iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Michael McAuliff
GET UPDATES FROM Michael:

Gas Prices Inspire War Of Words: Obama, Dems Take On GOP

Posted: 03/01/12 06:37 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- People who claim a lack of oil drilling is to blame for spiking gasoline prices are either dumb or dishonest, President Barack Obama argued Thursday as Democrats ramped up their defense against Republicans claiming just that.

"Anybody who tells you that we can just drill our way out of this problem does not know what they're talking about, or they're not telling you the truth -- one or the other," Obama said at an event held in New Hampshire to tout his energy policies.

He noted that, in fact, oil production in the United States has hit its highest level in eight years, that more rigs are operating in the U.S. than in the rest of the world combined, that more than 400 drilling permits have been granted since the massive BP oil spill, and that for the first time in 13 years, oil imports account for less than half of all U.S. oil consumption.

"And no matter what you hear from some folks in an election year, the key part of this strategy over the last three years has been to increase safe, responsible oil production here at home, while also pursuing clean energy for the future," Obama added.

Regardless, Republicans, who launched a coordinated assault on the administration over gas prices earlier this week, kept up the drumbeat on Thursday.

"American families and small businesses continue to struggle, and they're especially feeling the impact of rising gas prices, which have doubled under President Obama," House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) told reporters in his weekly briefing.

In the other chamber, Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) took to the floor to make the GOP case in the wake of Obama's speech. "It's clear that the president is defensive on this issue," said Barrasso, who also blamed Obama for a doubling of of gas prices.

Neither he nor Boehner noted that the current average of $3.73 per gallon is lower than the price at the start of the recession during the Bush administration.

"The president's polices are at best ineffective and at worst are contributing to the higher gas prices," Barrasso said, before hitting the week's mantra of demanding more drilling.

"The president actually has some options that make a lot of sense to a lot of Americans," said the senator, "and that option, of course, is to increase American energy production."

Obama also renewed his request to end $4 billion in tax subsidies that the oil companies still receive every year, even as they're reaping record profits. The GOP was quick to attack that as well.

"Democrats have already acknowledged that the idea the President discussed today won't lower gas prices," Boehner said later the same day in a statement. "In fact, the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service says it would increase them. Republicans are focused on an all-of-the-above energy policy, and I remain hopeful the President will follow through on his commitment to work with us to increase the supply of American-made energy."

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) tried a different angle in the Democratic pushback, suggesting that the top driver of gas prices right now is not supply but aggressive speculation in oil markets. She pointed to blocked efforts by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to stop such speculation, which the CFTC estimates adds more than 50 cents a gallon to the price of gas.

"What's happening about the price at the pump is very interesting," Pelosi said in her weekly press conference. "Supply is going up, demand is going down, and the price is going up," she said, referring to recent data to that effect.

"So how do you explain that?" Pelosi asked. "You explain it by recognizing that Republicans are protecting Wall Street speculators responsible for driving up the pain at the pump."

Michael McAuliff covers Congress and politics for The Huffington Post. Talk to him on Facebook.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- People who claim a lack of oil drilling is to blame for spiking gasoline prices are either dumb or dishonest, President Barack Obama argued Thursday as Democrats ramped up their defense ...
WASHINGTON -- People who claim a lack of oil drilling is to blame for spiking gasoline prices are either dumb or dishonest, President Barack Obama argued Thursday as Democrats ramped up their defense ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14,215
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (203 total)
  1 of 18  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
goodog 10:06 PM on 03/01/2012
"Boehner said later the same day in a statement. "In fact, the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service says it would increase them. Republicans are focused on an all-of-the-above energy policy, and I remain hopeful the President will follow through on his commitment to work with us to increase the supply of American-made energy."
That's how freaked out the Republicans are.  Read More...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emanonecafon
07:11 PM on 03/05/2012
Oil production has nearly doubled under Obama. Who that calls themselves green can vote for a president that has doubled oil production?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClimateHawk
Think before posting.
08:00 PM on 03/05/2012
I think you mean domestic production.

And you have a very good point.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:06 AM on 03/05/2012
The president does not control gas prices but he can sure help with having a rational energy policy, instead of giving money to companies which are failing. The environment is a concern but all energy production has a trade off their is no such thing as clean energy, because something must be made to product energy. I am blaming the POTUS for high gas prices because of his irrational green agenda which has a very limit affect at this time with our limit technology.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClimateHawk
Think before posting.
09:08 AM on 03/05/2012
It's very odd how some people seem to think it's OK not to have clean air, clean water, and a livable climate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClimateHawk
Think before posting.
07:56 PM on 03/05/2012
Even Obama with his ridiculous "all of the above" "strategy".
01:01 PM on 03/15/2012
another prog who sees the world through only their rose-shaded glasses. What is liveable to you is unliveable to others, and vise versa. Step outside your own hubris and see the world around you.
Having said that, I would like to know how forcing Canada to export oil outside the NAFTA zone lowers our prices.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blndgenie
As a matter of fact, I DID build that..
01:44 PM on 03/04/2012
Another taxpayer-funded "Green Energy" company bites the dust and lays off over a hundred workers. $ 390 million in subsidies, huge bonuses for the execs and GAME OVER! SSDD.

http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/green-company-gets-390m-subsidies-lays-125/394051
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CandyRaptor
Malia Obama 2044!
12:54 AM on 03/05/2012
Thank you for the link. I bookmarked it. I plan to go there tomorrow and see if I can get a nickle a post for flaming ultra conservatives.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClimateHawk
Think before posting.
07:03 AM on 03/04/2012
So domestic production is up, prices at the pump are up, and we're still headed toward climate chaos.

