iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

MidAmerican Energy Power Plant Deal Reached In Iowa

Posted: 03/ 6/2012 4:08 pm

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — A legislator said Tuesday that he had struck a deal on a plan that would give MidAmerican Energy new incentives to build a nuclear power plant in Iowa.

Sen. Matt McCoy, chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, said his panel will approve the compromise Thursday.

"We have the votes," McCoy, D-Des Moines, told The Associated Press. "We have a consumer-friendly amendment."

The compromise would require that MidAmerican, Iowa's largest utility, have financing in place before beginning construction of a nuclear power plant. Once state regulators approve a new plant, the utility would have to carry out construction.

Some legislators had worried earlier versions of the measure would allow the utility to raise rates to pay for the plant, without being committed to actually building the facility. They said consumers could end up with higher rates, and no new power plant to show for it.

Lawmakers reached the agreement even as opponents held a Statehouse news conference, where they argued that nuclear plants are inherently dangerous.

Sen. Rob Hogg, D-Cedar Rapids, was among the speakers at the event, timed to mark the upcoming anniversary of the March 11 meltdown at Japan's Fukushima Dai-ichi plant. The accident occurred after a massive earthquake caused a tsunami that knocked out power to the plant.

Hogg said he didn't share McCoy's confidence that the Iowa measure would be debated on the Senate floor.

"I would be surprised if it moved, but it's obviously still a live round," Hogg said.

Francis Thicke, a farmer and environmental activist from Fairfield, said the compromise backed by McCoy only dealt with the potential financial risks of the proposed nuclear plant.

"My concern is the whole environmental issue and they are not addressing the environment," Thicke said.

The incentives for developing another nuclear power plant cleared the House last year, but the proposal has been stalled in the Senate and backers had feared it wouldn't be approved as the Legislature moved toward adjournment next month.

MidAmerican spokeswoman Ann Thelen was cautious about the agreement, saying the deal was just struck Tuesday and officials have not had a chance to review it.

As head of the Commerce Committee, McCoy controls which issues are debated, and he's scheduled his panel to take up the nuclear plant bill Thursday.

Senate Majority Leader Michael Gronstal, D-Council Bluffs, said no decision had been made about the measure if it wins committee approval.

"It's available for the rest of the session," Gronstal said. "We may or may not debate it."

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — A legislator said Tuesday that he had struck a deal on a plan that would give MidAmerican Energy new incentives to build a nuclear power plant in Iowa. Sen. Ma...
DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — A legislator said Tuesday that he had struck a deal on a plan that would give MidAmerican Energy new incentives to build a nuclear power plant in Iowa. Sen. Ma...
Filed by Jessica Leader  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 39
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
04:49 PM on 03/09/2012
Iowa has vast waste bio char resources that cost less than half of what nukes do. Without the cancer, disaster, waste and terror targets.
11:32 AM on 03/09/2012
This would be absolutely dismal for ratepayers in Iowa (and local businesses who have large electricity contracts with Iowa utilities). Construction Work in Progress (CWIP) for advanced nuclear cost recovery was first tried in Florida, and local politicians, businesses, and ratepayers loath the policy and are active in trying to get it repealed. So much so they have posted editorials in Iowa newspapers (Des Moines Register and Iowa City Press Citizen) urging local legislators to reject proposal, and the burdens it would place on local businesses and ratepayers. Here's more on this alternative financing scheme (which nuclear industry supports), and why it's bad for people and businesses in Iowa.

http://www.tampabay.com/news/business/energy/unfortunate-trend-buffett-wants-no-risk-funding-for-nuclear-power-just/1217776

http://www.press-citizen.com/article/20120215/OPINION/302140031/On-nuclear-rate-hikes-Iowa-can-learn-from-Florida

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2012302200014
02:46 PM on 03/08/2012
The disaster at Fukishima continues today with no end in sight. We might want to learn some lessons from this disaster before building any more nuclear power plants.
12:46 PM on 03/08/2012
This sounds like a publicity stunt to me. One the eve of the one year anniversary of Fukushima, some industry PR firms decided to trot out Iowa rate payers and unsuspecting local politicians in an effort to re-brand the industry, and face down your toughest critics while the spotlight is on you. It's called making lemonade from lemons, or learning from the lessons of Three Mile Island. Don't scale back in the face of confusion and mayhem, but scale forward. We just learned from the former Prime Minister of Japan, Naoto Kan, that TEPCO was considering abandoning the 6 reactors at Fukushima on Day 5 of the accident.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/japans-nuclear-meltdown/

So let's build more of them in the States, and in a low population state that doesn't need the energy, no less. If you buy this, I know of some cheap foreclosures in Florida that you might want to buy as well? The AP should know better, and stop paraphrasing press releases, and do some reporting for a change.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
04:54 PM on 03/09/2012
fanned.

rooftop solar is cheaper, wind and waste half that and efficiency half that again, but the fix is in. The trillion dollar nuke industry owns the DOE and NREL to the point where the DOE and NREL now put out official reports full of lies and misinformation for our politicians to use to justify the actions the nuke industry bribes them for.

rooftop solar installed is 2$ per W for large roofs. Yet NREL and the DOE say it/'s 6-9 dollars.

They use Solarbuzz for their numbers and solarbuzz uses one price pricing for solar panels, and a 15 year life.

It's one vast conspiracy of big money nukes and fossils too.

