iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Keystone XL: Unions Bitterly Divided Over Pipeline

AP    
First Posted: 03/10/2012 7:29 am Updated: 03/12/2012 5:54 am

WASHINGTON (AP) — Unions may be united in working to re-elect President Barack Obama, but their leaders also are trying to repair bitter divisions over his rejection of an oil pipeline from Canada to Texas.

Trade unions representing workers who stand to benefit from thousands of new construction jobs from the Keystone XL pipeline are furious at other unions that joined environmentalists in opposing the project.

AFL-CIO leaders hope to smooth tensions at their executive council's annual winter meeting that starts Monday in Orlando, Fla.

The issue reflects a decades-old conflict between union leaders who believe creating jobs is paramount and others who are more strongly aligned with progressive groups on environmental and social causes.

After the White House blocked the pipeline in January, Laborers union president Terry O'Sullivan said he was "repulsed by some of our supposed brothers and sisters lining up with job killers like the Sierra Club and the Natural Resources Defense Council to destroy the lives of working men and women."

His harsh words were directed at groups such as the Transport Workers Union and the Amalgamated Transit Union, which said the risk of possible oils spills and environmental contamination outweighed the benefit of new jobs.

Several larger unions, including the Communications Workers and Auto Workers, also jumped in with praise for Obama, agreeing with his administration's arguments that a quick deadline forced by Republicans didn't provide enough time for a fair review.

O'Sullivan was livid that unions whose members had no jobs to gain or lose from the project would make their opposition public while construction unions struggling with 17 percent unemployment in the industry are desperate for any jobs.

The split led the AFL-CIO to take no public position on the pipeline. Leaders are expected to discuss the need for solidarity and how to tone down tensions when unions can't agree.

"I think discussion is always good," said Larry Cohen, the Communications Workers' president. "You have to treat disagreements with respect. You have to work hard for unity."

Cohen has no regrets about siding with Obama. He said his union was not specifically against the pipeline, but merely opposed to the Republican "ultimatum" to shorten the timeline. He sees room for unions to disagree, especially in areas he doesn't consider central to the labor movement's core philosophy.

"On the issues that make or break the labor movement, I don't think the pipeline is one of them," he said. "We think the core of the movement is bargaining and organizing rights."

O'Sullivan has a different perspective.

"If there's legislation or a project that's good for another union, and my members don't have equity in the work, I'm going to be supportive or I'm going to say nothing," he said.

Republicans have pounded Obama on the pipeline issue, saying it's a question of whether the president wants to create jobs and reduce reliance on oil from the Middle East.

In the GOP's weekly radio and Internet address Saturday, North Dakota Gov. Jack Dalrymple called rejection of the pipeline an example of the administration "killing energy development with overly burdensome regulations."

The pipeline operator, Calgary-based TransCanada, said last month it would build a portion of the pipeline from Oklahoma to Texas. That 485-mile line from Cushing, Okla., to Port Arthur, Texas, does not require presidential approval because it does not cross a U.S. border.

The proposed 1,700-mile pipeline would carry tar sands oil from western Canada to refineries along the Texas Gulf Coast. The company expected to be ready in a few weeks to submit plans for a new route that avoids the environmentally sensitive Nebraska Sandhills region and an aquifer that is a key water source for eight states.

It's hardly the first time unions have disagreed with each other.

Union officials say there are bound to be conflicts among the labor federation's 57 member unions. The pipeline split is just one of more than a dozen topics that will come up in Orlando.

Generally, there is broad support for endorsing Obama for a second term and working to fend off anti-union legislation in Ohio, Wisconsin and other states. Unions are working together to recall Gov. Scott Walker, R-Wis., who led the drive to pass legislation that curbed collective bargaining rights for many of the state's public employees.

A big issue this election year is how the AFL-CIO focuses its political apparatus and money to help Obama win and boost Democrats in their efforts to regain control of the House and keep their majority in the Senate.

Obama campaign manager Jim Messina will attend the meeting as union presidents and their political operatives consider how much to spend on campaign advertising, phone banks and door-to-door efforts that traditionally benefit Democratic candidates.

"Repositioning" the labor movement and improving the image of unions also are on the agenda as leaders experiment with new organizing techniques and try to attract more public support in their fight with critics trying to limit their clout in state legislatures.

