iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Global Warming: U.S. Belief Reportedly Rises With Mixed Explanations

AP    
First Posted: 02/28/2012 3:07 pm Updated: 03/ 2/2012 10:01 am

WASHINGTON (AP) — Americans' belief in global warming is on the rise, along with temperatures and surprising weather changes, according to a new university poll.

The survey by the University of Michigan and Muhlenberg College says 62 percent of those asked last December think the Earth is getting warmer. That's up from 55 percent in the spring of that year and 58 percent in December 2010. It is the highest proportion in two years.

Nearly half the people who say they believe in global warming base that on personal observations of the weather. Climate researchers say that's reaching the correct conclusion for reasons that aren't quite right.

When asked an open-ended question about why they thought the Earth was warming, one-quarter of those surveyed pointed to temperatures they experience and another quarter cited other weather changes. One in 7 mentioned melting glaciers and polar sea ice, and 1 in 8 noted media coverage. Only 8 percent mentioned scientific research.

"It seems to be driven by an increased connection that the public is making between what they see in terms of weather conditions and climate change," said Chris Borick, the director Muhlenberg College Institute of Public Opinion.

The poll was conducted from Dec. 4 to Dec. 21, after the U.S. experienced a record 14 billion-dollar weather disasters in 2011, including killer tornadoes, an unusual northeastern hurricane, a devastating southwestern drought and floods along major rivers.

At the same time, this poll was done before the official start of winter, so people were not yet affected by what has been a mild season for many regions.

Borick said that after the previous two winters, which were quite snowy, belief in global warming dropped dramatically. So he says the findings from a fresh poll to be conducted in upcoming weeks may again reflect views based on the latest weather trend.

Climate scientists say daily local weather is not evidence of climate change. But they also say long-term climate change is so dramatic that people recognize and experience it.

"I'm pleased that Americans believe in thermometers," said University of Victoria climate scientist Andrew Weaver. "People feel confident about what they personally experience. They mix up the difference between weather and climate. It's not unexpected. It's human nature."

While it is a misconception to think that every short-term extreme weather event — like a flood or drought — is caused by climate change, a warming world does make such events more frequent, Weaver said.

NASA climate scientist Gavin Schmidt called strange daily weather "the visceral experience of climate" for people.

Earlier versions of the Michigan and Muhlenberg survey showed that Americans' belief in global warming peaked in December 2008 with 72 percent.

In the most recent survey, 78 percent of Democrats, 55 percent of independents and 47 percent of Republicans said they thought there was "solid evidence" of climate change. Of those who did not believe climate change was occurring, 81 percent thought that scientists were overstating the evidence for their own interest.

The survey of 887 people has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.

The findings are similar to other recent polls, including a 2010 AP-Stanford University Poll showing 3 out of 4 Americans thought global temperatures were going up, said Stanford poll chief Jon Krosnick. That survey, too, indicated local weather affected people's views about climate change.

___

Online:Survey posted on Brookings Institution website: http://bit.ly/wuKdd8

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON (AP) — Americans' belief in global warming is on the rise, along with temperatures and surprising weather changes, according to a new university poll. The survey by the Uni...
WASHINGTON (AP) — Americans' belief in global warming is on the rise, along with temperatures and surprising weather changes, according to a new university poll. The survey by the Uni...
WASHINGTON (AP) — Americans' belief in global warming is on the rise, along with temperatures and surprising weather changes, according to a new university poll. The survey by the Uni...
WASHINGTON (AP) — Americans' belief in global warming is on the rise, along with temperatures and surprising weather changes, according to a new university poll. The survey by the Uni...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 535
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
01:32 PM on 03/09/2012
Maybe people are finally waking up because its not a religious or a science issue, it's a moral issue to protect the plant.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Darwincrat
My God only exists if you believe too.
05:23 PM on 03/08/2012
The Heartland Institute, one of the leading think-tanks behind climate change skepticism, worked for Phillip Morris to question the health effects of second-hand smoke in the 1990's. We know how that argument turned out.

It is far easier to sew doubt, ignorance, and innuendo than it is to sew knowledge and wisdom.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
eaarth2
“An era ends when its illusions are exhausted
07:16 PM on 03/04/2012
So it be- however the science of climate change/global warming is very subtle now. No one storm or event can be said to have been caused by climate change- most of the time- sometimes however yes. Also that extra warmth in the atmosphere from greenhouse gases produces more water vapor. We have about 4-5% more water vapor in the atmosphere then 30 years ago-producing in many cases more precipitation. Heat waves and droughts are a primary precursor of climate change- as is melting in the arctic.

