More

HuffPost Social Reading
Nico Pitney
GET UPDATES FROM Nico:

Israel-Iran Tension Mounts: Live Updates On The Drumbeat Of War

Posted: 03/ 5/2012 8:26 am Updated: 03/14/2012 11:58 am

The prospect of a high-profile military conflict looms again in the Middle East. National security analysts believe Israel's government is giving serious consideration to an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities in the coming months, an action that would trigger a cascade of unpredictable military, political and economic reactions in the region and around the world.

This blog aims to provide comprehensive, highly readable coverage of this story in realtime, and that won't be possible without your help: please tweet me, subscribe to my updates on Facebook or RSS, or comment below to join the conversation or pass along tips or observations.

live blog

Oldest Newest

Iranian-born Reza Baluchi is a regular Forrest Gump. Ten years ago he ran away from Iran. He’s run across the United States twice since then, once around its perimeter. Yet now he’s planning his biggest journey of all, CNN reports, a run around the world that will take him through his home country once more.

It started when he ran away from home at the age of eight. Later he ran away from his homeland, Iran, and spent seven years on a bicycle, pedaling 49,700 miles across 55 countries.

In 2002, he reached America. He now lives in a tent in Death Valley.

It's been nearly 10 years since Reza Baluchi escaped from Iran. He has run across the United States twice and around its perimeter once. He sets out on every journey with the same mission: to spread a message of world peace.

Read the full story here.

Share this:

After being seized by Iranian customs over a monetary dispute, a painting by Jackson Pollock has been returned to the Tehran Museum of Contemporary Art in Iran, the BBC reports.

The BBC explains:

Mural on Indian Red Ground was seized by the country's customs service on 11 May after being on loan to Japan.

The service said it confiscated the work over money owed by the Ministry of Culture, which runs the museum.

The ministry said the painting had been returned "after negotiations.â€

Read the full story here.

Share this:

Hossein Ronaghi Maleki, a 26-year-old Iranian dissident blogger, has spent the past 13 months in solitary confinement at Iran’s Evin Prison, BBC Persian reports.

International Business Times reports that Maleki has written a letter to Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, including the following passage:

(Read the full translation here.)

“Leader of the Islamic Republic,

We must admit that judicial independence is not possible with the existence of so many intelligence and security entities.

We must admit that the society is facing a great explosion, and the current superficial peace is basically due to oppression, intimidation, imprisonments and suppression.

We must know that the thoughts of freedom seekers cannot be enchained! Ideologies cannot be tortured! Truth cannot be suppressed!â€

Read the full story here.

Share this:
Who is running Iran's side of the nuclear negotiations? Here's Saeed Jalili, the man behind the nuclear talks: saeed jalili

AP Photo

From The National:

“Iran's chief nuclear negotiator is like no other diplomat. Saeed Jalili drives a battered Kia Pride that was assembled many years ago in Iran, insists on lugging his own suitcases around on high-level trips abroad and has a reputation for indulging in monologue rather than debate. It is not just Mr Jalili's style that makes him so different to the international big-name envoys he grapples with on the momentous issue of Iran's nuclear programme. His background is alien to the likes of Javier Solana, the European Union's foreign policy chief, or William Burns, the US undersecretary of state for political affairs.â€

Read the full story here.

Share this:

(Reuters) - International sanctions meant to deprive Iran's nuclear programme of funds and technology are squeezing the country's vital oil exports. Talks between Iran and major powers, that could lead to an easing of sanctions if successful, are set to begin in Baghdad on Wednesday.

Following are details of major sanctions imposed on Iran by the United States, the European Union, and the United Nations over the years.

Captions courtesy of Reuters.

U.S. Sanctions
1  of  20
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
In this Saturday, Nov. 12, 2011 photo, Iranian women and a man weave carpet in a workshop in Qom, 78 miles (125 kilometers) south of the capital Tehran, Iran. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi)



Initial sanctions were imposed after Iranian students stormed the U.S. embassy and took diplomats hostage in 1979. Iranian products cannot be imported into the United States apart from small gifts, information material, food and some carpets.

Share this:

VIENNA — The chief of the U.N. nuclear agency says he has reached a deal with Iran on probing suspected work on nuclear weapons and adds that the agreement will "be signed quite soon. "

Read more on HuffPost World.

Share this:

TEHRAN, Iran -- The head of the U.N. nuclear agency arrived Monday in Tehran on a key mission that could lead to the resumption of probes by the watchdog on whether Iran has secretly worked on an atomic weapon.

Read the full story on HuffPost World.

