iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

eBook Prices Prompt Justice Department To Warn Apple, Other Top Publishers Of Planned Suit

Ebooks Justice Department

First Posted: 03/ 8/2012 12:32 am Updated: 03/ 8/2012 6:50 pm


By Diane Bartz

(Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department has warned Apple and five major U.S. publishers that it plans to sue them, accusing them of colluding to raise the prices of electronic books, a person familiar with the probe said on Thursday.

Several parties have held talks to settle the potential antitrust case, said the person, who was not authorized to speak publicly on the matter. It is not yet clear what such a settlement might look like.

The five publishers facing possible Justice Department action are Simon & Schuster Inc, a unit of CBS Corp; Lagardere SCA's Hachette Book Group; Pearson Plc's Penguin Group (USA); Macmillan, a unit of Verlagsgruppe Georg von Holtzbrinck GmbH; and HarperCollins Publishers Inc, a unit of News Corp.

U.S. and European officials have been investigating whether publishers and Apple acted together to drive up prices in the booming electronic book industry, blocking rivals such as Amazon from offering cheaper e-books.

Antitrust rules forbid price-fixing agreements designed to shut out competitors or drive up what consumers pay.

E-book publishers adopted an "agency model" in 2010, around the time that Apple launched the iPad.

That model allowed publishers to set the price of e-books and in turn, Apple would take a 30 percent cut. The Apple agreements with publishers effectively barred them from allowing rival retailers to sell the same books at lower prices.

The strategy upended the "wholesale model" in which retailers pay for the product and charge what they like. Amazon, which got a headstart in the e-book market with its Kindle e-reader, had used the wholesale model to generally charge $9.99 for its e-books.

The Wall Street Journal first reported the Justice Department's lawsuit warning to Apple and the publishers.

An Apple spokeswoman declined to comment, as did a Justice Department spokeswoman. HarperCollins and MacMillan did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Penguin and Simon & Schuster declined to comment.

Hachette Books chief Arnaud Nourry said on Thursday during an analyst call on Lagardere's annual results that he was not going to comment on ongoing legal proceedings. "We have obviously decided to cooperate with the authorities on both sides of the Atlantic, and we believe that we have committed no objectionable acts."

PRIVATE SUIT

Apple and the publishers face a parallel class action lawsuit now in a Manhattan court that was brought on behalf of e-book customers.

The class action suit, filed last year by law firm Hagens, Berman, Sobol, Shapiro, LLP, accuses Apple of being a "hub" for collusion.

Jeff Friedman, a partner at Hagens Berman who helped file that suit, said it was prompted by a sudden increase in the price of e-books that was not matched by any cost increases.

"The case is about... a radical industry shift that simultaneously resulted in a 30 to 40 percent price increase across the industry overnight," Friedman said.

Apple asked the court last week to drop the class action suit, saying it did not collude with a group of publishers.

"Before Apple entered the eBook market, one competitor, Amazon, the nation's largest bookseller, had taken 90% of the market by pricing key eBooks below their wholesale cost," Apple said in the filing.

"Having no desire to incur the losses that would flow from retailing in such an environment, Apple individually negotiated separate vertical agreements with each of the Publishers to serve as a distribution agent in exchange for a 30% commission on eBook sales," the company said in its motion.

DIGITAL GROWTH

The e-book industry has exploded in recent years, growing from $78 million in sales in 2008 to $1.7 billion in 2011, according to Albert Greco, a book-industry expert at the business school of Fordham University.

Greco estimates e-book sales will be $3.55 billion in 2012.

Apple, which launched a new version of its iPad tablet computer on Wednesday, competes aggressively against Amazon's Kindle and Barnes & Noble's Nook e-reader.

Barnes & Noble in particular has made a big bet on electronic books. The No. 1 U.S. bookstore chain has relied on digital books and readers to offset shriveling sales at its brick-and-mortar stores.

Mark Coker, founder of e-book distributor Smashwords, blamed big publishers for pricing books too high and warned that any Justice Department action that hurts the agency model would benefit Amazon.

"I‘m incensed over this whole thing," Coker said. "It would be so bad for the future of books if the DOJ does anything to limit the agency model. They are either wittingly or unwittingly acting as Amazon's lapdog."

EU PROBE, JOBS' WORDS

The European Commission said in December that it was looking at the same five publishers for potential violations of antitrust law in how e-books were priced.

The decision by the European Commission to open an investigation followed raids on the companies in March 2011.

Apple's push for agency pricing was detailed in Walter Isaacson's biography of Apple founder Steve Jobs.

