More

HuffPost Social Reading

California Proposition 209: Minority Enrollments Down In UC Schools Despite Diversity Efforts

California Proposition 209

  First Posted: 02/24/2012 3:48 pm Updated: 02/24/2012 4:00 pm

This article comes to us courtesy of California Watch.

By Erica Perez

More than a decade after California law banned race-conscious admissions, outreach and financial aid at public universities, the state's most selective public university system has seen a significant impact on its ability to increase enrollments of African American, Latino and American Indian students.

A ruling by the Supreme Court ending race-based preferences in college admissions would have a limited effect in California because state law already prohibits it. But as other states consider the effects of a Supreme Court ruling on their own college populations, they might observe what's happened in the Golden State.

The University of California Board of Regents in 1995 passed a resolution that eliminated race, religion, sex, color, ethnicity or national origin as criteria for admission to the university. The following year, California voters approved Proposition 209, which went further by also prohibiting race-conscious outreach and financial aid.

The percentage of underrepresented minority students admitted to the UC system dropped significantly as soon as Prop. 209 passed. Today, despite a number of policies and strategies employed by the university to diversify its student population, these groups remain a substantially smaller proportion of those admitted to and enrolled at the university's most selective campuses - UC Berkeley and UCLA - than they were before the elimination of race-conscious policies.

What's more, the gap between the percentage of underrepresented minority students graduating from California high schools and the percentage enrolling at UC has widened.

At UC Berkeley, from 1995 to 1998, the number of admitted California resident African American, Latino and American Indian undergraduates dropped 58 percent. These students went from 27 percent of the admitted pool to 12 percent.

At UCLA, underrepresented minority admissions dropped by 53 percent in that period. They went from 28 percent to 13 percent of the pool.

The percentage of underrepresented minorities at UC Berkeley and UCLA has grown but never fully recovered. In fall 2010, these students made up 17 percent of the admitted pool at Berkeley and 21 percent at UCLA, according to UC data [PDF].

And while the percentage of new UC freshmen from California public schools who are underrepresented minorities has grown since 1995, from 20 percent to 25 percent in 2009, that hasn't kept pace with the changing demographics of California's public schools.

The gap between the percentage of underrepresented minorities graduating from California public high schools and the percentage of resident underrepresented minorities enrolled at UC has grown from an 18 percentage point gap to 23 percentage points, according to university data [PDF].

Anne De Luca, associate vice chancellor and acting director of undergraduate admissions at UC Berkeley, said Prop. 209 put the university at a disadvantage compared with some of its competitors, such as Stanford, MIT or Cal Tech, because those institutions can more freely reach out to underrepresented minority students and woo them with bigger financial aid packages.

De Luca said that when a parent whose son or daughter was offered a race-based scholarship from another institution calls UC Berkeley to ask whether Cal can match the award, the university's hands are tied.

"For us, it's a clear no," De Luca said. "It doesn't mean that a student's not deserving. For us, it means we can't take that approach with that student."

Under the provisions of state law, the university can't create outreach programs based on students' race or ethnicity, and admissions officials are prohibited from viewing applicants' race or ethnicity during admissions reviews.

In fact, application readers get 30 hours of training every year before starting to read active applications, in part to walk through scenarios that might test the boundaries of race-neutral admissions.

"When we see a mention of racial or ethnic background, it's neutral," De Luca said. "If a student says, 'I'm the only African American student in my AP calculus class,' that's not a plus. ... We're trying to understand the full context of a student's experience - what have they done with the opportunities they have been provided, how they respond to the challenges in their lives."

It's a balancing act for the university when it comes to recruitment strategies in the post-Prop. 209 era. For example, a new program called the Summer Institute for Emerging Managers and Leaders will bring 25 students from historically black colleges and universities to six UC business and management schools.

Such programs are aimed not only at training future leaders, but also at recruiting diverse undergraduates to UC graduate schools, said UC spokesman Steve Montiel. These programs have to be evaluated and approached delicately because of the ban on race-based outreach.