Share this:

JERUSALEM, May 17 (Reuters) - U.S. plans for a possible military strike on Iran are ready and the option is "fully available", the U.S. ambassador to Israel said, days before Tehran resumes talks with world powers which suspect it of seeking to develop nuclear arms.

Like Israel, the United States has said it considers military force a last resort to prevent Iran using its uranium enrichment to make a bomb. Iran insists its nuclear programme is for purely civilian purposes.

"It would be preferable to resolve this diplomatically and through the use of pressure than to use military force," Ambassador Dan Shapiro said in remarks about Iran aired by Israel's Army Radio on Thursday.

"But that doesn't mean that option is not fully available - not just available, but it's ready. The necessary planning has been done to ensure that it's ready," said Shapiro, who the radio station said had spoken on Tuesday.

The United States, Britain, France, Russia, China and Germany have been using sanctions and negotiations to try to persuade Iran to curb its uranium enrichment, which can produce fuel for reactors, medical isotopes, and, at higher levels of purification, fissile material for warheads.

New talks opened in Istanbul last month and resume on May 23 in Baghdad.

Israel, which is widely assumed to have the Middle East's only atomic arsenal, feels threatened by the prospect of its arch-foe Iran going nuclear and has hinted it could launch preemptive war.

But many analysts believe the United States alone has the military clout to do lasting damage to Iran's nuclear programme.

In January, Shapiro told an Israeli newspaper the United States was "guaranteeing that the military option is ready and available to the president at the moment he decides to use it".

U.S. lawmakers are considering additional legislation that would increase pressure on Iran, with further measures to punish foreign companies for dealing with Iran in any capacity. (Writing by Maayan Lubell; Editing by Andrew Roche)

Share this:

Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates sat down with CBS's Charlie Rose to talk about his new memoir -- and in doing so, gave insight into the Osama bin Laden raid, as well as the standoff between Iran and Israel.

"The only good option, is putting enough pressure on the Iranian government that they make the decision for themselves," Gates said.

As for a potential Israeli strike on Iran, Gates told Rose, "I think that would be worse."

Watch the embedded video above, or on CBS News.

Share this:

Share this:

VIENNA -- Iran's envoy to talks with the U.N. nuclear agency said Tuesday the meeting was going well, as the two sides began their second day of discussion of agency suspicions that Tehran might have tested atomic arms technology.

Read the full story on HuffPost World.

Share this:

VIENNA, May 14 (Reuters) - A senior U.N. nuclear official said Iran must give his inspectors access to information, people and sites as he began a two-day meeting with Iranian officials on the Islamic state's disputed atomic activities on Monday.

The meeting in Vienna will test Iran's readiness to address U.N. inspectors' suspicions of military dimensions to its nuclear programme, ahead of high-stakes talks on the programme in Baghdad next week between Iran and six world powers.

Read the whole story on HuffPost World.

Share this:

On Thursday, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad applauded the country’s subsidy reform project, Fars News reports.

Yet according to BBC Persian, the cuts have had drastic effects on the price of certain commodities such as food, with the price of produce, dairy, and meat nearly doubling since last year.

The BBC reports that while the price of a kilo of yogurt, a staple in Persian cuisine, was 11380 Rials ($0.93) last year, it amounted to 18320 Rials ($1.50) this year. Similarly, the price of lamb increased from 91160 Rials ($7.44) per kilo to 177230 Rials ($14.46) per kilo.

The Iranian government has dismissed the spike in prices, saying that it is just the immediate effect of a shock to Iran’s economy. However, economic experts are concerned with the increases, and say that if the Iranian government continues with the cuts, it might paralyze its manufacturing industry, the BBC reports.

The subsidy reform program, which was spearheaded in December of last year, was intended to remove inefficient subsidies on fuel and other goods within a five-year span, Fars News explains. Now, Iran is in the process of implementing a second phase of cuts.

Reuters reports the cuts came in response to recent international sanctions, which have reduced Iran’s oil revenue, and have placed additional pressure on its government to make up the loss.

Share this:

JERUSALEM — Israel on Wednesday accused Iran of stalling in negotiations over its nuclear program with the international community, and said an upcoming round of talks can succeed only if the Iranians agree to halt all uranium enrichment.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told the visiting EU foreign policy chief, Catherine Ashton, on Wednesday that Iran is "playing for time" with these talks, an Israeli official said.

Read the whole story here.

Share this:

Hopes dimmed Monday for staging major nuclear talks later this year between Israel and its Muslim rivals, as Iran and Arab countries at a 189-nation conference accused Israel of being the greatest threat to peace in the region and Egypt warned that Arab states might rethink their opposition to atomic arms.

