iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Gorilla Genome Decoded, Found Surprisingly Close To Man's (VIDEO)

First Posted: 03/ 7/2012 4:21 pm Updated: 03/ 7/2012 4:28 pm

LOS ANGELES -- Take a trip to the zoo and you can see gorillas are a lot like us. But a new DNA study says we're even more similar than scientists thought.

From the evolutionary family tree, you'd expect our DNA to be the most similar to chimps, our closest relatives. The new work found that's true for the most part, but it also found that a sizable portion of our genome is closer to a gorilla's than to a chimp's.

"The chimpanzee is often cited as `our closest living relative' and this is certainly true based on total genome sequence, but the gorilla is nearly as close a relative," Owen Lovejoy of Kent State University, who was not part of the project, said in an email.

That agrees with hints from with some smaller previous genetic studies. The latest work deciphered the entire genome of the gorilla, which Lovejoy called "a substantial achievement."

It reveals "a closer connection between our genome and that of the gorilla than was previously appreciated," Richard Gibbs and Jeffrey Rogers of the Baylor College of Medicine wrote in an editorial accompanying the work published in Thursday's issue of the journal Nature.

With the new research, scientists now have complete genetic blueprints of the living great apes – humans, chimps, gorillas and orangutans – to compare and gain fresh understanding of how humans evolved and developed key traits such as higher brain function and the ability to walk upright.

Humans and chimps evolved separately since splitting from a common ancestor about 6 million years ago.

The latest study was led by scientists at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, a nonprofit British genome research center. Researchers mapped the DNA of a female gorilla and compared it to the genomes of humans and chimps.

As expected, most of the human genome was closer to the chimp's than to the gorilla's. But in about 15 percent of the genome, human and gorilla resemble each other the most. In another 15 percent, chimp and gorilla DNA are closer to each other than chimp is to human. Both those situations clash with what you'd expect from the evolutionary tree, which says humans and chimps should always be the most similar, the researchers said.

The analysis also found gene variants in gorillas that are harmless to them but are linked to dementia and heart failure in people.

"If we could understand more about why those variants are so harmful in humans but not in gorillas, that would have important" medical implications, said one of the study's authors, Chris Tyler-Smith.

The gorilla genome was cracked using DNA from Kamilah, a 300-pound western lowland gorilla from the San Diego Zoo, which maintains a DNA library of endangered animals. Since the mapping of the human genome in 2001, there was a dash to similarly unravel the genetic codes of other animals, particularly primates. The first complete chimp genome was published in 2005 and the orangutan last year.

Like other great apes, gorilla populations in the forests of central Africa have been dwindling from hunting and disease. In decoding Kamilah's DNA, researchers said they hoped to do the same for the mountain gorilla, which is near extinction.

___

Online:

___

AP Science Writer Malcolm Ritter contributed to this report from New York.

___

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SCIENCE

LOS ANGELES -- Take a trip to the zoo and you can see gorillas are a lot like us. But a new DNA study says we're even more similar than scientists thought. From the evolutionary family tree, you'd ...
LOS ANGELES -- Take a trip to the zoo and you can see gorillas are a lot like us. But a new DNA study says we're even more similar than scientists thought. From the evolutionary family tree, you'd ...
Filed by Travis Korte  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 244
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kimbanyc
LIBERAL NY DEMOCRAT
04:37 PM on 03/14/2012
Creationis­ts basic premise is wrong. Darwinism and creationis­­m are clearly
defined by anyone outside of extreme religious circles as representi­­ng
different definition­­s of the word "theory" based on the context being
used.

Any simple research bears this out

Evolution is a "theory" in
the scientific sense of the term "theory"; it is an establishe­­d
scientific model of a portion of the universe that generates
propositio­­ns with observatio­­nal consequenc­­es. Such a model both helps
generate new research and helps us understand observed phenomena.

the·o·ry

1. a coherent group of general propositio­­ns used as principles of
explanatio­­n for a class of phenomena: Einstein's theory of relativity­­.
2. a proposed explanatio­­n whose status is still conjectura­­l, in
contrast to well-estab­­lished propositio­­ns that are regarded as
reporting matters of actual fact.
3. Mathematic­­s . a body of principles­­, theorems, or the like,
belonging to one subject: number theory.
4. the branch of a science or art that deals with its principles or
methods, as distinguis­­hed from its practice: music theory.
5. a particular conception or view of something to be done or of the
method of doing it; a system of rules or principles­­.
6. contemplat­­ion or speculatio­­n.
7. guess or conjecture­­.

