iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Social Security Benefits: 2 Tips To Help You Maximize Your Benefit

Social Security Benefits

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 03/ 5/2012 6:27 am Updated: 03/ 5/2012 6:27 am

Navigating Social Security benefits takes more than a compass. And don't expect a lot of help from the Social Security Administration.

But that doesn't mean you can't find ways to maximize your benefits. Brett Horowitz of Evensky & Katz Wealth Management shared two little-publicized tips on social security benefits with The Huffington Post -- and they may just put an extra $40,000 in your family's bank account.

Tip 1: Filing a restricted application.

Scenario: Joe is 66 and eligible to collect monthly Social Security benefits of $2,100. But since he's still working and doesn't need the money, he plans on delaying his benefits until he is 70, which would ultimately raise his benefit amount and make him eligible for the government's 8 percent a year bonus, or credit, bringing his monthly benefit up to $2,772. His wife Mary is 68 and has been collecting Social Security since she was 62. She gets less than the $1,750 a month she would have gotten had she waited until she was 66.

What's the secret? Joe is allowed to collect half of Mary's benefit -- $875 a month -- from when he is 66 to 70. That comes to $42,000 for the four years and is pretty much found money, says Horowitz. What Joe needs to do is file a restricted application -- meaning restricted to his wife's benefits.

For those for whom the situation applies, disabled and minor children (up to age 16) are also eligible to receive half of a parent's retirement benefits.

Tip 2: File and suspend (also known as file and refile later).

Let's take the same set of facts as above, except Mary is also 66 and only gets $100 a month in benefits. If Joe wanted to wait until he was 70 to collect benefits, Mary would get her $100 and he would get $50 a month from filing a restricted application.

Or, instead of doing that -- and here is the secret -- as soon as Joe turns 66, he can file for his own benefits and suspend them immediately. Once he does that, Mary is eligible for spousal benefits based on Joe's benefits. Mary can get up to one-half of Joe's full retirement age benefit of $2,100 a month. So she goes from $100 a month to $1,050 -- an extra $950 a month or $45,600 over that four-year period.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST FIFTY

Navigating Social Security benefits takes more than a compass. And don't expect a lot of help from the Social Security Administration. But that doesn't mean you can't find ways to maximize your be...
Navigating Social Security benefits takes more than a compass. And don't expect a lot of help from the Social Security Administration. But that doesn't mean you can't find ways to maximize your be...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 231
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
02:11 PM on 03/06/2012
my husband just died a few months ago. i just made it to collect ssi but it isn't enought to live off of and i never worked so now my daughter and i have to live together to pay the bills.
02:41 PM on 03/06/2012
Welcome to the real world. Many of us cannot make it in todays economy. I worked over 35 years at a great company, contributed to a 401k and lived frugally. I bought my first home at age 21 as an investment but, did not expect to lose 2/3rds of my homes value. One regret I have today is----I wish I could have saved more for retirement and I should have not expected the value of my home to factor into my retirement. If my home was valued today what it was valued at just 4 years ago, I would not have any money or retirement issues. Such is life ! ! !
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John96
01:41 PM on 03/06/2012
What no one here is aware of including myself is all the different circumstances that Socil Security will pay out to someone. Years ago the people I worked with voted to leave Social Security and after a two year mandatory wait we stopped paying in. I however already had over 120 quarters paid in, 80 more than required. I learned at that time if you had paid only $125.00 in your lifetime you could draw more than $400.00 at retirement age for the remainder of your life. I also know of adult children over 30 years of age who continue to draw on thier parents social security. More than $2000.00 a month. Social Security also pays for costs of schooling for dependent children. Just a few of their payouts. Who knows what else they pay. But they also are notorius for indept bookeeping procedures and seem at times to be more trouble than they are worth. The mojority of the people in the social security office near me came from jobs at a Defense Depot directly to Social Security with no trining. They get only what they themselves seek out according to a freind working there. Try getting a straight answer to a question there. The on-line at SocialSecurity.gov does not answer the question either. I just approached it with what is discussed in this article and got no where. Good Luck.
photo
DismayedRepub
300Mm/s Not just common sense, it’s the law
06:10 PM on 03/08/2012
Well of course they don't know anything about how you can maximize your benefit. Go see a SS lawyer he/she should be able to set this up for you fairly cheaply.
01:40 PM on 03/06/2012
A widow can collect her late husband's benefits at age 60 (if she doesn't remarry). That age drops to 55 if the widow is disabled (per SS's definition). A divorced woman who was married at least 10 years can get half her ex-husband's benefits, even if he is now deceased.
01:36 PM on 03/06/2012
I was aware of some of this, but not all.

