Insider Trading In Congress: SEC Chair Cautions Constitution Makes Enforcement Difficult

* SEC's Schapiro endorses insider-trading curb for lawmakers

* Schapiro says bill may help SEC bring cases

* Says constitutional protections could still pose challenge

* Schapiro also mulling reforms for high-speed traders

By Sarah N. Lynch

WASHINGTON, Feb 22 (Reuters) - The top U.S. securities regulator endorsed a bill that would put new curbs on insider trading by members of Congress, but cautioned that constitutional protections for lawmakers could make it hard to enforce.

"I think the STOCK Act can be helpful to us," said SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro, who spoke about a variety of policy issues at a breakfast on Wednesday sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor.

The legislation, aimed at ensuring lawmakers do not profit from non-public knowledge they gain through their positions, is the most extensive effort to clamp down on Congress' personal business dealings in years.

Both chambers of Congress have passed bills on the matter, but a few differences need to be resolved before a final version can be sent to President Barack Obama.

Although the SEC already has broad authority to bring insider-trading cases against anyone, including federal lawmakers, it has never done so in part because of lawmakers' unique privileges and relationship to government.

One of the biggest challenges the SEC faces in bringing an insider-trading case against lawmakers involves showing how they breached a duty of trust and confidence.

Schapiro said the bill is helpful because for the first time it provides "clarity that there is in fact a duty that members of Congress owe" to the government.

"This is very useful because we need to show a violation of a duty when we bring an insider-trading case," she said.

But she noted that lawmakers still enjoy constitutional protections that could make it difficult for enforcement officials to bring a case.

She pointed to the "speech or debate clause" of the U.S. Constitution that gives members of Congress protection against prosecutions that threaten the legislative process.

The courts have extended that privilege to include the communication of nonpublic information that is connected to legislative activity. Schapiro said the clause could complicate any future SEC investigations.

"That is the constitution. You can't ask Congress to fix that with legislation," she said.

For years, a handful of lawmakers have tried to clarify how insider trading bans apply to Congress, but the legislation didn't get momentum until a November report by CBS' "60 Minutes" that questioned whether some lawmakers had used privileged information to make trades.

House Financial Services Chairman Spencer Bachus was one of the lawmakers featured for his trades during the financial crisis.

Bachus faces a congressional investigation into his trades. He has strongly denied any wrongdoing.

OTHER POLICY AREAS FOR THE SEC

Schapiro also spoke about a range of policy areas the SEC is exploring, from Dodd-Frank rulemaking to market structure reforms being weighed following the May 6, 2010 "flash crash."

Schapiro said the agency is still reviewing potential reforms targeting high-frequency traders.

She voiced concerns that their trades are often "unrelated to the fundamentals of the company being traded" and driven instead by "the miniscule, aberrational price moves" that can be taken advantage of by locating their computerized trading programs next to an exchange's data center.

"That worries me in some ways," she said. "At the end of the day, our markets have to exist for companies to raise capital." (Reporting By Sarah N. Lynch; additional reporting by David Lawder; editing by Andre Grenon)

Comments

[dukeitout]

02:23 AM on 02/24/2012

Insider trading is illegal now. We don't need a duplicate law set up for any group, including Congress. Arrest the jerks if they break the existing law. If the justice system won't do it, the people should.

[AlanBannacheck]

01:25 AM on 02/24/2012

Most of the members of our beloved three branches of government are very wealthy compared to the average citizen. If we want to see real change above the status quo, we need to elect average Americans into office.

[kamact]

01:21 AM on 02/24/2012

No question what is right,...

[Trustfunded1]

11:07 PM on 02/23/2012

Congress Wall Street and the hedgefund industry are above the law.

[gomezrules]

03:18 PM on 02/23/2012

All this attention towards Congressional inside trading is all the more reason for term limits. There not going to stop it on their own, so at least let's limit them on how LONG they can do so!

[elbzee]

07:27 PM on 02/23/2012

Couldn't we just make it a crime to cheat, lie, or take bribes if you're an elected "law maker"? I mean, to heck with term limits. Prison for a looong time the day they're found guilty might clean the slate and keep em honest!

[gomezrules]

10:20 PM on 02/23/2012

Those rules and laws already exist, tell me, how have they worked out? How's Charley Rangel doing these days? How about maximum Maxine Waters?

[StopMakingSense2]

02:21 PM on 02/23/2012

Since that would be the end of the plutocracy it will never happen!

[Ordinary Citizen]

02:03 PM on 02/23/2012

I think no one and that includes the president should not be able to have any stocks, or any dealings in the stock market (or any other financial dealing that can make money for them) that they are in the power to regulate. We the people should pass laws in our own states barring our elected officials from participating in money making deals. If our elected officials won't do it we should.

[Batjak]

01:59 PM on 02/23/2012

That bill will have so many amendments it will be a paper tiger and hard to enforce. Pelosi made a cool million on the VISA legislation. one member of the house made 100K in a month. sorry, they are all crooks.

[MadDad1]

01:57 PM on 02/23/2012

Educating lawmakers about Rule 8 of the Code of Ethics for Government Service should help prevent inappropriate “insider” dealings and problem “earmarks.” Rule 8 states “Never use any information gained confidentially in the performance of governmental duties as a means of making a private profit.” Rule 8 would be a good complement to a STOCK Act or any similar legislation. Read about the Code of Ethics for Government Service at Pages 20 and 436 of the House and Senate Ethics Manuals at ethics.house.gov and ethics.senate.gov.

[BBackSoon]

01:52 PM on 02/23/2012

Tax High Frequency trades at 0.5%. That should slow them down, and if not we pay off the deficit.

[Mrald]

12:47 PM on 02/23/2012

Do the politicians actually think the public believes they are sincere about avoiding insider trading because of some law they plan to pass.....JUST MORE WOOL OVER THE EYES...
Why can't they stop wasting time on nonsense and BS and focus on doing something about real issues....like jobs and the economy

[authorized-user]

11:02 AM on 02/23/2012

Just like trying to get a junkie of get off drugs!

[Chubbster]

10:38 AM on 02/23/2012

Unbelievable. Unconstitutional to enforce...

[Peter Combs]

09:17 AM on 02/23/2012

It will make for an interesting debate....