iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Saki Knafo
GET UPDATES FROM Saki:

Child Poverty Jumps In Poor Areas By A Quarter Over Last Decade

Posted: 02/23/2012 12:56 pm Updated: 02/23/2012 12:56 pm

In the last decade, the number of children living in areas of concentrated poverty grew by 1.6 million, according to a new study released by the Annie E. Casey Foundation.

In 2000, 6.3 million children lived in high poverty areas in the United States, according to the report. By 2010, the number had climbed to 8 million, at a growth rate of about 25 percent.

The increase erases gains made in the 1990s, when the number of children living in high-poverty areas declined.

The study defined areas of concentrated poverty as census tracts where 30 percent of residents or more live below the government's poverty threshold, defined as an income of $22,000 or less for a family of four.

"We chose to look at this data because we know that regardless of the family's income, children who grow up in high-poverty communities are more likely to have their long-term outcomes be hampered by the community that they live in," said Laura Speer, the foundation's associate director for policy reform and data. "They have difficulty finding a good school, they're more like to struggle with getting access to good healthcare providers, they're more likely to be exposed to high levels of stress, and they're more likely to have social and behavioral problems because of that."

The study shows that certain children are more likely to live in areas of high poverty than others. They include children in cities or rural areas, as opposed to the suburbs, and children of color. African-American, American Indian and Latino children are six to nine times more likely than white children to live in high poverty areas.

The city with the highest rates of children living in areas of concentrated poverty is Detroit at 67 percent, followed by Cleveland and Miami. Mississippi, New Mexico, Louisiana, Texas and Arizona rank highest among states in this category.

The study also notes that three-quarters of children living in these neighborhoods have at least one employed parent.

As the federal government prepares a new budget for 2013, the report arguably has important implications for those deciding where to direct resources. Patricia Cole, the director of government relations for Zero To Three, an organization that advocates for policies that benefit young children and their families, said that neighborhood poverty is "of great concern" and could affect the country's future workforce.

"The developing brain is vulnerable to the damaging influences that you'd find in a poverty situation," she said. "The more deprived the neighborhood is, the less access to services, to parent health care, and to early childhood programs. Plus it's more likely to be a dangerous neighborhood, so there's more likely to be greater stress. Anything that increases the stress of young children and decrease their access to resources is going to be detrimental."

Earlier on HuffPost:

FOLLOW BUSINESS

In the last decade, the number of children living in areas of concentrated poverty grew by 1.6 million, according to a new study released by the Annie E. Casey Foundation. In 2000, 6.3 million chil...
In the last decade, the number of children living in areas of concentrated poverty grew by 1.6 million, according to a new study released by the Annie E. Casey Foundation. In 2000, 6.3 million chil...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 197
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
nothingchanges
too soon old, too late smart
03:28 PM on 02/25/2012
Well..........SOMEBODY has to PAY for those "tax cuts for the rich".

In America?

It's almost always those least able to protest........ or defend themselves.

Not a very flattering portrait...... but then.......... truth CAN be ugly

"Trickle Down Economics"....... Worked.

It's just that "money" wasn't the stuff that "trickled down",

and the vast majority of Americans have now become "pee-ons".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
medic628
02:34 PM on 02/25/2012
This why Newty wants to have poor children be jainitors.There will not be any schools so the children will be free to clean their condo's, mansions, office's.
01:22 AM on 02/25/2012
The top 1% have done pretty well the last 30 years.

The rest no so well.

The Republican party has always been the party of big business and billionaires.

It is time to vote all Republicans out of office and into the dust bin of history. They have done enough damage.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mombabytiger
Looking into the heart of an artichoke.
08:31 PM on 02/24/2012
I suspect that what follows will be a litany of blame. The Republicans don't care about the poor. Democrats want to continue the cycle of poverty because poor people depend on government handouts and so can be counted on to vote Democrat. The real answer? There isn't one. Children living in poverty is not news. It will always be so because poor people refuse to stop having children they cannot afford and expecting the rest of us to pick up the tab. Their poverty cannot be blamed on any political party. Any time I've had financial problems in my life, they were my fault. Why are these people "victims"?
11:52 AM on 02/25/2012
A general decline in the manufacturing sector is the antogonist in this story.

http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2012/manufacturing-overseas-competition-0224.html

