iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Bradley Manning, WikiLeaks Suspect, Defers Plea To 22 Charges Including Aiding The Enemy

Bradley Manning Charged

PAULINE JELINEK and DAVID DISHNEAU   02/23/12 04:06 PM ET  AP

FORT MEADE, Md. — An Army private declined to enter a plea Thursday to charges he engineered the biggest leak of classified information in U.S. history.

Pfc. Bradley Manning also deferred a choice of whether to be tried by a military jury or judge alone.

Military judge Col. Denise Lind presided over the 50-minute hearing at Fort Meade near Baltimore. She didn't set a trial date but scheduled another court session for March 15-16.

Defense attorney David Coombs proposed a trial date sometime in April. He said the government's proposed calendar could push the start of the trial to Aug. 3, a date that Coombs said could jeopardize his client's right to a speedy trial.

Manning has been in pretrial confinement since May 2010. He faces 22 counts, including aiding the enemy. That charge carries a maximum penalty of life in prison. The others carry a combined maximum of more than 150 years.

The 24-year-old native of Crescent, Okla., allegedly gave the anti-secrecy website more than 700,000 documents and video clips.

Defense lawyers say Manning was emotionally troubled and shouldn't have had access to classified material nor have been sent to Iraq for a tour of duty.

A court-martial defendant can defer entering a plea until the start of the trial and defer choosing a judge or jury until shortly before the trial date. Doing so could buy the defense more time to investigate the background of prospective jurors or negotiate a deal, said Eugene R. Fidell, a former Coast Guard judge advocate who teaches law at Yale.

The hearing – officially the start of Manning's court martial – was more formal than his December preliminary hearing in the same courtroom. The defendant, his military lawyers and the prosecution lawyers all appeared in military dress uniform by agreement, as opposed to the camouflage field uniforms they all wore in December.

Manning stood when the judge asked him for his plea, then let Coombs answer that he would not be entering one Thursday. Aside from that, Manning appeared calm as he sat at the defense table, largely motionless and expressionless. He looked directly at the judge when she spoke to him and occasionally at defense and prosecution lawyers as they stood to address the court.

Manning spoke only a half-dozen times, answering firmly and clearly, "Yes, your honor," and, "No, your honor," when asked if he understood the proceedings or had any questions.

Compared to the full courtroom at Manning's preliminary hearing, Thursday's session drew only about 20 courtroom observers, including a half-dozen journalists and some Manning supporters. Observers were warned before the hearing not to fidget, wear sunglasses or sleep during the hearing – a likely reference to the preliminary hearing, when Manning supporters did all those things in the audience section of wooden court benches. About another dozen journalists watched the proceeding on closed-circuit television in a nearby building.

The only outburst was as the judge adjourned the hearing. "Judge, isn't a soldier required to report a war crime?" protester David Eberhardt of Baltimore said loudly. She didn't respond.

A 70-year-old member of the anti-war group Code Pink, Eberhardt was referring to Manning's alleged leaking of a video showing the 2007 Apache helicopter attack in Iraq that killed a Reuters news photographer and his driver. The government says it was accidental.

The judge, Col. Denise Lind, also presided over the court martial in 2010 of Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, a doctor who was convicted of refusing to obey orders after refused to deploy to Afghanistan because he questioned whether President Barack Obama was born in the United States.

At the a preliminary hearing in December, military prosecutors produced evidence that Manning downloaded and electronically transferred to WikiLeaks nearly half a million sensitive battlefield reports from Iraq and Afghanistan, hundreds of thousands of diplomatic cables, and the video from the Army helicopter, which WikiLeaks dubbed "Collateral Murder."

Manning's lawyers countered that others had access to Manning's workplace computers in Iraq. They say he was in emotional turmoil, partly because he was a gay soldier while U.S. armed forces still barred gays from serving openly. The defense also claims Manning's apparent disregard for security rules during stateside training and his increasingly violent outbursts after deployment were red flags that should have prevented him from having access to classified material. They also contend that the material WikiLeaks published did little or no harm to national security.

