iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Michelle Rhee's Backers Include Obama Bundler Billionaire, Big Romney Backer

Posted: 02/24/2012 4:16 pm Updated: 03/ 9/2012 2:21 pm

Michelle Rhee Backers
Rhee with husband Kevin Johnson, the mayor of Sacramento, at the premiere of 'Waiting for Superman.'

Politics is once again making strange bedfellows. A top Mitt Romney supporter and one of Barack Obama's wealthier contributors have a common cause: They're both backing Michelle Rhee.

Until now, identifying Rhee's usually anonymous donors has been largely a guessing game. But recent lobbying filings in Pennsylvania name New Jersey hedge funder and Romney backer David Tepper and the Texas-based Laura and John Arnold Foundation as among the largest donors to StudentsFirst, Rhee's national lobbying and advocacy group that pushes for rigorous teacher evaluations and school choice. And though the filings don't give dollar amounts, a source close to the donor community said the Arnold grant amounted to tens of millions of dollars.

Rhee, one of the biggest names in the education reform movement, drew attention during her stint as chancellor of Washington, D.C., schools. There, her oft-lauded teacher evaluation system, teacher firings and bureaucratic shakeup landed a broom-wielding Rhee on the cover of Time magazine and made her the focus of the documentary "Waiting for Superman." Her critics point to allegations that her record in D.C. was inflated by cheating, a matter that has yet to be settled by an ongoing federal investigation (though its scope has been narrowed to 35 classrooms).

After Adrian Fenty, the mayor who appointed Rhee, was voted out of office, Rhee left to found StudentsFirst. SF has quickly become a big name in the education reform lobby, angering unions and working with legislatures that have altered their teacher hiring laws to the group's liking.

The nonprofit is notoriously tightlipped about its funding, which has aroused various and sundry rumors about the political leanings of its alleged backers, among them Rupert Murdoch. The American Federation of Teachers created RheeFirst, an opposition website that carries some of those rumors.

SF's spokesperson Hari Sevugan confirmed, "We do not comment on any individual donor."

But a Pennsylvania law requires lobbying organizations that spend over a certain amount to disclose any donor who contributes more than 10 percent "of the total resources received by the principal during the reporting period."

According to filings on the state's lobbying disclosure site, StudentsFirst has filed for two quarters, with the organization's over-10 percent funders listed as the Arnold Foundation and Tepper, who founded the organization's New Jersey arm.

Tepper, who heads Appaloosa Management, has a long history of political donations. According to FEC records, Tepper has given upwards of $23,000 to the Democratic National Committee; $5,000 to Glacier PAC, a backer of Democratic Rep. Max Baucus -- and $5,000 to Mitt Romney for President this December. This January, he gave $375,000 to Restore Our Future, a Romney PAC.

In March 2011, Tepper, who is estimated to be worth $5 billion, cofounded Better Education For New Jersey Kids, the New Jersey education reform group that eventually became SF's New Jersey arm.

Billionaire John Arnold, a former Enron trader and his wife Laura, were slated to host in their Houston home a $10,000-ticket Obama fundraiser to feature Michelle Obama last October (the event was postponed). Arnold describes himself as a libertarian, and his wife Laura identifies as a Democrat. Still, Arnold was one of Obama's top 2008 donors, a bundler who gave the campaign between $50,000 and $100,000. According to Huffington Post's FundRace, he has given $35,800 to the Obama Victory Fund 2012.

Both Arnolds have also contributed a few thousand each to Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) and hundreds of thousands to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.

Arnold is currently funding efforts to have legislatures convert the pensions of public employees, such as teachers, into 401k plans. According to the Arnold Foundation's most recent tax returns, it had $650 to $750 million in assets in 2010.

An additional donor to StudentsFirst is The Broad Foundation, the philanthropy run by Eli and Edythe Broad that puts billions into education reform causes such as charter schools and parent unions. Erica Lepping, a Broad spokesperson, confirmed that one year ago, the foundation contributed $500,000 in startup costs to StudentsFirst. "We've been in discussions with them since, regarding how we may be further able to support their work," Lepping added in an email.

As for who's not funding Rhee: A representative from the foundation of Julian Robertson, a rumored donor and Romney supporter, said he hasn't contributed to SF. And Murdoch's News Corp. Foundation's political funding disclosure does not list StudentsFirst as a grantee, although that does not preclude the possibility of a personal donation.

