More

HuffPost Social Reading

Oklahoma Personhood Bill Ignites Feminist Movement

Oklahoma Personhood

First Posted: 02/29/2012 2:03 pm Updated: 03/ 1/2012 11:12 am

Oklahoma Sen. Judy McIntyre (D), one of four women in the 48-member state Senate, looked out over a sea of homemade signs at a fetal personhood protest at the state Capitol on Tuesday and spotted one that she wanted to hold herself.

"If I wanted the government in my womb," the sign said in painted blue letters, "I'd fuck a Senator."

At the risk of offending some of her mostly male Republican colleagues, who recently voted to pass a controversial fetal personhood bill, she grabbed the sign and posed with it for photos.

"I was so excited about the fact that the women in Oklahoma have finally begun to wake up and fight for their rights," she told HuffPost. "I saw a sea of signs that caught my eye, but this one in particular -- I loved its offensive language, because it's just as offensive for Republicans of Oklahoma to do what they're doing as it relates to women's bodies. I don't apologize for it."

The "Personhood Act," introduced by Sen. Brian Crain (R), would give legal personhood rights to embryos from the moment of fertilization. A similar measure was rejected in Mississippi, one of the most conservative states in the country, because legal and medical experts raised concerns that the bill could ban some forms of birth control, in vitro fertilization and stem cell research.

Although Oklahoma Republicans have passed numerous abortion restrictions over the past few years, the culture wars over women's health and birth control that are currently happening nationally have reignited the women's rights movement on the state level, bringing unprecedented amounts of attention to what are now routine challenges to women's reproductive health.

In addition to grassroots protests, some female Democratic lawmakers have protested in their own way by attaching amendments to anti-abortion bills that are intended to call attention to what they say are absurd anti-women policy initiatives. For instance, Sen. Constance Johnson (D) proposed a "spilled semen" amendment to the personhood bill that would declare it an act against unborn children for men to waste sperm.

In Virginia, state Sen. Janet Howell (D) introduced a protest amendment to a mandatory ultrasound bill in her state that would require men to have a rectal exam before being prescribed Viagra.

"The Republicans have awakened a sleeping giant," McIntyre said. "When you get women stirred up, particularly the young women who are used to being able to make decisions about their own bodies, you are going to be challenged and challenged hard."

Crain, the Oklahoma bill's sponsor, did not respond to a request for comment.

The personhood bill passed in the state Senate by a vote of 34 to 8 and is expected to sail through the GOP-controlled House. If Gov. Mary Fallin (R) signs it, as she has signed every other anti-abortion bill that has reached her desk, Oklahoma will be the first state in the country to enact a personhood bill.

Despite the fact that McIntyre's opposition to fetal personhood places her very much in the minority in Oklahoma, she said she has yet to take any heat from Republican senators for holding the profane sign.

"I'm still getting the hugs from my colleagues, Republicans and Democrats," she said.

CORRECTION: An earlier photo caption for this story erroneously located the Oklahoma Capitol building in Tulsa. The error has been corrected.

Earlier on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Oklahoma Sen. Judy McIntyre (D), one of four women in the 48-member state Senate, looked out over a sea of homemade signs at a fetal personhood protest at the state Capitol on Tuesday and spotted one ...
Oklahoma Sen. Judy McIntyre (D), one of four women in the 48-member state Senate, looked out over a sea of homemade signs at a fetal personhood protest at the state Capitol on Tuesday and spotted one ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7,536
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (87 total)
  1 of 6  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
JShankel 09:51 PM on 02/29/2012
Okay, men, huddle up.  We are being represented here by a bunch of mewling man-babies who seem to be hell-bent on persuading women that we are a lot of borderline simian gynophobes with no understanding of basic human anatomy or the concept of individual dignity.