"Some people asked the question on that; is it consistent with Prop. 209?" he said. "We say it is, because HBCUs are open to students of all races."

In the wake of Prop. 209, the university implemented a number of strategies aimed at increasing diversity that were not race-based.

The Eligibility in the Local Context program allows the university reach out to the top 9 percent of students in each California high school early in their senior year and follow up with them throughout the application process.

The university implemented "comprehensive review" admissions, which encouraged UC campuses that could not admit all eligible applicants to more fully review each applicant.

UC also has worked to increase partnerships with community colleges and K-12 schools.

Gibor Basri, UC Berkeley's vice chancellor for equity and inclusion, oversees a portfolio of outreach programs that reach about 35,000 students with an annual budget of roughly $7 million. Many of the programs are aimed at developing a college-going culture in K-12 schools and community colleges. The university works directly with students, teachers and counselors.

The university runs the California College Preparatory Academy, a charter school in partnership with Aspire Public Schools, for example. All 17 students in the first graduating class went on to four-year colleges. Only one went to UC Berkeley.

"These programs are not Berkeley-specific," Basri said. "They are just raising the college-going culture in general ... so most of the people they touch won't be coming to Berkeley. We think that's a worthwhile thing in a broader sense."

Erica Perez is an investigative reporter for California Watch, a project of the non-profit Center for Investigative Reporting. Find more California Watch stories here.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SAN FRANCISCO

 
 
  • Comments
  • 69
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nix28
Embracing honesty and its ugly step-sister, truth.
12:20 AM on 02/28/2012
Just a few things. I'd like to know the statistics for citizens versus non-citizens. There are non-citizens graduating from high school that do not apply to college due to their status, and I think it's important to eliminate that as a factor in the gap between graduating seniors and college admissions.

From there, it would be great to know the number of underrepresented minorities applying as compared to the number of underrepresented minorities accepted into the university and the number that actually enrolls.

With both data sets, it would be great to know the reasoning behind not applying to school, the reasons why students weren't admitted, and the reasons why students were admitted but opted not to attend. I think this information is crucial in honestly assessing the underrepresentation of certain minority groups in CA's public university system. This information would help policy makers, legislators, administrators, educators, etc determine where the weaknesses lay so that streamlined efforts can be made towards improvement.
03:46 PM on 02/27/2012
When did Asians become a majority group in California?
photo
akutan
Black Conservative
05:09 PM on 02/26/2012
Attend college as an adult and you won't have to worry about admissions testings.
02:58 PM on 02/26/2012
Look on the bright side, graduation rates won't go down.
12:33 PM on 02/26/2012
Not necessarily a bad thing. For the Black and Hispanic kids that do get in they and others no they got in based on their own merits and hard work as opposed to their race.

The focus to cure these supposed deficiencies should be focused well before the admissions process.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UnknownSolider
10:31 AM on 02/26/2012
Some people here don't understand what this article is about, nor do many of you fully comprehend what the UC Berkley admission officers are talking about. 

They are talking about MINORITY CANDIDATES who are being recruited by places like MIT, HARVARD, and STANFORD. UC Berkley and other California State Schools are saying they can not compete for these ELITE Minority Candidates because of Prop 209. 

Where a Minority student from California may want to stay closer to home, but they make have to take out crippling Loans to go to UC Berkley, where Harvard is pretty telling them they can go to their school for FREE, or their tuition will be based on their parents income. 

