iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Arthur Delaney
GET UPDATES FROM Arthur:

Drug Testing Bill Targets Florida State Workers, Excludes Lawmakers

Posted: 02/27/2012 1:24 pm Updated: 02/27/2012 10:45 pm

A Florida state lawmaker is pushing a bill requiring state agencies to test their workers for drugs. But the bill wouldn't mandate testing for all public sector employees; members of the Florida legislature would get a pass.

Rep. Jimmie Smith (R-Lecanto), the bill's sponsor, said he supports drug testing for lawmakers, but requiring them to pee in cups like everyone else would violate their constitutional rights. In an email to The Huffington Post, Smith cited the U.S. Supreme Court's 1997 decision in Chandler v. Miller, which struck down tests for political candidates in Georgia.

While he "strongly" supports drug testing for legislators, Smith said, "being elected to office is completely different from being hired by a company or agency."

Some of Smith's Democratic colleagues think his bill would set a double standard. "I firmly believe we have to lead by example," Rep. Joe Abruzzo (D-Wellington) said last week, according to the Miami Herald. "The day that I have to go take a [drug] test as a state representative is the day that I'll support this legislation."

In 2011, Republicans caught a fever, and the only prescription has been more drug testing. At least 36 state legislatures considered bills to drug test welfare applicants, and at least a dozen mulled drug tests for the recipients of unemployment benefits -- although lawmakers rarely cite evidence that either population has a drug problem. In several states, Democrats have countered with legislation to drug test the people writing the bills.

Florida has already gone further than any other state. Last year, Gov. Rick Scott (R) issued an executive order directing some state agencies to test their workers for drugs, and he was the only governor to sign into law a bill requiring blanket drug testing of every welfare applicant. Lawsuits have beaten back both policies for now.

The Florida chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union challenged the executive order and the law in court. It won a temporary injunction that halted the welfare testing. Scott suspended the public worker testing in the wake of the suits, which are ongoing.

While the governor's order already represented "the most sweeping assessment of suspicionless testing by any government in the history of the country," said Florida ACLU spokesman Derek Newton, Rep. Smith's bill would set up an even broader drug testing regime. Newton said his organization doesn't comment on potential litigation, but suggested Smith's bill, which will soon be considered by the full Florida House of Representatives, would probably trigger another challenge if it became law.

"We have gone to court twice in the last year to challenge suspicionless drug testing," Newton said, "and if the state continues to enact policies to require people to be subject to government search and seizure without suspicion, I would not be surprised at all if that's something we continue to oppose."

HuffPost asked Smith why, if he's willing to risk a court challenge over testing state workers, is he not willing to risk a challenge over drug testing in the statehouse. He said that adding lawmakers would "incredibly broaden" the scope of the bill and that the Supreme Court has made it clear what's constitutional and what's not.

"To this date, the Supreme Court has only heard two cases relating to drug testing employees, and both of these were held constitutional," Smith said. "The Supreme Court is the ultimate law of the land, and, to date, drug testing of state employees has not been found unconstitutional."

Nevertheless, Smith stressed that he's not opposed to taking drug tests as a member of the Florida Legislature.

"In fact, just last week at the demand of some constituents, I gladly paid $40 out of my own pocket to take a drug test and passed this test," he said. "I will continue to make these results available in my office to any constituent who is interested in viewing them. My constituents are my boss, and if asked, I will gladly take a drug test."

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
A Florida state lawmaker is pushing a bill requiring state agencies to test their workers for drugs. But the bill wouldn't mandate testing for all public sector employees; members of the Florida legis...
A Florida state lawmaker is pushing a bill requiring state agencies to test their workers for drugs. But the bill wouldn't mandate testing for all public sector employees; members of the Florida legis...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,429
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (64 total)
11:47 AM on 08/09/2012
Just say "No" to drug testing without just cause.
04:24 AM on 03/13/2012
This guy is going over board with drugs and testing. No matter what anyone says he is violating eveyone's constitutional rights. Search and siezure for what? Unless someone is had an accident or breaks a law. why bother with all this? Besides that who says state reps are any better than other citizens? They are NOT above law and this is an insult to every Floridian that lives here! Yea, test all the police force too. He must have some kind of stock in the medical field to run up more bills. Making someone pay for these for no reason is nuts. Florida is a police state now. I feel like we are communist state. This governor has taken made it very difficult for Florida's legitimate pain patients to get their prescriptions filled. How cruel can anyone be to have taken this pain medication issue to this extreme. Pharmacy chains won't fill prescriptions for pain meds because they are afraid now and the private pharmacies are only taking cash that's marked up 300%! He is allowing this happen. We have a lot of elderly people here and a lot more pain patients than most states because we have the warm weather they seek. I guess he wants to know just how many state employees need pain medicine too? This is getting into the privacy of people a bit too far. Maybe he wants proof that 116 million people have pain on a daily basis in this country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TedEjr
If satire goes over your head, don't stand up
03:05 PM on 03/06/2012
From the Georgia ruling, upon which this guy bases his exemption, is the following---courts must undertake a context specific inquiry, examining closely the competing private and public interests advanced by the parties. See Von Raab, 489 U. S., at 665-666. In evaluating Georgia's ballot access, drug testing statute--a measure plainly not tied to individualized suspicion---AND---A Georgia statute requires candidates for designated state offices (END)

1---Note that the law struck down addressed CANDIDATES, not legislators. Ergo, the law from Georgia is not a valid use for claiming exemption.

