More

HuffPost Social Reading

Eddie Free, Voluntaryist, Tries To Thwart Falls Church Police

Eddie Free

First Posted: 02/23/2012 9:09 am Updated: 02/23/2012 11:02 am

FALLS CHURCH, Va. -- In Eddie Free's ideal world, the Falls Church roads he drives on his way to and from work would be privately owned.

Though the roads' owners might hire security to enforce whatever rules they decide to implement, there would be no police force paid for out of taxes -- in fact, there would be no taxes at all in Eddie Free's ideal world, because he thinks taxes are slavery -- and so there would be no police officers hiding out near intersections, waiting to give tickets to drivers who roll through stop signs.

But given that this is reality, there frequently are police officers hiding out near intersections in this Northern Virginia suburb. And as often as he can, Eddie Free thwarts them.

"I like to stand out at the stop signs," Free said one night, while out driving around in his black Land Rover. "Wave at people and make sure that they stop. I point at the police officer. That way I'm saving people from paying the state."

Eddie Free is a voluntaryist. Think of voluntaryists as extreme libertarians.

Many libertarians believe that the state, which is to say a government as we know it, should play some sort of limited role -- in national defense, in environmental regulations, or elsewhere.

Voluntaryists would do away with the state altogether. There would be no public roads, no public police force, no public education, no Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, no Congress, no courts, no gun laws, no seat belt laws. There would be no Treasury Department printing paper money. There would be no taxes. There would be no war. There would be no restrictions on interpersonal interactions.

"Whatever people are doing in the bedroom," he says. "I don't care. Keep the state out."

Polluters would still face penalties for polluting -- because their pollution would harm others' property, and those harmed would be able to sue. Money would exist insofar as people are willing to trade items of value. Disputes would be resolved by private arbiters. Roads would be built and maintained by entrepreneurs, who would set the terms of their use. Miscreants would be kept in check by wide firearm availability.

Free imagines this would be an "efficient society. Where all interaction is voluntary. No coercion."

A paralegal in the District of Columbia, Free says his job gives him insight into the dysfunction of the legal system. When he isn't at work, he is engaging in activism, trying to bring about the stateless world he'd like to live in.

That activism takes on a variety of forms, like not registering his gun, dancing at the Jefferson Memorial (which has a ban on dancing), or selling lemonade on the National Mall to protest the over-regulation of kids' lemonade stands.

On principle, Free does not vote -- though he's considered making an exception, in order to cast a ballot for Ron Paul.

The website Fr33 Agents rewards civil disobedience: one point for going to court to support another activist; one point for refusing to take a plea deal; one point for selling lemonade without a license.

Free will get 22 points when he leaves Virginia over the summer to move to New Hampshire, getting him closer to one of the site's prizes, like a video camera. He'll be joining the Free State Project, a whole community devoted to living out the small-state ideal in New Hampshire, itself a state with no seatbelt laws and no sales tax. The group has attracted 1,000 people so far, but aims to grow to 20,000 participants.

Free would like to continue protesting in New Hampshire. He also hopes to open a deer farm.

"I want to breed a really fine stock of elk and deer and charge people to hunt them," he says. "And then slaughter them as well, for meat."

A few more acts of civil disobedience are planned between now and the move, beyond watching for cops at stop signs.

One of those Northern Virginia cops recently caught Free going 20 miles over the speed limit. He'll have a court date soon, and he says he'd rather go to jail than pay a fine or take a plea.

He's also recently started putting coins into parking meters that are about to expire. He calls it "Robin Hooding."

"I'm just saving somebody from paying the state," he says. "And it's kind of a poke in the eye to authority."

