iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Unions Gearing Up To Spend Big In 2012 Elections

Obama Unions

SAM HANANEL   02/22/12 09:30 AM ET  AP

WASHINGTON — Unions are gearing up to spend more than $400 million to help re-elect President Barack Obama and lift Democrats this election year in a fight for labor's survival.

Under siege in state legislatures around the country – and fearing the consequences of a Republican in the White House – union leaders say they have little choice as they try to beat back GOP efforts to curb collective bargaining rights or limit their ability to collect dues.

"People are digging deeper," said Larry Scanlon, political director of the country's largest public workers union, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. "If Republicans take over the presidency, Congress and enough state legislatures, unions will be out of business, pure and simple."

Scanlon's union was the biggest overall spender in the 2010 midterm elections, doling out about $93 million to help state and federal candidates, mostly Democrats. This year, AFSCME is expected to spend at least $100 million or more on political action, including television advertising, phone banks and member canvassing. The effort is to help the president, Democrats running for the House and Senate, gubernatorial candidates and key state lawmakers.

With increased spending planned by other labor groups, including the powerful Service Employees International Union and the AFL-CIO, unions are likely to top the $400 million they spent to help elect Obama four years ago.

Not all union expenditures on political action are publicly disclosed, so some numbers are based on self-reporting. But unions have long been known as one of the most reliable supporters of Democratic candidates and their efforts have increased with every election as the threats to organized labor grow.

Unions already spent more than $40 million last year to successfully repeal an Ohio law that restricted collective bargaining rights and to recall lawmakers who backed a similar measure in Wisconsin. They are spending millions more in a bid to recall Republican Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, who led the charge to curb public employee union rights as a way to balance the state's budget.

But unions are being spread thin as they deal with a new wave of measures they say are designed to weaken their clout. Indiana passed a right-to-work measure earlier this month, and Republicans in New Hampshire are pushing a similar bill. Legislatures in Arizona and Utah are weighing measures to limit bargaining rights for their public employees.

"Part of the Republican strategy is to try to bleed us," said Mike Podhorzer, political director of the AFL-CIO. "There are certainly more union members now who understand the importance of political engagement and are willing to go door-to-door and make phone calls and do campaigns."

Tim Phillips, president of the conservative anti-tax and anti-regulation group Americans for Prosperity, denied any grand strategy to weaken unions. His group, founded with the support of billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch, spends millions on anti-Obama and anti-union ads across the country.

"It's not accurate to say there's some master plan to drain resources," Phillips said. "These are genuine public policy efforts."

But Phillips said he thinks that, for the first time, unions have to confront organized grassroots opposition in a number of states.

"And Americans for Prosperity is absolutely a key component in that," Phillips said. "The unions have always had the advantage and we are now matching them."

The stakes are even higher for unions this year, as GOP presidential hopefuls seeking conservative support have made unions a regular punching bag. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney says he would support states pursuing right-to-work laws and seek to ban unions from using automatic dues deductions for politics. He would also reverse Obama's executive order encouraging the use of union labor in large government construction projects.

AFSCME, the 1.6-million member union, started early this year, spending $1 million on television ads during Florida's GOP presidential primary to weaken Romney, the candidate organized labor presumes will emerge as the Republican nominee.

The SEIU teamed up with Priorities USA Action, the major super PAC backing Obama, to buy ads in Florida and Nevada accusing Romney of flip-flopping on immigration policy. SEIU is the single largest contributor to Priorities USA after making a $500,000 contribution in December.

The 2.1 million-member union is expected to spend at least $85 million to help Obama win, similar to what it spent in 2008.

So far, unions are finding a way to pay for all the political spending. Union members are contributing more to political action committees, agreeing to special assessments and spending more time working on political causes.

The AFL-CIO is following a new strategy outlined last summer to contribute less money to specific candidates and spend more on building its infrastructure. The goal is to lay a foundation for year-round mobilization that keeps going in the months following an election. Competing for the union money are the various races, from president to state lawmaker.

"We have to use 2012 not just to win for its own sake, but to use as a springboard for 2014 when the governors in all these states are up," Podhorzer said.

The new strategy emerged after some unions grew frustrated last year that Obama and Democrats in Congress were not doing enough to stand up for labor's agenda. But leaders say union members have become more enthusiastic about Obama since the president increased his focus on job creation.

The AFL-CIO also started its own labor super PAC, which allows it to raise unlimited amounts of money and mobilize support beyond its traditional base. The new super PAC has already pulled in $3.7 million.