2---Note that the strike down stated that the Georgia law did not address a reasonable suspicion INDIVIDUAL need for drug testing. Neither does the Florida law.

Governor Gollum, if you sign this, you are throwing away more tax dollars on what will surely be overturned in the courts.

Florida. In specific, all of you wearing tea bags on your hats. How do you like your BIG Government, Fiscally IRresponsible, Governor now?
04:09 PM on 03/03/2012
Look at the picture of Governor Scott. Does he look "high" or what? The true test is when he opens his mouth. Then, any and all doubt disappears. Is it any wonder that he supports giving elected officials a pass?
03:55 PM on 03/03/2012
The Florida legislature has joined ranks with all the public servant "haters". They are relentless in their attempt to blame all the woes of Florida on the heads of these people. It's ironic that the people who scream the loudest about the salaries and and benefits of public servants are the same people who refused to take civil servant jobs in the 70's, 80's, and 90's because the pay and benefits were too low. So, public servants worked years making low salaries while private industry employees racked in the "big bucks." Now, private industry jobs have dried up and all the people who wanted nothing to do with lowly government jobs are "up in arms" over public servants' benefits. So, in addition to taking money, benefits, vacation, and pensions, now Florida is demanding they "pee" in a cup. The Florida Legislature, on the other hand, will not "pee in a cup". They get a pass. Why? According to Rep. Smith (R) there is a difference between being elected and being hired by an agency. It would violate the legislators constitutional rights. Obviously, state and county employees have no such constitutional rights. What's next? Full body searches when upon arrival at work? We live in Florida, not the northeast. We don't have the same benefits, salaries, and pensions that our counterparts in other parts of the country have. People are reading daily about huge pensions in New York. Hello! We live and work in Florida. There is a big difference!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
01:44 PM on 03/01/2012
why am I not surprised

law maker ,s not having to go by the law ,s they them selves pass for others to follow

now what,s wrong with this picture ??
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
01:41 PM on 03/01/2012
he said

but requiring them to pee in cups like everyone else would violate their constitutional rights.

I believe it was all said right there in that sentence

now what does it all mean ? :)

I am now thinking of running for Senate

so I can have me some of those constitutional rights for my very own !!
photo
MarvinM
Where's the Ka-Boom?
02:46 PM on 02/29/2012
Bill sponsor Jimmie Smith (R-Lecanto) said "To this date, the Supreme Court has only heard two cases relating to drug testing employees, and both of these were held constitutional," Smith said. "The Supreme Court is the ultimate law of the land, and, to date, drug testing of state employees has not been found unconstitutional."

He brought up Supreme Court decision Chandler/Miller that said blanket drug testing of legislators WAS unconstitutional.

“Our precedents establish that the proffered special need for drug testing must be substantial--important enough to override the individual's acknowledged privacy interest, sufficiently vital to suppress the Fourth Amendment's normal requirement of individualized suspicion... Georgia has failed to show ... a special need of that kind.”

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/96-126.ZO.html

I’m gooling/yahooing/dogpiling and I cannot find 2 cases, unless he’s referring to:

“Von Raab, 489 U. S., at 659 (drug tests for United States Customs Service employees who seek transfer or promotion to certain positions); Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn., 489 U.S. 602, 608-613 (1989) (drug and alcohol tests for railway employees involved in train accidents and for those who violate particular safety rules)”

(from same document as above link)

Those were far from finding blanket unwarranted drug testing of state employees constitutional.

This will be challenged if they pass it, it will cost the state money, and I’m off to write my state representatives now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TedEjr
If satire goes over your head, don't stand up
03:07 PM on 03/06/2012
Also, the Georgia law specified CANDIDATES, not legislators.

The concept/rationale behind candidates is not applicable to this guy's excuse.
marinade
Not if a pipeline will break, but when.
08:41 AM on 02/29/2012
They also killed a bill that would require legislators to pay the same for their health insurance as other state employees.

A legislator pays $30 for a family plan. A regular employee pays $344.
10:29 PM on 02/28/2012
Too stupid to even comment on.

Idiot.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:27 PM on 02/28/2012
Its interesting how its a violation of constitutional rights for them to be tested but not for the regular imployees.
photo
MarvinM
Where's the Ka-Boom?
04:50 AM on 02/29/2012
But I wonder if the legislators' aides and staff will be required to take the random tests? They were not elected.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
policy5
Light a candle
08:57 PM on 02/28/2012
That is just WRONG on so many levels
08:17 PM on 02/28/2012
Im truly amazed at how easily Republicans give away their rights...take rights away from others and do it in the name of God.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:02 PM on 02/28/2012
Gilty until proven innocent.
photo
K August
Research Alec Exposed
07:37 PM on 02/28/2012
Follow the money. The first time Gov Scott of FL suggested drug testing he owned a string of drug testing labs.
Seeing how many states "considered" similar bills, this has to be the work of ALEC..... same with the Voter ID laws, Union busting etc.

There should be bills passed that make it a crime to let corporations write legislation and have their 99.9% Republican members pass the legislation off as their own.
Who'd Government is it anyway?........ the People's Government or corporate america's?