After paying the meter, Free leaves a note on the helped car's windshield. The note doesn't have his name or contact information; it just says "You've been saved from a parking ticket." Along with the note, Free leaves some pamphlets that encourage the car's owner to consider joining the voluntaryist movement.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST DC

FALLS CHURCH, Va. -- In Eddie Free's ideal world, the Falls Church roads he drives on his way to and from work would be privately owned. Though the roads' owners might hire security to enforce what...
FALLS CHURCH, Va. -- In Eddie Free's ideal world, the Falls Church roads he drives on his way to and from work would be privately owned. Though the roads' owners might hire security to enforce what...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 338
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
madcityy
02:57 PM on 04/11/2012
right on bro
06:59 PM on 03/04/2012
"But given that this is[n't] reality,"

Choice foible.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
12:34 PM on 03/02/2012
If we just look back to how much government and regulation we had in 1791 when the Bill of Rights was ratified by the States of the Union we can see all that is really necessary in a "free state."
04:30 PM on 02/29/2012
Pretty good write-up. Don't really care for the "extreme libertarians" comparison though. I've heard people call libertarians "extreme republicans" in an insulting manner, so I don't think the average person would take that phrase positively.

"he says he'd rather go to jail than pay a fine or take a plea."
I guess we'll see in the record if he goes back on his word & ends up paying. Unfortunately, he can't follow the Shire (NH) activists example in VA by going to jail instead of paying. If he doesn't pay, he'll have his license suspended. If he gets caught driving in VA without a license, he can have his car taken away for up to 3 months & he'd have to pay the storage expenses to get it back. He would also face a year in jail and/or a fine of $2,500. If he ever did move to NH, he would not be able to get a license there, as long as it's suspended in VA. Meanwhile his fine will accrue interest and will eventually be sent to collection. If he decided to get his license back, he would not only have to pay the ENTIRE fine (including any interest), but also a reinstatement fee to the DMV.

Anyway, I know we've had our differences, but I'm proud he's doing good. He's come a long way from his "anti-immigration" activism and his dv plea deal a few years back. Hopefully, he continues following the non-aggression principles.
12:41 PM on 03/01/2012
You sure know how to take a good thing and make it disgusting. How do you get off diggin through people's past (before they even knew what morality and the NAP are) and then lying about what you found?

You know that you've had your differences in the past, but then you continue to do creepy stuff like this. Why did you even comment on this Ingrid? You should heed your own advice... part of the NAP involves leaving people alone.

Ostracization has proven to be incredibly difficult with people like you who just will not go away.

I guess this is to be expected from the comment section in a HuffPo article on Voluntaryism. GTFO!
01:26 PM on 03/02/2012
Why did I comment? I saw the article linked on fb and felt like writing about what would really happen if he didn't pay. How is this violating the NAP? This is a news site and "free speech" is allowed here. I don't know why you are twisting what I said into something negative. Both are on the web. And he's talked about the same things on Free Talk Live in front of thousands when he did the "co-host" thing, yet when I make a comment it's "disgusting." Go figure.

I stand by what I said. Yes, we've had our differences and we've both said and done things we shouldn't have. But I don't hate him. Resentment is unhealthy. I am glad he is doing well and it is inspiring.
02:01 PM on 03/01/2012
Move on Ingrid, I dont want anything to do with you. Your just making yourself look even more desperate and pathetic than you already are. :(
Philimanjaro
Hate is law in the two-party system.
01:06 AM on 02/28/2012
Here's the points of voluntaryism and libertarianism that the haters tend to miss:

I'm not obligated to interact with, trade, or like you. I never consented to such a contract. As a rational human being, I'm allowed to make choices- as long as those choices don't prevent you from doing the same. I'm not your slave, and you're not mine. If you have something I want or need, I will voluntarily offer to do business with you. You cannot force me to buy something I have no interest in.
It is *always* morally wrong to initiate force against another human being. It isn't right to kidnap, kill, maim, or steal from me, even if it is done under the "authority" of a state and executed with armed goons. I'm a person. You're a person. Lets treat each other like people.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ItsBarranti
12:16 PM on 02/29/2012
I fail to see how that is different than what we have now, except that we have a system that has the teeth to back up those requirements and with the consent of the governed, punish those who violate the rules, where voluntaryism is kind of light on who is going to actually enforce those rules.
Philimanjaro
Hate is law in the two-party system.
03:03 PM on 02/29/2012
Its almost the polar opposite. Our system steals. Our system forces you to buy things. It forces you to refrain from certain specified non-violent and personal actions. It kidnaps you and puts you in a cage or steals from you if you refuse to buy its permits or give it money. It mandates its own definition of morality by refusing people their ability to make non-violent choices (Drug use, prostitution, un-registered business/transaction, etc). It steals your land and livelihood for things it deems necessary. It forces me to trade and deal with people that maybe I don't want to trade with for any specified number of reason.

