iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Amber Hansen's Chicken Slaughter Art Banned In Kansas

02/28/12 07:42 PM ET  AP

Amber Hansen
Amber Hansen's proposed art installation, "The Story of Chickens: A Revolution," has been banned in Lawrence, Kansas.

LAWRENCE, Kan. — Officials have banned an artist from publicly slaughtering chickens in eastern Kansas, saying the proposed art installation would amount to animal cruelty.

Lawrence's Assistant City Attorney Chad Sublet said Tuesday that artist Amber Hansen told him she "intends to abide by the city ordinance." Violating the animal cruelty ordinance could lead to a fine of up to $1,000 and six months in jail. Even keeping the chickens on private land would require her to meet other city codes on animal care.

Sublet said Hansen is considering alternatives to draw attention to the process of slaughtering animals, including a public sculpture.

Through the project, called "The Story of Chickens: A Revolution," Hansen originally planned to display coops of chickens at locations across Lawrence, where they would be cared for by volunteers. The birds would later be publicly slaughtered by a local farmer and served as a meal.

"By building a relationship with the birds, the project will transform the contemporary view of chickens as merely `livestock' to the beautiful and unique creatures they are, while promoting alternative and healthy processes of caring for them," Hansen, an artist in residence at the University of Kansas, wrote on her project's website.

She received funding from the Andy Warhol Foundation for Visual Arts' Rocket Grants program in collaboration with the Charlotte Street Foundation and the University of Kansas' Spencer Museum of Art.

Hansen spoke to the Lawrence-Journal World but didn't immediately respond to a message from The Associated Press left for her through a relative. She has said she grew up on a farm where some animals were raised for food. She said she began to feel disconnected from her food after she left and went to art school.

"If people choose to eat meat, it is an important process to witness and be mindful of," Hansen told the Lawrence newspaper. "It is a process that takes place on a mass scale every day, and we aren't really allowed to see it."

But several animal rights activists, including Lawrence's Compassion for All Animals group and United Poultry Concerns, had expressed concerns, including that the public display would be stressful for the animals. Hansen acknowledged there had been concerns.

"The project will move forward to accommodate that discussion, but it will abide by the city's codes," she told the Lawrence newspaper.

___

Online:

The Story of Chickens: http://thestoryofchickens.wordpress.com/2012/01/01/hello-world/

___

Information from: Lawrence Journal-World, http://www.ljworld.com

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

LAWRENCE, Kan. — Officials have banned an artist from publicly slaughtering chickens in eastern Kansas, saying the proposed art installation would amount to animal cruelty. Lawrence's Assistant...
LAWRENCE, Kan. — Officials have banned an artist from publicly slaughtering chickens in eastern Kansas, saying the proposed art installation would amount to animal cruelty. Lawrence's Assistant...
Filed by Hilary Hanson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 39
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
01:01 AM on 03/05/2012
Typical of Meat-Eating individuals. Keep the truth in the dark. Keep people as uninformed as they want to be. The animal rights people made a huge mistake not supporting this project. Getting people closer to the truth is worth being made a little uncomfortable for. Imagine the discomfort the animals go through each day... And the so called concern for the displayed chickens is nothing but a front by those organizations who don't want anyone to know the dirty little secrets. Being a vegan myself, I have realized that people need to be put face to face with the reality of meat. A reality that each person who buys industrialized meat is directly responsible for.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
plepgeat
My micro-bio was empty.
03:42 AM on 03/02/2012
She should choke her chicken in private, like I do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
greencowgirl
11:34 PM on 03/01/2012
Eastern Kansas is outlawing this artistic lesson on understanding where the meat all of us eat everyday comes from? Are they going to outlaw the chicken factory farms also located in kansas, where the care and slaughter of these poor creatures is beyond cruel? No! Infact, they'll probably make it a felony to take pictures in factory farms that expose what goes on there, just like Iowa is in the process of doing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bcmom
Stop breeding puppies
12:44 PM on 02/29/2012
People need to look at euthansias of our "pets". Some animal controls can euthanize hundreds of our "pets" daily. When I tell people that they do not want to hear about it because it is too awful. Duh, well yes. People cannot face up to the killings in our shelters. Out of sight out of mind. It is one thing to hear about it, it is completely another thing to hold them and see the fear in their eyes. Animals know what is going on. They smell the death. Yet we keep allowing people to keep breeding recklessly to turn around and kill them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
geauxangel
01:33 AM on 03/01/2012
I agree, wholeheartedly...animals feel fear, pain, confusion just like we do...they love and bond with humans and they should not be treated as objects...some people just have no heart...
09:24 AM on 03/02/2012
I AGREE
09:46 AM on 02/29/2012
I have to admit being stunned by seeing the words "art" and "chicken slaughter" together in a sentence, and then reading further that she actually got a grant for this. Com'n...you can't illustrate your point of view more creatively and less violently than this? I agree with cosmiCataclysm: Kansas sucks. Can't get their biology right...can't get art right apparently, either. It's just a shame that it's picked up publicity and being commented upon here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
plepgeat
My micro-bio was empty.
03:46 AM on 03/02/2012
What, do most people only eat animals that die of old age? The artist wasn't beating the chickens to death with a pool cue or cooking them alive like lobsters - they were going to be "publicly slaughtered by a local farmer and served as a meal." The only thing unusual is that the public would have learned, or been reminded of, where meat comes from - which was the point.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
xenubarb
Nebulon V
12:15 PM on 03/02/2012
This reminded me of a famous question posed on 'Yahoo Answers.' It was this:

"Why don't people get meat from the grocery store where no animals were harmed?"

This was a serious question from someone who apparently thinks grocery store is born in styrofoam trays.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Leslie Robinson Goldberg
Writer
11:43 PM on 02/28/2012
Why not cut to the chase, and just commit (a crime)? Do we need to see an actual killing to understand what's going on? Just watch "Meet Your Meat" or "Earthlings." Your heart will be broken, you may cry, you may look away and nobody extra will have to die.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:50 PM on 02/28/2012
Slaughter away! Don't tell anyone or just say its your religion. We have no freedom for such a free country.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:43 PM on 02/29/2012
Slaughter away.....who's up for Kentucky Fried Chicken? Extra crispy??? I'm buying....
photo
tavvie
Same circus, different clowns
06:54 PM on 02/28/2012
Art is meant to cause a stir, shake people up, get a reaction. So this is perfect!
10:35 PM on 02/28/2012
Um only when it's for a good purpose and when it doesn't infringe upon the rights of others (and that includes animals).

Sorry, so called "artists" who kill animals for their act are posers. It doesn't make them artists. It makes them narcissistic, attention seeking, idiots.
photo
tavvie
Same circus, different clowns
01:37 AM on 02/29/2012
It IS for a good purpose but one that's clearly lost on you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
geauxangel
01:36 AM on 03/01/2012
No other creature should have to suffer real, physical pain in the name of art...it's just sadistic!
01:04 AM on 03/05/2012
You are missing the point honey...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cosmiCataclysm
06:24 PM on 02/28/2012
Her point is not really that 'deep' -- chickens get slaughtered; seeing it happen will not affect most people. My grandmother used to slaughter chickens in the backyard, they were then eaten. Why did no one call her an artist for this? PS: Kansas sucks.
05:46 PM on 02/28/2012
She has a point, but it is political......I would hardly call it "art."
photo
MuckyPup
Think, Thank, Thunk
05:23 PM on 02/28/2012
I find it rather sad that she actually has a point; an awful lot of people today are completely clueless as to the processes by which their food reaches their plates. And that includes vegetables, too.
04:10 PM on 02/28/2012
What a fruitcake!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DrugSniffingCat
04:01 PM on 02/28/2012
I understand why she wanted to do this. Showing people that farm animals are just like dogs and cats, that you can form a relationship, and think twice before eating meat.
03:41 PM on 02/28/2012
I think it's brilliant.
03:09 PM on 02/28/2012
how exactly is this art, rather then some demonstration of where and how we get meat? Art?? Really??
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:29 PM on 02/28/2012
Culinary arts. Yes, it is art.