It's time to move to clean energy from renewable resources. Now.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blndgenie
As a matter of fact, I DID build that..
01:45 PM on 03/04/2012
um, NO.
photo
William A
Oh Lord, save me from your followers!
04:48 AM on 03/04/2012
Bush destroyed the economy and declared war on a major oil producing country. Meanwhile oil is a finite resource, and countries like China, India and Brazil are heavily industrializing.

What did the republicans think would happen?
01:04 PM on 03/15/2012
Blame Bush! Blame Bush! -what's that? It's been almost four years with an "anti-war" president??? Who do we blame now!?!
photo
Educated Black Man
I am not African-American, I am simply an American
10:37 PM on 03/03/2012
"The price of energy will necessarily skyrocket." Who said that?
photo
frdm399
Freedom is about choice
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blndgenie
As a matter of fact, I DID build that..
01:46 PM on 03/04/2012
HAD to be BUSH, right? LMAO!
photo
Educated Black Man
I am not African-American, I am simply an American
10:36 PM on 03/03/2012
Here I thought they were going to blame Bush and his oil buddies again.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blndgenie
As a matter of fact, I DID build that..
01:46 PM on 03/04/2012
THAT WAS THEN. Now of course its not the president's fault. Is that clear?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aaron Watkins
Ă€ Rebours
10:02 PM on 03/03/2012
Did anyone notice that the President hasn't addressed the charge that his administration WANTS hight gas prices?

That's interesting. Obama appointed Seceratary Of Engery Stephen Chu responded to a question....

'Chu delivered those stunning remarks in testimony before Congress yesterday. When Rep. Alan Nunnelee (R-Miss.) asked Chu whether it's his "overall goal to get our price" of gasoline lower, Chu said, "No, the overall goal is to decrease our dependency on oil, to build and strengthen our economy."


As shocking as his remarks are, they shouldn't come as a surprise. Chu has a long record of advocating for higher gas prices. In 2008, he stated, "Somehow we have to figure out how to boost the price of gasoline to the levels in Europe." Last March, he reiterated his point in an interview with Fox News' Chris Wallace, noting that his focus is to ease the pain felt by his energy policies by forcing automakers to make more fuel-efficient automobiles. "What I'm doing since I became Secretary of Energy has been quite clear. What I have been doing is developing methods to take the pain out of high gas prices." '

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/at-home/white-house-wants-keep-gas-prices-high-162900391.html
photo
bkhart
Oh yes! We did! Again!
09:46 AM on 03/04/2012
Oil prices are set on the world market. Read up on OPEC. US has no control over the world demand for oil. Read up on supply and demand. In the face of this and the problems caused by pollution, it makes absolute sense to concentrate on fuel efficient cars, etc. Decreasing dependence on a commodity controlled by the world market is the only way to gain control over how much we spend on an individual basis.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blndgenie
As a matter of fact, I DID build that..
01:47 PM on 03/04/2012
but that's not what Pelosi, Reid and candidate Owe bama said in 2007-2008. Which is it again?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blndgenie
As a matter of fact, I DID build that..
01:48 PM on 03/04/2012
oh, and the Chevy Dolt couldn't even make sales with taxpayer-funded subsidies of over $250K PER CAR. NOBODY wants them, and that's why GM is mothballing its production. Ask the laid off 1300 workers how that 'green car thang' worked out in reality, k?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
revdoc14
09:56 PM on 03/03/2012
GOP...Deflect, object, reject and select... Every day people still don't get their type of politics.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aaron Watkins
Ă€ Rebours
10:06 PM on 03/03/2012
Actually the President is deflecting from the fact that his policies have directly increased fuel prices and has admitted that they want high gas prices to progress the "green economy".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blndgenie
As a matter of fact, I DID build that..
01:50 PM on 03/04/2012
so true...........billions down the ratholes of 'green energy companies' who could not function without most of their funding from taxpayers. Same goes on in Spain and the Netherlands.

Cost effective 'green energy' simply does not exist.
09:22 PM on 03/03/2012
Gas Prices? Ha.
The GOP doesn't tell the truth about anything.
Lies, spin, hyperbole and propaganda are their modus operandi.
01:11 PM on 03/15/2012
Point fingers and call names, but don't ever, EVER, think for yourself or do your own research, your head may explode.
03:34 PM on 03/16/2012
Yeah I'm sure someone spouting right wing talking points has done a lot of research.

