iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

House Democrats Hold Birth Control Hearing With Themselves

First Posted: 02/23/2012 4:34 pm Updated: 02/23/2012 5:48 pm

WASHINGTON -- Here's what happened in Congress on Thursday: House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) presided over a hearing on women's health, featuring all Democratic lawmakers who support President Barack Obama's contraception rule and testimony from one witness who also supports the rule.

In other words, nothing happened. But Democrats, perhaps hoping to exact a bit of revenge after their views were excluded from the last such hearing, sure liked it.

When it comes to firing up their base ahead of the November elections, House Democrats are finding that women's health is a winning ticket. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has already collected nearly half a million signatures -- and earned a tweet from Barbra Streisand -- on a petition it began circulating less than a week ago that featured a note from Pelosi urging supporters to press House Republicans to include women in Hill discussions on women's health issues. The DCCC followed with another petition blasting Republicans for preventing Democrats from using House resources to televise Thursday's hearing -- a move Democrats say was politically driven. C-SPAN ended up bringing in their own equipment to air the hearing.

Pelosi also appealed to supporters by bringing in Sandra Fluke as the lone witness for Thursday's hearing. Fluke, a Georgetown University law student, made national news last week when Republicans turned her away as a witness in a House Oversight and Government Reform hearing on birth control and religious liberty. Fluke's rejection sparked outcry among Democrats, who were already peeved at the make-up of that hearing: nearly all male witnesses and no supporters of Obama's new contraception rule, which requires religiously-affiliated institutions to provide birth control coverage to their employees.

Thursday's hearing of the House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee was something of a payback for that. Fluke got the stage all to herself and was hailed as a hero by the crowd and Democratic lawmakers on the panel, all of whom rushed to appear on camera with her at the end. "Excuse me. I'd love to get a picture with our star," Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) said as she pushed her way through the packed room to Fluke.

The reality, though, is that Obama's new rule doesn't require Congressional approval. In fact, the main thing Thursday's hearing did is the same thing that the Republicans' one-sided hearing on the same subject did last week: give one party the chance to fire up their supporters on their side of a contentious issue.

Fluke, whose submitted testimony offers personal stories in making the case for Obama's contraception rule, said after Thursday's hearing that she doesn't feel like she is functioning as a pawn for Democrats as they ramp up their political messaging in the months ahead of a crucial election.

"I don't believe I am a pawn," Fluke told The Huffington Post. "I believe that women's health was being treated as a political football prior to the last week when women weren't being heard. So I'm happy to try to speak on behalf of women and I appreciate the opportunity to do so."

Asked what good it does to testify in support of Obama's contraception rule before an all-Democratic panel that already supports it, Fluke said the fact that she is testifying at all is the point.

"It means women's voices have been heard in the hall of their government," she said. "How can that not be a good thing?"

To be fair, Democrats likely wouldn't have held their own hearing if Republicans had held a fair hearing last week. But Democratic lawmakers on Thursday's panel dismissed the idea that they held their forum on birth control for political reasons.

"It's a big, big deal," Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) said of the Democrats' hearing. "To me, there's definitely a pushback on women with regard to contraceptives and this puts it out there. ... It causes women to say, 'We're not going to have it. Don't mess with it.'"

Asked what happened to Congress being focused on jobs and the economy, Cummings said, "We can certainly do more than one thing at one time."

"I think when you have more than half of your population being dissed, you've got to stand up," he said, adding, "I'm talking about women."

Maloney also said politics wasn't driving Democrats' decision to hold their own hearing. "This is about policy. We want women to have access to a whole range of insurance coverage for reproductive rights, including contraceptives," she said.

As for attention to jobs and the economy over politics, Maloney cited a meeting she had this week with Treasury Department officials to discuss legislation she is working on that would provide small loans to small businesses.

"I'm focused on that," she said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Here's what happened in Congress on Thursday: House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) presided over a hearing on women's health, featuring all Democratic lawmakers who support Pres...
WASHINGTON -- Here's what happened in Congress on Thursday: House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) presided over a hearing on women's health, featuring all Democratic lawmakers who support Pres...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 336
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
08:00 PM on 03/04/2012
. Fluke got the stage all to herself and was hailed as a hero by the crowd and Democratic lawmakers on the panel, all of whom rushed to appear on camera with her at the end. "Excuse me. I'd love to get a picture with our star," Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) said as she pushed her way through the packed room to Fluke.