My Dad, who was 42 years Army, retired early in his mid-50's and passed away at the age of 61. He collected his military pension, but never collected SS. When Mom decided to retire early at 62, she went to the SSA office who advised her to collect off of my Dad's account until she turned 65 because she would get more money that way. She had no idea she could do that until they told her. She agreed and when she turned 65 her benefits were automatically transferred to her account.

I also know that a divorced person who has never remarried is eligible to collect off of their ex-spouse's account if that means more monthly benefits. It doesn't matter if the ex-spouse has remarried or not...it only matters if the person collecting has. The same holds true for widows/widowers. I think this is why so many older/elderly people don't get remarried anymore but choose to live together instead.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bgri50
we fine away
01:33 PM on 03/06/2012
if SS crack down on frude, illegals and expire green cards workers collecting SS ,SSDI the be a huge saving..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SeaOtterBaby
Flushed Cat Litter Kills Sea Otters
10:23 AM on 03/08/2012
Green card workers getting Social Security? Hum.
01:21 PM on 03/06/2012
Aren't these really accidental loopholes?

Shouldn't we demand that congress plug them?
01:43 PM on 03/06/2012
No. These "loopholes" were put in place to protect women who traditionally earned less than men or didn't work outside the home. Plugging them would create hardship for many elderly people.
06:47 PM on 03/06/2012
The idea that the husband can collect half of his wife's social security while delaying his own retirement can only be a misconnection in the wording about who is entitled to collect what.

The problem with so many special situations that can game the system for some gives us all the incentive to game the system for ourselves.

I think it's time to start pre-qualifying myself for Medicaid. Give the money to the children early and let the taxpayers pay my nursing home bills. Just a month or two in a nursing home at taxpayer expense and I'll catch up for those missed social security opportunities.
01:55 PM on 03/06/2012
Nope.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joe Hennes
There is no topic that cannot be discussed calmly
01:05 PM on 03/06/2012
wow. The political in-fighting and mis-information in these comments is really frightening. If you have questions about benefits do not try and get the answers from anyone here (including me). Go to www.socialsecurity.gov. Just about anything you need to know about benefits, deductions, etc is there with no political spin. If you haven't done this, you should. There is a calculator that will tell you what to expect you will receive depending on what you have paid in and when you expect to retire (worrying about what someone else might be getting is pretty pointless). You can't plan for retirement without knowing (realistically) what you will collect from SS (unless you don't need Social Security to retire). Good luck.
12:39 PM on 03/06/2012
Here's a HA! HA! most people don't know about.-- If you accept Medicare when you are eligible and keep working; Not only will you still pay SS out of your salary; but you will be charged for Medicare by SS; also. ( This is usually taken out of your SS check ) In effect; you are paying twice for the same thing!! Of course; you could delay getting the Medicare ( and use your company medical plan ) ; but then there's no guarantee that Medicare ( and/or the same benefits ) will still be there when you do decide to reitre and get them ( and/or if you would still qualify for everything you are supposed to get ). So you are caught between a rock and two hard places! HA!
01:15 PM on 03/06/2012
The rub to your statement is that when you apply to receive SS you must apply for Medicare at that time. You cannot apply for Medicare at a later date once you are receiving SS benefits.
08:14 AM on 03/07/2012
This is only true if you are over 65 years of age. And of course you can apply for medicare if you apply for social security BEFORE you are eligible for medicare. If you retire at age 63, for instance, you do not receive medicare until you turn 65.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SeaOtterBaby
Flushed Cat Litter Kills Sea Otters
10:35 AM on 03/08/2012
Look, I still work part time, have Social Security and Medicare. I do pay into social security still, just as I did when I worked full time. However, my Social Security benefits have climbed for each year that I have worked. I had to take out SS when I was 62 for health reasons. My health improved, I am still working part time, and my Social Security has almost doubled since then. It has been good for me because I really took a hit when I retired at such a young age.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
DANIELISTICALL
HISTORY IS BUT A FABLE AGREED UPON,,NAPOLEON
12:30 PM on 03/06/2012
uart100s.

198 Fans
Become a fan

.

22 minutes ago (12:01 PM)
SS didn't post a surplus in 2010, it spent more than it took in. 29 billion in fact. Let's talk about 2011, projected at 1.5 trillion loss, and trillion dollar losses projected for years to come.
Favorite (0)Flag as Abusive

Permalink | Share it .

DANIELISTICALL
HISTORY IS BUT A FABLE AGREED UPON,,NAPOLEON .