In the December hearing at Fort Meade prosecutors presented excerpts of online chats found on Manning's personal computer that allegedly document collaboration between him and WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

___

Online:

Related interactive: http://apne.ws/sMZISz

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
FORT MEADE, Md. — An Army private declined to enter a plea Thursday to charges he engineered the biggest leak of classified information in U.S. history. Pfc. Bradley Manning also deferred a cho...
FORT MEADE, Md. — An Army private declined to enter a plea Thursday to charges he engineered the biggest leak of classified information in U.S. history. Pfc. Bradley Manning also deferred a cho...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 836
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
photo
John Eylar
Logic and Reason vs Republican lies
09:51 AM on 02/24/2012
The leaking of just one secrect level document can "bring serious harm to the United States of America". If that was true then leaking 700,000 of these secrect documents to the world America should have imploded by now. We live in a world where the rich and powerful hide behind the veil of national security any time they dont want to discuss something. Manning just exposed some of their dirty little secrects and now he will pay the price.
photo
special38x2
Live, Love, & Laugh
10:18 PM on 02/26/2012
Just a young, dumb kid too. What he did was wrong because of his position, they're going to hit him hard as it should be. I agree that some the veil of secrecy is creating some large issues for us to deal with, I guess it wouldn't be such a problem if we trusted those that we're paying to do the right things on our behalf. Kind of wonder if you could sue the Govt for defamation of character...namely the American public's...
09:12 AM on 02/24/2012
He took an oath. he broke that oath. He knowingly broke the laws of the United States. He deserves jail. I do not however see him as evil. He is just misguided and he knew the consequences and must suffer the penalty. He also put his fellow servicemen and women danger.
02:02 PM on 02/24/2012
While I agree with your sentiment what about all the politicians that take oaths and break them?

W got us into a war by his and all his cronies' lies. People were wiretapped illegally. Congressman on both sides of the aisle take bribes (most with impunity). Politicians frequent prostitutes (which is against the law in all but one state) and continue to serve without a single charge being brought against them.

Unfortunately in this country the scales are justice are horribly unbalanced.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:02 PM on 02/24/2012
HORRIBLY!
12:43 AM on 02/25/2012
perhaps this young man's attorney should have taken a page from Obama-rama's playbook:
"Your honor, what's past is past. Let's not look backward and accuse, let's just forget about all of this and move forward."
It worked for GW Bush.
05:47 PM on 02/25/2012
The following is a common derogatory comment from a US soldier and those who are supporting the military occupation of the Middle East. There are many citizens now who hold Manning to be a patriotic, "whistleblower," who deserves to be freed and praised for showing bravery against following unlawful orders. Which we will add is the ONLY real threat to our security as a nation. Please help stop the war propaganda.

Our comments follow the quotes.

"I am a US Soldier. I love how all these people, whose lives are not at stake by the actions of one, have these comments of courage and patriotism."

The kinds of crimes perpetrated by the military puts us, the citizens, in danger.

Just like the Soviet Union, Nazi's, imperialistic Japan, etc... (These are only examples of the past century) expanded their military presence in the name of patriotism and greater good, these institutions ultimately sunk their countries into sever depressions and civil revolution. As well as the incalculable wasted finite resources that could've been more intelligently used for the education and advancement of society as a whole.

It wasnt until they were stretched beyond their means, (debt) that they were humbled and dismantled.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
08:13 AM on 02/24/2012
I can understand how Bradley was attracted to Julian. It is hard for most to think Julian is straight.
04:23 AM on 02/24/2012
This man put our brother's and sister's at major risk of retaliation and exposure. War is about protecting each other until we make it back home again. The fact of this coward's heart and intention's to help the enemy and put our boys and girls at risk makes me sick! This New York Democrat has no mercy on politics, this man needs to be punished with life in prison.
photo
ThankGodhesgone
Always Progressive and loving the CONs meltdown.
06:28 AM on 02/24/2012
How did he put his brothers and sisters in danger? From what I have read, he only exposed statesmen comments about other statesmen.
08:02 AM on 02/24/2012
He dumped 700,000 classified documents on the internet without knowing what was in them. He is someone that deserves life behind bars.
photo
special38x2
Live, Love, & Laugh
10:23 PM on 02/26/2012
Some of the information I read was very disturbing assessments that could, in the wrong hands create problems.
09:50 AM on 02/24/2012
Would you like to share some evidence that his heart or intentions were to help the enemy or put our soldiers at risk? It seems like just the opposite, from everything that I've read:

"He said he hoped the material would lead to "worldwide discussion, debates, and reforms," and if not we're "doomed as a species...". He said the reaction to the Baghdad airstrike video had given him hope: "CNN’s iReport was overwhelmed ... Twitter exploded ..." He continued: "i want people to see the truth... regardless of who they are ... because without information, you cannot make informed decisions as a public."

