iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Iowa's Undercover Livestock Filming Bill Approved

First Posted: 03/ 1/2012 2:12 am Updated: 03/ 1/2012 3:04 pm

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Animal welfare groups reacted with outrage Wednesday after the Iowa Legislature made the state the first to approve a bill making it a crime to surreptitiously get into a farming operation to record video of animal abuse.

The groups have urged Gov. Terry Branstad to veto the measure that was overwhelmingly approved Tuesday by the Iowa House and Senate, arguing that the measure would prevent people from publicizing animal abuse.

"The intent behind the legislation is to put a chilling effect on whistleblowers on factory farms," said Matthew Dominguez, a spokesman for the Humane Society of the United States. "It begs the question of, what exactly does animal agriculture have to hide?"

Legislatures in seven states — Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New York and Utah— have considered laws that would enhance penalties against those who secretly record video of livestock, though the efforts have stalled in some states.

The Iowa measure would establish a new penalty for lying on a job application to get access to a farm facility, making it a serious misdemeanor. A second conviction would be an aggravated misdemeanor.

A serious misdemeanor carries a fine of up to $1,500 and imprisonment up to one year. An aggravated misdemeanor can be punished by a fine of up to $5,000 and imprisonment of up to two years.

Branstad spokesman Tim Albrecht said the governor's office had received numerous calls from people on both sides of the issue, and he noted that animal welfare groups had launched campaigns on Twitter and Facebook.

Branstad has strong ties to Iowa's agricultural industry, which has supported the measure. Albrecht also noted that the governor was impressed with the Legislature's support of the measure, which passed the Senate 40-10 and the House 69-28.

The issue is especially important in Iowa because the state is the nation's leading pork and egg producer. Its farms typically have more than 19 million hogs and 54 million egg-laying chickens in barns and confinement buildings.

Thanks to that status, Iowa operations have been targeted by groups seeking to publicize animal abuse or controversial industry practices, such as confining sows and chickens in small crates.

The Los Angeles-based group Mercy for Animals, which has released undercover videos depicting conditions for chickens and hogs in Iowa, has planned a demonstration at the Iowa Capitol on Thursday. Members of the group will dress in black and wear blindfolds and gags to illustrate what they call an ag-gag bill.

"Iowa has some of the weakest animal cruelty laws in the nation," Nathan Runkle, the group's spokesman, said in a statement. "Lawmakers should be focusing on strengthening these pathetic laws, not silencing whistleblowers who expose animal abuse or other serious issues involving the safety and security of the American food supply."

The Iowa measure was changed from an earlier version due to concerns that language making undercover video recording illegal could violate free speech protections in the U.S. Constitution.

Sen. Joe Seng, a Davenport Democrat and veterinarian who sponsored the bill, said the measure strikes a balance by discouraging animal activists from sneaking into livestock facilities but not prohibiting someone who legitimately works there from reporting animal abuse.

"I feel that we did something that was needed. It more than anything sends a message," Seng said. "But I didn't think it was real egregious to the animal welfare people."

He said the livestock industry has legitimate concerns about unauthorized people infiltrating their facilities because they could track in disease or let mice or other unwanted vermin into farm buildings.

Iowa grain and hog farmer John Weber said he realizes people want to be sure animals are treated humanely but said it's easy for groups to get video of livestock that when paired with dramatic music can give an improper impression.

"It became clear to everyone that agriculture did need some type of protection because it was just too easy for people to infiltrate or to lie on job applications for the purpose of sabotaging a business," said Weber, who farms near Dysart, about 100 miles northeast of Des Moines.

Craig Hill, president of the Iowa Farm Bureau Federation, said he hopes Branstad will sign the bill and that other states will follow Iowa's lead.

"I hope that we can display some success here and other states can follow suit and gain from the experience that we've had here developing this bill in Iowa," he said. "We don't want to do anything that amends somebody's right to turn somebody in if they're a bad actor or limit the freedom of speech. That's not the goal here."

Hill raises hogs on his 1,700-acre farm near Milo, about 30 miles southeast of Des Moines.

