iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Gerry Smith
GET UPDATES FROM Gerry:

Consumer Privacy 'Bill of Rights' Seeks To Give Web Users More Control Over Their Data

Posted: 02/23/12 12:01 AM ET  |  Updated: 02/23/12 11:48 AM ET

Google Privacy

The Obama administration on Thursday will unveil a consumer privacy "bill of rights" that aims to give web users more control over how their personal information is collected and used online.

The "bill of rights" will include seven principles to protect consumers' digital privacy, such as the right to opt out of having their personal data collected and the right to having easily understandable policies on company's privacy practices, Obama administration officials said on a conference call with reporters Wednesday.

The principles will include creating a setting on web browsers that allows Internet users to opt out of having their browsing habits monitored. The advertising industry also committed to not releasing consumers’ browsing data to companies that use it for purposes beyond advertising, such as employers making hiring decisions or insurers determining coverage, officials said.

“It’s great to see that companies are stepping up to our challenge to protect privacy so consumers have greater choice and control over how they are tracked online," Federal Trade Commission Chairman Jon Leibowitz said in a statement. "More needs to be done, but the work they have done so far is very encouraging."

In coming weeks, the Commerce Department will bring together companies, privacy advocates and other stakeholders to develop privacy policies based on principles outlined in the bill of rights, officials said. Though companies are not required to follow the principles, about 90 percent of companies involved in targeted online advertising have agreed to comply, Stu Ingis, general counsel for the Digital Advertising Alliance, a group of digital advertising trade organizations, told reporters on the conference call. Those companies could be subject to FTC enforcement for not adhering to the principles, officials said.

Officials said the bill of rights will serve as a blueprint for legislation in Congress to protect consumers' online privacy. Last year, at least two bills were introduced in support of a "Do Not Track" mechanism that would give web users control over online tracking, but did not pass.

Thursday's announcement comes as a growing number of privacy failings by tech companies have fueled concerns that consumers do not have control over how their personal information is being collected and shared.

In the last few weeks, Google was caught bypassing privacy settings on Apple's Safari browser to track the browsing habits of Internet users. Google disabled the code after being contacted by the Wall Street Journal, which first reported the story last week.

In addition, the mobile social network Path was found downloading users' address books without their permission.

"Silicon Valley has a privacy problem," said Jonathan Mayer, a graduate student at Stanford University who discovered Google was using a special computer code to monitor Safari web users. "It's very clear that companies have repeatedly fallen short in taking measures to protect users' information."

"For the moment, the M.O. in Silicon Valley is 'do as much as you can until somebody slaps your hand,'" Mayer said.

The FTC, which regulates the use of consumers’ data online, has become more aggressive in protecting that data. Last March, Google settled charges from the FTC that it used deceptive tactics and violated its own privacy promises to consumers when it launched its social network, Google Buzz, in 2010. Last November, Facebook agreed to settle FTC charges that it deceived consumers by telling them they could keep their information private on the social network, and then repeatedly allowed it to be shared and made public.

Google set off more privacy concerns last month when it announced in a blog post that it will revise its own privacy policies to track users across all of its products. This prompted consumer groups to file complaints with the FTC, arguing that Google was violating the commission's order as part of last year's settlement.

"The FTC takes compliance with our consent orders very seriously and always looks carefully at any evidence that they are being violated," an agency spokeswoman said in response to the complaints.

Web companies are required to issue statements to consumers about their privacy policies. But most privacy statements are so dense that consumers don't read them and there are no clear guidelines about what those privacy statements should say, said Ashkan Soltani, a noted privacy researcher. Many do not fully explain how companies use consumers' data, he said. It has often taken the work of independent researchers like Soltani, Mayer and others to shed light on how these companies are collecting, storing and distributing user information.

Soltani said that web companies are generating revenue by collecting user data and selling access to that information for third-party advertising. The public is mostly unaware of these practices, however, and web companies are getting into trouble because they are not asking users for permission, he said.

"They haven't used good manners," Soltani said. "They've decided to take it without asking."

FOLLOW TECH

From our partners


The Obama administration on Thursday will unveil a consumer privacy "bill of rights" that aims to give web users more control over how their personal information is collected and used online. The "...
The Obama administration on Thursday will unveil a consumer privacy "bill of rights" that aims to give web users more control over how their personal information is collected and used online. The "...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 104
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cabrobst
Return the top rate to 91%.
08:24 AM on 02/25/2012
Republicans would never protect private citizens from corporations.
05:44 PM on 02/24/2012
The Constitution covers this already. You got other problems, Dude. Most of them come from not following the Constitution. It's the law. Follow it.
01:54 AM on 02/24/2012
This is something that needs to happen.
08:04 PM on 02/23/2012
Many of us have been waiting for this for some time. But it will be a battle and Obama has not historically been good at waging them. Although, lately he seems both more battle tested and willing to fight.
04:21 PM on 02/23/2012
The Republicons will stop this if they can. They simply could not live if Obama succeeded at anything that people would praise him for. They will drive the entire nationan into ruin (and are well on their way to doing it) just to destroy him.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:11 PM on 02/23/2012
lets hope so! If this proposal had a chance it would make some of Obama's donors upset.

ALways gotta take a second look at Dem proposals that look truly progressive. If they have no chance of passing they could be political theater.
04:17 PM on 02/23/2012
The Republicons will stop it because it came from Obama's administration, and they just couldn't live if they allowed Obama to do anything. They would rather destroy the entire nation (which they are well on their way to doing) than give him credit for ANYTHING.
03:22 PM on 02/23/2012
One thing I never see mentioned in these advertising discussions is how targeted advertising might not be an effective or useful thing. I am male and in a certain age range. Regardless of my surfing habits, I get the usual inbox spam asking if I want ripped muscles, improved stamina, or to magically increase certain parts of my anatomy. Thing is, these are the ONLY ads I get in my inbox, because of my demographic.

