iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Mitch McConnell Presses Iran War Case

First Posted: 03/05/2012 9:03 pm Updated: 03/05/2012 9:03 pm

WASHINGTON -- A top Republican senator made a strong case for military action against Iran Monday night, calling the Obama administration's policy of diplomacy and sanctions "simply not enough," and "a talking point."

Speaking at a gala dinner for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee's annual conference, Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), the Senate Republican leader, proposed specific Iranian actions that would commit the United States to use force.

After laying out a case that Iran is a "state sponsor of terrorism" in pursuit of a nuclear weapon, McConnell proposed a doctrine that would affirm that "If Iran at any time begins to enrich uranium at weapons-grade levels, or decides to go ahead with a nuclear weapons program, then the United States will use military force to end that program."

To cement the plan, McConnell pledged to introduce a resolution authorizing military force if the "intelligence community" certifies that Iran has reached these thresholds.

McConnell's spoke to some 13,000 people at the Washington Convention Center, gathered to hear Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who met earlier in the day with President Barack Obama for a tense discussion about Iran.

In a strange twist of stagecraft, the house lights came up in the massive hall every time McConnell made reference to military action, resulting in somewhat stilted standing ovations.

In a speech Sunday at the same forum, Obama urged Israel's supporters to eschew "loose talk" of war, but affirmed that the U.S. would be willing to use "military force" to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.

"I have said that when it comes to preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, I will take no options off the table, and I mean what I say," Obama said Sunday. "That includes all elements of American power. A political effort aimed at isolating Iran; a diplomatic effort to sustain our coalition and ensure that the Iranian program is monitored; an economic effort to impose crippling sanctions; and, yes, a military effort to be prepared for any contingency."

But Israel's supporters, including Netanyahu and McConnell, have argued that the president's statement was too vague to be fully effective. They want the Obama administration to articulate stronger action should it emerge that Iran is indeed pursing a nuclear weapon.

"What is needed when it comes to Iran is a clear declaratory politcy that would declare what we would do, and why," McConnell said Monday. "In intending to offer 'all options,' it has inadvertently blurred the most important one and that is a determined military operation to end Iran's nuclear program."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

 
 
  • Comments
  • 135
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
12:30 PM on 03/11/2012
send that scumbagg to iran
12:29 PM on 03/11/2012
wish the people in ky would vote this trash out send him frist
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ZeraLee
A Citizen's View from Main Street
04:42 PM on 03/09/2012
If he wants to push us into another war, they he needs to start talking about raising taxes to pay for it.

Or is he proposing a war on domestic spending?
12:34 PM on 03/08/2012
McConnell needs another medical evaluation so that he can sign up with the 5th Special Forces Group along with Joe Lieberman. The entire army will sit out the fighting; Congress and the neocon shills will save humanity by starting World War III.
08:00 PM on 03/07/2012
Behind all of this war talk is a near certainty that Obama told Netanyahu that there would be no attack before November either by the US or Israel.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ultrabop
when bop isn't enough
05:30 PM on 03/07/2012
Is this cracker out of his mind?
01:42 PM on 03/07/2012
OoooooooooooooooooooooooooWheeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! Love that Mitch!!!
Even in the face of dramatic gov't debt, Mitch pushes forth with a hardline promise for military assault on Iran. Gotta love Mitch!
We built this country on Shock and Awe!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsdj9NRzqC4&feature=related
Just substitute words in the right places.
Nothing's gonna stop us now is another Starship song. More lyrics that sound like something Mitch could say!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BRAINS4USA
Vote. Just do it. Always.
10:15 PM on 03/15/2012
I am actually beginning to like you Jay.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allison Knight-Khan
Love 4 All, Hatred 4 None
01:10 AM on 03/07/2012
Fav quote: "After laying out a case that Iran is a "state sponsor of terrorism" in pursuit of a nuclear weapon."

Really?? Come again? After Israel kills off 2 nuclear specialists, we are supposed to believe that all the terrorism originates from Iran, not from Israel's Mossad?

Puhleese!
08:14 PM on 03/06/2012
The real question that Mitch never asked at AIPAC was "Can you stop Iran from getting a bomb if it is determined to have one?" The answer according to The Economist is "Not Indefinitely". Obama's policy has the best chance of preventing Iran from getting the nukes. The fact that the value of their currency and their economy is considerably weaker because of the sanctions, should be making them think twice. Iran armed with the knowledge that the sanctions will persist until they abandon this ambition, and the sanctions will persist into perpetuity if they acquire the weapons, is the best strategy we have in geting Iranian leadership to see the foolhardiness of their quest.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grittyreboot
LOLitical activist
02:42 PM on 03/06/2012
Is this Koch-sucker up for re-election this year?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
elamatt
Ever the optimistic realist
02:18 PM on 03/06/2012
I Just. Don't. Get. It. McConnell et. al. who are now advocating "war" with Iran, are the very Same. Guys. who bashed the US's participation in NATO actions in Libya!! Help me out here; what's the "basic" difference, other than pure politics, of course?
01:03 PM on 03/06/2012
Give McConnell a gun and drop him off in Iran and tell to fight the war he wants.
12:54 PM on 03/06/2012
Now Mitch, how about including in that resolution a section that states that all male members of Congress, regardless of age or circumstances, will be in uniform and a part of the first strike we make on Iran? The female member of Congress can do a fine job of running things while they're gone. In fact, I predict we'll all be much better off.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:48 PM on 03/06/2012
McConnell must own Haliburton stock.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pmoschetta
Where are the Jobs, Speaker Boehner?
01:34 PM on 03/06/2012
Maybe carlsays but I know Mitch owns alot of stock in Massey Energy
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
elamatt
Ever the optimistic realist
02:20 PM on 03/06/2012
Now THERE'S a company to be "proud of"--not!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
blueplano
I'm a yellow dog
12:43 PM on 03/06/2012
That's all they think about - war and ladies private parts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
elamatt
Ever the optimistic realist
02:21 PM on 03/06/2012
In which order??