iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Rick Santorum To Single Mothers: Government Paternity Tests Or No Welfare

Posted: 03/ 8/2012 6:17 pm Updated: 03/ 9/2012 7:32 am

Santorum
Rick Santorum

WASHINGTON -- GOP presidential contender Rick Santorum has yet to deliver a substantial blow to Mitt Romney's rival campaign. In the past two pivotal primary contests in battleground states, the former senator from Pennsylvania fell short, losing by squeaker margins in Michigan and Ohio. He may owe those defeats to his women problem.

Santorum lost women voters to Romney by five percentage points in Michigan and three percentage points in Ohio and faces a real challenge in turning that tide. That’s because Santorum’s women problem is not campaign-related but, rather, due to a long history of theorizing about women’s sex lives and attempting to turn those theories into law.

Santorum's version of women's studies includes unaccredited takes on women in combat, working mothers and single mothers. Last month, he stirred controversy when he suggested that women should not serve in combat because of "emotions." He clarified his remarks by saying a man's natural protective instinct might kick in if he had to share combat duties with female soldiers.

Santorum was also forced to defend a passage in his book, It Takes A Family, that argued that radical feminists had essentially brainwashed women into thinking work was the only arena where they could find happiness. He said that passage was written by his wife, although she was not given an author's credit.

J. Hogan Gidley, the Santorum campaign’s top spokesman, told The Huffington Post it's only a matter of time before his candidate's support among female voters increases.

"He's always been surrounded by strong women," Gidley said, adding that Santorum and his wife Karen share responsibilities at home. "Rick cooks and Rick cleans. They carpool. He takes the kids to school. They're equal partners in the marriage. I think the more people realize who he as a husband and as leader in the realm of women's rights, they'll be surprised."

"Nobody has a better record on supporting women's issues than Rick Santorum," Gidley added, "whether It was legislation to allow women to work from home or [hiring] women from the welfare rolls to work in his Senate office."

Santorum's recent comments are benign compared with his previous pontifications.

During his first U.S. Senate campaign in 1994, Santorum made unwed mothers and welfare reform regular features of his stump speech. Recently, Mother Jones reported that the candidate had once argued that single mothers were "breeding more criminals" and advocated that they should be denied welfare benefits if they refused to identify the child's father.

The Huffington Post obtained transcripts of Santorum's comments and speeches from various campaign stops in 1994, which show just how far Santorum was willing to go with his proposals. Produced for the then-Sen. Harris Wofford's campaign, the video and audio transcripts show that the Pennsylvania Republican was willing to deny unwed mothers government services until they revealed private family information.

Under the plan, those unwed mothers would have to reveal the name of their child’s father in exchange for welfare and subsidized medical care. What was once the domain of private labs, family courts, and Maury Povich would become the domain of the government.

"What we say is that in order for Mom to be able to go on welfare if she has a child out of wedlock, you have to tell us who the father is," Santorum said at an event in Carlisle, Pa., on April 1, 1994. "If you don't tell us who the father is, you're not eligible for any welfare benefits, none, not even medical care. You tell us who the father is or you don't receive benefits."

Santorum argued that his proposal could persuade single women to slow their sex lives, which, in turn, would lead to less out-of-wedlock parenting. "If Mom knows that she isn't gonna receive welfare if she doesn't tell us who Dad is, y'know maybe she'll be a little more careful, maybe," he said.

"Or maybe she gives us a list, say 'Well it could be one of five,'" Santorum went on. "I mean, y'know, I don't know what she's gonna do, but at some point we're gonna see her cooperate."

Santorum’s proposal raised a number of questions. For instance, what if the mother wasn’t sure of the father’s identity? To that possibility, he proposed even greater government involvement.

"We say to Mom that you tell us the wrong name, and we'll bring that guy in and we'll do a blood test and that's not Dad, you lose your welfare benefits,” he said at another event that same day in New Bloomfield. “You lose your welfare benefits ... Not till you tell us another name, but till we find out who Dad is, we establish it."

Santorum's focus on single mothers as part of welfare reform was not unusual among Republicans at the time, many of whom saw single-parent homes as a source of poverty and crime. His rhetoric, however, was harsher.

At a meeting in Williamsport, Pa., in March 1994, Santorum advocated that teenage moms should be ineligible for welfare, arguing that a main reason they got pregnant in the first place is because "they get a pretty big cash benefit."

The Observer-Reporter newspaper in Washington, Pa., captured Santorum's focus on mothers during a report from that March. The paper noted that "his bill would encourage states to refuse welfare to unmarried parents, require unmarried minor mothers to live with their parents, and the bill would reduce federal payments to states that do not achieve high rates of paternity establishment."

