More

HuffPost Social Reading

Rich Americans More Often Watch Mansions Fall Into Foreclosure

The Huffington Post  |  By Posted: 02/23/12 12:51 PM ET  |  Updated: 02/23/12 12:51 PM ET

Rich Foreclosure

Growing numbers of rich Americans are welcoming the foreclosure crisis into their homes.

Default rates for the nation's most expensive properties have jumped since 2007, CNN reports, with foreclosures of homes worth $2 million or more now accounting for a larger share of all foreclosure activity nationwide than in previous years.

As with the millions of other properties that have slid into default since the housing crash, these homes have experienced a precipitous drop in value, suddenly leaving their occupants with a lot less wealth. Sliding into foreclosure could also hurt the neighbors -- properties that are occupied, but in foreclosure, drive down neighboring home values twice as much as vacant properties, a recent study found.

But as one analyst explains to CNN, many working- and middle-class Americans experienced foreclosure because they simply ran out of money. By contrast, in wealthy communities like Beverly Hills, homeowners are turning to foreclosure because they owe more on their homes than what they're worth, and so going into default makes the most financial sense.

"You feel like a sucker if you’re paying a $5 million mortgage on a house that's worth $2 million," Zar Zanganeh, a Las Vegas broker, told Bloomberg last year. "These days, there are no traditional sales."

This practice of walking away from a mortgage, known as a strategic default, has become more common among the wealthy and other financially-savvy homeowners.

"Strategic defaults can be an even bigger issue with higher-end homes... because the borrowers may be more financially shrewd and consider it a financial decision to walk away from the home," RealtyTrac's Daren Blomquist explained to Forbes.

This housing strategy, increasingly common among the rich and which some argue often have a deleterious effect on the surrounding neighborhoods, is just one example of how the weak economy is drawing increasingly clear distinctions between those Americans equipped to deal with hard times and those for whom the downturn is proving disastrous. While the recession and slow recovery have touched nearly everyone in the country in some way, the effects have been far from uniform.

The nation's highest earners are drawing a smaller share of income now than they were a few years ago, for example, but they're still light-years ahead of the average taxpayer when it comes to net worth. The American wealth gap didn't get narrower during the recession -- rather, things are now more unequal than ever, with the gulf between the rich and poor at its most pronounced level in generations.

While nearly half the country lives paycheck to paycheck, with not enough in the bank to cover even one financial emergency, luxury spending among the well-heeled set has proceeded apace. And the wealthy even have their own ways of seeking out quick cash: Certain pawnshops that cater to the affluent will accept jewels, wine and fine art as collateral for loans, according to Reuters.

Also on HuffPost:

Contribute to this Story:
FOLLOW BUSINESS

Growing numbers of rich Americans are welcoming the foreclosure crisis into their homes. Default rates for the nation's most expensive properties have jumped since 2007, CNN reports, with foreclos...
Growing numbers of rich Americans are welcoming the foreclosure crisis into their homes. Default rates for the nation's most expensive properties have jumped since 2007, CNN reports, with foreclos...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 49
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siebenstein
99% -Don't do what they tell you !
03:00 AM on 03/13/2012
Let the banks eat it !!!!!!!!!!!!

Good.
05:57 AM on 02/27/2012
You could walk away or you could live free for 2 to three years save the cash and by the time housing prices have cratered which it will. You will be able to purchase the same house for cash. And you our out of the 30 year debt slavery trap. That's the only way to get back at the 1%
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siebenstein
99% -Don't do what they tell you !
02:59 AM on 03/13/2012
You will not be able to buy that same house or any other house for about 7 years because a foreclosure is like a bancruptcy.
05:55 AM on 02/27/2012
s
01:58 PM on 02/24/2012
Wow, isn't this moral hazard? Why don't they have to fullfill their obligations? Shouldn't they feel bad about this?

