iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

BP Settlement: First Step To Moving On From Gulf Oil Spill

Bp Settlement

JONATHAN FAHEY, CHRIS KAHN and MICHAEL KUNZELMAN   03/03/12 09:37 PM ET  AP

NEW YORK — BP's multibillion-dollar settlement with people and businesses harmed by its 2010 oil spill removes some uncertainty about the potential financial damages it faces. It also may help the company restore its all-important relationship with the federal government.

Although the oil company still has a few major legal and financial hurdles to overcome nearly two years after the spill in the Gulf of Mexico, the tentative settlement with plaintiff's lawyers sends important signals to investors, Gulf Coast states and federal regulators.

Where once it seemed conceivable that BP's spill-related costs could reach $200 billion, lawyers and industry analysts now say that figure will likely be less than a quarter that amount. If the class-action lawsuit by victims had gone to trial, BP could have faced much higher costs along with the embarrassment of having to publicly rehash the mistakes that led to the spill.

The settlement, which BP estimates will cost $7.8 billion, also shows its willingness to pay a huge sum to resolve issues related to the spill. That may improve its standing with the federal government, which controls access to oil reserves that are critically important to BP's future.

"The only trial I thought we would see in this case is the one that just went away," said David Uhlmann, a University of Michigan law professor who once headed the Justice Department's environmental crimes section.

A blowout of the Macondo well in April 2010 destroyed a drilling rig called the Deepwater Horizon. That killed 11 workers, spilled an estimated 200 million gallons of oil and disrupted thousands of Gulf Coast lives and businesses. The spill soiled sensitive tidal estuaries and beaches, killed wildlife and closed vast areas of the Gulf to commercial fishing.

The settlement announced Friday would apply to tens of thousands of victims along the Gulf Coast, including fishermen who lost work and cleanup workers who got sick. It still needs approval of a federal court in New Orleans.

BP expects to pay the victims using the remainder of a trust fund that the company had established to pay these types of claims. The trust has $9.5 billion in assets left out of an initial $20 billion. Whatever remains would return to BP.

Friday's deal does not resolve lawsuits with federal, state and local governments or address environmental damage. Those other claims could total up to $25 billion.

BP, which is based in London, says it doesn't expect to have to add to the $37.2 billion it has set aside to fund the trust and pay for other spill costs. Although some analysts expect BP to have to pay more eventually, the total would be much less than initially feared.

The settlement does not fully resolve all claims by victims, as individuals and businesses could reject it and choose to bring separate cases. It also doesn't put a final cost on them. The settlement creates a new fund that will pay all claims, with no cap on the total amount. It could ultimately add up to more or less than what BP estimates.

Some Gulf Coast residents dissatisfied with the claims process under the trust fund are hoping the settlement makes it easier to receive compensation.

Clara Gerica, a 59-year-old shrimp vendor at a downtown farmers' market in New Orleans, said she and her husband, a commercial fisherman, had not been compensated even though they filed claims with the fund.

If the new process isn't any better, she said, "I'm going to put up a fight."

Tony Buzbee, a Houston-based attorney who represents people and businesses with roughly 12,000 spill claims, questioned whether the settlement will be more beneficial to his clients than the existing fund.

"There better be a golden nugget in there," Buzbee said. "Otherwise, this smells. It doesn't benefit my clients any."

Still, BP's willingness to agree to a settlement with no cap will help it in future talks with states and the federal government, experts say.

BP is facing Clean Water Act fines of $5.4 billion to $21.1 billion, depending on whether BP is judged to have been grossly negligent in the design, construction or operation of the well.

Eric Schaeffer, who investigated oil spills for the Environmental Protection Agency as a former head of civil enforcement, said that a settlement with the government could reduce those charges by half.

Friday's deal with victims could also help BP work with the government in the future as it drills for oil in the federally controlled waters in the Gulf, one of the most important drilling regions in the world for BP. It's especially important for BP because its reputation was already tarnished from other recent environmental disasters, including a Texas City refinery fire in 2005 that killed 15 people and pipeline spills in 2006, 2009 and 2011 in Alaska.

"If the government doesn't have confidence in the company because of their track record, it's going to look harder for a reason to reject their permit," Schaeffer said.

In the wake of the disaster, BP was forced to cut its dividend, borrow money and begin selling off assets to pay for expenses. So far, it has sold $21 billion worth of oil fields, refineries and chemical plants on four continents, and it is trying to sell assets worth another $17 billion.

BP chief executive Tony Hayward was forced to step down in the fall of 2010 after making a series of gaffes related to the spill. BP's attempts to create an environmentally friendly image were crushed, and independent gas station owners with BP-branded stations lost business from upset customers.

The company's share price of $47.50 is still 21 percent below its $60.48 close before the spill on April 20, 2010. The well was finally capped on July 15 of that year.

Despite the spill and the legal and financial setbacks that followed, BP remains one of the world's biggest and most profitable companies. It is the fourth-largest investor-owned oil company. BP earned $27.5 billion in 2011 on revenue of $376 billion, helped by historically high oil prices that have padded the profits of all oil producers. Its shares have almost doubled from their low of $27.05 on June 25, 2010, when the well was still spewing oil and a series of efforts to plug the well had failed.