500M$ per reactor per year in breaks.

insurance by the taxpayers for those trillion dollar disasters.
04:37 PM on 03/10/2012
True enough. I learned long ago not to argue with any of your comments. I'm a fan as well.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
03:14 AM on 03/08/2012
Baksheesh safely delivered.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
westcoastsc
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhe
12:38 AM on 03/08/2012
People need to understand that there is very little benefit in building these nuclear power plants. They do not produce cheap energy. The energy required to build one nuclear power plant is the same amount of 35 years of energy produced from one. Building one of these is like writing a big check to the oil companies. No financial savings will be had until 35 years from now. The nuclear fuel needs to be enriched and will be done so most likely by fossil fuels. There is no good reason to build them. If we used them as much as we used coal, we would quickly reach the amount of destruction that coal causes in no time and would likely be much greater and last for many lifetimes. Sustainable energy, such as solar, wind, tide, wave, and geothermal have not even begun to be exploited to their potential.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
03:18 AM on 03/08/2012
Not energy, money - it takes 50 years of operation to pay the finance cost. $250m in income per year, for a cost of $10bn.

In energy terms, it's not so bad - only a factor of a few more expensive than any other type of power plant.
01:36 PM on 03/08/2012
Last time I checked, Iowa doesn't have tides or waves. And how are the oil companies involved? Isn't nuclear the competition?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
westcoastsc
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhe
11:53 PM on 03/08/2012
If nuclear power is so great, then why doesn't any business want to finance it? Only government has the funds to make it possible and lose the costs within their budget to make the costs less painful. Take a look at charts of the number of businesses that used to be and the number of businesses that exist now in whatever category you would like to choose and you will find there has been a huge consolidation into fewer and fewer hands. People are allowed to buy their own competition which allows a greater control of the economy. Whatever happened to the Sherman Antitrust Act? The Koch Brothers, for instance, have been trying to get the state owned geothermic powerplant in Wisconsin even though they are already heavily invested in oil. To build a nuclear power plant takes the energy from the oil companies to build that is subsidized by the government. Building a nuclear power plant is going to put a lot of immediate demand on energy. Why not own everything? The government is a dependable check when you control congress, and we all know what extra demand means.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
04:56 PM on 03/09/2012
Iowa has vast waste bio char resources. half the price or less of nuke power and no disasters.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
doriath22
Born-again Jacobin. Robespierre had the right idea
06:30 PM on 03/07/2012
Safe or not, it's still the most expensive way to boil water ever invented
01:32 PM on 03/08/2012
But the other ways produce CO2.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
doriath22
Born-again Jacobin. Robespierre had the right idea
02:46 PM on 03/08/2012
If the engineers could figure out what to do with the waste, and get the cost down, I could be convinced. Failing that, however......
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
04:57 PM on 03/09/2012
Waste bio char is carbon negative. Massively.

Nuke are carbon positive, somewhat.

Wind and solar are zero carbon.
photo
ShamsT
The door has opened, so there's no escape...
06:31 PM on 03/10/2012
Not true. Advanced Coal is the most expensive way to boil water ever invented. Nuclear is pretty reasonable, otherwise they wouldn't have been built in the first place.

When it comes to electricity, solar is the most expensive way to generate electricity ever invented.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/12/03/the-dark-future-of-solar-electricity/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
doriath22
Born-again Jacobin. Robespierre had the right idea
07:10 PM on 03/10/2012
I guess my 3.4kw solar furnace must be a figment of my imagination, then.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
doriath22
Born-again Jacobin. Robespierre had the right idea
07:20 PM on 03/10/2012
Oh, right. Watt, the weatherman who pretends to be an authority.........
dumocraps
My Screenname gets right to the point
06:28 PM on 03/07/2012
The AFL-CIO Building & Construction Trades Dept. will be happy.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
04:57 PM on 03/09/2012
They would make more installing solar and waste bio char plants.
photo
MichaelAKD
Be the change you wish to see in the world.
05:43 PM on 03/07/2012
these people are just nuts like the ones that decided it was a good idea to blow up a nuclear bomb west of vail, colorado back in 1969, then it was for natural gas. long story short it was called project rulison and they exploded a 40-kiloton nuclear bomb underground to see if they could get more natural gas out, that happened the summer of 1969. of note, the site is two miles west of I70 and the colorado river, source of water for most the western u.s. when it comes to making decisions in regards to power, nuclear power personally i trust not a sole in our government after they did that. iowa i feel for you, between floods and tornadoes i would not want be living anywhere near that plant if it does get built. thankfully ours, fort st. vrain was shut down and dismantled years ago.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:59 PM on 03/07/2012
again ,,, more have died in tedkennedy;s car than in nuclear accidents in the US
photo
MichaelAKD
Be the change you wish to see in the world.
05:49 PM on 03/07/2012
what about long term implications like Project Rulison? they detonated a 40 kiloton nuke underground 2 miles from the colorado river and I70 in the heart of colorado. all that aside nobody ever talks about the cost and if there are less expensive ways to produce energy. also we still have no long term storage plan for any of our nuclear waste. the one site deep underground was built then the state said, thanks but no thanks. forget about any possible environmental implications or safety rather focus on the economic feasibility as compared to other sources. when doing so you must also consider the long term cost of waste disposal as well as the state and federal incentives that come from our taxes to get these things up and going. it simply isn't smart financially and that should be the end of the discussion.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
doriath22
Born-again Jacobin. Robespierre had the right idea
06:31 PM on 03/07/2012
That is a highly debatable proposition
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
03:19 AM on 03/08/2012
Worse than that - no-one can name the people who've died from nuclear operation- and accident-related cancer, unlike the passenger in the car; however, they're still dead.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
therebis
04:45 PM on 03/07/2012
The rest of the world moves away from the horror of nuclear energy and its attendant environmental and national security risks but the good ol' US nuclear industry gets the go ahead by their paid for pals in the US.