The book says that Jobs, who died in October, was aware of publishers' frustration with Amazon. It quotes Jobs as saying: "So we told the publishers, 'We'll go to the agency model, where you set the price, and we get our 30 percent and yes, the customer pays a little more but that's what you want anyway.' ... So they went to Amazon and said, 'You're going to sign an agency contract or we're not going to give you the books.'"

(Reporting by Diane Bartz in Washington, with additional reporting from Yinka Adegoke in New York, Georgina Prodhan in London, Alistair Barr and Poornima Gupta in San Francisco, Leila Abboud in Paris, and Sakthi Prasad in Bangalore; Writing by Karey Wutkowski; Editing by Lisa Von Ahn and Tim Dobbyn)

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

By Diane Bartz (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department has warned Apple and five major U.S. publishers that it plans to sue them, accusing them of colluding to raise the prices of elect...
By Diane Bartz (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department has warned Apple and five major U.S. publishers that it plans to sue them, accusing them of colluding to raise the prices of elect...
Filed by Ramona Emerson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 628
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
06:10 AM on 03/27/2012
The cost of modern day publishing must also consider the electronic gizmo or reading device as the supplier of the device must also fish around for marketing effects, profits and price of the device.
At present nothings written in stone on the behavioral aspects as even the enforcers are going about with wading boots and wonderings of court renderings. Enjoy the present.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TonyG-on-Huff
'80s activist still paying off student loans
02:10 PM on 03/10/2012
Apple's digital market depends on creating products where the person is dependent upon it for content, designing interesting hardware that uses software that only Apple controls. It is a clever, insidious way to create a monopoly.

In the case of e-books, which they did not originally dominate, they had to create the monopoly the old way: via collusion.

Establishing and protecting monopolistic practices is Apple's forte when it comes to artistic content that has been digitized. It is Apple's de facto modus operandi. They should have been investigated a long time ago for iTunes.

I will never own an Apple hardware product because of their compulsion to create software -- designed for people with limited computing skills -- that effectively abuses its ease of use to coral people into purchasing products with severe limits that binds users to its affiliated stores.

It's kind of genius marketing, in an evil genius kind of way. But, I refuse to fall for it.

And, I have saved money and found some great alternative products to boot. Cowon is my MP3 player. Droid is my phone. ASUS Transformer prime is my tablet.

Leave the Dark Side. Come into the Light of the Force that is freedom of choice. You won't regret it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cabrobst
Return the top rate to 91%.
08:42 AM on 03/10/2012
Artificial scarcity impoverishes the public, enriches the executives, and strangles creativity.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:33 PM on 03/09/2012
I find it difficult to see why government intervention is necessary. All that a company like Amazon needs to do is to set up an electronic publishing company of its own: we'll license your books from you directly, sell them on your behalf, give you a bigger royalty share, and move ten times the volume.

"And, oh by the way, Apple etc., I know that we've got the next digital Harry Potter for sale at our Amazon store ... YOU CAN'T HAVE IT."

(Which, let the record show, is exactly what Scholastic, Inc. did with regard to the Harry Potter series. Publishers tried to purchase the business outright, just to get their hands on Harry.)

There's nothing except the leftover residues of "old school publishing" to in any way lock the =AUTHORS= to an agency vs. a wholesale model. The only reason why an agency-model succeeds at the moment is because of the library of material which the publishing companies own ... material that was originally licensed when electronic publishing, and particularly electronic SELF-publishing, did not yet exist as a viable business alternative.

The market will take care of itself, because the "publishing house" (which is the party that's making all these contracts e.g. with Apple) itself is on the way out.
photo
French Toast
MAPLE SYRUP
04:57 PM on 03/09/2012
The kind of behavior being discussed has been illegal for a very long time. It's called price fixing.