I guess the propaganda of the banks and politicans is not working too well.
01:51 PM on 02/24/2012
Our government has promoted home ownership for a long time. The benefits of tax deductible mortgages (worth 10x as much on a $1,000,000 house as on a $100,000 one), capital gain roll over, capital gain exclusion etc.. These indirectly benefit real estate brokers, banks, developers and local governments by supporting higher valuations than would otherwise be the case. Few other countries offer this type of subsidy. And look how much of the administrations energy is being directed at increasing housing costs. Keeping interest rates at nearly zero, savaging savers (many older and retired) in order to increase the prices of housing. We are repeating the mistakes of the past.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:12 AM on 02/24/2012
For those interested in the facts, read the following. It is a tidy summary of the havoc visited upon our nation at the hands of the sainted "progressives" Carter, Clinton et.al.

http://www.city-journal.org/html/10_1_the_trillion_dollar.html

Once again: "There is no free lunch".
photo
onwisco
all the facts left uncovered
06:16 AM on 02/24/2012
So people who can pay for their mistakes but it doesn't make financial sense are getting away with this? There needs to be legislation on this fast! These are not the same people all over the nation having trouble with their homes. These millionaires can simply move elsewhere and not have a problem. Something needs to be done.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:14 AM on 02/24/2012
Ahem. "Progressive" legislation (The Community Reinvestment Act), is what started the nation down the slippery slope.

http://www.city-journal.org/html/10_1_the_trillion_dollar.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:05 AM on 02/25/2012
I find it revealing that a hefty dose of truth does not elicit any "witty" retorts from the "progressives".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
Better to die fighting, than live on knees
07:07 PM on 02/23/2012
this is easy. Rich can do what they want. Why? Firstly, the banks will still loan them money. If you have 10 million in the bank and want to borrow 2 million, the banks will hand it to you with a big smile, even if you just finished walking out from under another property with the same bank for the same amount of money. Why? Cause your rich!!
The rich who do this dont look at things as right or wrong. Just does it make me money, or cost me money. That is their , right and wrong , moral meter.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
J T K
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
05:31 PM on 02/23/2012
I don't begrudge anyone strategically defaulting because it is a business decision. That being said it is hypocritical to call lower home values unfair when at the same time being one of the people who would cheer an upward shift in home prices, you can't have it both ways. You don't have to like losing home value but you can't call it unfair.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
J T K
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
05:27 PM on 02/23/2012
These realtor vs anti-realtor threads are always fun. It was Frank's turn to bring the nachos and RAL's turn to bring the beer right? Who brought the popcorn?
05:32 PM on 02/23/2012
Hey I know RAL from Ben's!
05:17 PM on 02/23/2012
The large quantity of highly leverage empty housing inventory on the high end is pushing all the other prices lower.

What a mess.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jen Celli
Done sitting and watching quietly.
05:07 PM on 02/23/2012
Sadly many of the middle class will deplete all of their liquid assets in an attempt to hold onto their home. Once they've lost all their cash and have nothing left to move on with, they finally have to face the loss. By then they have very little in the way of finances to make the move less traumatic and costly. The rich understand that it's a business decision that they are making. They will never plunder their capital reserves in a failed bid to maintain an asset they can replace at will. If most Americans were able to remove the emotion from the process and make a strictly business decision, they'd opt for a strategic default and use their cash to move forward into the next phase of life. You can relocate or seek a better environment when you have the choice and that means capital. Use your money to make your life better; do not give it to the banks, they don't care about you and yours.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:47 PM on 02/23/2012
Let's face it: whether you owe $5 million on a house that's now worth $2 million, or you owe $500,000 on a house that's now worth $200,000, in the eyes of "what a willing buyer would actually pay a willing seller right now," then what you are looking at right now is ...

... nothing.

That's right: Nothing.

Specifically: $3 million dollars' "worth" (sic...), or $300,000 "worth" (sic...) of ...

... money that does not exist anymore.