Darwins Theory of Evolution uses the term relative to its scientific
use obviously

creationis­­m falls mostly under numbers 6 & 7 in the general
discussion of the many faceted USES of the term

Speculatio­­n Guess Conjecture
photo
phal4875
The world is run by cats; we just feed them.
02:22 PM on 03/12/2012
How did they convince a 300-pound gorilla to swab the inside of her mouth with a Q-tip®?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
kareemachan
watashi ha tororu ga oroka da to omoi masu。
03:08 PM on 03/12/2012
Extremely politely.
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
09:23 AM on 03/12/2012
We must preserve as many primate species as possible within protected wild habitats of their own cuz we may need to engineer bits and pieces of their genome into our own in the distant future in order to broaden our the bio-diversity of humans. I bet that there are some biological traits which gorillas have that human beings will need to survive as a species. We need to save them to save ourselves! Wasn't the gorilla made in the image of God? And then from the gorilla's rib didn't God make man?
12:46 AM on 03/12/2012
Any God worth a damn could have set evolution in motion. Based on need, it's more likely Man created God than vice versa. But no scientific discovery can reflect on the question of the existence of design or supernatural being(s). So both you religious true believers and you atheist true believers can both check your competing faiths at the door and let science do its work. Enjoy!
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
09:26 AM on 03/12/2012
What if it turns out that God is Evolution?
10:56 AM on 03/12/2012
Not sure how that would work. In the cosmic scheme of things, evolution is but a tertiary process. The "design" and therefore, by definition, the Designer, would have to be a whole lot more all-encompassing....if there be any such. I don't know the answer and, while I understand their need for answers, I don't have much respect for those who claim to have them....whether yea or nay...regarding purpose or the lack thereof in the universe.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RAmen69
Someone is WRONG on the internet!
03:40 PM on 03/12/2012
What if 2 + 2 = Potato?
11:16 PM on 03/11/2012
"Both those situations clash with what you'd expect from the evolutionary tree, which says humans and chimps should always be the most similar, the researchers said."

Ummmmmmm... what researchers are those? Because clearly, they must not work in the field of genetics, home to a concept called "Independent Lineage Sorting." ILS not only allows for this kind of event, but actually demands it.
12:49 AM on 03/12/2012
The anthropocentric can only imagine evolution in a single straight line......because they know that the wonderful pre-ordained result was homo sapiens sapiens.
01:14 AM on 03/12/2012
homo sapiens can get married now.
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
04:07 PM on 03/11/2012
Has the creationist genome been compared to the gorilla genome? (the gorillas are nervous about this one)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:08 PM on 03/11/2012
"Both those situations clash with what you'd expect from the evolutionary tree, which says humans and chimps should always be the most similar, the researchers said."

Another prediction of evolution just falsified. (AGAIN!)

Evolution did NOT happen and science proves it!
photo
Maezeppa
Happy-Happy Joy-Joy
03:26 PM on 03/11/2012
Evolution happened.  You're just being dishonest by cutting out the bits that prove it.  Again.   The whole paragraph reads thusly:

As expected, most of the human genome was closer to the chimp's than to the gorilla's. But in about 15 per cent of the genome, human and gorilla resemble each other the most. In another 15 per cent, chimp and gorilla DNA are closer to each other than chimp is to human. Both those situations clash with what you'd expect from the evolutionary tree, which says humans and chimps should always be the most similar, the researchers said. 
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:36 PM on 03/11/2012
You believe it happened. There is little supporting evidence. This find contradicts the evolutionary tree.

Again you are following the amazing story instead of the evidence.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:55 PM on 03/11/2012
Mae; you are struggling with basic English now. clash means "in conflict". It contradicts the evolutionary tree.

This falsifies a "prediction" of evolution!
photo
Maezeppa
Happy-Happy Joy-Joy
04:22 PM on 03/11/2012
No, Clippie, it doesn't falsify evolution at all - just the opposite is true so stop your lying right now.   The prediction that chimps are humans' closest relative and gorillas our second-closest is supported by the new evidence.  That makes the prediction correct.   Are there surprises in the genomic details?  Sure.  There always are, but the general prediction is shown to be correct.


