More

HuffPost Social Reading
Lizzie Schiffman

Assistant Chicago Editor, The Huffington Post

GET UPDATES FROM Lizzie:

Judy Biggert's Keystone Ties Questioned By Challenger As 11th District Race Heats Up

Posted: 02/23/12 10:54 AM ET  |  Updated: 02/23/12 05:34 PM ET

Judybiggertkeystone

In light of ethics investigations that have followed the recent passage of the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act in the House, former U.S. Rep. Bill Foster is claiming Republican Rep. Judy Biggert (Ill.-13th) has a financial interest in the construction of TransCanada's proposed Keystone XL oil pipeline and wants her to step away from all related legislation.

Foster, a Democrat who is challenging Biggert in Illinois' new 11th District, points to TransCanada stock, valued between $1,000 to $15,000, owned by the congresswoman's husband, according to Crain's Chicago Business columnist Greg Hinz.

TransCanada released its quarterly report last week, which points to overall gains, and Reuters reports that the company has experienced increased profitability over the last 12 months. While reports cite many contributing factors for growth during that time period, congressional votes to move forward with the pipeline likely had influence.

A spokesperson from Biggert's office told The Huffington Post that the congresswoman's support for the pipeline is "based entirely on her interest in creating American jobs, keeping energy costs down, and protecting the interests of her constituents who overwhelmingly support the project," and also notes that Mr. Biggert's investments date back to 2004, before the pipeline was an issue in Washington. The spokesman also pointed out that the congresswoman isn't actively involved in the family's investments, although financial holdings are legally shared between spouses.

"Neither Mr. Biggert nor Mrs. Biggert takes an active role in or directs their broker on purchases or sales of assets in their accounts," said Brian Colgan, a spokesperson from Biggert's office. "For many years, their broker has been under standing orders to use his own judgment in buying or selling for their accounts."

Still, Foster argues that the Biggerts' financial interest in TransCanada raises questions about the motivations behind the representative's political decisions. In December, he called on Biggert to sell her stock in the company.

"It is a conflict of interest, and a breach of public trust, for members of Congress to be buying, selling, or even holding individual stocks that are being influenced by congressional actions," Foster said in an emailed statement. "Congresswoman Biggert should divest herself of the TransCanada stock she owns -- or at minimum recuse herself from votes and public statements about stocks that she has a financial interest in."

Biggert has denied that her husband's investments affect her position on what she calls purely energy-related legislation, and a representative from her office pointed to her vote in favor of the STOCK Act that passed the House earlier this month.

But Biggert only supported the bill with her vote; she's one of only eight Illinois representatives who didn't co-sponsor the STOCK Act. Eleven Illinois reps are listed as co-sponsors, including Biggert's fellow Republicans Timothy Johnson, Robert Schilling, John Shimkus and Joe Walsh.

Additionally, the act passed by the House has been criticized for removing a key measure from the Senate-approved version -- language that would require people who collect political intelligence for sale to lobbyists and on Wall Street to register, like lobbyists currently do, in an attempt to curb business decisions based on inside knowledge of pending legislation. The House-approved bill now awaits reconciliation with the Senate bill, which passed with the provision in place.

The consequences of that legislation could pose further problems for Biggert. A day after the STOCK Act passed, the Office of Congressional Ethics launched an investigation into the investment activities of Rep. Spencer Bachus (R-Ala.), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, over his alleged personal gains from Congress' $700 billion bailout of Wall Street in 2008.

Bachus and Biggert have worked together closely on financial legislation, and Biggert has accepted tens of thousands of dollars from Bachus since 2005 for her campaigns, according to data from the Federal Election Commission.

Though substantial polling has not been conducted in the race thus far, both candidates have secured significant endorsements recently: The National Education Association's political action committee voiced support for Biggert earlier this month, while Democratic Whip Dick Durbin voiced support for Foster on Wednesday.

Foster may be the least of Biggert's worries following Wednesday's announcement that Kane County Clerk Jack Cunningham would be allowed to challenge her for the GOP ticket, according to the Chicago Sun-Times. Cunningham had previously been thrown off the ballot on a technicality after a reportedly dyslexic volunteer inverted numbers on his signature forms.

Related on HuffPost:

Contribute to this Story:
FOLLOW CHICAGO

In light of ethics investigations that have followed the recent passage of the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act in the House, former U.S. Rep. Bill Foster is claiming Republican Rep...
In light of ethics investigations that have followed the recent passage of the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act in the House, former U.S. Rep. Bill Foster is claiming Republican Rep...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,032
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (16 total)
12:06 AM on 02/25/2012
Stock "valued at between $1,000 to $15,000"....

That is a tiny position in a stock. I see why some Lib in the media would get excited about it as most of the Tribune writers need to borrow money to go to McDonald's.

Seriously, this is a non-story.
12:04 AM on 02/25/2012
Bill Foster....