StudentFirst's IRS application sheds still more light on its finances. StudentsFirst estimates the organization will have $225 million in revenue between 2010 and 2013 -- and that's only its 501(c)3. StudentsFirst has used its revenues to set up shop in 16 states, where it's advancing legislation that abolishes or revises teacher tenure, opens the door for the creation of charter schools and parent trigger laws, which allow parents to take over management decisions at failing schools.

The group boasts over a million members, though Sevugan declined to specify how many of those are active. But he pointed to recent member activity around the Senate's reauthorization of the No Child Left Behind Act as proof that those who sign up for SF online are indeed involved.

"We sent an email to our national membership saying, 'We see some problems here ... and if you agree, let members of the HELP committee know,'" Sevugan said. "The number was 200,000 emails sent to HELP committee within two hours."

FOLLOW EDUCATION

Politics is once again making strange bedfellows. A top Mitt Romney supporter and one of Barack Obama's wealthier contributors have a common cause: They're both backing Michelle Rhee. Until now, id...
Politics is once again making strange bedfellows. A top Mitt Romney supporter and one of Barack Obama's wealthier contributors have a common cause: They're both backing Michelle Rhee. Until now, id...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 144
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
04:06 AM on 09/14/2012
As a big fan of both Kevin Johnson and Michelle Rhee, I am a bit disenchanted that Rhee is not focusing more on a diplomatic win-win-win by acknowledging that in order for teachers to perform to the standards needed for students to perform, they need smaller class sizes and help in the classrooms along with training for underperforming teachers!

Shouldn't this be the focus of Education Reform instead of demonizing and focusing all responsibility on the teacher (at least from the media coverage I am seeing her on HP & other venues associated with Michelle Rhee). I also like our President's past recommendations to parents to do their part too! This is not a one-sided, but a multi-pronged solution that is needed!
12:04 AM on 04/27/2012
Students first numbers are "growing every day" because they send out petitions saying "sign here if you think teachers should get paid more" this is somewhat misleading and this is how they got me on their email list.

Here is my response when I explained why I was unsubscribing: "I do not trust an organization that has the following written on their website: Keep Alabama's best teachers in the classroom. "Ask legislators to end the harmful practice of seniority-based layoffs." Do you have any empirical data that show this is a key driver of some key outcome measured by a statistically valid instrument? Are you implying that unions are the problem? It seems so. I am a former school teacher and research shows there are two things needed to increase school performance: 1) Reduce class size 2) increase teacher salary. There are also myriad problems with the predictive validity of teacher evaluations. What methods are you using to assess who are the 'best teachers' in Alabama? "
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tarra Scott
Sour grapes make a very bitter whine.
10:54 AM on 03/21/2012
Why is it a surprise that she's being backed by 'contributors to both parties'?

Everyone should know by now that politics and law are decided less on political affiliation and more on what their biggest paycheck says they should do.

We will reap what we sow with the quagmire we have let education reformers do to our schools, our teachers, and most importantly our children. We are going to need an influx of foreign professionals - both trade professionals like plumbers and white-collar professionals like doctors because the school systems have been so butchered that all we churn out are kids who being trained to believe that don't have any value to their community without a scantron sheet and a number 2 pencil.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
enlightened45
04:01 PM on 02/28/2012
Google St. Hope Academy in Sacramento, and see firsthand what a cozy and lucrative "marriage" Johnson and Rhee have "consummated".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
snesich
02:30 PM on 02/28/2012
If any public figure can best be compared to Michelle Rhee, it's probably Sarah Palin.

Both Rhee and Palin found themselves in the national spotlight after being chosen for their high-visibility positions, despite their lack of substantive credentials that would normally qualify them for that important a role.

Both Rhee and Palin expressed, with great sarcasm, their absolute disdain for "professionals", "elitists" and "the status quo". They both essentially argued that there was no genuine value to years of experience and specialized training, and that anyone with enough "common sense" and ambition could achieve more than the recognized leaders and experts.

Both Rhee and Palin relied on a demagogic mixture of selective data, superficial "analysis", and hoary clichés to argue highly dubious points---and then resorted to iniquitous accusations against any groups or individuals who questioned or challenged them.