The AFL-CIO has spent about $1.5 million this year on a "Work Connects Us All" television ad campaign in three cities. Union leaders are considering whether to expand the campaign, which also includes a new website.

"We need to get out the message that we're all in this together," said United Steelworkers president Leo Gerard. "There's a reason the right wing is attacking the hell out of the labor movement. We're effective in speaking for the 99 percent and the right wing doesn't like that."

___

Online:

AFL-CIO: http://www.aflcio.org

Keystone Pipeline: http://www.transcanada.com/keystone.html

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON (AP) — Unions may be united in working to re-elect President Barack Obama, but their leaders also are trying to repair bitter divisions over his rejection of an oil pipeline from Canada t...
WASHINGTON (AP) — Unions may be united in working to re-elect President Barack Obama, but their leaders also are trying to repair bitter divisions over his rejection of an oil pipeline from Canada t...
WASHINGTON (AP) — Unions may be united in working to re-elect President Barack Obama, but their leaders also are trying to repair bitter divisions over his rejection of an oil pipeline from Canada t...
WASHINGTON (AP) — Unions may be united in working to re-elect President Barack Obama, but their leaders also are trying to repair bitter divisions over his rejection of an oil pipeline from Canada t...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 160
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
04:38 PM on 03/19/2012
Keystone is not budging and thinking it is a minor issue is definitely the wrong approach. We need projects like these if we’re ever going to put more people back to work. It is important that we learn reconcile the issues that are brought forth with projects like these rather than just simply arguing over which side is better (http://bit.ly/sogpoX). The decision to do or not do the project both have consequences but they also have benefits. In our case, we needs jobs more than we have ever needed them, but we also are addressing a need in fossil fuel that is still very much a part of our society. It would be wise for us perhaps to use this opportunity to link ourselves to the future desires that we say we want.
12:52 AM on 03/12/2012
Sam, I know it does not take much to get a reporting job at AP, but please quit repeating the complete falsehood that the Nebraska Sand Hills region is a Ogalla aquifer recharge area for 8 states. It is hydrologically incorrect and another ridiculous NRDC fantasy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fireart
I got mine the hard way.
10:17 PM on 03/11/2012
Dems are always against change and progress.
photo
tjdwill02
There is no free lunch
11:43 PM on 03/11/2012
Odd how they consider themselves " progressive ".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:31 PM on 03/11/2012
If the republicans want this pipeline we know it sucks for the average american in the long run.
photo
tjdwill02
There is no free lunch
11:47 PM on 03/11/2012
Considering that entitlements consume 65% of the annual budget and promise leave future generations working for the government, my opinion is that you have it exactly backwards !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
06:50 PM on 03/11/2012
"Trade unions representing workers who stand to benefit from thousands of new construction jobs from the Keystone XL pipeline are furious at other unions that joined environmentalists in opposing the project."

Canada was willing to pay for American jobs. We put it on hold.
04:14 PM on 03/11/2012
The oil pipeline is for export. the job creation is small and short lived. medium risk very low reward.
When we can find a way to create tens of thousands of jobs then i will consider such endeavors. and the rushing of the project is the issue seemed underhanded. I am a proud member of the communication workers union and environmentally aware also.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
06:52 PM on 03/11/2012
The oil pipeline is for export? Yes, export from Canada to America.

The DOE debunked the idea that the oil pipeline is for export from America.
07:15 PM on 03/11/2012
I suppose i could be mistaken, but it was my understanding that we would be we would export from our Gulf.
So we will be importing oil then? lol
03:27 PM on 03/11/2012
Unification should not be limited by the current moment, the short-lived desire to appease the situation and avoid problems. We have to think about the future, but we are not doing that today. As UNESCO Director-General Irina Bokova said, “The future needs a green economy but above all a green society. Sustainable production patterns will only make an impact if they are accompanied by sustainable consumption patterns.”

Unification must involve a vision into the future, a program for the future, an inventory of what we are leaving to our children. We need to become more economical, and this is only possible by reducing unnecessary production and transportation, that is, by bringing all our activities to a reasonable level of consumption. If the goal is not profit at any cost but to bring public good, we will begin to explore many energy possibilities that were deemed unprofitable for corporations and thus not implemented.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
davidprosser
04:55 AM on 03/12/2012
I've had this conversation with many when speaking about the issue of "sustainability"; which generally, focuses only on curtailing consumption and usually eliminating economic growth.