As much as I support the women standing up against this, speaking as a man who enjoys making periodic contact with a vagina, I think  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
moroccantreasures
09:33 PM on 05/25/2012
I ordered a shirt to wear around Oklahoma and maybe a couple trips to KS City. Will be a great billboard with my 32FFF's! I hope it arrives next week!
05:09 PM on 05/24/2012
***NAZI ALERT***NAZI ALERT****NAZI ALERT**** I CAN SEE THE FAR REACHING FUTURE OF THIS ONE. " WOMAN ARRESTED AT T**O M*C AFTER BEING SEEN BY AN UNDERCOVER/OFF DUTY SECURITY GUARD, CONSUMING A "COLD ONE". When the Woman and Her "Friend" Stood Up To Leave The Establishment, the Security Guard Noticed A Quite Round Baby Bump. Upon Viewing the "Bump", The Woman Was Detained at the Eatery, Until Police Arrived, The Woman and Her Friend Were Both Arrested and Charged With Child Endangerment. Have We Forgotten Adolph, and His SS Band?
04:50 PM on 05/24/2012
***ALERT***ALERT***ALERT*** Our Government is ALREADY In Our Wombs, Our BedRooms, Our Wallet's, Our Phone Lines, Our Church's, Our Doctor's Office........ETC, ETC, ETC. Big Brother Walks Among Us..............Boo!!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:42 PM on 04/29/2012
Oklahoma SB 1433
http://www.oklegislature.gov/BillInfo.aspx?Bill=sb1433
http://webserver1.lsb.state.ok.us/cf/2011-12%20int/sb/SB1433%20int.doc

SECTION 1.
NEW LAW
A new section of law to be codified in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 1-750 of Title 63, unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:

A. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Personhood Act".

B. The Oklahoma Legislature finds that:
1. The life of each human being begins at conception;
2. Unborn children have protectable interests in life, health, and well-being; and
3. The natural parents of unborn children have protectable interests in the life, health, and well-being of their unborn child.

C. The laws of this state shall be interpreted and construed to acknowledge on behalf of the unborn child at every stage of development all the rights, privileges, and immunities available to other persons, citizens, and residents of this state.

D. As used in this section, “unborn child” or “unborn children” shall include all unborn children or the offspring of human beings from the moment of conception until birth at every stage of biological development.

E. Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as creating a cause of action against a woman for indirectly harming her unborn child by failing to properly care for herself or by failing to follow any particular program of prenatal care.
07:33 PM on 04/29/2012
Just the idea for this piece of legislation is ludicrous. There is no way to tell when the moment of conception occurs. If a fetus is a person directly following conception, does that mean we'll need conception certificates instead of birth certificates, even though to know the absolute moment sperm meets egg is impossible to measure? Will we have to print out social security cards even before children are born? Would it become illegal, even murder, to save a mother's life at the expense of her unborn child? When did a woman's right to her own reproductive organs and what she does with these organs become the decision of a mostly-male influence in the state of Oklahoma? I am this state's next door neighbor, and just the possibility that this is even being entertained as a possible law makes me sick to my stomach.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:59 PM on 04/29/2012
Congratulations for taking things to the absurd extreme!

Conception occurs without our knowledge. Woman finds out she is pregnant, usually when she misses her period, visits health care professional for documentation of positive pregnancy test. THIS is when the woman is legally considered pregnant! How could it even be possible to legally determine a woman is pregnant before she herself knows?? No one can pinpoint when conception occurred until after a woman realizes she is pregnant and has either solid dates for LMP and regular cycles or an ultrasound to determine *probable* date of conception.

All these ignorant comments about miscarriages equating to murder and all the other ridiculously absurd extremes show a complete lack of logical thinking.

This Bill gives parents RIGHTS FOR their unborn child!
09:08 PM on 04/29/2012
Exactly my point! Thus the absurdity of this legislation, because that event cannot be pinpointed in time. They cannot call it the time of conception because such a thing is impossible to know with today's technology.

Just because you couldn't detect the satire of my comments, doesn't mean my thinking is illogical. It shows to what extremes people would have to go in order for this legislation to make any sense.

Thanks for failing once again to get my point. You're such an awful player at this game.
09:10 PM on 04/29/2012
You possibly provide an answer to my questions, though, the ones that were somewhat serious: When did a woman's right to her own reproductive organs and what she does with these organs become the decision of a mostly-male influence in the state of Oklahoma? Would it become illegal, even murder, to save a mother's life at the expense of her unborn child?