Both Rhee and Palin became heavy liabilities for the political figures who chose them, as their statements and actions fell somewhere between controversial and reprehensible.

And, both Rhee and Palin used their relatively short time in their respective public positions as a way of gaining celebrity status, and the fame and income that goes with it. Both have since made a boatload of money, not one dollar of which would have been possible without the benefit of the "government", which they both so acidly castigate.
10:25 PM on 02/28/2012
"...being chosen despite their lack of substantive credentials that would normally qualify them for that important a role"

You've just described Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
snesich
06:12 PM on 03/01/2012
Interesting comparison. I was under the impression that Barack Obama was chosen by the American people in a process called a nationwide election. Do you have information to the contrary?

Also, can you tell us how many people voted for Michelle Rhee? And how did Sarah Palin do in her final election?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
geogeoff
12:00 PM on 02/27/2012
Michelle Rhee is not about improving public schools in this country. She is pushing a politically motivated agenda in this country to destroy public education. The fact that they are working to create charter schools, and not fix public schools is all you need to know.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tracey fletcher
12:11 PM on 02/27/2012
She tried fixing the public schools...little thing called a teachers union was completely rigid and non-compromising, blocking all hopes of progress. How can the public schools be fixed when they can't even fire teachers who should be fired? It is a mess, but at least she made an effort.
01:01 PM on 02/27/2012
She fired over half the teachers in DC and test results, if you actually believe them as indicators of student achievement which most people do not, went down. This despite rampant cheating in most DC schools. Many of the worst cheaters were even given bonuses.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CA Maestro
Am I teacher of music, or a musician who teaches?
08:32 AM on 02/28/2012
I hear this a lot: "Well, at least she did something, which is better than nothing." I'm not sure why it is that when it comes to the economy or health care, everyone understands that just doing something isn't enough - you have to do the right thing. Doing the wrong thing has potentially disastrous results and will make the situation worse and/ or impede real progress. But when it comes to education the reformers are taking a ready-fire-aim approach, stirring up a frenzy of outrage - hoping that if people get fired up enough they'll help push legislation through as quickly as possible without really thinking through the consequences.