The piece I see as missing in this is that if we wish to become sustainable, according to the above definition, we must first form sustainable "relationships" with one another.

Because an interesting thing has happened in our world in the 21st century: We have become interconnected and, as a result, interdependent globally. And so that means that before we can do things like curtail consumption we must first form lasting connections, built on mutual concern and responsibility.

Otherwise we won't have a foundation built where we can reach necessary consumption and ending economic growth.
photo
FTracy3
My micro-bio is as empty as the rest of my life.
12:14 PM on 03/11/2012
Labor obviously has to keep jobs a priority, but project decisions shouldn't be made on the basis of whether they create jobs..they should be made on whether they are good ideas in the first place--jobs are a side benefit. If creating jobs is going to be our criteria then let's pay people to dig holes and fill them up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
06:53 PM on 03/11/2012
If Canada is paying us to dig holes and fill them up, let's do it. That would be cheaper than unemployment checks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cvermeulen9
And you thought it could never happen!
10:20 AM on 03/11/2012
That should be " DON"T" have a dog in this fight!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cvermeulen9
And you thought it could never happen!
10:20 AM on 03/11/2012
I side with the pipeline workers! These other unions have have a dog in this fight! In other words they have nothing to lose or gain!
mooncop1
Impeachment is a beginning, not an end.
08:10 AM on 03/11/2012
Obamas answer more wind turbines that have been killing birds at an alarming rate. Yet not one single turbine operator has been charged by this administration. Theses turbines are are not just killing all birds they are killing of our protected eagles and thats ashame. We might as well go back to using DDT if this administration will not enforce the law.
07:47 PM on 03/11/2012
I don't know where your getting this information, but wind turbines are definitely not killing "all birds." There is a very small risk of animal injury with wind turbines, and if you compare it to the negative effects on birds that climate change and pollution from burning fossil fuels produce wouldn't you say that the merits outweigh the risks? It's great that you care about the birds but you're stretching the reality of the situation way out of proportion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fireart
I got mine the hard way.
10:22 PM on 03/11/2012
So the benifits out weigh the loss for birds but for people it doesnt apply?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fireart
I got mine the hard way.
10:26 PM on 03/11/2012
The noise from the wind ge. break up the rhythm cycle of reproduction for wild animals causing them to not reproduce.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mater
mater
07:19 AM on 03/11/2012
Terry O'Sullivan needs to drink water and have some coffee mADE WITH THE CHEMICALS they projects require. Good luck with that.
05:47 AM on 03/11/2012
ARe you people for real. Let look at some facts. Windmills, not the favorite of greenies. they kill birds for one. And go talk to all the libs on the east coast that turned down a lot of windmills off the coast (lots and lots of wind there) because they might have been able to see them out there and it would ruin their view. Solar power is no where near cost effective yet. And no, it should not be the government to build either one of these. what are you people smoking? The government does fund research in these areas and have for decades through the national science foundation and more federal granting authorities. And if you really want to get real, there is enough oil type fuels in the u.s. alone to give everyone in the country an auto and have them all drive for about 400 years. yes it is finite, and yes someone needs to invent or discover something better but the two should have been going hand in hand. too bad the libs only care about themselves as usual.
09:16 AM on 03/11/2012
400 years? What faux news report was that on? Please show your (valid) evidence for that and as far as only caring about themselves your "con"sevative attitude is helping out the worst offenders of all, BIG OIL - COAL monopolies that could care less about you an I as long as they can allow no other choice but thier product. Get real and stop this continuous kicking the can down the road attitude.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fireart
I got mine the hard way.
10:30 PM on 03/11/2012
Man who blinds himself cannot expect sympathy from those that see.
07:59 PM on 03/11/2012
Don't you think that liberals AND conservatives have selfish concerns? It's not just one party that has a selfish agenda, even though last time I checked it was the conservatives who are pushing to use fossil fuels so they can continue their lifestyle choices without making changes because they, as you call it, "only care about themselves."
01:11 AM on 03/11/2012
Unions are respectfully disagreeing with one another. How PC.
01:05 AM on 03/11/2012
New Law to take effect 2015. No American oil company can ship oil by tankers any longer. They must have purchased and use double-hull ships. Valdez happened with a tanker. Exxon Mobile intended to wait until 2015 to purchase double-hulls. )Note: terrorism has proven to be a reason for oil spills)