Yup..another libral Show Pony. Pay for your own sex please.
08:22 PM on 03/02/2012
This is a problem because the Dems want the women's vote not because this is any kind of REAL issue. Totally political. None of the politicians give a damn about women.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThurmanLady
more fun - and logical - to be right
05:33 PM on 03/02/2012
This isn't a women's health issue - it's a liberty issue for all. Birth control isn't an issue and never has been. Extorting more money from the rest of us is what this is all about.
photo
Jeth18
Silly liberal. Paychecks are for workers!
10:59 AM on 02/29/2012
Poor thing. Georgetown won't pay for her sex.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ipolitics123
The Left is not Liberal
08:58 PM on 02/28/2012
Note to Sandra Fluke, the "witness" who complained that birth control costs were imposing financial hardships on Georgetown students: Target sells the pill for $9 a month.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/dc-target-sells-birth-control-9-month-georgetown-student-tells-congress-friends-are-going-broke-pay-pills_632955.html?nopager=1
04:01 PM on 02/28/2012
Do you have one aspect of your life that is not controlled to some extent by the government?
Don't answer that, just think seriously about it for a few minutes, please.
If you can think of one meaningful thing, protect it with all your strength. And while you're doing that, try to imagine any others that you'd like to control for yourself -- but are not allowed to.
09:26 AM on 02/28/2012
Insurance is the problem, not the solution. Health insurance used to be for major medical expenses, but now it is used for every sneeze, fever and hangnail--now contraception.

It takes a PhD to know what medical costs really are. Doctors are squeezed by major insurers to the point where their profit margin is razor thin, if at all, and those without insurance, who don't qualify as 'poor' enough for free clinics, pay an inflated price to help balance the equation.

Now the government will require everyone to pay for health insurance, either through their employer or through the 'government plan.' The unfortunate result will be fewer, and eventually zero, options because private sector insurers will not be able to compete in a game where the other player is also the referee.
04:00 PM on 02/27/2012
To quote Bill Maher: "Here's the difference between me and Rick Santorum: Neither of us got a lot of dates in High School; I just didn't spend the rest of my life taking it out on women."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ian Gord
Resist we much !
10:44 AM on 02/29/2012
Yep. I celebrate all Saturday night because I'm keeping Sandra Fluke from having free sexual intercourse.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ennis438
07:18 PM on 02/24/2012
I would not expect the Republicants to show up. After all, their idea of hearings only include male members who support their weird ideas on dictating to women on all women's health issues.
10:00 AM on 02/24/2012
Permanent birth control for all dems.
12:34 AM on 02/27/2012
And free visectamies and viagra for all male republicans. How can that be fair? Democrates do not go into your bedroom without your consent. And, I thought republicans did not like voyerism, let alone threesomes!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThurmanLady
more fun - and logical - to be right
05:29 PM on 03/02/2012
The consent Democrats get is only from those who want everything "free." But, you have to know, if the Dems have opened those doors, the Republicans have to go in and try to shut them!
12:39 AM on 02/27/2012
And free visectamies, testosteron patches and shots, and Viagra for the male republican legislature that made sure these services were free for all men and denied women the same kind of protection of their health.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tin soldier
No more Mr. nice guy
08:29 AM on 02/24/2012
So typical of Pelosi,, only Democrats, so no opposite opinion or any chance of rebuttal a handpicked witness to give testimony in favor of the Democrat position again with no rebuttal or questions.
Democrats/Liberals really like a stacked deck, and what's even sader is they get support. Wonder how the Dem/Libs would react to the Republicans doing the exact same thing. Oh ,I forgot the double standard
photo
Slartibartfast
You're either for America or for republicans..
11:01 AM on 02/24/2012
Again I and the dnc have to thank you tin. Your comments do more for re electing obama and getting rid of state level gop than you could possibly know. Good job!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
windy33
08:21 AM on 02/24/2012
the repubs and the t-party tampons just sealed their fate for november going after women. YOU PISSED THEM OFF NOW YOU AIN'T SEEN NOTHING YET WAIT TILL NOVEMBER. YOU ALL WILL LOSE BIG TIME
07:46 AM on 02/28/2012
Wow, calling names really strengthens your argument.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
windy33
08:13 AM on 02/28/2012
what you don't like facts TO BAD SO SAD
07:31 AM on 02/24/2012
Did I miss that this is about the right for religion to offer healthcare that does offer contraceptives. Women have the right to have sex, they have the right to use contraceptives. The question is do they have a right to have these things for free in a government order part of healthcare. Abortions are the other that seem tobe a fight. I do not care if you have an abortion, I do not care if you use contraceptives, it is your right as much as it is the church right to not include it in thier healthcare plans. You have the right to use what you want and have an abortion if you want, but I do not want to pay for it(my right of choice). This is not a battle for women rights this is a battle over who should pay for what you want to do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GregJL
09:06 AM on 02/24/2012
This isn't about the CHURCHES. This is about hospitals and universities that, while being administered by religious organizations, take FEDERAL money. In return for taking that FEDERAL money, they must abide by FEDERAL regulations. One of which states that contraceptives must be covered in full by health insurance. I have to say, I think contraceptive prescriptions SHOULD be covered by health insurance, period. But I am not really clear as to why these, as opposed to the medications *I* take for regulating my body, should be exempt from having a co-pay. After all, THEIRS is a VOLUNTARY thing, MINE is necessary to the functioning of my being.
01:00 AM on 02/27/2012
My bad! In the end of the second paragraph, I was trying to say that God gave us a brain to use, not to blindly go about believing anything we are told to believe by our unelected "leaders". So, the sentence should have said: "I do not believe God gave us a brain to understand and develop modern medicine to save lives and make their lives better and not use our brains our God gave us."

