iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

WikiLeaks Stratfor Emails: Leak Suggests Pakistan Knew Bin Laden's Hiding Place

First Posted: 02/29/2012 10:01 am EST Updated: 03/16/2013 1:06 pm EDT

Did Pakistani army officials know Osama Bin Laden was hiding in Abbottabad?

Emails from the security think tank Stratfor, released by WikiLeaks on Monday, suggest that up to 12 Pakistani intelligence and army officials were aware of Bin Laden's presence in the Pakistani city.

The emails released do not identify the agents, but show that were mid- to senior level officials in the Pakistani military and intelligence service ISI.

From the Stratfor emails:


On 5/13/2011 2:27 PM, burton@stratfor.com wrote:

Same response as before:
Mid to senior level ISI and Pak Mil with one retired Pak Mil
General that had knowledge of the OBL arrangements and safe
house.

Names unk to me and not provided.

Specific ranks unk to me and not provided.

But, I get a very clear sense we (US intel) know names and
ranks.

Osama Bin Laden was killed on May 1, 2011, in a compound in the Pakistani garrison city of Abbottabad. Pakistan denies that the country's officials and military were aware of the Al Qaeda leader's whereabouts, according to the BBC.

"There has been intense suspicion over how much Pakistani authorities knew of Osama bin Laden's whereabouts but never any definitive proof - or at least none that has been made public," Gordon Corera, security correspondent for BBC, explains. "There's no smoking gun, as one Western intelligence official told me."

Commenting on the WikiLeaks release, spokesman for the Pakistan army Athar Abbas told news channel Al-Arabiya that the allegations were untrue. “They are nonsense and not credible,” he reportedly said.

According to the Christian Science Monitor, it is difficult to determine the trustworthiness of the information in the email. "With some observers speculating that, because Stratfor itself did not publish the data, they may have not deemed the intelligence report authentic," the Monitor writes.

WikiLeaks announced on Monday it had obtained 5 million emails from the Texas-based security think tank Stratfor. The emails are part of what the organization calls "The Global Intelligence Files" and purportedly "reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal’s Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defense Intelligence Agency."

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this article mistakenly said that WikiLeaks had obtained 5,000 emails from the security think tank Stratfor. Wikileaks obtained 5 million Stratfor emails. This error has been corrected.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

Filed by Eline Gordts  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 906
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (31 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ruth Rocchio
Art all the time, no matter what!
01:16 PM on 03/03/2012
I am not surprised that Pakistan knew where Osama was. I always thought they did and were using it as leverage. Sigh.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:37 AM on 03/03/2012
keep leaking so the USA doesn't sink!
01:24 PM on 03/02/2012
No surprises here!!!!!
Pakistan does what is good for Pakistan they can help the USA or not//// it's their decision to make..So we take what we can get..Pakistan is India's Problem not ours..We had Secret Bases in Pakistan for my Air Force Unit but it cost a few $$$$$ which we paid..gladly..
A CIA base there was breached recently and a CIA Agent was shot..it's a tough World out there we have to Play the Game...
OSAMA is Gone thats all that matters..Monday Morning Quarterbacking is not productive..