The voters tossed him in 2010 and he will remain sitting on the side lines in 2012.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tuhloola
The facts have a well-known liberal bias
01:16 PM on 02/24/2012
Surprise, surprise, Sgt. Carter ! A republican looking to profit from ravaging the earth and putting fellow Americans at risk. Witness my shock and awe !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
01:33 PM on 02/24/2012
you are amazingly dense. a 1-15k investment which most likely represents less than 1% of her entire portfolio isnt going to influence her vote. besides which, if you even read the article, "Neither Mr. Biggert nor Mrs. Biggert takes an active role in or directs their broker on purchases or sales of assets in their accounts," (BTW most people dont). do you have to remind yourself to breathe?
photo
JHancock
Why do wingers h8 American workers?
02:53 PM on 02/25/2012
Are you kidding. These GOTPers will bend over for a lot less in campaign donations. All they care about is money.
01:11 PM on 02/24/2012
Kathy Hochul (D-NY) proposed in congress if gas prices went over $3.75 per gallon exports should be halted to keep our gas prices reasonable. Guess what?? Republicans voted no. Since gas and oil are our major exports it seems to me there is no shortage here. Why are we being subjected to these rising prices? Couldn't possibly be greed, could it? The more we pay, the bigger their profits, the more they donate to their people in congress. What else could any reasonable person assume?
01:34 PM on 02/24/2012
you might start w/ econ 101. you have no clue.
10:32 AM on 02/25/2012
Really?? If we are so dependant on foreign oil, why in the world would we be exporting so much of ours?? How does econ 101 answer that? I have no clue? Seems to me if we need something here we wouldn't be sending it off to some other country. Maybe you should get a clue. Or are you heavily invested in oil?
01:05 PM on 02/24/2012
Create jobs, maybe. Keep energy prices down? This is meant for export, how does it keep our energy prices down?
John Eylar
Logic and Reason vs Republican lies
11:11 AM on 02/24/2012
It is high time the President mandates that oil/gasoline be a matter of national security. Our economy is directly tied into the price at the pump. Higer fuel prices means higher prices for everything that is transported. Our economic survival is on the line. The time to nationalize oil is now. The ability to speculate on the price of oil has given the oil barons the ability to raise the price of gas at will. Even though we import less than 10% of our oil from the middle east it always appears that our price is directly connected to that region. We must demand a Congressional investigation into the actions that have been taken by the oil companies. Unlees you want to watch Exxon post another 50 BILLION in profits that came at the cost of the American people.
10:19 AM on 02/24/2012
Oh now it becomes it becomes a big issue...gggeeezzze..where were all these people when Pelosi was pushing and passing legislation that put money directly in her husband's pockets, or when Barack pushes grants directly to his fund raisers at Solyndra? Blatant hypocracy! I would be supportive if the complainers were to suppport governmental reform that would rid D.C. of all these bloodsuckers with not a drop of ethical blood in their bodies.
John Eylar
Logic and Reason vs Republican lies
11:03 AM on 02/24/2012
Fine if you want to play that game then we can go back to the no bid KBR contracts that made Cheney... oops I mean Cheneys wife a ton of money.
01:02 PM on 02/24/2012
It is interesting that you are so quick to blame others..perhaps inculcated into your philosophical bent. Read what I said carefully. I propose to reform what we are doing and throw them all out respective of party. You comment seems to favor throwing out only a single party. I hope not. If It is, that warped sense of righteousness that got us into and is keeping us in this vomitory of D.C. cronyism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paula Sue Haswell Beatty
10:13 AM on 02/24/2012
Look people this has been going on for yr's and yr's and I notice not one name from the democratic side was brought up that was involved in the key stone project, as far as being invested, what are they given a pass, because these people are running against one another, we can hardly expect people to sell their stock that they bought some yr's ago to make these people happy, but what we can do is to monitor their positions after the law was passed, and if found to be involved in insider trading make sure they go to jail just like any other citizen. That is what is right and fair for every one. Are we not supposed to be a transparent Governing body or is that just for Republican's to abide by, this kind of nit picking always seems to get in the way of the real problems of this country, and it needs to stop now and if it will not then we need to find a way to get these people that are impeading our progress out of office remember they work for us , it's time to start handing out pink slips, there are enough of us getting them.
09:50 AM on 02/24/2012
The Republicans are sure in a rush to get this pipeline bill passed for their oil company friends.As you can see now the big oil companys are putting pressure on the
white house by raising the price of oil to record highs, I am sure that they will offer lower oil prices if the xl pipeline bill gets passed. A lot of the Republicans in congress are on their way out and they need as much money as they can get . Their 175,000 dollars a year + benefits for life will be hard to live on , don't you feel sorry for them.The speaker of the house Boner will get 223,500 for life, senate majority/minority leaders193,000 for life and it seems that no one can figure out why we are broke. These are the people who want to take away our Social Security and medicare and ask us to pay their taxes. Every one of these SOB need to get out of town.
10:13 AM on 02/24/2012
So Very True Fanned
10:24 AM on 02/24/2012