Santorum also had a theory about working mothers long before his book "It Takes A Family" was published in 2005. He claimed higher taxes were forcing women to join the workforce. At a campaign stop in April 1994 in Latrobe, Pa., he said the Clinton administration was "taxing families out of existence."

He made similar arguments at events in Somerset County and in western Pennsylvania.

"Do you know why a lot of spouses, wives have to go out and work? Many want to, but a lot have to,” Santorum said. “Why? Because the federal government takes more money from them."

Santorum's campaign spokesman Gidley said his candidate was arguing that all the choices a woman makes -- working or not working -- should be respected.

"If you want to get into a discussion about what we said in the '90s versus what Romney said the '90s, we are happy to have that discussion," Gidley said.

For all the rough edges in his approach to women’s issues, Santorum went on to narrowly defeat Wofford for the Senate seat that year. Gidley pointed out that the election included women voters. "It wasn't like all the men got together and said let's do this," Gidley said, adding that women occupy much of the upper ranks of Santorum's presidential campaign.

"Our national finance director is a woman. Our national grassroots director is a woman. Our national press secretary is a woman. Our national campaign manager is a woman," Gidley said. "These are high-level women in our campaign who only report to Rick."

Loading Slideshow...
  • On Contraception

    "It's not okay. It's a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be." <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/health/2011/10/19/348007/rick-santorum-pledges-to-defund-contraception-its-not-okay-its-a-license-to-do-things/" target="_hplink">Think Progress, 2011</a>

  • On The Definition Of Marriage

    "Marriage is what marriage is. Marriage was around before government said what it was. It's like going out and saying, 'That tree is a car.' Well, the tree's not a car. A tree's a tree. Marriage is marriage." "It's like handing up this and saying this glass of water is a glass of beer. Well you can call it a glass of beer, it's not a glass of beer, it's a glass of water. And water is what water is. Marriage is what marriage is." "I can call this napkin a paper towel, but it is a napkin. Why? Because it is, what it is." <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/60602/santorum-qa-marriage-for-gays-threatens-religious-freedom" target="_hplink">Iowa Independant, 2011</a> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=fLbAFNbVSEE http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2011/08/09/292121/santorum-marriage-is-like-water-not-beer/" target="_hplink">Think Progress, 2011</a> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U394HKpak1s" target="_hplink">MSNBC, 2011</a>

  • On Sex In The Military

    "I -- I would say, any type of sexual activity has absolutely no place in the military. And the fact that they're making a point to include it as a provision within the military that we are going to recognize a group of people and give them a special privilege to -- to -- and removing 'don't ask, don't tell' I think tries to inject social policy into the military. And the military's job is to do one thing, and that is to defend our country." <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/09/22/fox-news-google-gop-2012-presidential-debate/" target="_hplink">Fox News, 2011</a>

  • On Gays In The Military

    "The problem is that sexual activity with people who you are in close quarters with who happen to be of the same sex is different than being open about your sexuality ... They're in close quarters, they live with people, they obviously shower with people." <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/09/rick-santorum-gay-soldiers-shower-dadt_n_1002244.html" target="_hplink">HuffPost, 2011</a>

  • On Polygamy, Bigamy, Adultery ...

    "If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything." <a href="http://articles.cnn.com/2003-04-22/politics/santorum.gays_1_statement-on-individual-lifestyles-senator-santorum-bigamy-and-adultery?_s=PM:ALLPOLITICS" target="_hplink">Associated Press, 2003</a>

  • On The Difference Between Being Black And Being Gay

    "You are black by the color of your skin. You are not homosexual, necessarily -- obviously, by the color of your skin. [...] The idea that being black and being gay is the same is simply not true." <a href="http://politics.foxnews.mobi/quickPage.html?page=23681&content=58208053&pageNum=-1" target="_hplink">Fox News, 2011</a>

  • On Candidates' Sex Lives

    "When you look at someone to determine whether they'd be the right person for public office, look at who they lay down with at night and what they believe in." <a href="http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/10/rick-santorum-when-selecting-candidate-look-at-who-they-lay-down-with-at-night.php" target="_hplink">Talking Points Memo, 2011</a>

  • On 'Man On Dog'

    "In every society, the definition of marriage has not ever to my knowledge included homosexuality. That's not to pick on homosexuality. It's not, you know, man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be. It is one thing." <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2003-04-23-santorum-excerpt_x.htm" target="_hplink">Associated Press, 2003</a>

  • On Sodomy, etc..

