More

HuffPost Social Reading
Elise Foley
GET UPDATES FROM Elise:

GOP Debate: Rick Santorum Thrashed By Ron Paul, Mitt Romney Team-Up

Posted: 02/23/12 12:02 AM ET  |  Updated: 02/26/12 09:33 PM ET

Gop Debate

MESA, Ariz. -- Rick Santorum received another lesson Wednesday on why it's not easy to be at the top. With strong poll numbers in Michigan and Arizona, the two upcoming primaries, Santorum faced a barrage of attacks during the debate here from fellow front-runner Mitt Romney and his unlikely ally, Ron Paul.

"He's fake," Paul said of Santorum early in CNN debate, hosted by John King. "I think his record's so bad as a politician."

That became a theme of the attacks over the course of the debate. Romney took shots at Santorum, but in many instances Paul went after him harder, questioning his leadership and small-government bona fides.

In Arizona and Michigan next Tuesday, the race is effectively down to Romney and Santorum -- something of an embarrassment for Romney, given his longstanding ties to Michigan. He has played up those ties with commercials about growing up in Michigan when his father was governor. Santorum, though, has a good chance to take the primary there, and the Romney campaign has responded by attempting to dial-down expectations, although that doesn't mean the two were any less testy during the debate.

The four men sat at a table, rolling their eyes and shrugging with annoyance as other candidates mentioned them. That gave the debate a more contentious feel, with numerous jabs back and forth. "You're entitled to your opinion, but you're not entitled to misrepresent the facts," Santorum told Romney during a discussion of congressional earmarks. "I've heard that line before," Romney said, waving his hand dismissively.

Santorum, bruised by repeated attacks led by Paul, suggested to reporters after the debate that Romney and Paul may be colluding against him.

"You have to ask Congressman Paul and Governor Romney what they've got going together. Their commercials look a lot alike and so do their attacks," Santorum said in the spin room.

Romney strategist Stuart Stevens brushed off the idea that Paul would intentionally help Romney on stage. "I read the stuff and I laugh," he said of the implication the two men are allies. "I think they like each other,"

"One thing you have to say about Ron Paul: at any given moment he is always true to himself and says whatever he believes," Stevens told reporters in the spin room. "At any given moment, (he) calls them like he sees them."

Still, that often boiled down to Paul going after Santorum, and almost never attacking Romney. He dealt one blow on No Child Left Behind, former President George W. Bush's education reform bill that Santorum voted for and now opposes.

"You know, politics is a team sport, folks," Santorum said. "And sometimes you've got to rally together and do something. And in this case, you know, I thought testing was -- and finding out how bad the problem was wasn't a bad idea."

That led Paul to question Santorum's leadership and to insist he is a Washington insider, a message candidates have been trying to pin on Santorum as his campaign gains steam.

"He calls it a team sport," Paul said of Santorum. "He has to go along to get along and that's the way the team plays. But that's what the problem is with Washington. That's what's been going on for so long."

Paul later insisted that some of Santorum's policies would amount to more government interference, not less. Santorum defended voting for Title X, which provides federal funding for family planning, by saying he also supported Title XX for abstinence education in schools.

"John, this demonstrates the problem I'm talking about," Paul told moderator King. "It's not a program of the federal government to get involved in our lives this way. ... The government shouldn't be spending money on abstinence -- don't see that in the Constitution anyplace."

Romney focused some attention on Santorum for his support for then-Sen. Arlen Specter, who switched from a Republican to a Democrat. Romney said Santorum is essentially to blame for the passage of "Obamacare," the president's health care reform law, because he supported Specter.

But Santorum struck back. He said he backed Specter because Specter chaired the Judiciary Committee and ultimately helped confirm the appointments of Supreme Court Justices John Roberts and Samuel Alito.

Romney called that explanation "torturous."

"Just about as torturous as six years later blaming me for Obamacare," Santorum quipped.

Contribute to this Story:
FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
MESA, Ariz. -- Rick Santorum received another lesson Wednesday on why it's not easy to be at the top. With strong poll numbers in Michigan and Arizona, the two upcoming primaries, Santorum faced a ba...
MESA, Ariz. -- Rick Santorum received another lesson Wednesday on why it's not easy to be at the top. With strong poll numbers in Michigan and Arizona, the two upcoming primaries, Santorum faced a ba...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,399
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (35 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
larmarch5 01:40 PM on 02/23/2012
Rick, why shouldn't individuals check e-verify before hiring a domestic worker? How many people who hire domestic workers don't have access to a computer? There are only two reasons to not require ALL employers to use e-verify: 1. Illegal employment so that the employer doesn't have to pay the employee's SS (leaving the rest of us stuck with THAT bill) and 2. Allow individuals to pay very low wages, extract  Read More...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Tao-Chan
Making you feel smug & superior since 1949
09:42 AM on 02/25/2012
Larry, Moe, Curly Joe and Shemp.
Slapstick comedy without mallets on the head.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bill Edelman
Writer. Progressive
03:53 PM on 02/24/2012
This GOP nominating process reminds me of professional wrestling, many years ago, when my dad thought it was real. Even though the slow-motion replay showed conclusively that no forearm smash to the chest ever landed and the "aggressor" was making the contact sound with his other hand against his thigh, dad was a True Believer. Even when the good guy became a bad guy for a few weeks and then became a good guy again, he couldn't see that it was all staged. These guys did beat up on each other, but any real damage was phony. Guys used hidden razor blades to cut their foreheads to make their faces bloody. Same thing here. Santorum is the king of the hill and the other boys are trying to knock him off. And the True Believers eat it up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bill Edelman
Writer. Progressive
03:46 PM on 02/24/2012
Now it's Santorum's turn to play soup-bone while the other puppies grapple over him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TomDegan
Author of "The Rant": http://www.tomdegan.blogspot
12:45 PM on 02/24/2012
This is a party destroyed. Unless and until they rehabilitate themselves by disposing of the criminals, crooks and crazy people who hijacked the GOP a generation ago, George W. Bush will be remembered as the last Republican president.