When a factory leaves town a lot of people are left in the cold. Including children.
beachgrl3226
"What we've got here is failure to communicate"
12:45 AM on 02/27/2012
" ... because poor people refuse to stop having children they cannot afford and expecting the rest of us to pick up the tab. " What kind of elitist BS is that? The only people "entitled" to have children are people that can afford them? That will come as news to my Catholic parents who had 8 kids. THE ANSWER is quit pontificating about your fellow Americans and maybe do something to help, not the government, BUT YOU! A child that is living in poverty doesn't vote, can't work, has no control over whether they get a meal every day, and they can't post responses to you on comment boards on HuffPost. Jeez!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mombabytiger
Looking into the heart of an artichoke.
04:07 AM on 02/27/2012
Yep. Let's give yet another generation money for nothing. That will stop this cycle of poverty.Do you not understand that as long as we reward teenage girls for having babies, they will continue to have them. There's no downside for them. Stop paying them and see how many children are born into poverty. It's not elitist, it's common sense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sanders McGrillin
08:04 PM on 02/24/2012
America is doomed
it will not get any better
it will only decline more
all great civilizations come to an end
and it seems like we have started on that downward spiral
thank you GOP members that threw your own citizens under the bus, & then backed up over them again, only to throw it back in drive to do a burnout on the bodies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ipbron
Light-Warrior
05:15 PM on 02/24/2012
All red states
03:27 PM on 02/24/2012
Did this study check to see how many of these children are trying hard in school to better themselves?
safistikaytdlayd
Jesus is coming back, be ready!!!
06:02 PM on 02/24/2012
Sometimes it takes more than trying hard in school. Some of these children are in single parent homes where they barely see their parent because he/she is working double shifts or several jobs to support their child. Many times the teacher(who many times doesn't want to teach or doesn't care about the child, but just does it for the little bit of revenue), in their substandard buildings teaching antiquated information (ie books being published in 1975 or later). Some of these children have no type of encouragement at all. It takes a village to raise a child and without the proper encouragement, the right fostering, many of these young people are in risk of being another "statistic" If ALL politicians would put on their big boy pants and big girl panties, maybe some headway could be made. Maybe if companies would stop outsourcing jobs and bring work back, change could happen If the politicians would really concentrate all their negative energy into creating after school programs, mentoring programs, updating school books and curricula and parents could be more supportive, these stats will change. I believe they can and hope they will!
11:18 AM on 02/27/2012
You got that right. However, quit the blame game, I grew up in provity. I wanted more for myself. I can remember going to school during the winter months without a coat. That made me do more to get it for myself, not looking for handouts. Today's youths, the first thing you hear from them is: What are you going to give me? They come up with the idea that everything is free, and I don't have to do anything for it. A sence of entitlments. Who has the answers? Social programs has made our youths lazy, and that's the bottom line.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Winter Skye
Spiritual being not human doing
02:48 PM on 02/24/2012
The only way to break the cycle of poverty is to somehow implore teens of color that having sex (especially with inadequate birth control) will more than likely GUARANTEE that they will be trapped in the underclass. However, if they finish high school (no matter how inferior it may be compared to suburban ones), avoid getting caught up in the prison industrial complex, and go on to college (away from the 'hood), there is a good chance they can escape this fate!
09:55 PM on 02/24/2012
So not white teens, just teens of color?
09:01 AM on 02/24/2012
That is Obama's plan. Creates votes. Sad thing is the people living in that garbage will never fiqure out that they are there for a reason and being controlled by government dependency.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Karelh
When fact is fiction and TV reality
09:39 AM on 02/24/2012
So this all happen in two years? This presented data from 2000 to 2010. And exactly who was President then? And who controlled Congress for the majority of that time? You may not have to like Obama, but this isn't his doing, he may not be doing anything to fix it, but he didn't create it.
02:25 PM on 02/24/2012
The presented data is 2000 to 2010. The conditions didn't start under Bush, they were the result of the previous administrations policies as well. The fact is that none of these politicians (Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan, etc...) seem to be doing anything about stemming the time. Complacency by politicians is not the answer, and neither is throwing welfare money at the problem. Education, developing skills, building infrastructure so that companies want to move into those areas is the answer. Rewarding achievement and recognizing excellence so that people have goals to achieve gives people hope. No child left behind was one of the dumbest moves made by a president. Those who believed Obama's Hope and Change message also were bamboozled by his rhetoric. Yet, both sides in politics continue to play the sides against each other, while they continue to enjoy the power and be entertained by the plight of the unaware.
03:31 PM on 02/24/2012
We need to get of this president stuff and the blame game. Whatever happend to I want to do better for myself by doing for myself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ipbron
Light-Warrior
05:16 PM on 02/24/2012
I did not know Obama has been president since the year 2000
ewwthatsnasty
My micro-bio is as empty as your head.
07:37 PM on 02/24/2012
he wasn't elected yet but he was controlling the sitting presidents with his muslim powers using some illegal alien kenyan voodoo
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:08 AM on 02/24/2012
Workers' share of national income has been declining at least since 2001, per this 2006 article:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/28/business/28wages.html
Real Wages Fail to Match a Rise in Productivity - New York Times