For those thinking this is some numbers game where Elite schools are just looking for Minority bodies to fill some quota, let me be the first to tell you that you are woefully misinformed.
11:52 AM on 02/27/2012
It should be about the students. If Harvard is willing to give one kid a free education, let him go there. It allows the UC system to take the next kid. Why should the UC system compete for those few kids (even if Harvard filled their class it is what....1500 kids), there are more than enough qualified students to fill the UC system.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UnknownSolider
12:36 PM on 02/27/2012
Its not the entire UC system that they are talking about, they are talking about the top schools in the UC system. What they do not want is for their elite schools to become Second Tier. If the majority white populace starts to shun a particular school because it is becoming to Asian, or too white (think Bob Jones University), what will happen is the school will not be able to attract top Asians, or top Whites. This process will lead the school to become a Second Tier school, where they can not attract top black, latino, or native American students because of Prop 209. The concepts behind Diversity were not based on some feel good PC crap, they were built on clinical studies paid for by large corporations. Diversity is about money and competition, anyone telling you something different doesn't know what they are talking about.
06:05 PM on 02/25/2012
My son is a sophomore at UC Merced, which has done a great job in attracting Hispanic students. The numbers for African Americans are not great, but better than most UCs. Overall, I believe UC Merced is the most diverse campus. The school has a huge outreach in the central valley and has already had a significant (and positive) effect in high school student's aspirations and academic improvement. Also, having a very diverse faculty helps.
09:58 PM on 02/27/2012
that's wonderful to hear
02:29 AM on 02/28/2012
Check it out. It IS wonderful. My son is European white, which number about 20% But he is a "post racial" kid as are most people his age.
01:14 PM on 02/25/2012
Sounds like these "under represented" minorities need to focus on their studies in high school and do better. No body reserves spots for specific races on a basketball court. They shouldn't do it in college admissions either.
10:16 PM on 02/27/2012
unless their high schools are horribly underfunded, neglected, and have poor facilities and are having programs cut b/c of lack of state funding for public education. or if their schools are being shut down, which is happening in low income minority areas across the state (and the nation), forcing them to go to already overcrowded schools, making them even more overcrowded.

i'm waiting for the day when white Californians become a substantially underrepresented minority in the UC system (in other words, when Asian Americans represent 60 or 70 or even 80% of the student body at all the campuses including Berkeley and UCLA, not only UC Irvine)

once white students become underrepresented minorities and are proven to benefit from race-based affirmative action, how much longer will it be illegal in California? at many of the Ivy League / other elite universities in the nation, if it weren't for affirmative action policies, the student bodies would have majorities that were (perhaps overwhelmingly) Asian/Asian American.

i support race-based affirmative action, not b/c i inherently like the idea of giving benefits based on race, or b/c i think that all white & Asian people are homogenous, but b/c i acknowledge that white supremacy has a very ugly, violent, oppressive, and genocidal history in this country, with economic-cultural-political effects to this day. i would like to exhaust race-conscious policies until we reach the day when they are unnecessary (and i believe we can reach that day).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UnknownSolider
09:11 AM on 02/28/2012
A lot of people misconstrue Affirmative Action just the way you did. Affirmative Action was never meant to be Race Based, it was suppose to be race inclusive. If the minimum standard for acceptance into Yale is a 4.0 High School GPA, and 1300 on the SATs, what people started to call Affirmative Action was the White kid who scored 1500 with a 4.2 GPA being rejected in favor of the Black American kid who scored 1350 with a 4.0 GPA......... They both met the minimum standard which means they are both qualified to attend the school, its just that one exceeded the standard......... Once they meet the standard, then other factors are considered with race being one of the other factors in the admissions office shaping the incoming student body.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
12:36 PM on 02/25/2012
Proposition 209 is the most fair way to run a college admission's program. It gives a graduate from Beverly Hills High and Hoover High the exact same process.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UCBAlum
Secularism is the only guarantee of relig. freedom
01:21 PM on 02/25/2012
And that benefits the advantaged over the disadvantaged - whether the disadvantaged is race-based or based on something else. Is that a fair way to run a public university system that ALL taxpayers pay for?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
02:34 PM on 02/25/2012
How so? EVERY high school graduate has an equal opportunity. That is the definition of fair.
09:21 PM on 02/25/2012
There is a place for the disadvantaged. Its called junior college. If they can't muster the grades to get into UC, they can prove themselves in junior college and transfer in. Shortcomings from grade school aren't going to help in a top level university, and a top level university isn't the place to play catch up.
photo
George Hanshaw
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
11:58 AM on 02/25/2012
The real tragedy is that the UC system continues to fund totally worthless 'majors' like race and gender identity studies when what the state REALLY needs is Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics majors. You can toss poly sci onto the totally worthless pile as well. More lawyers is DEFINITELY something California can do without. Masters in Social Work could go too.

