raising the taxes on Dividends which is what keeps businesses from investing and hiring
And yes things were MUCH better under Clinton before W screwed with the tax system which was producing a surplus which incidentally was much hiring than now
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blackraisin
Life, Liberty, Property.
05:53 PM on 02/22/2012
Good start. Cut more.
05:48 PM on 02/22/2012
Not even in the game.....not even close. When it comes to the economy this president just will not make a move that is bold enough to really make a difference in encouraging capital to start flowing into the country in a significant way. He made a modest cut in the tax and then took it all back by eliminating some very important deductions. If this wasn't an election year corporate taxes wouldn't even be on Obama's radar, unless he was attempting to raise them. We don't need any more half-baked efforts mainly just to attract attention. We need corporate taxes at zero, we need capital gains taxes at zero this would send a message to the rest of the world that we are very serious about attracting investment from every where. The problem is when a "salesman" doesn't really believe in what he is selling, the "sale" will never take place.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
itzfatcat
Conservative voter – Small Gov FOOTPRINT
07:45 PM on 02/22/2012
Half baked and lost - no clue.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
itzfatcat
Conservative voter – Small Gov FOOTPRINT
07:46 PM on 02/22/2012
My previous post was meant to agree with you, was not calling you half-baked.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeff Sadowsky
05:43 PM on 02/22/2012
PLEASE CLOSE ALL YOU EXCESSIVELY SLOW BOARDS AND BE FULLY PREPARED TO SERVE YOUR CUSTOMER / COMMENTORS IN A PROFESSIONAL & TIMELY MANNER FOR TONIGHT'S DEBATE.
IT IS NO FUN NOT BEING ABLE TO INTERACT IN TIMELY MANNER! THANK YOU
05:38 PM on 02/22/2012
How does he plan on doing this? Add to the deficit? Kill Seniors with rationing? Eliminate babies with abortion and birth control? This is one time when a tax break to corporations is not good. It will help them move their jobs off shore and make their dividends bigger taking more money out of the economy. Give the extra 7% to the population to make things better. Don't give it to the 1%.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BBLOND
Anyone but Obama
04:59 PM on 02/22/2012
Obama has added 4 trillion to the national debt in 3.5 years. Wake up people. We can't afford another 4 years with this man.
05:53 PM on 02/22/2012
It goes to show you that this guy can't even buy a little growth.......
11:42 PM on 02/22/2012
At the rate Bush was going we would have been in three more wars and 10 trillion dollars in debt
He had to spend to keep the economy from spiraling out of control
Remember the days of W and losing 500,000 jobs a month instead of gaining 300,000 like under Clinton
Well guess what we are back to gaining jobs again even though since the new congress has been put in place they have done nothing. Good thing O did all he could do in the first two years or we would really be up Sh&*T^&$^%$%^t creek