iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Michael McAuliff
GET UPDATES FROM Michael:

Algae Biofuel Proposal, Now Mocked By Republicans, Used To Have Their Support

Posted: 02/28/2012 5:50 pm Updated: 02/28/2012 7:04 pm

Green Energy

WASHINGTON -- Capitol Hill Republicans mounted an all-out offensive against President Obama's energy initiatives Tuesday, even mocking him for an idea many of them used to like: using algae to create biofuel.

"Over the past few weeks the American people have begun to feel the painful effects of President Obama's energy policy," Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell declared in a Senate floor speech that ridiculed an energy plan Obama detailed last week, which included the use of biofuel sources such as algae. "As millions of Americans groaned at the rising cost of a gallon of gasoline, the president took algae as a substitute for gas. Algae as a substitute for gas," McConnell said in apparent disbelief.

"I think the American people realize that a president who's out there talking about algae -- algae! -- when we're having to choose between whether to buy groceries or fill up the tank is the one who is out of touch," McConnell added, arguing that the way to bring down gas prices is to drill for more oil.

"Americans get this issue," McConnell said. "They get that we need to increase oil production right here at home, not simply rely on pipe dreams -- pipe dreams -- like algae or by wasting billions of taxpayer dollars on more failed clean energy projects."

McConnell was followed by Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Texas), who suggested Obama's plans were no plans at all.

"What the president does favor is the Saudis increasing oil production, and increased use of solar, wind and algae here at home," she said. "Does that really substitute for an energy policy?"

Republicans used to think that all of that was at least part of an energy policy. In fact, many were so convinced, they wrote letters to the Department of Energy asking the Obama administration to support algae projects.

In September, 2009, Nebraska Republican Sen. Mike Johanns lobbied for funding for the San Diego Center for Algae Biotechnology, a project that only offered the hope that such technology could be brought to his state.

"The center will not only accelerate the development of sustainable alternative transportation fuels from algae, but will also create new jobs in the green energy industry," Johanns wrote to Energy Secretary Steven Chu, arguing also that the technology would "reduce our dependence on imported oil."

Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), now one of Obama's fiercest alternative energy critics over the failure of solar firm Solyndra, also sought support for the project in an October 2009 letter. "Development of algae as a viable and sustainable source of transportation fuel is critical to decreasing America's dependence on imported oil, while creating new sources of meaningful green collar jobs."

Similarly, former House Republican Conference Chairman Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.) argued that algae was a near-magic bullet to solve American energy problems in a July 2009 letter that supported a grant for a company called Stellarwind BioEnergy.

"Algae production directly addresses all the significant challenges being faced by the U.S., namely domestic energy security, greenhouse gas emissions, scientific leadership in a variety of industries, and broad-based green job creation," Pence wrote to the Department of Energy.

The recent attack on algae and biofuel was only part of a broader GOP message avalanche in response to Obama's energy policy speech last week. After their morning conference meeting, shortly after McConnell's remarks, House GOP leaders each delivered scathing broadsides at Obama's plans.

"The president says he's for an all-of-the-above energy plan," said Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio). "Has anyone seen it? I'm not seeing it," he said, going on to argue that Obama is blocking oil production, although, as the White House argues, oil production has reached eight-year highs in the United States.

"Listen, Americans understand that we can produce more of our own energy. And they don't understand why 35 years since the oil embargo of 1974, that we've never had a national energy policy. We've got a handful of environmental groups, radical environmental groups, who've stood in the way of having a national energy policy all of these years," Boehner argued. "And it's just about damn time that we actually have a national energy policy and do something the American people want us to do."

Ironically, while Republicans were bashing alternative energy efforts and the algae research -- which is part of the ARPA-E push to develop new fuels -- Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates was enthusiastically praising such work at a conference in Maryland, and calling for funding to be doubled.

"In my view, energy research in the U.S., across the board, is greatly underfunded," Gates said, according to several reports. "It's crazy how little we're funding this energy stuff."