Because Israel has not signed the nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, it was not present at Tuesday's gathering of treaty members. But the United States defended its ally, warning that singling out Israel for criticism diminished chances of a planned meeting between it and its Muslim neighbors to explore the prospect of a Middle East free of weapons of mass destruction.

The Mideast conference planned for later this year was a key plank of a monthlong 2010 high-level gathering of treaty signatories that convenes every five years to review the objectives of the 42-year-old treaty. Muslim nations have warned that failure to stage the Mideast meeting would call into question the overall achievements of the 2010 conference.

Egypt, speaking for nonaligned NPT signatory nations – the camp of developing countries – said Israel's nuclear capabilities constitute "a threat to international peace and security."

Later, in his separate capacity as Egypt's delegate, senior Foreign Ministry official Ahmed Fathalla warned that Arab nations might "revise their policies" regarding their opposition to having nuclear weapons if the planned Mideast conference failed to materialize.

Fathalla said he was citing a declaration from the March 29 Arab summit in Baghdad. But a senior U.S. official, who demanded anonymity because he was not authorized to comment to reporters, said it was the first time he had heard that threat.

The senior official also said he was not surprised by the verbal attacks on Israel, noting that outreach by Washington to individual Arab countries for moderation so as to not jeopardize the Mideast conference had been unsuccessful.

Israel is unlikely to attend any hostile Mideast meeting and its absence would strip the gathering of significance, leaving it as little more than a forum for Arab states to further criticize the Jewish state and its undeclared nuclear arsenal.

Israel has remained opaque on its nuclear capabilities but is commonly considered to posess atomic arms – a status that Muslim nations say make it the greatest threat to Mideast stability.

Western allies of Israel disagree, accusing Iran of violating the nonproliferation treaty by noncompliance with U.N. Security Council resolutions demanding it curb uranium enrichment and other activities with nonmilitary applications that could also be used in the manufacture of nuclear weapons. As such, they say, Iran most menaces Mideast stability.

Reacting to a harsh series of attacks on Israel, U.S. State Department envoy Thomas M. Countryman urged Muslim nations to ease their pressure at the Vienna meeting, convened to prepare for the next NPT summit in 2015, telling delegates: "continued efforts to single out Israel ... will make a (Mideast) conference less likely."

He also voiced "deep concern over Iran's persistent failure to comply with its nonproliferation obligations, including ... U.N. Security Council resolutions," and urged Tehran to reduce concerns about is nuclear program by coming to May 23 talks with six world powers in Baghdad "with the same serious and constructive attitude that the six partners bring."

Countryman also criticized Syria – found by the International Atomic Energy Agency to be "very likely" hiding a covert nuclear program – and urged it and Tehran to "return to full compliance" with their treaty obligations.

Iran insists that it has no intention of harnessing its expanding nuclear program into weapons making, a stance repeated Tuesday by Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Mohammad Mahdi Akhondzadeh. He condemned the "hypocritic and double standard approach of the United States and the EU member states for keeping "deadly silent on the Israel nuclear program (while) they express baseless concern about Iran's nuclear program." (AP)

Share this:

Iran has made no secret of its hopes for the next round of nuclear negotiations with world powers: Pledges by the West to ease sanctions as a step toward deal making by Tehran.

Iran's pitch is certain to smack head-on into resistance and counter proposals by the West. But it reflects a harder-edged atmosphere before the next talks that suggests envoys will face pressure to stake out at least some tangible bargaining positions, as opposed to the last round where just getting to the negotiating table was considered positive.

Iran has been careful about avoiding ultimatums in a possible sign that it sees the meeting scheduled for later this month in Baghdad as a stepping stone, not a showdown.

No official, for example, has suggested that talks would hit an impasse if the U.S. and European partners balk at immediately rolling back some sanctions, which have targeted Iran's critical oil sector and left the country effectively blackballed from international banking networks.

Instead, Iran has cultivated a sunny approach - with officials repeatedly saying they are "optimistic" about the May 23 session and their hopes for goodwill gestures from the other side: the five permanent U.N. Security Council members plus Germany.

"We continue to be optimistic about upcoming negotiations," said Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister, Mohammad Mahdi Akhondzadeh, at a conference in Vienna on Wednesday.

From the Western corner, the mood is much tougher.

U.S. officials have rejected the idea that they could ease sanctions against Iran as a confidence-building measure. They have said sanctions will only be pulled back if Iran eases world concern over its nuclear program and complies with demands that include suspending uranium enrichment.

"No one's talking about any sanctions being reversed or canceled at all," said State Department spokesman Mark Toner on April 16, just after the Baghdad meeting was announced.