My apology.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:32 PM on 02/27/2012
No this is about the 1st Amendment! Churches found establishments to help people and simply cannot afford to do it without a little help. Churches do not force or mandate their beliefs on others. I am sure that everyone's insurance covers physician prescribed drugs of all variety (as long as it's on the formulary!) and the consumer pays the co-pay or what-not for said prescription. The problem is that the Government thinks that all the insurance companies must provide free-of-charge contraceptive drugs! I ask, are there ANY OTHER DRUGS MANDATED BE PROVIDED FREE OF CHARGE????? Nope! And pretty much any other drug (legal, prescribed) would be better to mandate for free. I'd be happy to subsidize so Type 1 diabetics can get their insulin free-of-charge - that is a medical necessity. Contraception, not so much.
12:55 AM on 02/27/2012
No, this is about the church providing services to the community to attract new members and dictating to the rest of our country how we should live and forcing their beliefs upon the rest of us.

If my employer was a Scientologist, would they have to provide health insurance to me at all? After all, they provide me a 'Reading Room' to study and pray to God to heal me because they do not believe in modern medicine. Yet, I do not believe God gave us a brain to understand and develop modern medicine to save lives and make their lives better.

The Holy Roman Catholic Church gets waivers and tax exemptions for their Churches. Once the church moves into the public sector and provide services for those other then their religion, accepting tax dollars mean you have to follow the rules, regulations, and laws of this country without the benefit of tax exemptions and polkicy waivers.

I am not a Roman Catholic. I should not have Bishops affecting my family's access to woman health insurance. There is such a thing as seperation of church and state. Isn't there?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:34 PM on 02/27/2012
Separation of Church and State - exactly! The government cannot tell the Church what insurance to buy and mandate all insurance provide immoral drug choices. Contraception is not a medical necessity! If you are the rare case in which it is, then I'm sure your Dr can write you a rx so you can obtain it - but not free-of-charge at the cost of everyone!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
catz1515
02:45 AM on 02/24/2012
if anyone didn't watch the hearing, its really quite good, learned some things I didn't know.
the gop REALLY is trying to silence women, the facts of their actions are all explained in the video.

http://www.c-span.org/Events/Democrats-Hold-Hearing-on-Contraceptives-amp-Women39s-Health/10737428508/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
01:59 AM on 02/24/2012
The GOP has found itself standing on the shore and the water has rushed far out to sea. They don't know what's about to happen next. And even if they did it's too late to do anyting about it.
09:33 AM on 02/28/2012
Not that I put much stock in polls, but the latest indicate the president is risking losing those Christians who voted him in last time by making them pay for contraception, sterilization and abortion-inducing drugs, despite their religious beliefs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
02:00 PM on 02/28/2012
I'm with you on that - I don't put much stock in them either, but that's interesting because the polls are in conflict. IMO what is more important is the actual reaction of people - the same people who are upset with republicans and the church for enforcing their will and imposing their religious beliefs on others. The only reason repubs are keeping this in the news is they lost the issue and they are trying desparately to regain it. Most don't want government what to do, but most don't want the church leadership or politicians intruding in their personal lives either.