"...In another recent report on the boom in profits, economists at Goldman Sachs wrote, “The most important contributor to higher profit margins over the past five years has been a decline in labor’s share of national income.” ..."

Now U.S. workers' share of national income is at an all-time low:

http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/PRS85006173
FRED« Nonfarm Business Sector: Labor Share

While corporate profits are increasing:

http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/CP
FRED« Corporate Profits After Tax

Mainly because of reduced wages and benefits:

"JPMorgan’s July 11 “Eye on the Market” newsletter put it, “Reductions in wages and benefits explain the majority of the net improvement in [profit] margins… US labor compensation is now at a 50-year low relative to both company sales and US GDP.”

In 2004, the Bush administra­tion stated that the offshoring of blue-colla­r AND white-coll­ar jobs would enrich the U.S. Link available upon request.

In 2011, the Obama administra­tion selected Jeff "I'm a nut on China" Immelt, GE's CEO, a high priest of the offshoring cult, to be the jobs czar.

This economy is a result of a bi-partisan effort by corporatist politicians, and their masters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AlanBannacheck
President of the Deep Thoughts Association (DTA)
12:47 AM on 02/24/2012
Our standard of living continues to decline, and this evidence points this out. As energy is becoming more expensive (at least oil and liquid fuels), everything else is too! This combined with the recession's net job loss and stagnant wages, paints a very ugly picture indeed. It's like "the scream" with a new background of fire and desperation.

But you and I can make a difference! You could easily befriend your neighbors, learn to share with your community, start a garden for food, and learn to live more independently from our industrial beast.
theaustralian
to the far left of right wing democrats
12:13 AM on 02/24/2012
well that is where republicans dump their unwanted unwed teenage daughters.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Karelh
When fact is fiction and TV reality
09:41 AM on 02/24/2012
don't forget pregnant too!
10:42 PM on 02/23/2012
A couple of things. It is obvious to all that more people are in poverty while obama's in charge than anyone else. It is clear obama's policies have greatly impacted the poor.

Second, it is clear that the Great Society programs of the 1960s have devastated families and ruined the lives of many. Great Society led to the breakdown of the American family.

I blame the democrat party for this. They are the ones who deserve to be thrown out of power forever for their bad policies. Libs, these are people's lives and not a college experiment.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Karelh
When fact is fiction and TV reality
09:48 AM on 02/24/2012
2000 to 2010, who was in power for the majority of that time? You are full of hot air. This has it roots in 80's and the so called Reagan revolution. Please name just one program that has been passed in the last 30 years in which the PRIMARY beneficiary was the average person?

Personally, I wish every democrat would step down, we'll give you wing nuts the reigns (again). And in 10 years after the country is in total ruins, put an end to this charade called conservatism, assuming there's something left and we're not in a state of total civil war and/or anarchy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcaunter
Profile: schizoid, INTJ
09:52 PM on 02/23/2012
Since poverty is increasing dramatically across the board in America, it does sort of make sense that more and more kids are growing up impoverished. There might even be a casual factor involved in there somewhere.
photo
pleasantlyny
Addie, Carole, Cynthia & Denise, for you we fight
09:51 PM on 02/23/2012
greatest country on earth that is blessed by god!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
looneydoone
not a "cookie"
03:56 PM on 02/24/2012
No substance, your comment is pure jingoism wrapped in a Chinese made flag, yellow ribbon "support our troops" magnet on the family car....and a "god" that only extends blessings on one country....