Two days later, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said the question of removing sanctions was "hypothetical."

"We have to see what the Iranians are willing to do, then we have to make sure they do it, and then we have to reciprocate. That's what a negotiation is all about," she told CNN.

Any progress in the talks also further dampens support for possible military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities.

Israel, which has been the most aggressive in discussing the military option, has been confronted with growing questions over the risks versus rewards of an attack. Some former Israeli security officials, including the ex-chief of internal security Yuval Diskin, have speculated that bombs would only set back Iran's nuclear development by a few years, but could touch off a region-wide war and bring direct retaliation from Tehran proxies such as Hezbollah in Lebanon.

The Obama administration has been trying to convince Israel to give more time for sanctions and negotiations to yield results - even as Netanyahu branded last month's talks in Istanbul a "freebie" that allowed Iran to continue enriching uranium until the next round.

Istanbul's meeting ended with little more than the plan to meet again. Yet that was portrayed as a success after the swift collapse of negotiations in early 2011.

Iran's uranium enrichment remains the central issue.

Tehran says its enrichment labs are only making nuclear fuel for energy and research reactors, and insists it has no intention of producing weapons. Washington and allies worry the enrichment sites could eventually churn out weapons-grade material.

Now looms the greater challenges of actually hashing out proposals that bridge very different agendas: The West and its allies seeking to rein in Iran's nuclear enrichment, and Tehran strongly refusing to accept any significant reverses in its atomic program.

This is where negotiators may begin to parse the enrichment capabilities.

Iranian officials have indicated they could consider suspending production of 20 percent enriched uranium, which is used for Iran's medical research reactor but is a far higher grade than needed for the country's lone electricity-generating reactor. The 20 percent uranium is a significant concern for the West because it can be converted into weapons-grade material - at over 90 percent enrichment - in a matter of months.

Iran also has agreed to answer questions about its alleged attempt to develop nuclear weapons. In the past, Iran refused to even enter into discussions, simply rejecting them as CIA fabrications.

Iranian officials plan to meet May 13-14 in Vienna with experts from the U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency. Among the discussions could be efforts to work out guidelines for an IAEA inspection of Iran's Parchin military complex, where the agency suspects secret atomic work has been carried out.

Iranian lawmaker Hossein Nejabat suggested a move by the West to lift some sanctions could bring an Iranian pledge not to exceed 5 percent enriched uranium. But Iranian officials - as high as Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei - flatly reject any calls to halt uranium enrichment entirely.

"Lifting sanctions is our least expectation," added hardline parliament member Gholam Ali Haddad Adel.

It appears unlikely that U.S. or European governments would offer any rollback in sanctions without considerable concessions from Iran in return.

State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said Monday that Washington wants "to see Iran live up to its international obligations including the suspension of uranium enrichment as required by multiple UN Security Council resolutions."

A full boycott of Iranian oil goes into effect July 1 across the European Union, which once accounted for about 18 percent of Iran's crude exports. Iran threatened to block Gulf tankers in retaliation for tougher sanctions, at one point shooting oil prices above $120 a barrel.

A prominent Iranian political analyst, Sadeq Zibakalam, said sanctions may become the linchpin on whether talks stall in Baghdad or move forward.

"Sanctions have harmed Iran. They also harmed Europeans," he said. "Sanctions also have caused a hike in the oil price, worsening the global economic downturn ... Neither Iran nor the West benefit." (AP)

Share this:

Two top Israeli security officials said Wednesday that the prospect of early national elections will have no influence over a decision over whether to strike Iranian nuclear sites.

Both Defense Minister Ehud Barak and Deputy Prime Minister Moshe Yaalon said in published comments on Wednesday that policy toward Iran will be based solely on strategic interests.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu signaled this week that he may call parliamentary elections a year ahead of schedule - casting additional uncertainty over any Israeli military plans.

Israel considers Iran a threat to its existence because of its nuclear and missile development programs, frequent reference to Israel's destruction by Iranian leaders and Iran's support of violent anti-Israel groups in Lebanon and Gaza.

Israel has been warning for years that Iran is trying to construct nuclear bombs. Iran insists its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.

Both Barak and Netanyahu have often hinted at an Israeli military strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, but no specific threats have been made, and some believe the talk is meant only as pressure.

Israeli media reported Wednesday that the election would be set for September 4.

"The election would have no affect on considerations on the professional level regarding the Iranian issue," Barak said on his Facebook page in answer to questions from the public.

Echoing Barak's sentiments was Deputy Prime Minster Moshe Yaalon. "The election will not be a consideration in the Iranian issue. If we need to make decisions we will make them," he told the Maariv daily.