It takes time for the warmth now being generated by greenhouse gases to be seen. For-instance the warming we are seeing now is from the early 1990s- when C02 was in the low 360sppm- just over the line for what is considered a 'safe climate'. C02 this spring could reach 397ppm- but that will not be seen till 2030 and after. Its like a 'Faustian Bargain' it leads to complacency- but once the warming starts, it will be impossible to stop-
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:21 PM on 03/04/2012
An interesting bit of history -

"About 55 million years ago, in the Eocene, volcanic activity spewed enormous amounts of carbon dioxide into the air. The earth warmed by 4-5 degrees Centigrade. All surface ice melted, and every place on earth became tropical, even Antarctica. Sea levels rose a great deal and a significant amount of land was lost to the sea. It is estimated that sea levels rise some 10 to 20 meters (yards) for every 1 degree C increase in the average surface temperature, over the long term.

But along with all that dramatic change came something else. The seas absorbed a lot of the new carbon dioxide, creating carbonic acid. About 50% of some sorts of sea creatures did not survive the change.

The earth is repeating the experiment today, with human beings spewing out enormous amounts of carbon dioxide. And faster. Much faster indeed than in the Eocene.

Because of acidification and over-fishing, the world could lose a large number of ocean species just in the next 40 years or so."

This from Professor Juan Cole.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robco1
07:22 PM on 03/04/2012
Unfortunately, recent events are not looking good.

--The world's oceans might be acidifying 10 times faster than at any time during the last 300m years according to new research.--
http://preview.tinyurl.com/ocean-acid-carbonbrief
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:18 PM on 03/04/2012
Thanks for that. Not looking good at all.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:13 PM on 03/03/2012
Climatologist and evangelical Christian, Katherine Hayhoe, PhD., signed Kevin Trenberth's the "Letter from Concerned Scientists" response to the "No Need to Panic about Global Warming" letter to the Wall St. Journal.

Hayhoe now receives hate mail routinely from AGW deniers.

Meanwhile, Trenberth's signatories are representative of the current Who's Who of climatology, having authored or co-authored roughly 2,000 climate-related, peer-reviewed publications since 2001.

sample links beginning here:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/maxwells/heartland-institute-documents_b_1289669_138308180.html

By contrast, the "No Need to Panic" group consists of one contrarian climatologist, Richard Lindzen, with 45 climatology-related papers during this millennium, one astrophysicist, Nir Shaviv, with 6 such papers, and fourteen others with a sum total of ZERO climate-related papers during this millennium. Among those fourteen are: a right-wing science policy guy with a bachelor's degree and no science papers at all, a marketing and advertising professor, one medical researcher, one chemist, and variety of physicists who've never written anything peer-reviewed in climatology in decades or in several cases NEVER, as in no such papers at all.

The LIndzen gang's publication record:

starting here:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/maxwells/chasing-ice-climate-change_b_1300568_137601443.html

and here:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/maxwells/heartland-institute-documents_b_1289669_138313703.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EHenry
Author of the new book - How We Got Swindled by Wa
06:48 PM on 03/04/2012
And one creationist MD -- Ron Paul.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cayce58
04:59 PM on 03/03/2012
What is pathetic is that Europe and Siberia had heat waves in previous years. Anyone with a computer could have logged that in their brain. There have been abnormally warm winters somewhere for years.
photo
StephenBP
What's he building in there?
08:07 AM on 03/02/2012
It would be interesting to see a poll that identified people's relationship to nature and their age. For instance, what do people with a significant relationship with the outdoors, such as hunters, fishermen, farmers, outdoor construction workers, gardeners, and so forth, what do they think about about global warming. I would especially value the opinion of people who have been around the block for more than a few decades, as a significant period of time in the study of climate is usually defined in decades, not years.
07:54 PM on 03/02/2012
Fanned and faved but too common sense an approach for a survey group that is looking for a specific response.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cayce58
05:08 PM on 03/03/2012
63 here. Winter is snow on the ground from Dec. 15 to March 15. I walked roads that drifted so much that the telephone poles were buried by the plows. We had snowball fights above the wires. My son is 35 and doesn't remember snow there higher than a person. By 1985 it was raining in January. Thunder in winter gives me the creeps. I didn't hear that until the 90's. It's all different and the change is accelerating. We had tornados in S Pa. where I live now and it was a storm system unlike anything the weathermen remembered. Scientific America said the debate was over in 2006. For me it was over in 1985.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
01:24 AM on 03/01/2012
"promise not to complain when you come down with West Nile Virus."