If your going to post this spin, please back it up with facts! Every Congress person get pension for life and health benifits, that you seem to forget. Second, "big oil" as you put it hasn't been able to build a new refinery in the US for over 25 years, and our refinery's are at capacity, translation, less gas for the higher demand, plus look at all the grades of gas, and then look at the Federal tax and State tax on Gas(but big oil does not get a pass either). Third, please provide the names of the people who want to do away with Social Security and Medicare(fix it maybe), no one ever said get rid of it.
John Eylar
Logic and Reason vs Republican lies
11:18 AM on 02/24/2012
Your telling me that "big oil" could not have persuaded Bush to allow the building of new refinerys especally when the Republicans controlled both houses for 6 years? Lay off the pipe and get back to reality. If more refinerys means cheaper gas than that equates to less profits. And less profits makes Republicans cry!!!!
12:31 PM on 02/24/2012
Why should the oil companys build refinerys in the United States when they can ship the oil to china and get it refined with no worry about polution law or wages.Adam Kinzinger spoke at the Joliet Junior Colledge 2/23/2012 and stated that this pipeline would create100,000 thousand manufacturing jobs and construction jobs and we would see 830,000 barrels of safe energy and secure oil every day from our friends in the North.What he didn't mention is that our friends from the north are sending the oil directly to our enemys in the East and the only thing we are going to get is 1700 miles of pipeline running across the US. I would love to see how this pipeline is going to create any lasting jobs in the US. This pipeline is nothing but a target for a terriorist attack.Nowhere have I read anything about the oil being used for anything in the US, this is strictly for China. I can't see how it is going to take 100,000 people to build 1700 miles of pipeline unless they use different people every week.Kinzinger is a Republican if I might add, he don't mention that on his website , don't blame him.I think the congess people need to give up some of their pensions , I paid into Social Security and I don't want anyone fooling with it, the Republicans already took more than enough out of it.
09:45 AM on 02/24/2012
Typical democratic bias. Durbin backs Foster, I guess he's already forgotten about the debaucle last week with his wife taking pay as a lobbyist??
10:00 AM on 02/24/2012
Foster is a fool. TransCanada is selling for $42/share so the Congresswoman's family holdings are probably less than 200 shares. Even in corrupt Chicago politics that is less than lunch money.
09:42 AM on 02/24/2012
omg her keystone ties!!!! nobody cares about obamas ties to solyndra, and all of his stooges that were involved in that HALF A BILLION DOLLAR GIVE AWAY!!.... Democrats are such HYPOCRITES!!! whine whine whine .....lie lie lie......
09:36 AM on 02/24/2012
The bigger question from the bias media should be why don't we have the Keystone pipeline ! Investigate that issue and stop pandering to the tree hugger environmentalist out there
09:23 AM on 02/24/2012
Question, HP had headline about Cook County Comissioner and a Fla Rep, neither was indentfied as a Democrat, but when it's a Republican, well HP you slip is showing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paula Sue Haswell Beatty
10:13 AM on 02/24/2012
And that surprises you.
09:17 AM on 02/24/2012
This isn"t news. Just business as usual for the GOP.
09:27 AM on 02/24/2012
Yea, well funny Maxine Waters husband got stimulus money and a bail out for the bank that he was CEO, and they still have not had her hearing yet, so it is business as usual for the Democrats also. the pipeline will bring hundreds of thousands of jobs that trickle down. can't wait until you are paying your $6.00 a gallon this summer, but then again you are probably one of the 50% who don't pay in any taxes and receives refunds from this administration for all your tax credits.
09:39 AM on 02/24/2012
Iasml: Good comment and I'm sure you won't hear back from wlab because there is no depth to their rambling.
09:52 AM on 02/24/2012
After a Close study of the Keystone Pipeline It was found that at Most the project would employ 2500 to 3000 people. Oil Well Drilling has Rose 350% during the obama administration Do you like the Congresswomen own stock in the company?
And FYI I do pay taxes way to many. My advice to you is quit watching the Republican Debates and start watching when the President speaks . He actually knows the score those on the stage are pandering to people who are unaware of the reason Fuel is so High as you obviously are.
Heres is One Clue EXXON MOBIL 48 Bil in Profits .
To put that in Prospective for you The largest Automaker in the country (GM) Had there Best year ever 7.8 Bil profit.
Once again Im gonna say to you Quit watching the Debates and Fox news
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paula Sue Haswell Beatty
10:14 AM on 02/24/2012
And Dem's.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:11 AM on 02/24/2012
and of course the former madam speaker pelosi still walks from her affiliations with t boone pickens as IF there was no conflict of interest,the same way her tax deals,real estate deals(presidio etc) and where and where not the minimum wage apples etc.are meaningless.
IF they want to play here along the lines of party as to whom has a greater supply of conflicts of interest etc,there are absolutely no problems as the scales tilt towards dem.
We can next go right over to elena kagan and obama care.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
barneynx
09:16 AM on 02/24/2012
You might add the VISA Credit card millions she made on the fees while she stood up and scream about the hight interest rates of these card companies--Organized crime---when you look it up in the Websters you will find her picture.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paula Sue Haswell Beatty
10:18 AM on 02/24/2012
Those's are hopefully dead issus.