There has been a precedent to big military offensive prior to an election.

Prime Minister Menachem Begin ordered a daring Israeli airstrike on an unfinished Iraqi nuclear in 1981 just a few weeks before Israelis went to the polls. His Likud Party won that election. Though that attack successfully destroyed the Iraqi reactor, critics charged that Begin ordered the raid to win votes.

An Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear facilities now would likely trigger the same charges. In any event, success of such an Israeli strike is far from guaranteed, and the risk is far greater.

Iran is believed to have multiple well guarded underground nuclear sites. An Israeli attack would require that almost all of its fleet fly over hostile countries and face formidable Iranian defense systems.

Also, an Israeli attack on Iran would likely trigger punishing retaliation from Iran itself and its proxies on Israel's borders - Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza - both armed with thousands of rockets.

Israel is also under international pressure not to act militarily. The U.S want Israel to give sanctions imposed on Iran more time.

With debates of an attack being aired publicly Israel has lost the element of surprise, a key to the 1981 air raid's success.

Barak warned earlier this week that as long as Iran poses a threat to Israel with its nuclear program, an Israeli strike remains an option.

"It would be complicated with certain associated risks. But a radical Islamic Republic of Iran with nuclear weapons would be far more dangerous both for the region and, indeed, the world," he said. (AP)

Share this:

@jstreetdotorg: RT @cnni: Israeli politics now 'in tailspin' over Iran http://t.co/GRtOly79

Share this:

Yet another senior Israeli defense official speaks out about an attack on Iran:

Iran would possibly accelerate its nuclear weapons program after a future Israeli military strike, former IDF Intelligence head Shlomo Gazit told The Jerusalem Post on Tuesday.

Gazit, a senior research fellow at Tel Aviv University’s Institute for National Security Studies, made the comments in response to a question put to him by the Post over recent views aired by former Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) director Yuval Diskin, who questioned the effectiveness of an Israeli strike.

The public discourse over a strike largely neglected the likelihood that Iran would resume its program after being attacked, Gazit noted.

He said he agreed with Diskin that an Israeli attack would not destroy the program, and could even accelerate it, while enabling Iran to legitimize its efforts diplomatically.

Share this:

The New York Times runs a story on Barak's speech yesterday:

The Israeli defense minister, Ehud Barak, said Monday night that the international talks on the Iranian nuclear program do “not fill me with confidence,†reiterating his hard-line position about all options — including an independent Israeli attack — remaining on the table, despite mounting criticism from the security establishment here and a growing sense abroad that a diplomatic solution may be possible.

“They say in the Middle East a pessimist is simply an optimist with experience,†Mr. Barak said in a speech to about 100 members of the Foreign Press Association at the King David Hotel. Acknowledging that a military strike was “not simple†and would be “complicated by certain risks,†he said that a “radical Islamic Republic of Iran with nuclear weapons would be far more dangerous both for the region and, indeed, the whole world.â€

Share this:

@brit_newsman: Map: US bases encircle Iran http://t.co/upv2IfnV via @ajenglish Interesting to find no bases in the US belonging to foreign countries

Share this:

The prospect of an imminent election in Israel will not affect its strategy for tackling Iran's nuclear program, including plans for a possible preemptive war, Defence Minister Ehud Barak said on Wednesday.

Rifts in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's conservative coalition over military conscription and budget cuts have prompted parties to mobilize to bring forward the ballot to as early as September, a year ahead of schedule.

That has raised questions about whether an Israeli strike on Iranian nuclear sites - long threatened, although viewed by some Netanyahu critics as a bluff - might now be shelved due to government reluctance to send potential voters to bomb shelters.

"Elections will not affect deliberations of the professional echelon in everything regarding the Iranian issue," Barak said on his Facebook page, adding that Israel still saw military force as among "options on the table".

Israel, reputed to have the region's sole atomic arsenal, has long said it would strike Iran to prevent it from getting nuclear weapons. Iran says its nuclear program is peaceful.

The United States and European Union have sharply tightened economic sanctions on Iran this year, and have called on Israel to show restraint to give the new measures a chance to bite. Washington says it too would be willing to strike Iran as a last resort, but the White House believes it is too early to give up on diplomacy.

Nuclear talks between major powers and Iran, which broke down last year, restarted in Istanbul on April 14 and are expected to continue later this month in Baghdad.

Netanyahu's national security adviser, Yaakov Amidror, was touring European capitals this week to hear arguments in favor of the six world powers' negotiations with Iran.

"We are telling him (Amidror) that we need time," a Western diplomat told Reuters, saying the goal was "verifiable compliance" by Iran with nuclear anti-proliferation safeguards.