Oh wait. Scratch that. I probably don't want to see your answers, given my past history conversing with you.
04:41 PM on 04/29/2012
The personhood bill passed in the state Senate by a vote of 34 to 8 and is expected to sail through the GOP-controlled House. If Gov. Mary Fallin (R) signs it, as she has signed every other anti-abortion bill that has reached her desk, Oklahoma will be the first state in the country to enact a personhood bill.
---------
Republicans defeated Democrat slavery and they dill defeat Democrat infanticide.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steven Hunt
05:48 PM on 05/24/2012
i totally agree with you! its nice to meet someone who agrees with me! the democrats are wrong on every issue!
02:43 PM on 04/29/2012
The personhood bill passed in the state Senate by a vote of 34 to 8 and is expected to sail through the GOP-controlled House. If Gov. Mary Fallin (R) signs it, as she has signed every other anti-abortion bill that has reached her desk, Oklahoma will be the first state in the country to enact a personhood bill.
----------------
Radical Pro-abortion Liberals believe they should have “rights” of personhood and choice while withholding those same rights from their own unborn children, even worse exterminating them for selfish sexual gains.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steven Hunt
05:50 PM on 05/24/2012
i agree. the democratic party is the party of death and destruction. Liberals have no hearts if they did they would protect the unborn not fight for the right to murder their own unborn children.
02:39 PM on 04/29/2012
"I was so excited about the fact that the women in Oklahoma have finally begun to wake up and fight for their rights,"
-----------
Except of course unborn women...
02:29 PM on 04/29/2012
Margret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood said:

"We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population," "The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it." The purpose in promoting birth control was "to create a race of thoroughbreds."

"[Our objective is] unlimited sexual gratification without the burden of unwanted children”
On marital sex: "The marriage bed is the most degenerating influence in the social order,"

On adultery: “A woman's physical satisfaction was more important than any marriage vow, Sanger believed.”
Birth Control in America, p. 11
http://www.dianedew.com/sanger.htm

Sanger is responsible 43,000,000 deaths world wide per year. It is quite likely that she made possible the killing of more unborn people, then all other atrocities combined 1,720,000,000,000. Other estimates put it between 1-2 billion. Those numbers do not include abortive contraception. Quite an accomplishment for one person.
http://www.lifenews.com/2011/04/21/earth-day-abortion-has-killed-1-2-billion-worldwide-in-50-years/

This is not 1930. It is time to put Sanger’s primitive barbaric racist ideologies behind us! I though Liberals were we were suppose progressive, advanced, tolerant and Civilized people?

"Oklahoma Personhood Bill Ignites Feminist Movement "
Guess not.
06:25 PM on 04/29/2012
Already gave you links about the falsehood of these quotes. What, did you ignore them?
09:35 PM on 04/29/2012
Planned parenthood is not a credible source.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steven Hunt
05:53 PM on 05/24/2012
margaret sanger was a feminist radical who only valued sexual gratification and creating the "perfect" race. Her ideology is what modern pro-abortion industy is based on. she is a disgrace and is responsible for a lot of deaths. she is pure evil!
11:55 AM on 04/13/2012
It seems to me that under this law a woman who had a miscarriage could be considered a murderer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steven Hunt
05:54 PM on 05/24/2012
matthew use your head before you speak
04:02 PM on 04/12/2012
Politicians are ignorant when it comes down to human bill, they really think they can stop a normal Human process next they will say we cant spit, that that is a waste of DNA, what next Politicans Bring it on.
01:10 PM on 04/12/2012
I am not a fan of abortion but if this bill is passed it will cause problems for people with ectopic pregnancy and the victims of incestuous relationships, and rape. Yes for one of those adoption is still a better option but in those cases it is an option that should always be the woman's right and no other person's right to make a decision.
Also if we take one right away, even one I don't agree with we will start to strip other rights. Then we will be right back to woman are barefoot pregnant and in the kitchen. Also my rights as a gay man will be lost, the rights of Blacks, Asians, American Indians, you name it.
Rich male conservatives, aka white, does not make right.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fanny Lebowitz
11:48 PM on 04/11/2012
I'm getting my tubes tied while I still can...
08:53 PM on 03/22/2012
Seen multiple posts by people saying "I dont want pay for your birth control because its immoral" ....well I dont want to pay for your wars "because its immoral".....I get so angry at people that want to imply that their morality is somehow better then my morality. I raised 3 children to adults and adopted 3 more, hows that for my morality! I volunteer to help the elderly. Hows that for my morality! I was Paramedic for 18 years, saved lives the best I could, Hows that for my morality! I didnt have to live in the time period where women had to have illegal abortions and I sure dont want to now. You make your life choices for your "morals" and I will make mine. But do not presume I need your morals to pushed upon me, or that I even want yours.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:34 PM on 03/30/2012
Okay then, how about this:

"I don't want to pay for your birth control because:

1. It IS "immoral" by reason of abortive action alone, which is murder.

and

2. I should not have to pay an increased price for my health insurance just so said health insurance can PROVIDE AT NO COST TO USER "all FDA-approved contraceptives, 'morning after' pills, and sterilization" to anyone who opts to use them.

and

3. This is supposedly in the name of health care, but contraception is not health care at all!

This is infringement, by the government, of MY 1st Amendment rights to not be a party to abortion. It in no way "pushes my morals on you". I'm not forcing you to do, or not to do, anything. If repealed, there will be no change from how things already are - no banning of, or reduced availability of contraception. It merely means that those choosing to use contraceptives are THEMSELVES RESPONSIBLE for providing the means of obtaining such instead of it being provided to them for free at the expense of everyone else. There is no other drug/medication/supply provided to the consumer for free at the expense of everyone but there are certainly many other more necessary things that could be provided for free (eg: insulin, cancer drugs...).
05:27 PM on 03/31/2012
1) abortion is not murder, wars on the other hand murder thousands every year!!
2) your health insurance would actually DECREASE from providing birth control. why? because with birth control, there are fewer medical costs from children AND fewer abortions (which aren't even paid for by the government) because of fewer pregnancies.
3) contraception is ABSOLUTELY health care--it doesn't just prevent pregnancy but treats a wide variety of conditions like ovarian cysts.

just fyi: contraception and abortion are NOT the same thing, first of all. second of all, by saying "i don't believe in abortion or contraception so no one else is allowed to have it" you are by definition forcing your beliefs on us. the government does not pay for abortion, people pay for it themselves.

try taking a science class maybe?

i see that you have 5 kids judging by your name--just because you chose to be a duggaresque baby-machine doesn't mean everyone else has to.
photo
ScreenParty
My other micro-bio was better...
07:11 AM on 04/03/2012
And here is some evidence that helps to explain your Spanish journal evidence.

http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/tgr/06/4/gr060407.html

If you see the example of South Korea, there IS a rise in unwanted pregnancies as contraception use increases... until people learn how to use them properly, then the unwanted pregnancy rate falls off dramatically.

There are always more variables at work in something as complicated as human sexual behavior.
06:18 PM on 04/29/2012
Virtually unheard of. Not impossible. Also FYI, proportionally to population, there were many more teen mothers back in the 1800s than there are today. Why? Because it was completely acceptable to marry off your daughters before the age of 14 back in those days. It is still social suicide to become a teen mom in this day and age. The only difference being that we don't condemn young girls the way we did back then. They are still allowed to function in society without being consider outcasts. Again, you can't predict what every teen is thinking. Stop pretending like you can.

Multiple forms of evidence from reputable evidence concerning the pill and STD connection, or I call absolute falsehood. Also require evidence concerning contraception and all those things you mentioned. I'm not taking your word for it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MasterKat
Because I'm more American than you.
10:25 PM on 03/20/2012
Also, over the counter pregnancy tests will have to go, because conception = pesonhood, so that will have to be legally documented. You can't have women finding out they're pregnant then traveling to Canada or some other hedonist liberal country to get a safe abortion. So, only doctors should be allowed to test for pregnancy. And we'll need a conception certificate. Do you register schools based on conception date or birth date? And which is more important? That will have cultural and legal implications.

If this passes everyone is now about 9 months older legally, at least in Oklahoma. THAT will be confusing since not every state recognizes the personhood of zygotes.

I will move down there and annoy the crap out of these people if they pass this. So help me.
01:03 PM on 04/24/2012
I love it. You are so right, and I think you should start annoying them NOW! What an utter load of linguistic garbage this bill is!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steven Hunt
05:57 PM on 05/24/2012
so who exactly is the abortion safe for? definitely not the unborn child and abortion scars women mentally, emotionally and physically. No mother should utilize a "choice" to kill her child. A mother should love her child not abort it
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MasterKat
Because I'm more American than you.
08:35 PM on 05/24/2012
1) My mother had an abortion years before she met my father and she did not regret her decision. She was not emotionally or physically harmed by the procedure and was later able to bear 2 healthy children with no complications or latent medical problems. I would not be here today if it weren't for Roe v. Wade.

2) You are confusing a zygote/fetus/embryo with a child/baby. A pine seed is not a pine tree. I have never finished a salad with pine nuts on it and thought to myself: "Wow, that forest was delicious!" It is a POTENTIAL person, not a person. That is why the personhood bill is ridiculous, logistically unfeasible, and unconstitutional.