More

HuffPost Social Reading

Fox News Debate Moderators Spoke More Than CNN Counterparts: Study

Posted: 02/24/12 11:39 AM ET

Fox Debate

Fox News moderators spoke 65% more during GOP debates than their CNN counterparts, according to a new study by the University of Minnesota.

Smart Politics, a non-partisan political news site at the Humphrey School of Public Affairs, conducted a study of 17 GOP debates that have taken place since September. Out of the five media outlets that hosted debates, moderators at CNN spoke the least amount of time in comparison to the candidates. The moderators, which included Wolf Blitzer, John King and Anderson Cooper, were heard during 15.9% of the debates.

In contrast, Fox News took up the greatest share of their broadcasts compared to the other outlets' debates. The three Fox News debates saw moderators speaking 26.2% of the time.

"Overall, CNN debates saw candidates speak at a ratio of 5.12 minutes for every 1 minute of moderator speaking time," the study concluded. "At FOX candidates were allowed to speak for just 2.76 minutes for every 1 minute given to the moderators." View the full results here.

Both CNN and Fox News have seen controversial moments during their debates, including Newt Gingrich's showdowns with Juan Williams and John King.

Related on HuffPost:

Controversial GOP debate moments:
  • Juan Williams and Newt Gingrich

    In South Carolina, Juan Williams suggested that Gingrich's comments about blacks and food stamps were insulting to all Americans, especially black Americans. Gingrich fiercely denied those charges, and doubled down on his comments -- and got a standing ovation from the audience.

  • John King and Newt Gingrich

    John King began CNN's South Carolina debate by asking Gingrich about his ex-wife's explosive interview. Gingrich responded with a searing condemnation of the question, and the "elite media."

  • Wolf Blitzer and Ron Paul

    One of the most discussed moments of the GOP debates came when Wolf Blitzer questioned Ron Paul about his views on health care. Members of the audience cheered when Blitzer asked if society should let an uninsured man die.

  • George Stephanopoulos and Mitt Romney

    George Stephanopoulos asked Mitt Romney whether states could legally ban contraception. Romney was offended by the question, and said there was no point to it because no state was considering doing so.

  • John King and Mitt Romney

    John King asked Mitt Romney if he planned to follow in the footsteps of his father -- who once ran for president -- and release his tax returns. Romney said, "Maybe," prompting boos from the audience.

  • Byron York and Michele Bachmann

    Byron York asked Michele Bachmann if she would be submissive to her husband as president.

  • Megyn Kelly and Rick Santorum

    Members of the audience booed when Megyn Kelly replayed a clip of a gay soldier asking the candidates whether they would reinstate DADT.

  • Brian Williams and Rick Perry

    Brian Williams asked Rick Perry if he ever had trouble sleeping over the possibility that one of the 234 prisoners who were executed during his term could have been innocent. The audience cheered at the mention of 234 executions, and Williams also asked Perry what he made of that reaction.

  • Chris Wallace and Rick Perry

    Chris Wallace asked Rick Perry to defend his decision to allow undocumented college students to pay in-state tuition. Perry was booed when he said that people who do not believe in educating undocumented students do not have a heart.

  • Chris Wallace and Newt Gingrich

    Chris Wallace and Newt Gingrich got into a hostile exchange at a debate in Iowa after Wallace asked him to explain reports that his campaign staff had quit en masse. Gingrich accused the Fox News panelists of playing "Mickey Mouse games."

Contribute to this Story:
FOLLOW MEDIA

Filed by Katherine Fung  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 76
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
06:28 PM on 02/27/2012
45 minutes into the CNN debate, John King had not asked one question on the Economy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christian Howell
Totalitarian STEM Master...
05:54 PM on 02/27/2012
Maybe they were giving them clues.
photo
NotMcCain
www.welcomeesl.com
02:54 PM on 02/27/2012
Who cares that FOX mods spoke more? I'm no fan of Ailes & Co., but the QUESTIONS the Fox mods asked were so superior to the ones asked by CNN, either John King or Wolf Blitzer. CNN did a horrible job with every debate they modded.