Netanyahu and Barak have maintained a continuously hawkish stance in public towards Iran, but there are signs that the Israeli security establishment may not be keen on war.

In a rare public rebuke on Friday, Netanyahu's former internal security chief accused the prime minister and Barak of having a "messianic" policy, and of overstating their belligerence.

"A barking dog doesn't bite," Yuval Diskin said.

Surveys show Netanyahu's Likud party is likely to win the most seats in an election, but most Israelis would oppose going solo in an attack on Iran.

Israel could be vulnerable to cross-border missile salvoes from Iran and its guerrilla allies in retaliation for any strike. Fortification drives overseen by its Civil Defence Ministry have lagged, with the current minister, Matan Vilnai, due to step down in August and no successor in sight. (REUTERS)

Share this:

"India's top two importers of crude oil from Iran will reduce shipments from the Persian Gulf nation by at least 15% this financial year, the latest sign that New Delhi is playing ball with Washington's efforts to shut-down Iran oil trade despite public pronouncement from Indian officials that they will continue to buy from Tehran," the Wall Street Journal reports.

Share this:

The suddenly very talkative former Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert offers new comments to CNN:

Speaking to CNN's Christiane Amanpour on Monday, Olmert was asked about this "war within Israel" on how to deal with Iran's nuclear program, with the former PM saying: "I don't think there is a war, there is a serious and genuine dispute."

"The last resort is a military action, and I prefer it to be an American action, supported by the international community, if all the other efforts will fail," Olmert answered, saying Israel should only have a secondary role in such a scenario.

"The United States should be the one that decides on it, on the scope of it, on the extent of it, its cooperation," said Olmert. "Israel certainly could be a part of the effort, but Israel should not lead it."

Share this:

Iran said on Wednesday it was seeking an end to Western sanctions over its arms program during talks with world powers and criticized France for helping Israel, the only country in the Middle East widely believed to have atomic weapons.

An adviser to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said the talks in Baghdad on May 23 should lead to the lifting of sanctions, according to Iranian media.

The comments reflect increasing emphasis in the Islamic Republic that an end to sanctions is vital to the success of the talks. It was also the first time an influential political figure explicitly said he expects progress on the issue.

"At the least, our expectation is the lifting of sanctions," Gholam-Ali Haddad Adel said in answer to a question.

The United States and its allies say Iran's nuclear program is a cover for developing atomic weapons, a charge Tehran denies.

They have imposed new sanctions against Iran's energy and banking sectors since the beginning of this year and the European Union is set to impose a total embargo on the purchase of Iranian crude oil in July.

In Vienna, Deputy Foreign Minister Mohammad Mahdi Akhondzadeh sought to turn the tables on the Western powers. He said nuclear weapons had no place in Iran's defense doctrine, and accused "certain" states of double standards.

He took aim at France, a key player in tightening sanctions on Iran, and said it had "spared no effort" in helping Israel - widely believed to be the only nuclear-armed state in the Middle East. He did not elaborate.

"The existence of nuclear weapons in the hands of...Israel continues to pose the gravest threat to the stability and security" in the Middle East, Akhondzadeh said.

Israel neither confirms nor denies it has nuclear weapons, under an ambiguity designed to deter regional foes but avoid arms races.

The United States and Israel regard Iran's nuclear ambitions as the main threat in the volatile region, prompting persistent speculation they might attack its atomic sites if diplomacy fails to resolve the dispute.

OPTIMISTIC ABOUT PROGRESS

Akhondzadeh said the existence of nearly 23,000 nuclear warheads in the world and their continued modernization was the "most serious threat to the survival of mankind."

The nuclear weapon states should agree a target date for "the total elimination" of their atomic arsenals, he said.

The five recognized nuclear weapon states are the United States, Russia, China, France and Britain.

Akhondzadeh said Iran was optimistic about progress in the talks in Baghdad, but it will never give up its right to the peaceful use of atomic energy.

"We continue to be optimistic about upcoming negotiations," Akhondzadeh said in a speech to a nuclear non-proliferation conference in Vienna, attended also by Western states.

But he added: "There should be no doubt that the great nation of Iran...will never abandon exercising its inalienable right to peaceful use of nuclear energy and technology,"

The talks with the United States, Russia, China, Germany, France and Britain resumed in mid-April in Istanbul after more than a year - a chance for the powers and Iran to halt a deterioration in diplomacy and help avert the threat of a new Middle East war.

Western governments have credited the sanctions against Iran's financial institutions as instrumental in forcing Tehran back to the negotiating table.