And when did we consent to be governed? When did I consciously sign the social contract? Did I tacitly agree to be ruled over when I was born?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SteagleCobEagle
07:21 PM on 02/25/2012
"One of those Northern Virginia cops recently caught Free going 20 miles over the speed limit. He'll have a court date soon, and he says he'd rather go to jail than pay a fine or take a plea....

"I'm just saving somebody from paying the state," he says. "And it's kind of a poke in the eye to authority.""

Where does he think funding for jails come from? It's like the people who are on welfare and Medicare who adamantly deny they accept federal funds.
09:17 PM on 02/26/2012
Umm, he doesn't support the whole system of cops enforcing traffic laws. Why would he support the funding of public jails? He is just saying that if it comes to it, he would rather go to jail than pay them. If one in fifty people took his kind of stand, we could effect enormous change.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dennydorite
To Serve Man--A Cookbook
09:09 AM on 02/24/2012
"Eddie Free is a voluntaryist. Think of voluntaryists as extreme libertarians."
No, think of them as people who never grew up. A form of arrested development where adolescent rebellion is a badge of honor.
In the event you have a car wreck or your house catches fire, Eddie, call on your voluntaryist buds to lend you a hand.
I hope you're wealthy enough to pay full cost of your "private" roads and body guards and all of the other things we collectively pay for. How much do you think a gallon of gas would cost if you had to pay a private army and navy to protect the oil it's made from?
No? Never thought that far?
Didn't think so.
09:37 AM on 02/24/2012
You seem to be full of ad hominem attacks and utterly stale objections that you apparently believe are novel.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dennydorite
To Serve Man--A Cookbook
04:12 PM on 02/24/2012
Hit a nerve did we?
03:57 PM on 02/25/2012
Most people have insurance for the event of a car wreck or if their house catches fire. The government won't pay to fix those things.

If we won't have to pay to keep non-violent victim-less criminals in prison by your current "body guards", you will have extra money left over after you pay a private security firm.

We are wealthy enough to pay a violent monopoly (your government) for the full cost of your state run roads, we are forced to pay them, even when they waste money. I think we can afford to pay for mutually owned roads in a voluntary society, it will cost a lot less.

Yes. I've thought that far, apparently you haven't.
08:45 AM on 02/24/2012
what about the old public roads? in this world, would private companies buy them from the states?

there might be some problems with that. what if there are no private companies willing to run such a business? moreover, if there was a monopoly or oligopoly on the road system, there's no doubt that the costs to drive on the roads (fees, fines, etc.) will be marched higher.

more-moreover, private companies aren't publicly elected officials. so the public would have little to no leverage over the decisions made about the roads. if that was the case, wouldn't people want the government to regulate the private companies to protect them. and at that point, doesn't it seem worth it to just let the government take care of the roads for us?
09:23 AM on 03/01/2012
No private companies willing to run such a business? When has that EVER happened? When has a group of people ever said, "Hey, we can make a lot of money on this, but we just don't FEEL like it." Not never. There would be companies sprouting up left and right just dying for a piece of those sweet sweet roads.
photo
Gunfighter
Husband, father, follower of Christ, lawman.
07:18 AM on 02/24/2012
Voluntaryist. Libertarian. Utopianist.... call them what you wish, they aren't much more than anarchists, and that isn't good.
09:28 AM on 02/24/2012
Voluntaryism is not utopian. There are always going to be problems, the question is how can we reduce conflict as much as possible. The means do not justify the ends.

And then the "anarchist" boogeyman comes out. Yay.
09:29 AM on 02/24/2012
ends do not justify the means*
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Godweiser
The eyes have it.
06:28 AM on 02/24/2012
This system is still akin to other utopian schemes in that it ignores human nature. Sooner or later, someone with enough people following them, armed to the teeth, will impose a new and cruder order whether people like Mr. Free like it or not. Human nature hasn't changed much since the start of civilization and the beginning of written history -- you can pick up something by Thucydides or Tacitus and instantly relate to the frustrations and hurdles that society faces today, because not much has honestly changed.
09:32 AM on 02/24/2012
Voluntaryism is based on human nature, and doesn't claim a utopian world. It's about conflict reduction. You're right, human nature hasn't changed, we're still self-interested, acting individuals.
09:39 AM on 02/24/2012
Human nature hasn't changed... yet we still abolished slavery.