Scott Hendrick, a senior policy specialist for the National Conference of State Legislatures, said Iowa was the first to approve such restrictions. Florida and Minnesota considered bills last year, but they died in their legislatures, he said.

Among those states considering similar bills this year, Utah could be the next to follow Iowa in approving a measure.

The Utah House has approved a bill that would make it a misdemeanor to film on private agricultural property without the owner's consent, and the measure is now awaiting debate in the Senate.

In Nebraska, lawmakers have opted not to take action on a bill making it a felony to take a job at an animal facility with the intent of disrupting normal operations. The bill also would require anyone uncovering animal abuse to report it and hand in videos, photos and other evidence to authorities within 12 hours. Failure to do so would be a felony.

The bill's sponsor, Sen. Tyson Larson of O'Neill, said he expects to bring the bill back next year.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Animal welfare groups reacted with outrage Wednesday after the Iowa Legislature made the state the first to approve a bill making it a crime to surreptitiously get into a far...
DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Animal welfare groups reacted with outrage Wednesday after the Iowa Legislature made the state the first to approve a bill making it a crime to surreptitiously get into a far...
Filed by Jessica Leader  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 532
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
evolvedtg
A lie's a lie, even if everyone believes it.
04:09 PM on 04/27/2012
Well, when someone shows you who they are (a friend of the animal industry, not wanting their abuses to become public,) believe them. Out of sight, out of mind.
05:43 AM on 03/06/2012
"He said the livestock industry has legitimate concerns about unauthorized people infiltrating their facilities because they could track in disease or let mice or other unwanted vermin into farm buildings."
factory farms are havens for mice and filth and most certainly disease which is rarely treated. This is a concentration camp not a country club.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
john649
09:03 PM on 03/09/2012
gotta love the way they lie.....and cover up their crimes.

This law will now ENSURE more undercover work will continue.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
11:08 PM on 03/09/2012
diseases being spread by unauthorized people between farms are a legitimate concern.

I myself when visiting poultry farms have had to wash my tires disinfectant as I enter the farm and then wear special clothes and boots.

But you citytwits have no clue what i am talking about do you? You people are irresponsible with your arrogant holier-than-thou attitudes.
photo
lifelongdemo
The truth shall set you free
11:13 AM on 03/04/2012
What do Iowa farmers want to cover up? In response to another comment, I do not agree that property rights is more important that humane treatment of animals. I can only assume that these "farmers" have something to hide. I will pursue checking this out. Something is seriously wrong in Iowa.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
12:39 PM on 03/04/2012
99% are hiding nothing. It's about basic civil liberties you twit
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:43 PM on 03/04/2012
No, for the right its about placing greed beyond scrutiny by the people at large.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
john649
08:52 PM on 03/09/2012
yea, right,thats why wee have an internet filled with animal abuse videos form cafo's.

Try another lie......
08:30 AM on 03/04/2012
Its too late, my family saw the videos and we are all vegetarians
03:16 AM on 03/04/2012
The solution to this is incredibly simple: stop eating meat or eat meat 1 day a week. Buy from a local farmer. We have the power in our own choices to make this stop in this country but sadley we don't.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
12:48 PM on 03/04/2012
buy from a local farmer? What are you talking about? The local farmer will get spied on by you people too. get it? Please explain why you think "local" livestock farms will not get spied on.

97% of farms in this country are family run operations, even the big ones. That fact makes people on HPost ill, but it's true.

Documentation:
http://www.ers.usda.gov/news/AIB797_researchbrief.pdf
Data is a few years old, but still relevant.
02:29 PM on 03/04/2012
I don't really care how many farms are family owned. I can contact a local farmer and ask questions, buy directly from them. Maybe I am wrong in my reasoning but I would think that a small local farmer would treat his/her animals much more humane than a factory farm that has to produce way more meat. If they don't want to answer my questions, I go somewhere else. When I ask a butcher at my local grocer where the meat comes from and they say the United States, no thanks, I'll pass. My point again though, is that people have the choice to stop this cruelty. It is all about choice. No one is going to die if they don't eat meat all the time.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
john649
08:54 PM on 03/09/2012
hey, something tells me you need some undercover work done on your farm.....
10:18 PM on 03/03/2012
If you wish to call Gov Terry Branstad at 515-281-5211 and ask him to veto HF589, that would be awesome. You'd just get one of his reps and it just takes a minute.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
12:50 PM on 03/04/2012
This message has been brought to you by "Big City Non-Farmers: clueless about agriculture since 1994"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
john649
08:55 PM on 03/09/2012
busted, you make money from GMOs. Tell the truth, its all about MONEY.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
john649
08:54 PM on 03/09/2012
already done, this bill won't last.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mhh310351
Roosevelt Democrat
07:40 PM on 03/03/2012
I've made a lot of comments about this situation in favor of the Iowa's legislation, not because I favor animal cruelty or factory farms but because I understand the importance of property rights as regards our other rights. Our founding fathers understood without property rights, rights like freedom of speech are meaningless!