(From his wikipedia page, the part about his private discussions with Adrian Lamo)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jrgilb0729
10:44 AM on 02/24/2012
I don't think that you understand how the military works. They don't need evidence to support or refute what his intentions were.

All they need is evidence that he violated the oath he took when he enlisted. The Uniform Code of Military Justice will take it from there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
independentvoter007
God bless America
01:42 AM on 02/24/2012
God can see into his soul, and Manning will be judged harshly in the fires of eternal damnation
photo
ThankGodhesgone
Always Progressive and loving the CONs meltdown.
06:35 AM on 02/24/2012
For what?
08:03 AM on 02/24/2012
Read the 22 charges aagainst him.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican. Liberalism = Liberty
08:43 AM on 02/24/2012
The measure you measure shall be measured upon you.

Who appointed you judge?
09:00 AM on 02/24/2012
Evidently, Manning appointed himself judge
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:17 PM on 02/23/2012
LONG LIVE WIKILEAKS.....
paul87920
Don't tread on you? Quit stomping on everyone else
10:08 PM on 02/23/2012
He should get the same treatment Dick Cheney got for the CIA leaks. No more. No less.
09:01 AM on 02/24/2012
What leaks from Cheney? Are you referring to Richard Armitedge?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ramirez
Taxpayer-American
08:41 PM on 02/23/2012
Democrats by and large consider Manning to be a whistleblower, patriot and hero. They should run him for public office if he walks on these charges.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
B Powell
Accurate fact trumps loud emotion, always.
02:54 AM on 02/24/2012
I'm a democrat, but as a former soldier, I understand that what he did was take intelligence from a secure US asset and make it available to the enemy. That is aiding the enemy, and is punishable by death in a time of war. He's getting off light as far as UCMJ is concerned.
photo
ThankGodhesgone
Always Progressive and loving the CONs meltdown.
06:35 AM on 02/24/2012
What did he provide the enemy?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican. Liberalism = Liberty
08:47 AM on 02/24/2012
This is similar to the Pentagon Papers. The court will not be able to make it stick that he gave such information to the enemy, and the prosecution will have to prove what information the enemy got and how they could not have gotten that information any other way - a near impossible task. The best they can do is his releasing classified information, and even there they will have to show exactly what he released was properly classified as documents used for coverups is not considered classified.
07:59 PM on 02/23/2012
"I make no pretension to patriotism. So long as my voice can be heard on this or the other side of the Atlantic, I will hold up America to the lightning scorn of moral indignation. In doing this, I shall feel myself discharging the duty of a true patriot; for he is a lover of his country who rebukes and does not excuse its sins. It is righteousness that exalteth a nation while sin is a reproach to any people. " - Frederick Douglass
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sophie M
ANTI WAR./animal rescue
07:37 PM on 02/23/2012
To me , it seems, that if others ..
had access to Bradley's computer.............the case against Bradley
should be thrown out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ramirez
Taxpayer-American
08:42 PM on 02/23/2012
Manning has to prove they have access to his passwords as well. He would also have to give some names.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
neighborhoodmole
no one really knows who anyone is here
10:56 PM on 02/23/2012
The passwords were posted on sticky notes on all the secure computers in the room. I'm not making this up.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sophie M
ANTI WAR./animal rescue
04:15 PM on 02/24/2012
HACKERS!
01:58 AM on 02/24/2012
They also have other direct evidence.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sophie M
ANTI WAR./animal rescue
07:24 PM on 02/23/2012
the problem with this whole case is Bradley's attorney (sucks)
and the FACT:
Bradley has been in solitary confinement for months on end. .
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sophie M
ANTI WAR./animal rescue
07:34 PM on 02/23/2012
well.i am glad they did advise..that Others........had access to Bradley's computer.
photo
TheMediaRanger
Pull over, buddy, let's see your poetic license
07:03 PM on 02/23/2012
If you really love your country, you gotta show the courage to expose war crimes and cover-ups when you become aware of them, and stand up when we're running off the rails. Otherwise, "American exceptionalism" is a cruel joke. As citizens of the US, we hold ourselves to a pretty high standard, and rightly so. Intentionally bombing civilians, war plans based on lies, waterboarding and torture in direct contradiction of Geneva accords that we've pledged ourselves to ... those are things that should embarrass and appall us. Heroes blow the whistle on that kind of B.S., and more heroes have their backs.