No matter WHO we have as students, we need to direct them toward majors that California actually needs. These worthless faux-education majors contribute nothing to the state and damn little to the individual. These departments should all be eliminated before you raise tuition a dime for the science majors.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UCBAlum
Secularism is the only guarantee of relig. freedom
01:25 PM on 02/25/2012
The University of California is not a vocational school. "Worthwhile majors" are not chosen by fiat.
photo
George Hanshaw
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
09:02 PM on 02/26/2012
BULL

EVERY university makes a decision as to what degrees and degree programs it is going to offer. For public universities, taxpayers are substantially subsidizing these choices. They have a right to expect that these judgments are reasonable ones. As a UC Berkeley graduate, I can tell you that is not generally the case.
06:09 PM on 02/25/2012
Part of the goal of higher education is to teach about culture, the arts, literature, philosophy and the like. A University is not a trade school or only for job preparation. A major goal is to produce educated people and responsible, knowledgeable citizens.
photo
akutan
Black Conservative
05:08 PM on 02/26/2012
None of those will help get you a high paying job. Employers care about skills not culture.
photo
George Hanshaw
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
09:07 PM on 02/26/2012
It is indeed, and when the money to do those things is diverted to truly worthless majors because of political correctness, we all suffer.

Would you approve of an advocacy course on creationism? How about if it were made a distribution requirement for graduation?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Le Nwwaert
10:47 AM on 02/25/2012
Having standards is racist
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UnknownSolider
12:38 PM on 02/25/2012
Its easy to see that you didn't comprehend the article, so why do you care? You wouldn't qualify for admission.
10:23 AM on 02/25/2012
This is going to spread across the country if the Supreme Court rules the way I expect it to rule when it hears the affirmative action case. www.thelettersproject.org
01:16 PM on 02/25/2012
Perhaps with the end of racial set asides, we'll all be able to say: "Free at last"!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
VegasBabe
All for one & one for all!
06:26 PM on 02/24/2012
This is a testament to the importance of affirmative action. Shame on UC schools or maybe they just prefer their campuses to be lily white. There are a great many students who have done poorly in high school, an abyss if there ever was one as many will agree, and on the so called admission tests and yet EXCEL in college. This needs to be vigorously addressed and the sooner, the better.
09:26 PM on 02/24/2012
Your contention is that students unable to do solid work in high school and equally poorly on admissions testing are unfairly being excluded from college? Are you sure you want to advocate for those best suited to vocational training with this argument?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Elecktra001
PC assassin
10:14 PM on 02/24/2012
Fanned & Fav'd Klous.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
VegasBabe
All for one & one for all!
08:26 PM on 02/25/2012
OR, with your contention, these students are only suited for "vocational training". Do you really want to explore how many of our U.S. most accomplished citizens excelled with and w/o formal education and/or did poorly in high school?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:00 PM on 02/24/2012
White enrollment at UC Berkley: 27.1%
White composition of California: 57.6%

http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06000.html
http://opa.berkeley.edu/statistics/enrollmentData.html

Apology accepted.
11:35 PM on 02/24/2012
57.6% includes Hispanics who are white, actual culture-less whites make up 40.1% of California's population.
09:11 AM on 02/25/2012
Asian population in Calfornia..... 13%
Asian population at UC Berkeley....41-45% varies with stats.

What does that tell you?

No need for apologies.