Legend
01:12 PM on 03/02/2012
I would not trust the Pakistani goverment as far as I could throw them !
07:10 AM on 03/02/2012
Was there ever any doubt?
Most likely it was no secret for the US either.
That is why the killing of bin Laden was what Bill Mahr referred to as "low hanging fruit".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ansdlmol
02:37 AM on 03/02/2012
I have absolutely no doubt the Pakistan government knew where Bin Laden was. I have advocated before and do so again here. Cut ALL aid to Pakistan and treat them as Taliban.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
bigdaddyvike
left and rightly so...
06:44 PM on 03/01/2012
Yes, because how many Pakistanis live in a "compound" with 8-20 ft high walls a half mile from Pakistan's West Point? No-brainer.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:16 PM on 03/01/2012
There is no money for schools and roads here but we have billions for countries like Pakistan.
photo
BrutusHonestus
Don't Ask Me for the Answer You Want to Hear
01:43 AM on 03/02/2012
Schools and roads are worse in Pakistan, I guess
09:38 AM on 03/02/2012
Ah, the republican view of the world.
02:02 PM on 03/02/2012
WHY point fingers at Republicans or Democrats? Only makes you seem childish.
04:31 PM on 03/01/2012
Stratfor is a Neocon think tank that gave discharged army officer Allen West a platform on which to publish his views on international affairs so he could run for congress. The op ed pieces I saw on their website by West did not disclose the circumstances of his discharge from the military. The pieces contained Stratfor's implication that West had expertise on international affairs. I would take anything they say, do or claim with a huge grain of salt.
10:34 PM on 03/01/2012
You know, that was close to what Chamberlain said on his return visit from Germany in the late 30s. Just why would there be misinformation about something that is over and we now know to be true. And how the devil could you not be doubting the sincerity of Pakistan about anything? They are Muslims first.
07:10 AM on 03/02/2012
I think it is hilarious that your response starts of with an accusation of Appeasement. Everything I have ever read from STRATFOR contains the argument that if you, (or the current Administration in Washington), disagree with their Neocon position, you are guilty of Appeasement: to North Korea, to Cuba and Chavez, to Radical Islam, Iran or Hammas. It does not take a Rocket Scientist to speculate that the ISI or elements of the Pakistani Military had to have known that OBL was building a compound and then living in Pakistan. I am just saying that citing STRATFOR's internal emails as hard National Security evidence is akin to citing internal RNC, Cato Institute or Fox News communications. Stratfor is essentially an advocacy group. Their Op Ed pieces by Allen West, sold to their subscribers (without mentioning his discharge from the military or his Tea Party House candidacy) as the product of someone with expertise in international affairs prove that they are not a reliable source for anything but what Right Wing active and retired military think and speculate.
10:35 AM on 03/02/2012
I am responding here because of the lag in posting your new comment. My dad was career military WWII and Korea who was an FDR Liberal so I was not assuming all retired or active military are right wing, but the right wing ones and their speculations rumors and Monday morning Quarterbacking (even on successful operations like the Somali Pirates and the assassination of OBL) seem to be the main source of everything I have ever read from Stratfor ( I have a friend who passes along their pieces, so I read them out of courtesy to him). And their pieces always suggest that anyone who does not do as they say are capitulating, appeasing and endangering Western Civilization. And they did publish Allen West as some expert on international affairs, which is a huge misrepresentation if you ask me. I just think that for Wikileaks to assume that Stratfor actually has access to hard intelligence is inaccurate, and silly, which was the point I was making initially..
photo
clarkesantacruz
sunshine daydreams
01:05 PM on 03/01/2012
dubyah probably paid the pakistanis to provide a safehouse so he could maintain his fake wars.
the taliban were not part of 911 and never attacked us until we invaded afghanistan.
torture, invasion, extraordinary rendition, imprisonment without trial or charges, etc etc
the apathy of the american people, that we let that happen.
the ignorance of the brainwashed who believed in the "official version".
a small handful of evil people profit while the country approaches the abyss.
11:30 AM on 03/01/2012
OBL was the unmentioned guest of the Pakistani army. Not only some officers, Musharraf himself knew where OBL was. But Pakistani generals have a habit of lying with a straight face and then deny, deny, deny.
10:12 AM on 03/01/2012
raise your hand if you needed wikileaks to tell you this. anybody?
05:18 PM on 03/01/2012
No but I was happy wikileaks said there were indeed WMD's and Blister gas in Iraq
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
09:58 AM on 03/01/2012
I suspect there are people in Crawford TX who knew OBL's hideout, too
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:11 PM on 03/01/2012
It would certainly explain his lack of interest in catching him. His being alive served a lot of interests, ... besides Pakistani aid, figure a number of domestic as well. It took an honest broker to get elected to end that deceit.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:32 PM on 03/01/2012
Well said. Papi is a good friend of the Bin Laden family and an avid supporter of Saudi Arabia ( whose particular brand of Wahabism drives Al Qaeda ). Getting OBL really was all that was needed. No trillion dollar wars. No caskets at Dover AFB. No brutalizing whole populations that had nothing to do with 9/11. No erosion of our credibility in the world. No windfall for the MIC. The neocons were, and will always be, wrong.
11:25 PM on 03/01/2012
as did bill clinton. get over it. bill c. had the seals right on him and said no.bill could have killed him.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robertstone1robert
My micro bio is too big.
09:57 AM on 03/01/2012
LOL. What a shock! Anybody above the age of above knows this. This may have been speculation but we didn't travel around the globe yet we know the world isn't flat. Under the circumstances it would seem most likely that the somebody in the Pakistani military knew the precise location of OBL.
The method of his bothers me tremendously. He killed 3000 Americans with no regard as to their rituals of burial. Why did we show him any courtesy? He should've just been thrown into the garbage where it would feel right at home.
photo
maslin
At 6 bn km, it's mostly small stuff.
01:44 PM on 03/01/2012
Because Obama knows that the real fight is political and psychological, not military, and what you describe is not the way to win it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robertstone1robert
My micro bio is too big.
02:46 PM on 03/01/2012
Obama knows nothing. The only talking does: it delays a decision. I hope there are not many more who believe in this "strategy." We'll be reading about this fictional approach, LOL.
photo
Bushido08
Spirit of a Warrior
04:34 PM on 03/01/2012
msalin...well said! Faved! But you are waisting your time trying to explain something beyond a gun and a garbage can to some people.
09:21 AM on 03/01/2012
If Pakistan did have knowledge, obviously they were sharing it with Stratfor via emails, who was then sharing it with our government. So, Pakistan was cooperating after all, wasn't it?
photo
maslin
At 6 bn km, it's mostly small stuff.
01:44 PM on 03/01/2012
This is a completely baseless assumption on your part.