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Capitol Hill Republicans mounted an all-out offensive against President Obama's energy initiatives Tuesday, even mocking him for an idea many of them used to like: using algae to create ...
WASHINGTON -- Capitol Hill Republicans mounted an all-out offensive against President Obama's energy initiatives Tuesday, even mocking him for an idea many of them used to like: using algae to create ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,172
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (33 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
Gaylord P Farqua 08:40 AM on 02/29/2012
The only mistake the President makes is that he should dig up every issue that the TPGOP does want and publicly support it. That will guarantee McConnell whose job one is to unseat the President regardless of the cost to the American people, will surely bite every time. No matter how hard the TPGOP wants to blame the President for gas prices it is their supporters and recipients of billions in subsidies to  Read More...
01:57 PM on 03/28/2012
Please everyone when you have coal-fired powerplants pump their CO2 emissions into vats of algae (as opposed to in the ground). Zero emmissions to feed algae-fuel.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
01:59 PM on 03/28/2012
hmm, article one year old.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
02:27 AM on 03/08/2012
Sen. Ronald McConnell may know a thing or two about how to take money from lobbyists, but these biologists know more about biofuel:http://cleantechnica.com/2011/10/03/mushroom-detectives-find-key-to-low-cost-biofuels/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
02:24 AM on 03/08/2012
More good news about biofuel:http://cleantechnica.com/2011/03/23/simple-new-device-churns-out-cheap-biofuel/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
02:22 AM on 03/08/2012
Why am I not surprised that Ronald McConnell likes to flap his gums without knowing a thing about what he's opinionating about? (I've heard him spew lies before.)
More on micro-bio to the rescue:http://cleantechnica.com/2011/01/31/workhorse-bacteria-solves-biofuel-waste-problem/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
01:57 AM on 03/08/2012
Sen. Ronald McConnell is no expert and only the paid mouth-piece of the oil & gas lobbyists.

Meanwhile, there is good news to report:http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/07/microalgae-lamp-absorbs-150-200-times-more-co2-than-a-tree/
11:30 AM on 03/04/2012
Over the top adjectives, like "all out offensive", "mocking", "apparent disbelief", "fiercest critic", "message avalanche", "scathing broadsides", "bashing alternative energy efforts" -- painting the opposition as ignorant, angry anti American hayseeds of course.

The eeevil Republicans are saying is that the price of gas has gone way up since Obama came into office, and they are RIGHT about that folks. The Obama policies have raised the price of gas. DUH. Want higher gas prices, vote Obama.

The bright person who comes up with a non polluting, "alternative energy" process that is workable without government subsidies would become fabulously wealthy, which is a far bigger motivation than all the government money in the world.

Anytime the government throws money at ANYTHING the prices goes up for all of us.

Anytime the government throws money at ANYTHING a pigs-at-the-trough condition occurs as the greedy rush in, willing to tell any lie to get a share of the free money.

This is how the real world works.

The left have set energy research back, not advanced it. The right has not helped the situation either.

As is the case with climate science, greed has clouded their judgement to the point that real science has been thrown out the window.

It is the greed we should be angry about. It is the stealing of our money to pad the wrong pockets we should be upset about.
11:41 AM on 03/16/2012
For the last time, the President has virtually no control over gas prices.

For the last time, gas was so cheap when Obama took office because demand had cratered due to the recession.
11:56 AM on 03/16/2012
With all due respect, Snidely:

When Bush was in office you liberals blamed him for everything. Now that your guy is in office it is exactly the opposite story. Make up your mind here.

Sure, Obama the man can't affect gas prices. However the people he appointed to key positions, his statements in public, the actions of his administration, his messages to members of congress, etc. etc. all affect gas prices in a very real and tangible way. We have had a dramatic policy shift on energy, that was designed to increase the cost of fossil fuel to make alternative energy more profitable, and we are now experiencing the result.

The plain truth is that the Oil Companies give money to Republicans, so they are evil, where as the primary players in alternative energy give money to Democrats, so they are grand, special, wonderful, and beyond criticism, earning huge handouts of MY MONEY with no expectation of return.