Hmm...
02:29 AM on 02/24/2012
They used to call people with that belief system "anarchists."

I guess these guys think that has too many negative connotations?
02:50 AM on 02/24/2012
Sort of. Thanks to a system of indoctrination began by the English in the 16th century, the term anarchy tends to make some people think of chaos and lawlessness. Anarchy simply means without rulers.

The English called Revolutionaries 'anarchists' as an epithet in the late 18th century as well, though that couldn't have been further from the truth.

When you think of an anarchist or voluntaryist, think of any person on the street, because that's what we are. We don't carry ball bombs and wear balaklavas.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
J Owen Williams
My micro-bio is empty
01:56 AM on 02/24/2012
"Whatever people are doing in the bedroom," he says. "I don't care. Keep the state out."
Really? Sex offenders and children together in the bedroom is okay with you?
02:52 AM on 02/24/2012
Of course not. A child cannot make an informed and mature decision on his or her own. There is no voluntary contract in such a case.
02:44 AM on 02/28/2012
Ok Jim...the robotic cold response to that honest question was a little unnerving...I wouldn't be able to answer it but I sure as hell wouldn't state the obvious as debate or the answer. I like some voluntaryist philosophies but I keep seeing people give the same spontaneous robotic responses to people's questions. Some just jump down the curious' throats. I really wish life was so cut and dry sometimes but it just isn't. I'm all for the ol' "take 'em out back of the wood shed" in a case of child abuse or rape, but aside from a private security force, there would need to be investigators and "social workers" of some sort right? Otherwise a lot of these types of very serious crimes would go unnoticed. I'd love to see a statist mentality free world and I'm sure a lot of the ones with questions would to. But the robotic references back to the basics of voluntaryism is a turn off for a lot of people.
10:53 PM on 03/01/2012
Nope. I would certainly want any security force in my community to investigate and stop such crimes against children, and I'd bet most of my neighbors would too.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ursasr
11:38 PM on 02/23/2012
there would be no civilization, so we would be back to cave dwellers. fanatics jusu ignore what would hurt their fantasty
02:54 AM on 02/24/2012
My fantasy involves a world where people can read and write, spell correctly, and use punctuation so they don't look like a blathering simpleton. Voluntaryism is not a time machine. The buildings and roads won't disappear. People won't forget how to build or produce things.
10:54 PM on 03/01/2012
Right, because the state=society.

You get a gold star on your third grade public school civics test.
10:33 PM on 02/23/2012
Sounds like a great world! I'd prefer a monopolistic corporation whose responsibilities to a select group of share holders taking my freedom is WAY better than the government doing it.
03:27 AM on 02/24/2012
The state is a monopoly (on the use of force/law/final arbitrator) funded via coercion. Monopoly initially was a word to describe state sanctioned priviliege.

"Corporations" as we know them today are state-chartered legal fictions with special privileges. The state then becomes an avenue to create barriers to entry through regulation which protects those who lobby to their advantage. Cartels and monopolies are not stable on a voluntary market. The state forces itself to "stabilize" through the threat of violence, but ultimately it too is destined to collapse.
10:56 PM on 03/01/2012
Not at all. I'd oppose such a corporation every bit as much as the state.

In fact, the current federal government is effectively exactly what you're describing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ddanimal
10:27 PM on 02/23/2012
You have to admit-the guy has got a point.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ursasr
11:39 PM on 02/23/2012
yesa pointed head.
05:20 AM on 02/24/2012
meesa laugh that sound like poopoo head. oh ani, yousa so funnee.
photo
Gunfighter
Husband, father, follower of Christ, lawman.
07:21 AM on 02/24/2012
Not really. Utopianism is pointless.
09:41 AM on 02/24/2012
So is asserting a confused position.