    "Whether it's polygamy, whether it's adultery, whether it's sodomy, all of those things, are antithetical to a healthy, stable, traditional family." <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2003-04-23-santorum-excerpt_x.htm" target="_hplink">Associated Press, 2003</a>

  • On The Government Getting Up In Your Sex Life

    "The idea is that the state doesn't have rights to limit individuals' wants and passions -- I disagree with that. I think we absolutely have rights because there are consequences to letting people live out whatever wants or passions they desire. And we're seeing it in our society." <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2003-04-23-santorum-excerpt_x.htm" target="_hplink">Associated Press, 2003</a>

  • On Gay Marriage

    "This is an issue just like 9/11 ... We didn't decide we wanted to fight the war on terrorism because we wanted to. It was brought to us. And if not now, when?" "The battle we're engaged in right now on same-sex marriage, ultimately that is the very foundation of our country, the family, what the family structure is going to look like. I'll die on that hill fighting." <a href="http://articles.mcall.com/2004-02-25/news/3521981_1_gay-marriage-defense-of-marriage-act-amendment-process" target="_hplink">The Morning Call, 2004</a> <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2011/10/19/348059/rick-santorum-pledges-to-die-on-the-hill-fighting-against-same-sex-marriage/" target="_hplink">Think Progress, 2011 </a>

  • On Being A Hater

    "You can say I'm a hater. But I would argue I'm a lover. I'm a lover of traditional families and of the right of children to have a mother and father. ... Isn't that the ultimate homeland security, standing up and defending marriage?" <a href="http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04197/346633-84.stm" target="_hplink">Pittsburg Post Gazette, 2011</a>

  • On The Gay Jihad

    "So the gay community said, 'He's comparing gay sex to incest and polygamy, how dare he do this,' and they have gone out on a, I would argue, jihad against Rick Santorum since then." <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/178543-santorum-gay-community-on-jihad-against-me-for-stance-on-marriage?utm_campaign=briefingroom&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitterfeed" target="_hplink">The Hill, 2011</a>

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- GOP presidential contender Rick Santorum has yet to deliver a substantial blow to Mitt Romney's rival campaign. In the past two pivotal primary contests in battleground states, the forme...
WASHINGTON -- GOP presidential contender Rick Santorum has yet to deliver a substantial blow to Mitt Romney's rival campaign. In the past two pivotal primary contests in battleground states, the forme...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,429
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (116 total)
09:38 PM on 03/23/2012
I agree with Santorum , he is the first to come up with a solution. Right now I see too
many young fathers not married to the female, sitting around the waiting rooms of the medicare
office with their girlfriends, with 1 or 2 or 3, children. Why are they not working?? Why are they
still having babies, and on welfare. The molested, raped, incest, is another issue. And they
should be reported, let them serve time for it.
The same goes for the ones born in this country, but children of immirgrants. Hold them
responsible also, our laws are different from their country. Hold them accountable.
As tax payer, we are getting worn out by paying from our check taxes after taxes.
02:41 PM on 04/10/2012
I agree. These people have time to sit in the office with their baby mama because they aren't working. Stop paying these women to have babies. If you can't afford to raise 1, don't have 5! There are thousands of good working, married couples that want desparately to adopt but can't afford to go over seas to get a baby. Let these people adopt the unwanted babies and get them out of the welfare cycle. Then thee children will grow up knowing you work for what you want, get an education to better yourself instead of demanding others pay for your laziness.
05:09 PM on 03/19/2012
Breeders? Single women are breeders? What is wrong with this sanctimonious prk! He's better than anyone because he's 'special' in the eyes of God. Why has God chosen a bunch of people like him to lead like Moses. I don't believe it and I believe that most people have compassion and feelings for women who get 'caught' or have been molested, or raped or, are victims of incest.
nonethewyzzer
Master of neither subtlety nor style.....
11:52 AM on 03/19/2012
Okee dokee, Ricky. Then I suggest that all males be subjected to DNA testing. Let's just get ahead of the problem and start the day their born.
06:59 AM on 03/18/2012
My Ex-wife of three children never collect welfare! Why? Because I paid way over 100k in child support. I'm not against welfare. I'm against deadbeat dads. They are 50% of the problem and where the hell are they. I guy that helps bring a human into this world, then takes no responsibility is no man at all. It takes both man and women to make a baby. This is no more a women's issue then it is a deadbeat dad issue. We could cut welfare payments in half if we would track down and make the deadbeat dad pay his fair share. My children are grown and out on there own, two with families of their own and both love and respect their father.
08:13 AM on 03/18/2012
And if the Dad cant (wont) pay we put him in jail//// more taxpayers money........ Afriend of mine has raised her daughter by herself (does know who dad is) and the child is now in college! I am also one of those children with no support from DaD (knew who he was tooo)
Guess My MOM was a stronger women than she thought! It does not matter if ya know or not. It is up to the man to stand up to what is right. But i do think that ridding ourselves of planned parenthood will present an even larger problem.
04:16 AM on 03/19/2012
Congrats to your friend, you and your mom. I'm not a Santorum supporter. You can't legislate morality. Education is the Key!
01:00 AM on 03/18/2012
What the @*$^@#* difference does it make who anyone's father is? If a child is in the world and in a poor family, you don't deny aid because a father isn't claimed. What if the mother doesn't know and potential father candidates aren't coming forward to submit a sample to match the child? Not only is this proposed plan unimplementable, but not at all practical. What kind of a dipstick is Santorum?
12:11 PM on 03/18/2012
Gosh...there you go thinking the child counts!
What are you?
Compassionate or something?
nonethewyzzer
Master of neither subtlety nor style.....
11:55 AM on 03/19/2012
Well, you see, in Ricky's skewed view of the world if he knows who the dad is, he can go after him for the child support that the state may or may not have laid out in welfare benefits. If that fails, he can throw the dad in jail... which is where he really wants him. Punishment for having sex in the first place, only it falls under the auspices of a modern day debtor's prison.
photo
pciorlandosales
have come to chew bubble gum and kick ash
12:14 AM on 03/18/2012
His campaign manager said he has always had the support of strong women. Like whom? Where are they?
11:40 PM on 03/17/2012
Why would they even want this information? Will their next step be to make having babies outside of marriage a crime?