I think you have research and web browsing confused as one and the same.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blndgenie
As a matter of fact, I DID build that..
08:44 PM on 03/03/2012
Thank God the poster-child for corporate welfare Chevy DOLT has now ceased production and its 1300 workers have been laid off. The $250K PER CAR in taxpayer subsidies has hopefully ended---you know it was a horrible idea when the warmers would not even buy it! Next!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClimateHawk
Think before posting.
09:01 PM on 03/03/2012
Here's a good report for those who want some background information without a lot of ideological spin:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/03/business/gm-suspends-production-of-chevrolet-volt.html

You make it sound as if GM has decided not to build any more Volts. In reality, what they are doing is matching production to demand (which at about 1,000 a month is less than they were anticipating).

Maybe they'll decide to knock a few thousand off the price so they can keep the lines busy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aaron Watkins
Ă€ Rebours
10:10 PM on 03/03/2012
Actually prices won't go down until they sell more. R&D costs in all of these products are factored into long term sales and overall costs only decrease when they start making profits. The administration has discussed increasing the tax credit (that taxpayers will be paying) to 10K now because it isn't selling well.

http://news.investors.com/article/601207/201202141851/obama-administration-raises-chevy-volt-subsidy-.htm

If anyone thinks the Volt is selling well or that the price goes down, you should ask yourselves why the government has increased the tax credit to 10k.
09:23 PM on 03/03/2012
Keep on spinning.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blndgenie
As a matter of fact, I DID build that..
10:11 AM on 03/04/2012
all facts. What don't you get, actually? The volt will make a great bbq grill though! LMAO!
07:35 PM on 03/03/2012
Some there will be no more oil in the ground and the planet will grind to a stop; Oh! wait that's not quite right; but some-thing or some-body won't be moving...LOL
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
dragonlady620
My karma will run over your dogma
04:42 PM on 03/03/2012
Obama and his lot are directly responsible for higher energy costs. The US Energy Secretary, Steven Chu, has openly testified to this effect before the United States House of Representatives.

'Rather, when Rep. Alan Nunnelee asked Chu whether the department’s “overall goal” is to “get our price —”, Chu interrupted him and said: “No, the overall goal is to decrease our dependency on oil, to build and strengthen our economy,'

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0212/73408.html#ixzz1nlwKN38K

Anyone who claims the Obama Administration is not responsible for these high gas prices is engaged in deception.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
dragonlady620
My karma will run over your dogma
06:18 PM on 03/03/2012
And anyone who thinks that the Obama administration is solely responsible for higher gas prices is an ignoramus, nor does you link do anything to prove that it is. Oil is a global commodity and there is actually comparatively little any sitting president to directly affect the price of crude.And you seem to forgotten that gas prices also spiked under Bush. http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/is-there-anything-that-washington-can-do-about-gas-prices-not-really/ http://www.investopedia.com/articles/economics/08/determining-oil-prices.asp#axzz1o20Z86Xl http://wallstcheatsheet.com/stocks/an-easy-fix-to-the-oil-price-problem.html/ http://news.consumerreports.org/cars/2008/06/gas-prices-4.html http://lomalinda.patch.com/articles/time-for-an-oil-change
08:25 PM on 03/03/2012
I am certain that Obama's policies to reduce domestic oil production and supply will serve to reduce US gas prices and increase oil supplies on the world market. Makes perfect sense in the world of liberal ideologues.

The United States is sitting on top of 1.4 Trillion bbls of recoverable oil reserves. This is 5 times what is in Saudi Arabia. Our own government is the largest obstacle to development of these resources and people like you have the nerve to suggest the President has no control over this?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
revdoc14
10:03 PM on 03/03/2012
Excellent!!! The only way to deal with an ignoramus is to give the fact then forget they were born... Love it.....
09:30 PM on 03/03/2012
Outright lies. It is you trying to deceive with your Fox bubble pseudo-facts.

For the first time in US history, this year fuel has become the number one US export.

This link pretty much blows your hypothesis out of the water.

http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/story/2011-12-31/united-states-export/52298812/1

You're sold on big oil propaganda, disseminated through the GOP to you, in exchange for little brown envelopes. How can you not see this really boggles my mind.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
revdoc14
10:08 PM on 03/03/2012
Good point...The GOP is very good at deceiving small minds and big mouths...
12:41 AM on 03/04/2012
Fuel is not oil;. Your point is irrelevant. You claim that because the United States exports fuel, it is a net exporter of oil. This is utter rubbish.

"In 2011, the U.S. imported 45 percent of its oil from foreign suppliers, "
http://news.yahoo.com/less-u-foreign-oil-reliance-yet-higher-gas-184800328.html

The plain fact is this: even with the increased domestic production created by Clinton and Bush era oil leases, the United States is still a net importer of oil. The Obama administration is approving oil leases at half the rate Bush was. Where do you suppose domestic oil production will be in 5 years? Higher, or lower than today?

You lose.