European diplomats have said an EU oil embargo is a valuable tool and is unlikely to be lifted unless tangible progress is made at the meeting.

"I hope the Baghdad negotiations complete the talks that took place in Istanbul and the other side should take note that it should use rational behavior with Iran and (the) country will never surrender to pressure," Fars news agency quoted Haddad Adel as saying. (REUTERS)

Share this:

@StateDept: Executive Order takes additional steps with respect to #Iran and #Syria: http://t.co/CHGhlEWk via @PressSec

Share this:

@gkeizer:Iran admits more cyberattacks, claims it's IDed the hackers. So says state-backed media. #iranhack http://t.co/QaYUk2nQ

Share this:

The International Monetary Fund on Tuesday rejected a call by a US anti-Iran group for it to cut its relations with Tehran's central bank in order to adhere to US and European sanctions.

The IMF said its account with Bank Markazi is simply related to Iran's membership in the IMF and does not contravene sanctions placed on Tehran to pressure it not to develop nuclear weapons.

The advocacy group United Against Nuclear Iran, a group of US ex-diplomats and government officials, said that the IMF needed to shut down its account with Bank Markazi, a specific target of the sanctions, or suspend Iran's membership in the fund.

It also criticized the IMF managing director, Christine Lagarde, for meeting with Bank Markazi's chief during the IMF's spring meeting last month in Washington, and for allegedly "lavishing praise on Iran and Bank Markazi."

"The IMF must also stop treating the Iranian regime like a responsible government in good standing at a time when the international community is trying to isolate it."

But IMF spokesman William Murray said the IMF's account at Iran's central bank is simply there to hold the Iranian funds committed to the IMF as an obligation of its membership in the crisis lender.

"According to our constitution... the IMF's holdings of each member's currency are maintained with the central bank of the relevant member, including Iran," Murray said.

"There is nothing in the EU or US sanctions regimes that is inconsistent with these arrangements."

As for UANI's call to suspend Iran's membership in the 188-member Fund, Murray said: "This is a matter that is best taken up with the Fund's member countries. We have no comment."

UANI is a group of former US diplomats, security officials, academics and others aimed at raising pressure on Tehran.

Mark Wallace, a former US ambassador to the United Nations, is the group's president. (AFP)

Share this:

[J]udging by actual bets placed on the on-line trading exchange, Intrade, the chances that the U.S. or Israel will indeed conduct air strikes against Iran before the end of the year have fallen by more than half since the high reached in mid-February – from just over 60 percent to about 28 percent as of Monday.

That's still a substantial percentage – about twice what it was before the latest round of Israeli sabre-rattling was launched in November.

And it's difficult to find any close observer of U.S.-Israeli-Iran relations who believes that war clouds could not suddenly reappear, particularly if the next meeting of the so-called P5+1 (the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council – the U.S., Russia, China, Britain, and France – plus Germany) with Iran scheduled for May 23 in Baghdad should break down or be delayed.

Share this:

@TonyKaron: Israeli challenges to Netanyahu on Iran may help Obama's nuclear diplomacy | http://t.co/c3RVcIPd via @TIMEWorld

Share this:

Contribute to this Story:
FOLLOW WORLD

 
 
  • Comments
  • 5,319
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (126 total)
03:33 AM on 03/30/2012
"Imagine all the people living life in peace" - ~John Lennon The voices of the people of Iran & Israel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=&feature=share