Now there's a scary thought.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
little wing
practical radical
09:56 PM on 03/17/2012
That's just plain creepy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Laura Gares
09:30 PM on 03/17/2012
Can't someone just make him go away?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
day678
09:15 PM on 03/17/2012
He must be so proud of his wife Karen, who lived with an OB/Gyn for 6 years prior to the Karen/Rick union. I'm not sure if it's hypocritical that she lived "in sin" for 6 years or that the Doctor performed abortions during that time. Sanctimonious Rick must have had a hard time forgiving her.
All I know is that he shames all Italian Catholics with his inane remarks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GnosisMan
08:53 PM on 03/17/2012
"due to a long history of theorizing about women’s sex lives and attempting to turn those theories into law"

that sums up Santorum's MO ....there are far far more urgent problems but he won't address them because he's to busy imposing his view of reality on others....his MO is like Windows 98 with no updates. Well, Rick, I tell you what, if you care so much about women, read Riane Eisler's book ("The Real Wealth of Nations") as if women's life depended on it because, you know what? it does. Your level of awareness of our socioeconomic and cultural problems are confined within what pastor Matt Chandler referred to as "Moralistic Deism"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzTm3W2Ai7s
and as long as your MO is confined in this bizarro world, you will never understand why people tell you just how f**ked up you really are
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Randolph Greer
I am a Poet .
08:42 PM on 03/17/2012
If Santorum becomes President, the first think I am going to do is corner the market on the production of SCARLET LETTERS for women to wear. Then I can join Romney's 1% club.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lancedaboil
All is Maya
08:09 PM on 03/17/2012
Who pays for this. It will be very,very expensive.
The mother?
The Tax Payer?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
day678
09:17 PM on 03/17/2012
Government interference is only OK when the Republicans are inserting themselves into the bedrooms of others. What an odd concept.
photo
pciorlandosales
have come to chew bubble gum and kick ash
12:15 AM on 03/18/2012
Certainly not the 1% if he would have his way :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
randinoel
God is the only way to ever-lasting life.
08:09 PM on 03/17/2012
Not everyone carries my story and simply dated a guy at 18 and got pregnant. Their are women who simply have a one-night stand, been the victim of sexual assault, etc and do not know the full details of the man they were with and conceived with. Infact, all those examples I have provided- I have gone through. Victim of assault at 16, which led to various one night stands at 16,17, and 18, up until I dated my son's father and got pregnant and had my son at 19. However, If I did NOT know my son's father, should I still be punished by not receiving funding, or my child?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lancedaboil
All is Maya
08:04 PM on 03/17/2012
There are DAs all over this country who can not afford to test DNA in their Rape cases. Now Rick wants to test all welfare babies? Where do you come up with the data base for men who may have had a welfare baby?
photo
pciorlandosales
have come to chew bubble gum and kick ash
12:17 AM on 03/18/2012
I'd send him the bill for child support and tell him, "hey you did not want anyone having contraceptives, now you pay for the kid".