I'll give an example, say a reporter sees and reports a government abuse. The government allows him to have his story printed however after the story is printed the government uses eminent domain to take his house and car "For the good of the Nation".

Now ask yourself how much freedom of speech would this reporter exercise in the future?

Cont.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:46 PM on 03/04/2012
Actually, the better analogy is that government is then compelled to explain itself in the public forum, not take any property from whistleblowers; just as any animal abusing operation should be compelled to do.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
john649
08:56 PM on 03/09/2012
ahhh, bs. Undercover wrk is as old as this planet. To try to use that 'freedom is our right' bs to prevent animal abuse from being exposed is simply shameful.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mhh310351
Roosevelt Democrat
07:40 PM on 03/03/2012
cont.

So taking away property rights irregardless of the nobel aims is the wrong approach!

There is a good example of what we could do:

http://www.policechiefmagazine.org/magazine/index.cfm?fuseaction=display_arch&article_id=358&issue_id=82004

Many of our Police now self Police with camera's!

I would be likely to buy meat from a farm that allowed access to their voluntary filming. This filming of course would be policed by upper management. The attitudes of employees would be improve toward the animals. Use this as a sales tool!

Mind you I have worked on a farm at the advent of factory farming in the Carolinas and they are some areas most don't want to see! But few want to clean and butcher the deer they shoot. It's unpleasant for many. It's life as an omnivore.

There is no doubt we can do better but the larger picture is we get pigs from Iowa with U.S.D.A. inspections during the process or we import and have minimum inspections after the fact!

We have already exported our manufacturing jobs! Do we really want to export our farm jobs too?
04:31 AM on 03/06/2012
"...the larger picture is we get pigs from Iowa with U.S.D.A. inspections during the process or we import and have minimum inspections after the fact! "
The USDA gives minimal inspections, less and less over the last 20 years.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
john649
08:58 PM on 03/09/2012
no, stop with the mass hysteria. If animal farms were innocent and transparent we'd have no problem. Simply amazing you so callously ignore the animal abuse you are trying to hide.
03:42 PM on 03/03/2012
When the President and the Congress and the largest corporations have zero respect for the
law the people have no obligation to comply with the law either. Outrageous attempts to hide
dangerous behaviour like this in Iowa will encourage surreptitious filming not suppress it. In a
fascist state like America has become the law isn't to protect the public at the behest of the
public it just some arbitrary rule to protect the 1% and irrelevant. People in Iowa have no
obligation whatsoever to comply with it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mhh310351
Roosevelt Democrat
07:03 PM on 03/03/2012
you wouldn't have a clue about the law even after going to Law School.

So don't speak of the law.

Took the liberty to substitute "feelings" for "the law" in your tirade and was amazed how much more sensible your trade became.
07:40 AM on 03/04/2012
Really, 4 of my best friends are lawyers, one a former US attorney and another
a former states attorney, a third a criminal defense attorney, we talk about the
rule of law in this country plenty..
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
07:48 PM on 03/03/2012
Speaking of fa scis m is a little ironic because you are condoning a police state.

You want someone to be allowed to come onto my farm to spy even if I am completely law abiding? Spying is a police state. What part of this don't you get? These are not USDA inspectors. They are not OSHA. They are illegally spying.