The market isn't taking care of itself, factually speaking, no matter what your ideology presses you to blindly state.
11:30 AM on 03/09/2012
The government creates monopolies via copyright and then wants to sue for anti-trust violations? This is just another example of large companies relying on government for their profits.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MacManLB
Public Enemy #2
09:31 AM on 03/09/2012
As a voracious reader, the fact that Apple and book publishers are colluding to jack prices up bothers me immensely. There is no reason except vile, unchecked greed for companies to charge more than a mere fraction of the price of a printed book and yet over night they got together and raised the price of eBooks 40%. I envision a day when most books will be electronic and paper books will be a relic of a bygone era. Look at encyclopedias! Sales of Encyclopaedia Britannica's 32 volumes peaked in 1990 and by 1996 it had dropped off 60%. Microsoft's Encarta encyclopedia led the way into the eBook era. I use World Book Encyclopedia that is updated monthly! By the time a printed encyclopedia is on your shelf, it is outdated and only good for decorations. This is what is sweeping through the college text book publishing industry. Professors can now update books on the fly. No more $90 dollar text books on Sociology or $150 dollar books on pre-law (My daughter is at USC).
02:42 PM on 03/09/2012
the majority of the costs for making a book do NOT come from printing but from writing, editing, layout, promotion, etc
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MacManLB
Public Enemy #2
07:40 AM on 03/11/2012
You seem to be confusing production cost and price.
photo
tma6o
Another Brick In the Wall
03:57 AM on 03/09/2012
Huff should call the whole tech section the Apple page.That's 90% of it...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MacManLB
Public Enemy #2
09:04 AM on 03/09/2012
They are the vanguard. Do you remember way back in the last century when Microsoft was 90% of the conversation?
12:34 AM on 03/09/2012
As a voracious reader who spends a lot of money on ebooks what I can tell you is that when Amazon had control of the market I had to pay a lot less money for my ebooks. Why should I pay close to the same price as print when the production costs are a fraction and most big publishers won't let me loan the books out like I could with a print book? Why is that? While there will always be "traditionalists" who prefer the inconvenience and "smell"( lol!), of a print book I can't believe any true lovers of the written word don't just love their Kindle(ebooks). I think the ones to blame are the big print publishers who are terrified of this strange new electronic world.
02:16 AM on 03/09/2012
do you really think Amazon will keep prices low once they've put everyone else that sells books out of business? also I don't find print books inconvenient at all. I prefer to spend money on physical objects and find the "look" of printed pages easier to read and less distracting. Tried out an ereader at the library, hated it, and will never buy one.
02:17 AM on 03/09/2012
also most of the costs of producing a physical book are NOT from printing the thing but from editing, layout, design, publicity, etc.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MacManLB
Public Enemy #2
09:06 AM on 03/09/2012
Paper is close to 70% of production costs.
photo
bump00000
The Seventh Chakra, amazon
10:32 PM on 03/08/2012
Mine is still just four ninty-nine.
photo
bnorwood
Father, Grandfather, Uncle, Son, Brother
10:01 PM on 03/08/2012
justice ignores real offenders that impact the lives of every working person who must commute to work and goes after ebook sellers? Eric Holder is a global government tool.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jsgaetano
Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus
10:12 PM on 03/08/2012
I didn't realize he wasn't able to do both.
09:58 PM on 03/08/2012
If they get rid of agency pricing perhaps they should go after Amazon for their predatory pricing because they are going to end up with a monopoly if this happens which is hardly better for consumers. I'd say the current "price fixing" is less harmful than Amazon being the only place to buy books. If you love books especially print books you should not want a world where only Amazon survives. Cause they can afford to slash prices and take a loss, B&N etc can not.
photo
White Raven
Eyeballs are tasty
09:50 PM on 03/08/2012
I was wondering if the JD would get around to this. Glad to see someone isn't going to just let Apple and the publishing companies continue to get away with their evil.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whatever1234
09:32 PM on 03/08/2012
What exactly is the point of buying an ebook anyway? It's costs the same price as a real book and if you like it you can't use it without your electronic device and worse yet, years from now you can't pass them on to your children. Other than that, there's nothing like the smell of a good book.
photo
bump00000
The Seventh Chakra, amazon
10:34 PM on 03/08/2012
Yes but if you are in the airport and finished reading your two books in your bag you go pay airport prices for a book or two. But with digital, you carry the entire library with you. Couple thousand books or more.
Wib
Liberal former Marine who loves fly fishing and is
09:30 PM on 03/08/2012
It's about time someone looked at Apple's business practices. I hope they take a deeper look and in many other areas, especially into how they bully small inventors and small computer companies into giving away everything they have just to avoid being crushed by Apple in suits the small guys can't fight for lack of funds that come anywhere close to matching Apple's.
09:55 PM on 03/08/2012
you think Amazon is any better? they want agency pricing gone so they can have a monopoly since they can afford to sell at a loss. I love books and I would hate a world where Amazon was the only place left to buy them. I refuse to spend one penny there. I believe Amazon doesn't care for print books surviving they just want their monopoly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amajamus
Occupy James ! ! !
11:24 AM on 03/09/2012
Amazon is the best. I get all my ebooks AND print books along with just about everything else. No taxes, cheap prices and both my ebook and physical book collection is huge!
08:36 PM on 03/08/2012
Apple is no different than any other corporate malaise exploiting the global landscape for profit.