They have succeeded in getting you to believe that a) the problems of education are solely a product of bad teaching and b) it's the unions that are to blame. You have become their most valuable weapon - the mislead voter.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Cougar90210
That's me in the corner . . . losing my religion
11:28 AM on 02/27/2012
Look at "big name" education "reformers," and more often than not you will find politically connected individuals who are much more interested in personal power, prestige, and $$$ than in doing anything of substance for kids. Michelle Rhee is just a poster girl for this crowd. She's about as phony as they come.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:33 PM on 02/27/2012
When I first read your post I thought you were talking about teacher unions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
snesich
02:37 PM on 02/28/2012
Yeah, we all know those rich and well-connected teachers...making a gargantuan $40K a year, and living the life of glamour, fancy dinners, limos, private jets, yachts, mansions...oh wait, that's the people who are funding the "education reform" efforts. My mistake.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vesaversa1
Stupid is forever, ignorance can be fixed.
11:11 AM on 02/27/2012
I didn't know Rhee's and Kevin Johnson were married .Shocking .
12:54 PM on 02/27/2012
Who do you think covered up Johnson's sexual molestation accusations from two teenagers who worked for his organization.
11:05 AM on 02/27/2012
"Billionaire John Arnold, a former Enron "TRADER"..."??? Hmmm...talk about corruption hidden in plain sight.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NetLoa
10:50 AM on 02/27/2012
BTW, somebody once pointed out, when you are losing a war, you don't blame the troops (i.e., the teachers), you blame the generals.
11:10 AM on 02/27/2012
Well, I used to teach in Texas, and all our principals and asst principals were former "bad" coaches. The good coaches got paid the highest salaries in the districts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
enlightened45
03:53 PM on 02/28/2012
The good coaches got loaded up with "extra" duty assignments that paid big $$$$$ added to their paychecks, and I don't ever know of a coach who didn't get assigned "supervision" instead of teaching classes. All had lucrative 255 day instead of the typical 180 day contracts so they could plan the sports seasons and schedules during the summer. The superintendent was usually a really bad coach who had built cattle loaders and painted tractors using school facilities and personnel for the influential farmers who were conveniently also Board of Education members. Not Texas, but this is not unique to only Texas, unfortunately, my friend.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NetLoa
10:49 AM on 02/27/2012
Poverty is THE BIGGEST PROBLEM in our education system, period. If you control for that, our schools do as well as any on earth.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:24 PM on 03/01/2012
Poverty, violence, and and inability for schools to implement good sound values like good discipline in the school and classroom, respect for themselves, their peers, authority and their school. For some reason there is a trend right now of being in denial about student's misbehavior. I'm not sure if it's fear of lawsuits, but somehow "due process" has turned into do nothing and it's such a great disservice to our children because when they leave the shelter of being a minor and the lax consequences they face without the high expectations of a strong disciplinary program in schools, these kids are being groomed for prison. Wait, I guess that ensures profits for the prison corporate enterprise.
08:35 AM on 04/10/2012
@watcherback I loved your comment, "there is a trend right now of being in denial about students' misbehavior." There couldn't be a more true statement. We teachers can do everything possible, short of waving pom-poms and doing cartwheels in class, to get our students' attention and interest, but it all comes down to home training. If the child has a supportive parent who disciplines and corrects poor behavior, then the child will perform well in the classroom. However, that is not what we're teaching right now. There is no respect for authority, for peers, apathy, disdain for rules, blatant and rude misbehavior....it is difficult to teach in such situations. Thus, blaming the teacher is moot. The child is responsible for his education, whether or not he/she wishes to succeed. The teacher can teach, motivate, inspire all she wants, but if the child doesn't care, scores will go down, schools will fail.
10:20 AM on 02/27/2012
The AFT should not be posting rumors. As far as Ms. Rhee goes, it is quite apparent who she is loyal to. Here is a fact, charter schools do not operate by the same rules as public schools, they are not found to be substantially better, and the schools are the biggest problem- it is society.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris Corcoran
10:19 AM on 02/27/2012
This woman has no clue about education. She spent a few years as a teacher and now is an "expert"? She favors charter schools...which studies have shown, show no improvement, and they actually funnel money away from the regular public schools. She also claims poverty is no excuse. Teach in a low income school for a day, and you'll know otherwise. It's all about parenting, means, modeling, and a stable home life. Stable home lives are created with good jobs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
enlightened45
10:09 AM on 02/27/2012
Rhee has discovered the most effective means of garnering both a big paycheck and political clout is by blaming the classroom teachers. Get on the Bash the Teacher bandwagon and you will soon have a parade of wealthy "benefactors" who are either naive or opportunistic in selling their products such as testing materials, textbooks, hedge fund retirement investments, etc. Rhee is a self-promoter in the same league as Sarah Palin and Herman Cain. But she is not the only one with big influence and $$$$$skin in the game.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
snesich
02:45 PM on 02/28/2012
Rhee gets $50,000 per speech, demands a suite in a 5 star hotel, first class seats, or a private jet, and much more. Don't believe me. Go inquire with the people who book this "Celebrity Girl" and find out for yourself.

This is what people like Rhee do: put in a few short years---or even less---in a public position. Gain the public spotlight by beating up on people with little power or influence, and then, once you have a following---and funding from a few billionaires---you can exploit what was a public trust that was given to you, and milk it for millions.

When will we FINALLY demand new laws that prohibit former government officials from using their offices to then make gobs of money afterwards? Can't everyone see the obvious? People in high-level government positions will compromise their actions in office, with an eye on the Big Payoff coming later...as long as they "behave" (wink, wink)

It's called "Delayed Bribery". And it's time we put an end to this charade.
11:27 PM on 02/26/2012
What tended to make America great and its citizens identify with a nationalism and sense of brotherhood is that children of the rich the poor and the middle all attended the same public schools and were drafted into the military. That was true of communities that had large parochial schools, eventually all the students generally attended the same high school. Even in segregated communities there was a shared and common experience, albeit not good of being American. We have since descended into tribalism. Gated communities segregated by wealth.
02:41 AM on 02/28/2012
I salute you saintjule. You are so right. Everyone should go to the same schools and everyone benefits.
photo
nypoet22
Psychology Ph.D., Civics Teacher, Songwriter
08:07 PM on 02/28/2012
absolutely right. this is the new political divide; left-right politics is over, it's us vs. the corporations, and three guesses who's winning.