BP CEO Bob Dudley said in a statement that the settlement "represents significant progress toward resolving issues" from the disaster.

At times during the summer of 2010, BP's survival as a company was questioned. Goldman Sachs had estimated the spill costs could reach $200 billion.

BP took an accounting charge of $40.9 billion in 2010 to cover such costs. The company has received four payments from partners in the project, including $4 billion from minority owner Anadarko Petroleum and $250 million from Cameron International Corp, which made the blowout preventer that failed to prevent the spill. These settlements and other adjustments brought BP's total write-off to $37.2 billion.

The company has paid out $28.1 billion in expenses, claims and contributions to the victims' trust fund. That leaves the company with $9.1 billion to pay fines and other penalties from states, the federal government and others. That would not be enough to cover federal environmental fines if BP is faced to pay the maximum fine of $4,300 per barrel, or $21.1 billion.

BP is suing Transocean, which owned the Deepwater Horizon rig and Halliburton, the contractor hired by BP to cement the Macondo well, to help pay for cleanup costs. Phil Weiss, an analyst at Argus Research, does not expect BP to win much, though.

Fadel Gheit, an analyst at Oppenheimer & Co., said that by agreeing to a substantial settlement with individuals and businesses, BP is proving it is willing to pay whatever it needs to try to put the oil spill behind it.

"They have been telling the government: `We'll do whatever it takes. We're just going to pay and get this over with. We want to be back in business,'" Gheit said.

___

Kunzelman contributed from New Orleans. AP Writer Cain Burdeau also contributed to this story from New Orleans.

Jonathan Fahey can be reached at . http://twitter.com/JonathanFahey

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

NEW YORK — BP's multibillion-dollar settlement with people and businesses harmed by its 2010 oil spill removes some uncertainty about the potential financial damages it faces. It also may help t...
NEW YORK — BP's multibillion-dollar settlement with people and businesses harmed by its 2010 oil spill removes some uncertainty about the potential financial damages it faces. It also may help t...
Filed by Stephanie Marcus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 589
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
09:05 PM on 03/05/2012
Many living and working along the Gulf are still suffering, almost two years since the explosion & then oil spill. The Disaster Distress Helpline is an independent service that offers 24/7, year-round crisis counseling and support to individuals in distress (like overwhelming feelings of anxiety) related to any natural or man-made disaster. Call 1-800-985-5990 or text 'talkwithus' to 66746. Calls and texts are answered by trained crisis counselors from local call centers located throughout the U.S.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
prvrtbl1
07:31 PM on 03/05/2012
WEETARD WHERE ARE YOU CANT REPLY WUSSY
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Derrick
08:19 AM on 03/05/2012
Don't be surprised if BP exit's the U.S. market due to the legal burden and what may be inexhaustable settlements for this incident. The application of the thousands of gallons of dispersants added an element of uncertainty that I'm sure the EPA won't discuss. I'm curious, how much of the settlement $ has gone to attorney's in this whole incident? Is this not a risk that we all bear in the name of oil, Texas tea? Load up the truck Jed.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stephen Thorpe
Every breath you take - I'll take one too!
07:29 AM on 03/05/2012
I just watched a Louisianna shrimper say; "nothings living in these waters." "Ain't no shrimp to catch."

So all the ads. that the oil industry lobby puts up to make everyone feel better, its dog mess.
12:36 AM on 03/05/2012
Dear Friends,

The gulf spill had no long lasting effects, except to almost destroy BP as a company. We need to ask ourselves, if no companies want to provide us with energy in the future what are we gong to do?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Katherine Guidry
Real Estate Appraiser & Environmental
01:06 AM on 03/05/2012
no long lasting effects" is a false statement...makes the rest of the comment irrevelent
08:20 AM on 03/05/2012
Dear Katherine,

Please show me the long lasting effect, every single thing I have read talk about maybe, or possible or ....

The reality is the guilf is the best place in the world to have an oil spill for many reasons, and the long term effect is zero.

I loved the report about finding a deep water sheen of oil, the PPM of oil they found in the water was less than the PPM of feces allowed in hamburger.

In alaska it is much different due to the climate.
photo
RegMac
I am the virus, earth is my host
07:15 AM on 03/05/2012
Mark, big oil is very profitable right now, they also have HUGE influence over many governments. BP is not even in danger of going belly up, in fact they are making money right now.
The gulf of Mexico still has a long way to go and may never fully recover from the spill.
A link
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/edward-flattau/bp-gulf-coast-oil_b_1253860.html?ref=bp-oil-spill

Ignore it and continue to believe as you do, or enlighten yourself and join the ranks of us gulf coast residents who still see the dangers.
10:48 PM on 03/04/2012
We have two legal systems. One for corporations and the rich and another legal system for average folks.
10:31 PM on 03/04/2012
That spill was 2 years ago lets get on with business the gulf is cleaned up . Let the drilling begin and move oil . I don't care what company but lets make money
photo
catgirl666
FDR must be rolling in his grave
03:16 AM on 03/05/2012
US only exports oil, it doesn't make our country money, as only a few oil giants profit .If you don't want to bankrupt this country by depending on other unstable countries for our lust for oil, we need to invest in alternatives.