Free Bradley Manning.
07:53 PM on 02/23/2012
That's why the chain of command is in the military. They take care of their own. He just randomly sent out thousands of classified documents to soime mental fur ball. Assange or what ever the creeps name is And he released them just to get even with someone during a hissy fit, or maybe paid, we don't know everything.. If you come across something in the military that you know isn't right, then that's where your chain of command comes in. So your right about reporting things. But we that were in the military were taught how to go about that. And the way he did it was criminal. He may have gotten someones relative, or friend killed. Loose lips sink ships. Ever hear that phrase before?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Flint
just ignore him.
08:42 PM on 02/23/2012
You speak like somebody who wants military tyranny. I don't trust the military, and would NEVER trust them to admit wrongdoing. Vietnam, the pentagon papers, and the fact that the Gulf of Tonkin incident was faked are all too clear of examples of the huge flaws in your thinking.
Also, what ship sunk as a result of Manning?
This man was exposing war crimes, and the only people who were hurt are those who wanted to cover them up. The army knew they were killing entire innocent families on those raids, but nobody said anything about it until Bradley Manning did. The Iraqis knew people getting slaughtered on those raids, and people deserved to know the truth.
Manning told the truth, and the military was covering lies, which is why your theory is entirely flawed.
photo
TheMediaRanger
Pull over, buddy, let's see your poetic license
12:13 AM on 02/24/2012
The army already had poor credibility in that regard. The death by friendly fire of Cpl. Pat Tillman and subsequent cover-up in Afghanistan and the U.S. officially opened the door to mistrust and rogue action within the ranks. Though I don't think you meant it the way it came out, they certainly do take care of their own. And everyone knows there are many more cases than the ones we know about.

Really, the army has a major stake in portraying things one way, romanticizing death and battle, promoting Jessica Lynch as the female Rambo of Iraq, and all that nonsense. A country that allows its military that kind of latitude for tasteless behavior has no real grounds to cry foul when someone blows the whistle on institutionalized immorality.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
B Powell
Accurate fact trumps loud emotion, always.
03:04 AM on 02/24/2012
This isn't just about the Apache video. This is about the tens of thousands of documents unrelated to war crimes and cover ups that affect operations of the US all over the world. In addition, he supplied secure US intelligence to the public, which could be Al Qaeda, Taliban, or any other non coalition force, which is a black and white violation of article 104, aiding the enemy.
photo
TheMediaRanger
Pull over, buddy, let's see your poetic license
09:54 AM on 02/24/2012
Being aware of the tens of thousands of documents that affect operations of the US all over the world now, doesn't it make you pause and ask yourself what the hell we're doing trying to garrison the entire globe? Is it any surprise that the country finds itself in perpetual war, wasting real money, natural resources and, of course, young lives?

Besides, isn't there just a small element of the military, diplomatic and business community being upset about being exposed for their duplicitous, embarrassing and fraudulent behavior?
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
matilda81
07:02 PM on 02/23/2012
How did he aide the enemy? What real damage was caused by his leaking of information other than the damage to governmental leaders' egos?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thegreatdaveo
Mr. Puppers says:
07:24 PM on 02/23/2012
There was a lot of classified military information in there as well. Releasing that information and making it public puts our soldiers in the field at risk. Terrorist organizations read Wikileaks too.
photo
ThankGodhesgone
Always Progressive and loving the CONs meltdown.
06:43 AM on 02/24/2012
Such as?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican. Liberalism = Liberty
08:51 AM on 02/24/2012
Prosecution will have to show what information the terrorists got and that they could not have gotten that information elsewhere.

I suspect in the end there will be a plea bargain of some kind.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ramirez
Taxpayer-American
08:43 PM on 02/23/2012
It might take years to learn the extent of the damage, and the names of the lives lost.
photo
ThankGodhesgone
Always Progressive and loving the CONs meltdown.
06:44 AM on 02/24/2012
Why would it take years? Surely, if he had exposed those who lives have been lost, we would have heard about it by now, and the charges against him would include these.