1908 Fans.

17 minutes ago (12:06 PM)
Social Security Finances: Findings of the 2010 Trustees Report ...
www.nasi.org › Research › Briefs & Fact Sheets
According to the 2010 Trustees report, the Social Security trust funds will have an annual surplus of $77 billion in 2010. Annual surpluses are projected to

STUART TURN OFF FIX NEWS
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
DANIELISTICALL
HISTORY IS BUT A FABLE AGREED UPON,,NAPOLEON
12:21 PM on 03/06/2012
U.S. Social Security $2.6 Trillion Dollar Surplus
www.disabled-world.com/.../social-security/.../social-security-surplus....
Sep 4, 2010 – Social Security is far from bankrupt with a $2.6 trillion dollar surplus
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
DANIELISTICALL
HISTORY IS BUT A FABLE AGREED UPON,,NAPOLEON
12:09 PM on 03/06/2012
Release of Social Security Trustees' Report Shows Program Again ...

strengthensocialsecurity.org/.../release-of-social-security-trustees-repo...

“The trustees' report found that Social Security's surplus will be $69.3 billion in 2011. Those who say that Social Security is in deficit this year are flat wrong,”
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rm42749
12:09 PM on 03/06/2012
Obama and his carzs are raiding SS every day. They act like it is their personal checking account. At the rate they spend now SS will be gone before many get a chance to retire. Of course their solution is to tax the working poor which will only work if they stop spending now. There must be an obama speech somewhere today because the stock market is taking a dive. Dump obama now.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
DANIELISTICALL
HISTORY IS BUT A FABLE AGREED UPON,,NAPOLEON
12:14 PM on 03/06/2012
REALY how much and when TELL US ALL ABOUT IT ,,,, can you????? TURN OFF FIX NEWS and check with the SS adm.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rm42749
03:06 PM on 03/06/2012
"As of December 2000, more than a trillion dollars of the U.S. national debt is owed to the Social Security program. This amounts to $3,600 for every man, woman, and child living in the United States. By 2015, this figure is projected to reach $9,000 per person, burdening young people with a debt that they had no part in creating." This statement came from the web site posted below by sierra496. As you can see it is as of Dec 2000 and is much worse now. That is in large part due to the obama admin. Obama is printing and giving away money in the guise of economic stimulus. Obama is shifting us from an economic crisis to a debt crisis! He may think he is doing what needs to be done but it doesn't seem to be working. Dump obama now before it is too late.
12:07 PM on 03/06/2012
Best advice? Keeping working until you die
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
DANIELISTICALL
HISTORY IS BUT A FABLE AGREED UPON,,NAPOLEON
12:00 PM on 03/06/2012
The next biggest whopper in this e-mail is a claim that it was "the Democratic party" that "decided to give money to immigrants" through the SSI program, "although they never paid a dime into it."

Actually it was Republican President Richard Nixon who both proposed and signed the legislation creating SSI — the Supplemental Security Income program. When he signed it on Oct. 30, 1972, Nixon called it "landmark legislation."
12:30 PM on 03/06/2012
Also, SSI is not Social Security but an independently financed program funded by the general fund. The only reason that Social Security administrates it is the SSA already had a mechanism in place to distirbute checks. Those who think that SSI is draining Social Security are wrong.
01:48 PM on 03/06/2012
Actually, the SSI program has nothing to do with social security. I used to think so myself until I found out it is a separate government program. However, I do agree with you that no one who is not an American citizen should get anything from that program. I will never forget how my mother-in-law, who came from Lebanon, never worked a day in her life and never paid a dime into our system, got more money from SSI than my mother, who worked her entire life, received from social security benefits. It ws not a pretty picture to say the least.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SeaOtterBaby
Flushed Cat Litter Kills Sea Otters
10:46 AM on 03/08/2012
Your mother in law never worked a day in her life, eh? I absolutely hate men who ascribe the only legitimate work to those who go to a job. Most women work twice as hard as men and never ever have the true compensation they deserve.
11:56 AM on 03/06/2012
Had the Liberal Socialist Democrat, F. D. Roosevelt put Social Security incoming money into an INTEREST bering account and ruled it ILLEGAL for any politician to use the funds for anything but the PEOPLES retirement fund, we would not be in this trouble today.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
DANIELISTICALL
HISTORY IS BUT A FABLE AGREED UPON,,NAPOLEON
12:02 PM on 03/06/2012
FALSE,,,, Reagen 1983
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
stuart100s
I started with nothing, & still have most of it.
12:05 PM on 03/06/2012
You have told so many misleading things so far, that I don't believe anything you say any more. You can't be trusted any longer.
12:08 PM on 03/06/2012
Buy a GOOD HISTORY BOOK, or ask your Grandfather.
12:05 PM on 03/06/2012
Interesting point.History has been kid to FDR what with the depression ending measures (War among others) he helped undertake. He is generally recognized as one of the top 5 presidents. However, he was also widely despised at the time for social security, income tax, provoking the Japanese into attacking us and such.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SeaOtterBaby
Flushed Cat Litter Kills Sea Otters
10:49 AM on 03/08/2012
Oh yes, provoking the Japanese into attacking us. Right.