Influenza is much more deadly [1] and thankfully much more mild this year [2]. Mild winters do have some benefits.

[1] http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/deaths.htm
[2] http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/25/health/start-of-winter-flu-season-in-us-is-announced.html?_r=1&ref=centersfordiseasecontrolandprevention
ubrew12
that crazy uncle from Amarcord
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
04:28 PM on 03/01/2012
As long as mortality improves, we'll have a net benefit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
04:34 PM on 03/01/2012
ubrew: Check out the CDC site. You are focused on a problem that is smaller than suicide. But influenza is a bigger problem than suicide. Heart disease and stroke are even worse. Heart disease, stroke, and influenze are mitigated some by milder winters. All three problems dwarf West Nile Virus.

Your focus on the little problems is interesting but does not discount my focus on the big problems.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:33 PM on 02/29/2012
This issue is still way on the back burner for Americans.

They will vote for "drill baby drill" candidates for the forseeable future ... which is why Obama moved himself into the "drill baby drill" camp in his most recent SOTU.
BlackbirdHighway
Brawndo's got electrolites!
04:12 PM on 02/29/2012
Do you think that will make conservatives vote for Obama? I'm thinking he won't get a lot of votes out of it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:27 PM on 02/29/2012
Meh, that's an interesting question.

I think it's sort of like arguing about whether signing welfare reform helped Clinton or hurt him .... I suspect in both cases it helped a fair bit, and took some of the wind of the conservatives sails.

It's not necc about winning over conservatives in cases like that, it can be about reducing their angst enough so they don't bother voting, and/or winning over fence-riding voters looking for a reasonable moderate to vote for.

It's an interesting question. Considering the Clinton won re-election, Obama probably will, and Carter didn't, I expect Democratic presidents will look for triangulation issues for many years to come.
ubrew12
that crazy uncle from Amarcord
04:34 PM on 02/29/2012
the meme is that if gas prices go up, and voters perceive you aren't drilling domestically, then your not drilling is why gas went up. This has nothing to do with reality, but has effectively been programmed into the American mind by the fossil fuels industry. And their power to program the American people is reflected in this, and by the entire subject of global warming. As Mel Brooks would say, 'Being King has its priviledges...'
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
10:30 PM on 02/29/2012
"They will vote for "drill baby drill" candidates for the forseeable future "

The 'drill baby drill" party lost the last presidential election.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:09 AM on 03/01/2012
Considering that Barack Obama embraced drilling in his most recent SOTU, I think it's safe to say the "drill baby drill" ***idea*** now carries ***both*** major parties.

If you want to vote for a "no more fossil fuels" presidential candidate, you need to look to the Green Party.
11:40 AM on 03/01/2012
I am neither GOP nor Democrat, but I can't help but notice that the "drill baby drill" party (AKA"The Party of 'Hell No'")kicked their opposition's butts in 2010 with the largest single Congressional shift in history.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
eaarth2
“An era ends when its illusions are exhausted
03:09 PM on 02/29/2012
I wonder what the public will think in a few years after more strange and destructive weather. As C02 continues to rise at a rate unknown in earths history- we will be in for some very unpleasant events.
10:21 PM on 02/29/2012
Since warming has paused since 1995 I don't see where this "strange destructive weather " will come from, do you ?

It may or may not warm further but blaming present weather on CO2 is mentally challenged.

When Al Gore went to congress to ague that localized cooling was caused by CO2 he set respect for science back 50 years.
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
10:33 PM on 02/29/2012
As you've been told before, no it ain't and no he didn't.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Milks
Ecologist
11:09 PM on 02/29/2012
Wow. Still at it with the "No warming since ____" tall tale. Don't you even bother looking at the temperature data before you post?