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7agK8MIJ3T0&feature=share
Peace be with you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IMac
08:31 AM on 03/16/2012
Israel is a nuclear power - it is getting ready to attack Iran, a country that has done nothing to Israel but go after nuclear power too. Doesn't that bother anyone? That all these countries are bullying Iran and putting sanctions agains them because Iran has oil and won't "bend over" for the US and Israel? Iran is not the aggressor - Israel and the US are the invaders, the attackers, the base-builders who occupy and then stay forever. Doesn't anybody care about what is fair and right. This war agains Iran is wrong - on every count. Iran has the same right to nuclear power as Israel or the US. Russia and China - you are our only hope to avoid another horrible war - please step in and put the crazy countries back in line by telling them to mind their own business.
08:17 AM on 03/16/2012
Does anybody here itching for a fight have a son/daughter who risks being sent over there?
08:12 AM on 03/16/2012
Anti-govmint deficit-busting Republicans want Big Govmint to wage another useless 2-trillion dollar war where other people will get killed. Criminals.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:29 AM on 03/16/2012
The Iranian government is as much concerned about human's rights as China, Russia, Israel and Syria (The worst human rights offenders on this planet). However this does not justify hitting Iran and not hitting Israel. Both compete as human’s rights offenders! Both will increase their abuses when nuclear weapons are available.
A country that showers the sky over civilians with phosphorus bombs constitute a danger to every human!
02:40 AM on 03/16/2012
It's time for Sugar Daddy to cut the cord. We are in no position to fight someone else's war, or to bail them out if things don't go as planned. "You're on your own!" we should say. "May God be with you" if you believe in that sort of stuff.
photo
lkfman
Look out, Big Brother is watching
08:53 PM on 03/15/2012
Once again, it looks like Israel is looking to be the aggressor.
06:57 PM on 03/15/2012
If Israel wants a war, they can go it alone; we're tired of war.
04:34 PM on 03/15/2012
For a number of years now the water in the Dead Sea has been evaporating and has the water level at a very dangerous point. Industrial development in the area and the threat from tourism has only complicated the problem. There have been many studies to try and find a solution for this problem - the most interesting being the Red-Dead Project. This plan, now being considered by the World Bank as to its feasibility, was first introduce by Israeli President Shimon Peres. The Red-Dead Project would channel water from the Red Sea on Israel's southern border, down to the Dead Sea. If this actually worked, it would revitalize the Dead Sea and increase revenues from the Dead Sea industries and the tourism that would come about as a result of this project.

Bible prophecy has an interesting prospective on this major ecological problem. The ancient Jewish prophet Ezekiel wrote 2500 years ago that the Dead Sea will be revitalized and would no longer be the saltiest sea on the earth which is today 7 times saltier than any ocean. Ezekiel 47 speaks of a time in the future during the kingdom period when water will flow from the temple on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem to the Dead Sea and it will become a freshwater lake.

I say that this happens during the 1000 year kingdom on earth which will be headquartered in Jerusalem when a Jewish temple is built and in operation (Zechariah 6:12; Zechariah 14).
04:07 PM on 03/15/2012
Here’s a quote from a prominent Republican back when the GOP might have legitimately
applied the term “Grand†to itself:

“[T]here are a few clear precepts which govern the conduct of world affairs.
First: No people on earth can be held, as a people, to be enemy, for all humanity
shares the common hunger for peace and fellowship and justice.
Second: No nation's security and well-being can be lastingly achieved in isolation
but only in effective cooperation with fellow-nations.
Third: Any nation's right to form a government and an economic system of its
own choosing is inalienable.
Fourth: Any nation's attempt to dictate to other nations their form of government
is indefensible.
And fifth: A nation's hope of lasting peace cannot be firmly based upon any race
in armaments but rather upon just relations and honest understanding with all other
nations.
I believe that these principles define a way toward true peace.â€

This is from President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s â€Chance for Peace†speech, Washington,
D.C., April 16, 1953.
Unfortunately the CIA overthrew the democratically elected governments of both
Guatemala and Iran in 1953 and installed puppet dictators in their place. One suspects
that Obama is in the same situation today that Ike was in then: a fundamentally decent
man in the top spot but locked in an unwinnable conflict with the real powers that run this
country - not the ones we get to vote for or against.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:31 PM on 03/15/2012
Iran not meeting it's oil delivery commitments? Oh, now that's a reason for the US to bomb Iran's people from 30,000 feet. The israelinazis will eventually promote a nuclear war, that's a given.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mzkitti
6/3/1927
02:08 PM on 03/15/2012
3/15/12

Nearly 70 percent of Americans support “continuing to pursue negotiations with Iran†while only a quarter support an Israeli military attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities, say a new poll released today by the Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) and the University of Maryland.
01:57 PM on 03/15/2012
Will we and our troops be on the receiving end of the loaded Tow Missiles Ollie North, Ronald Reagan sold to our sworn enemy, Iran after Iran agreed to hold the hostages until after the election so Reagan would have a chance to defeat Jimmy Carter? I wonder if Reagan or North still have the money from the sales (North testified, "it happened not once, but many, many times") stashed in their Swiss Bank Accounts. If so, could get it returned to our treasury where it belongs?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ProgressivesWin
TeaParty? We don' need no steenkin' TeaParty
01:22 PM on 03/15/2012
SCREWTHEPEOPLEWHO want to start another war. This means YOU, GOTP. This means YOU, Israel lobbyists.

I don't want another CENT spent on it. I don't want a single life lost for it.
01:13 PM on 03/15/2012
So why is noone concerned or debating Israel's nuclear threat? That's exactly what they are: a threat. This is just another exercise in the same tactics of global insanity. Why when given the perfect opportunity to enable a revolution that's brewing all over the arab/muslim world would we persist with our warmongering? They will continue this trend until we are all toast, my friends.