http://www.tomdegan.blogspot.com

Tom Degan
heronpoint
My micro-bio is empty
12:18 AM on 03/10/2012
If Shrub could be remembered as the last republican president I would be very happy and feel much better about my child 's future
Typed from my iPhone is there a tutorial?
09:26 AM on 02/24/2012
Ron Paul/Andrew Napolitano 2012
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bunty4321r
war veteran
05:19 AM on 02/24/2012
The four are fighting have a bite on the same apple but wants to be the first to bite even at the peril each others life. The American audience would be more than happy if all four are doomed and are barred form taking part in Presidential election.

They ask "Can't that happen in the greater interest of the American Nation? "
mijjy
Read, Be Aware, Prepare
10:31 PM on 02/23/2012
Mr. Santorum graces Bowling Green, Ohio, tomorrow. Arranged by Rep. Bob Latta, (R), he makes an appearance at a Lincoln Day dinner fund raiser for the party at the state university. Oh, of even better interest: the keynote speaker? Mr. Grover Norquist himself.

Maybe Mr. Santorum will re-align with some more mojo - considering who'll be hob-nobbing with whom....

I look forward to local coverage, and tell everyone to pay attention to Mr. Santorum's comments the following day. They could prove enlightening.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anteos
Time for a new paradigm
08:18 PM on 02/23/2012
http://meta-global.blogspot.com/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jgelling
05:48 PM on 02/23/2012
I can't imagine how the Paulbots could look at last night's debate and not see what an obvious shill Ron Paul has become for the Romney campaign. Pretty much every step of the way Paul has torn down each of Romney's leading opponents in turn. I don't know if Romney promised him his Fed audit or a job for Rand or if Paul has just always been an eccentric tool of the Republican establishment, but it became painfully obvious last night.

The entire Republican field is a disgrace, of course, but I had slightly more respect for him when I thought of Ron Paul as just an out of touch libertarian. He's obviously just a tool with a different thread, though.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
truly moderate
Reform Party, a third way
09:49 PM on 02/23/2012
Ron Paul's budget was reported by a NON PARTISIAN group as the ONLY true conservative budget. A tool? His budgetary ideals are dramatically different from Obama and Romney.....and substantially different from Newt and Santorum.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jgelling
08:38 AM on 02/24/2012
Um, his budget ideas involve gutting our military, R&D, health, and education budgets and letting people starve. They're balanced assuming any Congress would be insane enough to approve such draconian measures, which will never happen.

More importantly, Paul won't run third party and won't attack Romney on the eve of him cinching the nomination. By attacking Santorum before Michigan, Paul's assured Romney the Republican nod. It's a simple fact, however you want to spin it. Paul helped secure the nomination for Romney, for his own purposes. Not for "liberty"...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bill Edelman
Writer. Progressive
03:56 PM on 02/24/2012
And not of the real world. I always figured he was on MIB's watch list...
11:42 PM on 02/23/2012
It's strategy to win. Attacks against the weaker candidate which is Santorum. Why attack Romney now? That only helps in keeping Santorum and Gingrich in the race, because Romney has consistently gotten high numbers and leads in delegates. Gingrich is gone, soon to drop out, but Santorum needs to be obliterated. Once he drops out, trust me, Paul has plenty of money saved to tell the truth about Romney.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jgelling
08:39 AM on 02/24/2012
If Santorum loses Michigan, Romney is 100% the Republican nominee. Without a doubt. The only reason Paul would attack Santorum now... In ads in Michigan no less, is because he's doing the bidding of the Republican establishment. There's no other explanation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mateo Smith
ANTIDILLUSIONALIST
05:38 PM on 02/23/2012
Poles show after last night's debate that Republicans are increasingly frustrated with the field of far-right candidates. I find it ironic that they were the ones, in the Republican primaries, who voted for the four horsemen and put them on that stage. Essentially they fell for the big-money rap the Koch Bros, Adelson and Romney stuffed them with on prime time TV between segments of "Reality Shows".
But they knew this would happen. Didn't they?
05:30 PM on 02/23/2012
Just for the record, I'll happily collude with anyone who's against Santorum. If anyone's looking for someone to cahoot with to keep that guy out of any office equal or higher to dog-catcher, my wholly ineffectual internet cahootery.
05:28 PM on 02/23/2012
Gotta say while I wouldn't vote for him, Ron Paul really adds to these debates with his refreshingly honest comments and quips.

He has a great, wry sense of humor.

(Obama 2012). : )
exclintonsupporter
Forgive your enemies...it messes with their heads!
05:22 PM on 02/23/2012
Hey Rick...you are NO different than the rest of the pack...this is what happens when you become the "supposed" FRONT RUNNER...and until you slip back into place where you should be...

...get used to it!!!

Obama 2012
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
truly moderate
Reform Party, a third way
09:51 PM on 02/23/2012
Actually he IS different. Hes a far worse choice than Romney, or even our current president.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
raviandsonia
05:22 PM on 02/23/2012
Certainly looked like Paul was in Romney's pocket since Paul did not criticize, re-buff, correct, argue or insult Romney even once. Not once.

But then being in the lead invites these kinds of attacks. Welcome to the #1 front runner status Mr. Santorum.
05:21 PM on 02/23/2012
Slow reader or media matters moderator, that is the question.
05:33 PM on 02/23/2012
I see media matters mod. That's why my comment submitted over half hour ago has not posted.