iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Twitter Is Selling Your Data

Twitter Selling Data

First Posted: 03/ 1/2012 11:39 am Updated: 03/ 2/2012 11:55 am


By Mitch Lipka

(REUTERS) - Twitter users are about to become major marketing fodder, as two research companies get set to release information to clients who will pay for the privilege of mining the data.

Boulder, Colorado-based Gnip Inc and DataSift Inc, based in the U.K. and San Francisco, are licensed by Twitter to analyze archived tweets and basic information about users, like geographic location. DataSift announced this week that it will release Twitter data in packages that will encompass the last two years of activity for its customers to mine, while Gnip can go back only 30 days.

"Harvesting what someone said a year or more ago is game-changing," said Paul Stephens, director of policy and advocacy for the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse in San Diego. As details emerge on the kind of information being mined, he and other privacy rights experts are concerned about the implications of user information being released to businesses waiting to pore through it with a fine-tooth comb.

"As we see Twitter grow and social media evolve, this will become a bigger and bigger issue," said Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant for British-based Internet security company Sophos Ltd. "Online companies know which websites we click on, which adverts catch our eye, and what we buy ... increasingly, they're also learning what we're thinking. And that's quite a spooky thought."

Twitter opted not to comment on the sale and deferred questions to DataSift. In 2010, Twitter agreed to share all of its tweets with the U.S. Library of Congress. Details of how that information will be shared publicly are still in development, but there are some stated restrictions, including a six-month delay and a prohibition against using the information for commercial purposes.

That's where DataSift comes in. More than 700 companies are on a waiting list to try out its offering, DataSift CEO Rob Bailey said in an interview with Reuters. Those who buy the data will be able to see tweets on specific topics and even isolate those views based on geography. Bailey, who is based in San Francisco, said the effect is something like holding a huge number of sporadic focus groups on brands or products.

For instance, Coca-Cola Co could look at what people in Massachusetts are saying about its Coke Zero, or Starbucks Corp could find out what people in Florida are saying about caramel lattes. Companies can also look at how they have responded to consumer complaints.

Gnip, which offers the short-term data package, said the information collected -- which involves real-time viewing -- can also be used during natural disasters to help rescuers, to monitor illnesses such as a flu outbreak and to analyze stock market sentiment.

No private conversations or deleted tweets can be accessed, Bailey said. Companies want aggregated data, not to try to figure out who said what to whom. "The only information that we make available is what's public," Bailey added. "We do not sell data for targeted advertising. I don't even know how that would work."

A digital analytics expert said the biggest impact will be for marketers. "The only privacy risk is marketers being able to do more with the data, faster," said Thomas Bosilevac, director of analytics for the digital marketing company Digitaria.

That doesn't mean everyone has to be happy about this. "It's frustrating, and telling, that now marketers have greater access to my old tweets than I do," said Rebecca Jeschke, digital rights analyst and spokeswoman for the non-profit Electronic Frontier Foundation. "However, this is perfectly legal, if creepy. If you publish your tweets publicly, that allows all sorts of folks to do all sorts of things with them."

For people concerned that something they said will come back to haunt them, it's not too late to go back and delete old tweets. DataSift is required to regularly update its files to remove comments that have since been deleted. Unlike when you're looking for someone else's tweets, users can always see their own simply by clicking on the word "tweets."

(Edited by Linda Stern and Beth Gladstone and Gerald E. McCormick)

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

By Mitch Lipka (REUTERS) - Twitter users are about to become major marketing fodder, as two research companies get set to release information to clients who will pay for the privilege o...
By Mitch Lipka (REUTERS) - Twitter users are about to become major marketing fodder, as two research companies get set to release information to clients who will pay for the privilege o...
Filed by Catharine Smith  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 29
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
bobdob
Chug-a-lug, chug-a-lug
07:57 PM on 03/02/2012
Just try to delete your old tweets. I do it once a week. It's a pain in the butt. Twitter wants to own your opinions.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mmike1969
11:08 AM on 03/02/2012
Yeah, good luck selling my data of favorite cat videos :p
10:09 AM on 03/02/2012
Just remember - like TV, or Facebook, or any other service:

If you're not paying them for it, you aren't the client, you're the product.
12:27 PM on 03/02/2012
Great post.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bklynsparrow
creating reality from unreal things
06:09 PM on 03/04/2012
So true.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:45 AM on 03/02/2012
This should please major stakeholder Prince Walid bin Talal, together twitters agreement to selectively block countries from access on demand, and the succesful international capture of Hamza Kashgari for thought crimes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RobertFromMN
Fiercely secular Luxemburgist
07:56 AM on 03/02/2012
Unless the Nazi Party comes into power and starts rounding up all the socialists, I can't think of why I should worry. Advertisers are going to target me? So what? I guess I'd rather see targeted ads than random ads.
I regard myself as someone who is very concerned about privacy. If they were reading my email, I'd be outraged, obviously. But it's Twitter. If you're worried about privacy, don't post it, or protect your tweets. Am I wrong? Maybe I'm overlooking some obvious concern.
12:29 PM on 03/02/2012
I believe google targets through emails. Not sure exactly how. I expect it picks out key words.
02:24 AM on 03/02/2012
I mainly use my tweets for beta testing and to stop from following me
12:31 AM on 03/02/2012
Social media we have or shouldnt expect anything. Anything may happen we should be carefull and aware of it
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wesdfs
a guy with different point of veiw
11:44 PM on 03/01/2012
start a lawsuit and get your cut
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:23 PM on 03/01/2012
"Harvesting" ?

So now we're consumers to be "harvested'.

The connotation is downright creepy.

Why do I immediately think of Soylent Green?
photo
freeSpeakr
I stand on the shoulders of giants
09:35 AM on 03/02/2012
Your analogy is not far off. With growing income disparity the fortunate, the privileged and the business-criminal classes will become increasing oppressive. A modest redistribution of wealth would go a long way to avoiding social unrest.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:12 AM on 03/02/2012
Exactly. You'd think, with history to guide them, they'd more equitably distribute the profits of our massive productivity, if for no other reason than self-defense.

As it stands, social unrest is all but guaranteed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MyTake
Release the Hydrogen Economy now!
08:13 PM on 03/01/2012
We need a READ/WRITE copyright law.

If a person types letters onto webpages or social networks, the moment those letters are written and stored to disk drives on the Internet side, they should then be under copyright to the author.

Then when those letters are accessed on a read operation, whoever initiated that read operation has to pay the copyright author $5 a letter.

We just have to find a new method of data storage that enables this capability.

In this way, every person would be quickly elevated into the 1% and these Corporations would be reduced to the 90% which would make everyone happy!
12:36 PM on 03/02/2012
We would be in a new category below the ninety-percent, if there were no corporations. That's the reality of life. They produce the jobs, savings, investments, consumer goods and services, including food, shelter, clothing, communications.

You get my drift.

Your thought about copyright for individual postings/emails is fascinating. I have long believed that it should be illegal for corporations to check out employees or potential employees through their internet activity.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:01 PM on 03/01/2012
Is this article from The Onion? It sounds like it: a spoof. Data miners are going to get what? I use Twitter; not my name; profile is tongue-in-cheek; okay so my location is defined, so what. A lot of Twitter is insignificant banter. Go for it Gnip Inc and DataSift Inc. It's not my money.
12:37 AM on 03/02/2012
yes but what you choose to put in your "insignificant banter" says a lot about you. People reveal all sorts of stuff about themselves in small ways. It adds up.
12:42 PM on 03/02/2012
Our privacy went out the window a long time ago. Companies collected and stored our data long before the internet. Now they simply have quicker and easier methods to collect and store.

The point is that in most cases it is generic information that is of interest to the snoopers, not the person behind the information. As far as who said what, it is whitewashed amongst millions and millions of snipets of information. Nobody cares or is interested.
06:47 PM on 03/01/2012
Of course it is. That is the business model for all social media.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alexis Elizabeth Drob
There's no intelligent life down here
06:33 PM on 03/01/2012
Twitter is selling my info.... so what, how many thousands of other websites are selling bits of our info everytime we visit one of those sites??? This is not new!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jsgaetano
Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus
06:04 PM on 03/01/2012
I'm fine with statistical data, but when they start selling information that can be used to violate privacy of individual users, that's where they lose my support.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HamburgerTime
Real eyes realize real lies.
04:48 PM on 03/01/2012
So glad I've never put any real information into Twitter, and that I only use it to follow people. You have to assume everything you do online is being recorded somewhere.