Woodfortrees.org: http://bit.ly/zaD9qe

GISS: +0.0123727ºC per year (1.23727ºC per century)
HadCRU3: +0.00810906ºC per year (0.810906ºC per century)

Yep. Sure looks like warming has paused since 1995 to me.
07:48 PM on 03/02/2012
Extra heat in the system causes some parts to COOL ! Surely you are kidding ?
03:00 PM on 03/03/2012
Why is that simple concept so hard for you to understand?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SuZQ22
03:02 PM on 02/29/2012
Duh! It's about time. And these same folks that don't believe in global warming probably believe wholeheartedly in Noah taking ALL the animals 2 x 2 onto a huge boat for 40 days and 40 nights. Why is it these people believe in stuff written by unscientific folk thousands of years ago, but don't believe in the science of today. It simply amazes me.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
08:03 PM on 03/02/2012
Carbon dating is a theory used to validate other theories used to validate other theories used to validate the global warming theory, just like they used it to validate the global cooling theory a few years ago.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rjhuntington
left is right and right is wrong
02:28 PM on 02/29/2012
The polar ice is melting and glaciers are receding all around the world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
11:44 AM on 03/01/2012
More are receding than increasing. No doubt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rjhuntington
left is right and right is wrong
12:21 PM on 03/01/2012
Almost all receding, only a few advancing. Glacier National Park is almost free of glaciers. Here's an informative discussion of world glacier retreat, along with photos and stats:

http://bit.ly/wpdMBr
10:12 PM on 03/02/2012
Polar ice measurements go way back to 1978!
10:30 PM on 03/02/2012
Sorry performing multiple tasks at once. Satellite observation began in 1978, the North West passage and other changing ice conditions have been recorded since the white man and women invaded (like the Vikings .) I am really bummed that someone who understands stats more than me does not respond to the weakness of historical record of the NOAA. When I was a business student, I would have been laughed out of school by not looking at the trends and year to year variables.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rjhuntington
left is right and right is wrong
05:32 AM on 03/03/2012
Melting is melting
02:18 PM on 02/29/2012
Americans are unaware that the rest of the world has had one of the coldest winters and there was no summer in Australia or that it snowed several times in the Sahel. How many would know the loer Troposphere is at on of its coldest measurements in over 10 years. I have a letter from friends in Serbia whose lives were at risk this winter and said this was the coldest winter they had ever seen in their lives. I wouln't get too excited about the USA being an outlier and having a warm winter when the rest of the world froze and cold related deaths in Europe skyrocketed.
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
02:38 PM on 02/29/2012
Well. You have described Europe in winter. Hardly representative of the entire planet, now is it.
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
02:49 PM on 02/29/2012
SF: "the world has had one of the coldest winters and there was no summer in Australia..."

1) We are in a La Nina, which of course leads to one of the coldest winters over the past 10 years.

2) Despite being in a La Nina:

"The combined global land and ocean average surface temperature for January 2012 was the 19th warmest on record at 12.35°C (54.23°F), which is 0.35°C (0.63°F) above the 20th century average of 12.0°C (53.6°F)."

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2012/1
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
02:57 PM on 02/29/2012
Also:

--------------
A growing number of experts believe complex wind patterns are being changed because melting Arctic sea ice has exposed huge swaths of normally frozen ocean to the atmosphere above.

In particular, the loss of Arctic sea ice could be influencing the development of high-pressure weather systems over northern Russia, which bring very cold winds from the Arctic and Siberia to Western Europe and the British Isles, the scientists believe. An intense anticyclone over north-west Russia is behind the bitterly cold easterly winds that have swept across Europe and some climate scientists say the lack of Arctic sea ice brought about by global warming is responsible.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/science-behind-the-big-freeze-is-climate-change-bringing-the-arctic-to-europe-6358928.html
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
02:13 PM on 02/29/2012
I remember ice skating in the winters as a child. We waited for a few sub zero days to ensure that the ice was safe. I have seen fewer of those sub zero days in my adult years.....
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
04:05 PM on 02/29/2012
Your memory is good. Here in Madison the University has been keeping records of the lake ice continuously since 1852. The warming trend is clear. From the State Climatologists office:

http://www.aos.wisc.edu/~sco/lakes/mendota-dur.gif
http://www.aos.wisc.edu/~sco/lakes/msnicesum.html

Be sure the entire link gets entered in your browser.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
04:07 PM on 02/29/2012
The last two winters were brutally cold in the midwest. This year is a welcome change, though I do like snow.
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
11:45 PM on 02/29/2012
The winters used to be far colder.