___

Follow Sam Hananel's labor coverage on Twitter at http://twitter.com/shananel

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Unions are gearing up to spend more than $400 million to help re-elect President Barack Obama and lift Democrats this election year in a fight for labor's survival. Under siege in ...
WASHINGTON — Unions are gearing up to spend more than $400 million to help re-elect President Barack Obama and lift Democrats this election year in a fight for labor's survival. Under siege in ...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 66
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ariel Finn
09:54 AM on 02/27/2012
It's well worth spending $400 million supporting President Obama. He scratched our back and now it's our time to scratch his.
09:35 AM on 02/23/2012
Unions have become what they were created to fight, and now ordinary citizens need their own "union' to fight them.
09:33 AM on 02/23/2012
Bought and paid for. Sure did change the face of politics, didn't he.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BocaMom
01:18 AM on 02/23/2012
It's payback time, baby! It's takes money to get money!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:12 PM on 02/22/2012
Unions are archaic and obsolete. Time for them to simply go away.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Phil-EA
05:01 PM on 02/22/2012
Unions will continue to spend money supporting politicians they feel will in turn give them union friendly legislation that will continue to support the growing disparity between public and private sector compensation (http://bit.ly/pn5weF).

Ultimately though, it’s becoming pretty clear that for as much as unions want to outspend any attempt to create legislation to control public sector compensation, at some point these issues are going to have to be addressed. Even Obama himself has frozen wages for federal employees (http://bit.ly/ncNc89), and typical “blue” states like Connecticut and New York are being forced to start introducing tough public sector reforms (http://eng.am/qh2i1T).

Unions certainly want the best they can get, but if the rest of the country doesn’t want to end up like Rhode Island and on the precipice of bankruptcy (http://nyti.ms/wn7HlE), it’s up to politicians to not let their policy be dictated by how much unions spend.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
amaboss52
Jesus died for your sins...get your moneys worth!
04:19 PM on 02/22/2012
Good, the working class need unions, which makes the collective more powerful, informed and ready to take action. The repuds are definately scared!

Obama 2012!
03:23 PM on 02/22/2012
Presisent Zero following Chicago-Style Politics.....Buying votes.

“There’s a massive amnesty occurring behind the scenes. Unless you represent a national security threat, you’ll be let go and given more authorization. That’s the new amnesty plan, declared unilaterally by President Zero.. President Zero has been using immigration policies, to intentionally try to alter the electorate in his favor.

“The fact is that most Latinos are lower income. They are heavily government-dependent, and tend to vote for the government that gives them free stuff, and it’s typically not Republicans. It’s Democrats.” Time for president Zero to go! See ya!...won't miss ya!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
amaboss52
Jesus died for your sins...get your moneys worth!
04:00 PM on 02/22/2012
You're kind of stupid huh?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jadeba
03:14 PM on 02/22/2012
Go Unions!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MelanieMatthias
I am President Obama's biggest fan!
10:27 AM on 02/22/2012
Unions are one of the best things that happened to America. I thnk it is long over due for them to be supporting the President and his agenda. Be loud and strong, people! The republicans have to go.
photo
windstorm46
y a H O O O O !!!!! 4 MORE for 44
10:25 AM on 02/22/2012
YESSSSS - UNIONS - LOVE to ALL of you - keep up the GOOD work - you're the BEST !!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
miketothad
trollslayer
10:16 AM on 02/22/2012
Why weren't "conservatives" moaning about the evil unions so much back in 2008?
Because Fox and hate radio hadn't yet sent out the marching orders to the illiterate GOP base.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TexianLife
When nothing goes right ... go left.
09:55 AM on 02/22/2012
Every single voter who belongs to a union or appreciates what unions do for working people, should never vote GOP.

GOP has never liked unions BUT in 2010 the most extremist of the party were elected & they began immediately to dismantle all unions.
Some people vote against their own best interests.
Dogvane
Here, smell this.
11:11 AM on 02/22/2012
I'd suggest modifying your statement to "every single voter with a job and a boss".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sammi 56
12:52 PM on 02/22/2012
What they really wanted to do is stop the money flow for the dems-- that meant attack the unions which they did.
09:53 AM on 02/22/2012
Da Unions are one of the few who support obama's wreckage of the economy.
photo
patters85
Obama the Capitalist!
10:07 AM on 02/22/2012
"Da Unions" are unions are the many that watched their retirements go down the toilet under Bush. But you keep claiming that Obama wrecked the economy after the economy was already wrecked. That will get you very far on the radical right but in the real world. We remember $4.00 gas in May 2008 and the stock market crash in September 2008. But you and Leahman Brothers can keep blaming Obama for being a Senator when Bush crashed the car. All of us Union members were there then and we are here now. Good luck with the fantasy sequence.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jadeba
03:11 PM on 02/22/2012
F&F
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
miketothad
trollslayer
10:13 AM on 02/22/2012
"conservatives" are clearly too economically ignorant to realize they're the stewards of wreckage.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
magnolialover
09:47 AM on 02/22/2012
Not surprising of course considering the position of republicans about unions. They hate them. They try to destroy them any chance they can get. This is just another group republicans will never regain, or get any traction with, because they attack them over and over again.