My point is this: How am I ever going to learn about any other product if I am only targeted for certain things based on age, sex, location, income? I surf tech sites, game sites, news sites, YouTube. I don't get ads for games in my inbox, I don't get iPod ads, I don't get ads for the medical condition I have and searched for extensively on the internet.

Great thing about TV commercials (can't believe I just said that with a straight face) is that they were not targeted at me specifically. I can learn about all kinds of products from TV ads. I can learn about a new feminine product that my lady might want to try, or a new flea treatment for my pets, or something completely new that I have no idea exists.

I for one prefer a more general advertising experience. If I didn't buy your genital enhancement pills the first time you sent me an advert, why do you think I will on the 1000th time?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:40 PM on 02/23/2012
Reaffirm and extend the 4th amendment
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
apathyman
Let them hate, so long as they fear
01:48 PM on 02/23/2012
Expect to see Facebook and Google pour millions into stopping this from ever happening
08:09 PM on 02/23/2012
Facebook and Google have a problem though. It is hard to pour those millions in with complete transparency. And they do have a constituency that will hold them responsible and fill out millions of petitions and have rallies and create a public relations nightmare. Just let MoveOn get a hold of it and Sergi might be crying, "Uncle!". Think about how quickly Komen came around.

It is a different world we live in then it was even 5 years ago.
01:40 PM on 02/23/2012
It's easy to find those who have no problem with privacy at this point, as they are they ones using Google+.

As time goes on some might be sorry they wen't more careful.
01:37 PM on 02/23/2012
Won't it be interesting to see how the usual suspects find fault with Obama for this?

Remember when AT&T was seen as being too powerful and was broken up? Google is too powerful and NEEDS to be broken up.
photo
bellsblu2
Unrepentant Liberal living on the edge
01:48 PM on 02/23/2012
I am NOT the usual suspect.. I am an ardent supporter of our president.

He's dropped the ball by not protecting us from corporations...

I'll STILL vote for him, because , well, there's absolutely no one ELSE to vote for... but lets call this what it is.... a capitulation...just like the tax cuts for the wealthy.
08:19 PM on 02/23/2012
We are all disappointed by President Obama because we had such high hopes.

I seriously doubt that even those who say the opposite are glad Sara Palin isn't in office.
photo
bellsblu2
Unrepentant Liberal living on the edge
01:13 PM on 02/23/2012
While I greatly admire Mr. Obama, sometimes I am left to wonder about his idea of meeting in the middle ground.

Downloading movies or music illegally comes with a hefty fine. It isn't "optional" and certainly isn't left up to the key boarder if they want to be penalized or not. Corporations are people to (remember?), and their intellectual property isn't free.

HOWEVER, what about REAL people?

Corporations have been given a green light to track you, track your friends, keep tabs on your browsing interests, and basically accumulate massive amounts of data about you, and SELL it to OTHER corporations for a profit.... NOT selling it, or accumulating it is only an OPTION, and TRACKING YOU IS NOT illegal... Which do you honestly believe THEY are going to opt for?

Bottom line, if corporations are people and it's illegal to steal their information and profit by it, why ISN'T it illegal to steal OUR information and profit by it?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:45 PM on 02/24/2012
I don't understand how this "privacy bill of rights," which came from his administration, is anything but for the benefit of consumers. It sounds like silicon valley corporations would have to overhaul their practices. What I'm trying to get at is that this particular issue, judging from your opinions on the situation, should be a reason for you to be happy with Obama.

What you're complaining about - the crack down on piracy - he can't do much about. The president's power is limited. And the proposed privacy rights make it illegal to steal our information and profit from it.
photo
bellsblu2
Unrepentant Liberal living on the edge
02:55 PM on 02/24/2012
A)- The president's powers are nowhere near as limited as you suggest.

B)- The crackdown on piracy is the corporations insisting on being paid for their intellectual property...Yet those same corporations are free to take, use, and profit from YOUR intellectual property.. ( information derived from your activities...)...Your specific, unique interests are part of your identity...

Do you NOT own your identity?

Do not wish to have "The right to be let alone"?

Do you feel corporations (who would otherwise profit by having everything there is to know about you on an ongoing basis) will voluntarily forego the inherent PROFIT?

The president has agreed to allow corporations to police themselves...So they MAY, or MAY NOT collect everything there is to know about you... it's THEIR call.... Not OURS.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
AVoiceInThe Darkness
Darkness is your candle - Rumi
01:12 PM on 02/23/2012
The president's proposal is a good idea, but I suspect Google is in agreement with it. The tech section also has an article on Google soon offering a 'do not track' button for its services at the same time this news is announced. Too bad the comments are not allowed on that article, HP, but this article is in the same vein. Maybe Google is acting responsibly, or maybe users, like myself, have started using other search engines and have started removing Google cookies and downloads from their computers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stoopid American
Trooth, justice, and the American way ...
12:56 PM on 02/23/2012
Sounds like a great start.
photo
bellsblu2
Unrepentant Liberal living on the edge
01:03 PM on 02/23/2012
Not really
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stoopid American
Trooth, justice, and the American way ...
01:12 PM on 02/23/2012
Please elucidate.
12:08 PM on 02/23/2012
Finally someone is actually attempting to curb all the privacy violations from companies like Google and Facebook.
http://geekedoutelectronics.blogspot.com/2012/02/obamas-new-consumer-privacy-bill-of.html