We are so far behind the world it's tragic.
09:28 AM on 03/05/2012
I agree with you we are way far behind. But this country can regain where we were if the people would only put their time in working and stop expecting the government to take care of them. We must also make it my easier for the companies here to do their job product products, don't invest in poorly run companies like the solar ones we did invest in.
photo
waitforitwaitforit
Hey ya'll, watch thi.......
09:36 PM on 03/04/2012
And I would be willing to bet that the corporate culture that allowed such a slovenly safety environment to exist for such a long time (even after previous safety fiascoes) hasn't changed a thing about that environment.

No, wait. They might have beefed up their PR corps.
photo
ToddlerJ
Cloud-hidden, whereabouts unknown
09:20 PM on 03/04/2012
BP needs to pay the taxpayers back for all the destruction and obstruction they did to our gulf coast environment. $25 billion would be a good start, and, hey, we are willing to loan it to you with a really good interest rate!
12:37 AM on 03/05/2012
Dear Toddler,

What destruction, there is not effect to the gulf coast, the guild coast has more oil and gas leaked into it from natural sources over the course of a year than BP did.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Katherine Guidry
Real Estate Appraiser & Environmental
01:09 AM on 03/05/2012
wow, again you lay out lies that serve up money to the already rich...there are safe ways to do this work but there is no incentive if they make 500 Billion and only have to give back 25 Billion in fines...just a business decision with no care to the live eco system that is a part of many locals lives...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:42 AM on 03/05/2012
Start with your federal government that was supposed to response to "a single drop of oil into any body of water" They waited six months for Obama to give the go ahead.
Second, there have been no damages. By removing oil through pipes, the oil is not seeping into the ocean the way it naturally does.drills are rotting away. and big rigs have moved to other countries.
Third, the most damage is what this admin did by closing off drilling. While states lose royalties that they use to pay for higher education,China is in the Gulf off Cuba running lateral lines. Stalled
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Timma
nihil habentes omnia posidentes
08:24 PM on 03/04/2012
I know it won't be popular to say it but - Screw BP!
photo
paultec1
my bio is private
11:35 PM on 03/04/2012
a good bu.t bump.
07:55 PM on 03/04/2012
people with this internet we have power--- we must unite---- we need to pick one oil company and boycott it I MEAN ALL OF US!!! If we all say were not buying B P gas---- and bury the company---- then say to the survivors who want's to be next ???? they will collectively lower their price's in fear of being our next target-----
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
accmiller
09:24 PM on 03/04/2012
Or you keep doing it until there is only one oil company left. Then what do you think happens?
photo
paultec1
my bio is private
11:37 PM on 03/04/2012
Diplomacy is allways better with a gun.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Katherine Guidry
Real Estate Appraiser & Environmental
01:10 AM on 03/05/2012
use your money as a gun and they will pay attention
07:48 PM on 03/04/2012
yes of course the settlement is done that's why we are paying $1 to $2 more at the pump. It's not coming out of their pocket's, I'm sure they get free gas everywhere they go in the world. Just like Exxon spill, when it was time to settle the price of gas jump up $1 for a drunk mishap.
PhillipCollins
not the singer from Genesis
07:46 PM on 03/04/2012
If they had let BP drill offshore this wouldn't have happened.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Timma
nihil habentes omnia posidentes
08:25 PM on 03/04/2012
huh?!
photo
paultec1
my bio is private
11:39 PM on 03/04/2012
He said he's laying in an inch of water and don't feel right.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jflorish
07:07 PM on 03/04/2012
I do want the gulf spill behind us, hopefully all companies improved from it and will be better going forward.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Timma
nihil habentes omnia posidentes
08:25 PM on 03/04/2012
Of course it will (not)...
08:36 PM on 03/04/2012
Unfortunately, it doesn't look like anything will change in the long run. After the Exxon disaster in Alaska, stronger protections were put in place to avoid it happening again (double hulled ships, etc.). To date, NOTHING has changed about the way offshore drilling is done.

Folks, we could have another Gulf disaster tomorrow.
06:51 PM on 03/04/2012
obama made sure he did a shake down of BP.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Timma
nihil habentes omnia posidentes
08:28 PM on 03/04/2012
So what do you - being a laissez-faire capitalist - say to the people whose businesses went belly up because BP's outright negligence cost 11 lives and as yet, undetermined ecological damage?
12:39 AM on 03/05/2012
Dear Timma,

what damage, please show us? Their is not long term damage, none.
08:39 PM on 03/04/2012
"Shake down" says this clown. Have you talked to any of the thousands of people down in the Gulf - many of them respectful conservative champions like yourself - who are now dealing with respiratory, skin and neurological long-term damage. Those who find their way to a clinic to test their blood are finding elevated levels of all kinds of toxins, directly linked to the crude and the dispersants.

Talk to them about the shakedown and see what they say.
12:39 AM on 03/05/2012
Dear Perpetual,

Crude oil is not toxic, sorry.