Therefore, the conditions of the security-contract that was originally entered to, have changed so radically that, even though both of you (say...) entered into it in good faith at the time, it no longer makes sense. The collateral, quite literally, is no longer there. Naturally your creditor does not want to take the hit. They bet against you, of course, and they don't want to lose that bet. But, "c'est la guerre."

This is exactly what the entirety of the Bankruptcy code is all about. It's also why mortgage loans are secured, supposedly, by real property. Sometimes, through no fault of either party and no wrongdoing by either party ("a-hem...") tomorrow is just radically different from what you expected yesterday. And you don't have to go to, or through, debtor's prison for that.
02:20 PM on 02/23/2012
Tens of millions of people were suckered into paying inflated prices for what is always a depreciating asset, a house in this case.

Now prices are cratering and there is no way for these people to recover financially.

The answer? Walk away.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Republican = FAIL
02:45 PM on 02/23/2012
Did you lose another account that quickly??

You've had so many it makes my head spin.
02:51 PM on 02/23/2012
Did you lose another $10,000 on your depreciating house this month?

You're losses are so great your head is spinning.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jkkFL
microbio refusé, je vous refusez
03:33 PM on 02/23/2012
You go Frank! Your comment was exactly what I was going to say.
faved-already fanned.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IndyFem
02:59 PM on 02/23/2012
Tell this to those that made huge profits in the real estate market BEFORE the banks' scheme came into play....
AND...
Tell that to the savy Investors that are scooping up bargain priced properties today....and will make a killing down the road.
03:34 PM on 02/23/2012
"Savvy investors" eh? lmao.

You reaItors truly are corrupt. Characterizing clueless speculators as "investors" and further suggesting that prices will go up in our life time?

When will you reaItors ever get honest with the public?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jkkFL
microbio refusé, je vous refusez
03:35 PM on 02/23/2012
.. don't feed That One..
IWantTofu
Evolution. Now a political position.
01:51 PM on 02/23/2012
You can't refinance if the home is worth less than the mortgage you are trying to get. Why do they get a mortgage? Because you can use the leverage. For example, the stock market is up 30% since President Obama took office. Rather than using cash to pay for all of your home, you can have a $1 million mortgage, paying 4% interest/year, and having gone up 30% which would be 18% or $180,000 you would not otherwise have had.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:54 PM on 02/23/2012
Yes, and that would have been an extremely wise use of your money, because the amount of money that you actually paid, over the portion of time that you wished to occupy the house, would be much less than otherwise and the cash flow would have been good.

But ... that naturally leads to gambling-induced "hyper valuation" because no one really wants to think that what goes up must come down.

Banking institutions that were =only= banking institutions, as Glass-Steagall once so wisely mandated, would have naturally checked those tendencies. But institutions that could take those loans, package them as "securities," sell the same "mortgage backed" (sic...) security a hundred times in a row, and on top of that, sell the sucker "credit-default swap" insurance (sic...) that was actually issued by the same conglomerate ... in so doing tied =themselves= into a web of Folly from which they cannot extricate themselves, no matter how many billions of dollars (sic...) they now pay out in bribes to equally-gullible government officials.

If you default on your loan, word's eventually going to get out that those "mortgage backed" thingies are the Emperor's clothes.

Bankers desperately fear what they know to be: inevitably, their Doom.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
webnova
and Justice for All
04:39 PM on 02/23/2012
When I found out that my note went as a security and no assignments were recorded, I STOPPED PAYING my mortgage. Screw those who think they are going to steal my money (Bank of America) and now SLS of Colorado. Threaten me all you want ... I have not walked away from my Arizona Home as many did and I have been living rent free for 3 and a half years now. No one legally owns my home by any standard but ....ME. I find it strange that those who left their homes over 2 years ago still are empty. Except one of my friends who walked away from his home and was never foreclosed on, NEVER, yet the home was sold on the market. Can you say STOLEN HOME .... someone bought a home that the bank actually stole. How can you close the books if the person was never foreclosed on? This just happened in the past 2 months.