I actually looked forward to the FOX debates. (Just wish they modded more of them.)
02:31 PM on 02/27/2012
Of course they did because they asked real relevant questions. It is the other debates that are run like a reality show to get someone voted off the ticket.
07:34 AM on 02/27/2012
And? We all know that Faux is part of the political life of the Republicans and feels the need to inject themselves into anything conservative and political. Nothing new here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blknightowl
Independent, forced to vote a straight Dem ticket
06:02 AM on 02/27/2012
Really? This study was needed? An informed viewer could not distinguish this from watching?

Oh well, the results are still not surprising.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
04:23 AM on 02/27/2012
But ironically both were terrible. Fox tried to steer the debates in a rightwing bent, while CNN asked questions that were so light on substance or did so little real follow up and redirect for answers that they yielded very little substantive info.

Lets bet back to the League of Women Voters and PBS!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blknightowl
Independent, forced to vote a straight Dem ticket
05:59 AM on 02/27/2012
Agreed.
photo
NotMcCain
www.welcomeesl.com
02:55 PM on 02/27/2012
No question League of Women Voters and PBS would be better. But FOX, imo, was far superior to CNN.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
03:30 PM on 02/27/2012
IMO, they were preachy and injected too much rightwing ideology before they even asked the questions. That was unfortunate because people who are moderate but right of center were left out because FOX steered the debate further right than many of those voters are. They will lose those voters in the fall. They won't vote for Obama, but they may stay home.
photo
Counterglow
Werner Heisenberg may have been right.
01:59 AM on 02/27/2012
OK, the expression "doubled down" has had its 15 minutes of fame. Time to move on and invent another ambiguous phrase that gives a general impression without being accurate enough that "journalists" can be pinned down on exactly what they mean.
photo
pleasantlyny
Addie, Carole, Cynthia & Denise, for you we fight
07:10 PM on 02/26/2012
CNN Moderator: "What will you do about Iran"?

Fox: "Since we know Obama is a muslim kenyan socialist who has a deep seated hatred for american values and goes around apologizing for america and bowing to kings and we know he is really really soft on the muslims and he has already thrown Isreal under the bus knowing all that please tell us please tell me What will you do about Iran"
photo
Counterglow
Werner Heisenberg may have been right.
02:00 AM on 02/27/2012
Brilliant!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janzee12000
06:26 PM on 02/26/2012
FOX wasn't really hosting a debate but rather showcasing a conservative reality show. Ailes didn't want anyone to look too foolish (couldn't help Perry) so softball setups were in order...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CSKAP
Morlock or Eloi?
11:46 AM on 02/26/2012
Fox “moderators†have a much harder job, they have talking points they have been directed to address by Roger and Rupert.
They have to try to lead the “debaters†to positions that are the approved Fox positions.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:48 AM on 02/26/2012
Why do they call them debates?
11:52 PM on 02/26/2012
Because deboobs are talking about debiases and deprejudices.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SimianNation
Progressive NOT Regressive
08:58 AM on 02/26/2012
In the court room, the Fox moderators would be objected to, on grounds of leading the witness.
photo
Counterglow
Werner Heisenberg may have been right.
02:01 AM on 02/27/2012
In the bedroom, they'd stand accused of worse.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SimianNation
Progressive NOT Regressive
10:08 AM on 02/27/2012
Hahahahha
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christian Howell
Totalitarian STEM Master...
05:57 PM on 02/27/2012
Rape!
11:24 PM on 02/25/2012
The Fox talking heads had to speak more than their CNN counterparts because the Fox people had a much more difficult job. The CNN crowd only had to ask the question. The Fox troop not only had to ask the question, but ask it in such a way the normal Fox viewer would understand it and understand whether or not they should like the response from the candidates. So don't begrudge the the extra time the Fox people used. They had a tough job.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Grumpy Old Dude
My screen name is an Acronym
02:34 PM on 02/27/2012
Now that is funny! ;-)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
taquinas
11:03 PM on 02/25/2012
Fox didn't want to give the clowns enough time make the debates look even stupider?