What has changed?  Scientists predicted chimpanzees were the human's closest relative and that gorillas were second closest.   Looks like a confirmation to me.
04:34 PM on 03/11/2012
it seems some humans have more gorilla genes then others
TomMartin
Freedom and equality.
08:57 PM on 03/10/2012
I guess the places where we share DNA sequences with gorillas but not chimps, it could be that here we and gorillas have kept the DNA from a common ancestor while the chimps have innovated.
06:45 PM on 03/10/2012
Human beings also share parasites of common ancestry with great apes and gorillas. I forget if it is the one that can infect the hair on your head or the other place.
TomMartin
Freedom and equality.
09:02 PM on 03/10/2012
The head louse is closely related to the chimp louse while the crab louse is closely related to the gorilla louse.
09:49 AM on 03/12/2012
So are you saying we got crabs from gorillas?....LOL
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iknowscottyknows
12:18 AM on 03/10/2012
This article says nothing new.

What would be new would be the finding of a transitional fossil...of ANY type. It would be the first.
photo
Counterglow
Werner Heisenberg may have been right.
10:23 AM on 03/10/2012
You're incorrect, and your definition of what would be new is naive to the point of stupidity.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Darren J Cohen
I'm semi-awesome!
06:53 PM on 03/10/2012
Virtually ALL fossils are transitional! Read book! No, not THAT book, any other one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CanadianSkeptic
Amazingly, thinking can solve most problems
02:13 PM on 03/11/2012
The transitional fossil point is a concept that cannot penetrated a creationist's wall of ignorance. It seems creationists (and perhaps fundamentalists to a wider degree), view the world and information in binary; all or nothing, yes/no, good/evil, black/white, etc. Or specifically to this point, species A/species B. They seem to be unable to comprehend that very little is black and white, most things are shades of grey. This is itself an overly simplistic analogy, but I'm trying to keep it simple in case any creationists read it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:12 PM on 03/11/2012
Ok, show me a early homo sapiens fossils with a bone tail! Should be hundreds of them since the gene would have been more likely to exist.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RillyKewl
Fighting the War on Women
03:36 PM on 03/09/2012
I know that Bonobos are essentially like chimps, but I wonder if there are any significant differences there, as those guys are the most like us, temperamentally.
11:30 AM on 03/09/2012
Darn it. Here we go again with scientific evidence proving that "god" didn't create us. I hate when that happens. Science, Lie-ence. I will close my eyes, stick my fingers in my ears, go to church this weekend, and hopefully reality will keep its distance a little longer.
photo
phal4875
The world is run by cats; we just feed them.
02:28 PM on 03/12/2012
There is an even easier approach: Just listen to Rush.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RAmen69
Someone is WRONG on the internet!
03:45 PM on 03/12/2012
The Canadian Rush or the wrong one?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:25 AM on 03/09/2012
Fascinating stuff.

To think that humans and chimps separated only 6 million years ago! It says that are pace of evolution is remarkably rapid. If we live long enough, we will perhaps evolve into something worthy of meeting other races in the galaxy.
photo
uniqumm
Hot Snark served with relish
09:51 PM on 03/09/2012
If.....IF......
photo
phal4875
The world is run by cats; we just feed them.
02:30 PM on 03/12/2012
If only water didn't hinder technological improvement. Dolphins might be better representatives of the earth than we are. We are not powerful enough to destroy the earth, but we are well on our way to ruining it for our species.
photo
G R
Ad astra per aspera
07:44 PM on 03/08/2012
I recall Richard Dawkins caution that "DNA recipe" should be substituted for "DNA blueprint", as living things cannot be assembled and dis-assembled as a "blueprint" implies, as a blueprint implies one to one mapping, not the three dimensional structure of DNA and all living things.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Angel1999
Microbiologist & Historian
07:50 PM on 03/08/2012
That's a fair description.
photo
uniqumm
Hot Snark served with relish
07:24 PM on 03/08/2012
Oh well. Another one of our "expectations" just fell out of a tree!

It didn't surprise that much: Every time I saw a silverback it was embarrassing- their torso is so similar to a human's!