It is as jaded, and greedy, and disgusting as it gets. To pretend that any of this has anything to do with what is good for the middle class, our our future, is incredibly naive....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrBIgp
If I'm wrong, please show me
01:05 PM on 03/01/2012
Algae isn't going to make any difference in the near future. To produce a million barrels oil equivalent a day (we import 12 million barrels a day) would take about 2000 square miles of algae ponds. Imagine the environmental impact report required and the nimbyism. Imagine the outcry when companies start using genetically modified algae.

If an algae industry capable of supplying a significant amount of fuel, the political left will hate that industry as much as they hates the oil industry.
El Justiciero
HP mods have NO sense of humor, obviously
02:19 PM on 03/02/2012
You can grow algae vertically. They do that. You can also grow it with waste water and waste CO2. You can grow it on land that can't be used for anything else.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrBIgp
If I'm wrong, please show me
12:10 AM on 03/03/2012
"You can grow algae vertically" Doesn't matter, algae is simply converted solar radiaiton and the amount of solar radiation per acre is set by nature.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chisnaalaska
05:41 PM on 03/08/2012
Why would you say that ? The U.S. Military has been developing algae based fuels for years now through a DARPA program. They've powered jets and even a destroyer with algae based bio fuel. It's carbon neutral. And could be used to help reduce nutrient pollution in lakes streams and rivers all over the country.
Sounds to me like another excuse being used by the right to try and stay in the 20th century. Just like they did with Carters progressive energy policy that ( if we had followed it ) very well could have prevented the situation we are facing right now. And who said the political left hates the oil industry ?

Oh, let me guess, because some people ( not just the left ) wants to improve fuel efficiency, preserve resources and establish common sense regulations to protect workers and the environment. That must mean we hate the oil industry.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrBIgp
If I'm wrong, please show me
08:06 PM on 03/08/2012
I didn't say you couldn't make fuel out of algae, you can. The military has a Congressional mandate to use renewable energy for 20% of their needs, I doubt they would be interested otherwise. Check my numbers, I used 6000 gallons of fuel per acre, per year - a generous assumption. This soul take 2000 square miles of algae ponds.

"And who said the political left hates the oil industry ? " You've got to be kidding, right. Just read the Hufington post comments, you'll see as much vitriol and hatred as with a KKK rally.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
06:54 AM on 03/01/2012
Having our energy be embargo-proof is a top national security concern. I am pleased that our President is addressing it rationally.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrBIgp
If I'm wrong, please show me
02:55 PM on 03/01/2012
He has not presented any plan which will lead to an "embargo-proof" nation. A truly rational plan would be built around nuclear power.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
04:52 PM on 03/01/2012
Wrong. Because you choose to be in the dark or profess selective amnesia doesn't mean there hasn't been a plan for very long time. There is , there was, and there will continue to be. See also; WhiteHouse.gov
Your standards are not those of many others.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
06:53 AM on 03/01/2012
FMR Corp., one of Sen. Ronald McConnell's big donors, hires many lobbying firms. I suggest the "patriot" is attempting to take money from one place and reappropriate it to concerns that he's been lobbied about.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
06:46 AM on 03/01/2012
AOlpo once again fishes for comments by saying the opposite of what needs to be said.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
06:18 AM on 03/01/2012
Not knowing anything doesn't stop Sen. Ronald McConnell from speaking out against it. Here's some of the people that give money to this corrupt politician: http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.php?type=C&cid=n00003389&newMem=N&cycle=2012
03:46 AM on 03/01/2012
I'm with gates on the issue.
07:23 PM on 02/29/2012
Yipes, Here we go again. I guess its attack republicans anyway you can here in the huffy post just attack, attack attack. Well,who cares what you people think its obvious you don't no how to research or your not honest enough to admit it. The gov't should not be involved in the algae market both party's would completely screw it up. The free market is providing this solution-just do the research. Probably the funniest thing I've heard all week Obama wants to put 14 million into the "research" whopee. Get real out there
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ecyornagol
Phil Robertson/ Uncle Si, 2016
06:54 PM on 02/29/2012
Another twisted story. Republicans support research in all forms of energy, just do it with good stewardship of the public's money. Not with payoffs like Solyndra got, or huge subsidies for the Chevy Volt. We'll even support the pond scum plan to a limited degree but we know the technology will take many years. We need energy now like the Keystone pipeline.