Just because I am against this law doesn't mean I condone animal abuse. No competent farmer abuses animals. It's just plain bad business. That is not a hard concept to understand.
Unless of course it is HPost, where farmers get lectured day and night by non-farmer urban cityiots on how to farm the politically correct way.

I roared with laughter when a "whistleblower" a while back had video of a manure pile on a farm. Wow...you mean a real manure pile on a farm?! Never heard of that before. lol... Thanks to the whistleblower the fact that livestock actually make manure has been exposed.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
07:52 PM on 03/03/2012
Correction: I actually am in favor of this Iowa bill.

That's obvious....obviously.
08:00 AM on 03/04/2012
Look up the definition of fascism. It's about using government to protect
corporations. It's the police state that facilitates that. This law isn't about
"trespassing" It's about 10 years in a federal prison for exposing criminal
behaviour that threatens the American food supply. There no justification
for that. We are all responsible for our own welfare no one else, not the
"government" and certainly not those who's interest it is to sell a
commodity for a profit. If you are selling food to me then I most certainly
do have a right to come onto your farm and inspect it any time I want to.
If I'm there as an employee filming you have a right to fire me. If I'm not then
you have a right to ask me to leave and if I don't then call the police who
can issue a civil complaint and escort me off your property. What you don't
have a right to do is send me to a federal prison for inspecting my food
supply. The law is positioned as stopping zealots from exposing animal
abuse but it isn't about that at all, it's about exposing safety in the food
supply. Unsanitary practices are good for business because they improve
yields but they endanger the public. That's why any citizen who consumes
your food has a right to come on your property any time he wants and look
around. If you don't like that, then stop producing my food.
03:35 PM on 03/03/2012
Corporatism is Fascism.
Corporatism does not entail Fascism. Corporatism IS Fascism.
01:31 PM on 03/03/2012
How many people on this thread have been to a factory farm? Or is all the information you have gleaned from the internet? Saying you grew up on a farm doesn't count.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
john649
09:00 PM on 03/09/2012
who cares???
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Terry S Singeltary Sr
12:50 PM on 03/03/2012
PLEASE understand this very carefully, the largest meat recall in history (at the time), was documented because of filming and video. IF not for that and the HSUS, we would have NEVER KNOWN, that children all across the Nation, from school to school, were fed the most high risk cattle for mad cow disease i.e. dead stock downer cows, VIA THE USDA AND THE NSLP. THIS IS FACT! now all this was hidden under the guise of _animal abuse_, when if fact, it was child abuse. since when do you have the largest meat recall in the USA history, because a few animals were abused? nope, fact was, our Children all across the Nation were exposed to mad cow disease via the USDA and the NSLP. now, the USDA et al will lay claim to nothing but lies, that the USA does not have mad cow disease, then they will lie about the mad cow feed ban, and then lie some more about the mad cow surveillance program, all this PROVEN FACTS, that both failed terribly. proven by the GAO and OIG, time and time again.

Saturday, March 3, 2012

Iowa Legislature gives the green light for more dead stock downer cows to be fed to your children i.e. mad cow CJD

http://downercattle.blogspot.com/2012/03/iowa-legislature-gives-green-light-for.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lovetostitch
12:14 AM on 03/05/2012
I found your blog to be quite interesting. You are fanned.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
john649
09:00 PM on 03/09/2012
yes, thats why this law wil never last.
03:19 AM on 03/03/2012
when people are doing abuse to animals, the next thing is killing people like Heinrich Luitpold Himmler...!
01:34 AM on 03/03/2012
The issue at hand, which will have a great impact on the Governor's decision, is more about product quality and safety. That will drive more interest into tell him to avoid against the bill than simply focusing on cruelty. I don't want animals to be treated poorly, I just don't see it as a viable voice to stop the bill.
01:03 AM on 03/03/2012
There are gonna be people with enough balls to go in and do it anyway..
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
03:19 PM on 03/03/2012
why don't you try it then yourself if you are so uptight about?
09:06 PM on 03/03/2012
I'm not uptight about it, I was just making a statement.
04:41 AM on 03/06/2012
yes, but who knows if mercy for animals or Peta et al will want to put their names on it for fear of legal action.
03:24 PM on 03/07/2012
hopefully PETA won't and something might actually get done.