iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Junk Food Taxes Gain Advocate In United Nations


First Posted: 03/12/2012 2:23 pm Updated: 03/13/2012 2:00 pm

Most of the overlap between the food world and the United Nations' mandate is about life-threatening hunger. The UN steps in to facilitate the distribution of food aid to those in desperate need. But a recent report from Olivier de Schutter [pdf], the UN's Special Rapporteur on the right to food, shows that when it comes to the UN's activities in the food world, feast can be just as important as famine.

"The right to food cannot be reduced to a right not to starve," the report explains. "States have a duty to protect the right to an adequate diet, in particular by regulating the food system."

In other words, letting the food industry create an environment that makes citizens unhealthy constitutes a violation of human rights. And the report argues that many Western governments have done just that by allowing "agrifood" businesses to sell fattening foods at low prices.

The report notes that over one billion people -- one in seven alive today -- are overweight or obese, a major factor behind the growth of many noncommunicable diseases, like heart disease and diabetes. Such diseases have so far gone relatively unaddressed by the UN because they were not included in the organization's Millenium Development Goals, which have guided its activities since 2000.

But de Schutter's report isn't just a series of complaints. It also suggests solutions. Some are relatively uncontroversial. He argues governments should ban trans fats, regulate the marketing of unhealthy foods and encourage the spread of farmers markets and other access points for fresh produce.

The main suggestion of the report, though, is that governments implement taxes on soda and junk food, a perennially contentious topic. Specifically, the report recommends a 10 percent tax on soda and other foods "high in saturated fats, trans-fatty acids, sodium and sugar."

The report cites studies that have indicated that such a tax would reduce soda consumption by eight to 10 percent. And a recent analysis of soda taxes predicted that the measure would raise billions that could be dedicated to the support of health measures. Still, critics say such taxes are regressive and an unwelcome intrusion by an overactive nanny state.

Either way, de Schoutter's decision to discuss the dangers of obesity in a forum more often reserved for starvation is a sign of how serious the problem has become.

CORRECTION:
A HuffPost headline for this article originally misidentified the nature of the UN's support for junk food taxes. It has since been changed.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST FOOD

Most of the overlap between the food world and the United Nations' mandate is about life-threatening hunger. The UN steps in to facilitate the distribution of food aid to those in desperate need. But ...
Most of the overlap between the food world and the United Nations' mandate is about life-threatening hunger. The UN steps in to facilitate the distribution of food aid to those in desperate need. But ...
Most of the overlap between the food world and the United Nations' mandate is about life-threatening hunger. The UN steps in to facilitate the distribution of food aid to those in desperate need. But ...
Most of the overlap between the food world and the United Nations' mandate is about life-threatening hunger. The UN steps in to facilitate the distribution of food aid to those in desperate need. But ...
Filed by Joe Satran  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 36
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
03:50 PM on 03/13/2012
While it is clear that the mounting incidence of obesity, diabetes and heart disease is a serious international public health concern, I don’t believe that a tax on soda and junk food is the best solution. Obesity is a multifaceted issue for which no one food or drink can be blamed. Since anything consumed in excess can be problematic, a junk food tax does not properly address the complex lifestyle and environmental factors that must be changed. Plus, research shows that a soda tax will not affect lasting behavior changes needed to turn around rising obesity rates. In fact, some studies show even a very high soda tax will not significantly impact body mass index, a measure of body fat. In my experience as a registered dietitian working with obese individuals as well as food and beverage companies, like Coca-Cola, nutrition education and physical activity are essential to improve the outlook on obesity.
01:38 PM on 03/14/2012
I agree that the tax is nothing short of a band-aid solution, however, if an increase of 10% on these products can deter people from buying them and instead, that money is spent on healthy foods, then the tax has done its job.
11:54 AM on 03/13/2012
Now the UN is getting involved in tax policy of counties? Great. I wonder how North Korea is going to vote? How about before worrying about junk food, we stop tinhorn governments from starving their own people through corruption, incessant wars and military spending. Hunger and starvation is a global problem, and taxation is a weak, easy attempt at appearing to take action. Sad and disappointing. I don't thnk relieving hunger and malnutrition is going to be easy, but I also don't think it's a big secret as to what the world can get together and pull off to achieve it. I know, easy for me to say, but that's how I feel.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:29 AM on 03/13/2012
What would we ever do without the UN to protect us from Coca Cola and Doritos.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:09 PM on 03/13/2012
I don't know because I'm just too darned daft to realize that certain foods are bad for me and should only be eaten in moderation.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:14 PM on 03/13/2012
If only they took the toys out of Happy Meals, then people would realize McDonalds food is actually bad for your health.
photo
Annieke
Rules are not necessarily sacred, principles are.
10:04 AM on 03/13/2012
I hope the Dutch government take note! It is ridiculous that you can have an unhealthy weekly diet for as little as 20-25 euro's a week per person (at one of the high-end groceries) and when I try to eat healthy (still my New Year's Resolution and stucking by it) with lots of fresh fruit and vegetables, no pre-fabricated powdered sauces etc, I spend 50-60 euro's a week all for one person.

Now it won't break the bank for me, luckily, but for many people this amount of money will be impossible and so they return to eating unhealthy. And in the end the costs for health care will go up and we will all pay for it.
01:30 AM on 03/13/2012
Cheap junk food is a human rights violation, LOL. Give me a break.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:09 PM on 03/13/2012
Seriously. These people have a bizarre view of what is and isn't a human right.
11:20 PM on 03/12/2012
Definitely a joke and a waste of time! The UN needs to focus on other things than what we are eating. Fitting time to want to bring this up. Prices are already higher than normal for basically everything we buy or consume.

And if it's some stupid ploy to get us to eat healthier then they need to lower the prices of the healthier foods in order for this to work or else this is just a waste of time.
10:03 PM on 03/12/2012
What a joke! You know, there are people out here that actually BENEFIT health-wise from high-calorie high-fat junk foods. Those people don't have a choice. The fatties who stuff their faces do.
08:52 PM on 03/12/2012
Just what we need, foreigners telling us what is food and what is not and taxing us for it? When did we abrogate the constitution for the new world order?
photo
Parkite
Still haven't found what I'm looking for
07:44 AM on 03/13/2012
Excuse me, but I believe these are suggestions...ONLY suggestions. They don't pass laws.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
El Chingaso
Fighting for mental superiority...
08:20 PM on 03/12/2012
Two words for the U.N.: buzz off.
mothergrace
If they knock you down, bite 'em on the ankle.
08:13 PM on 03/12/2012
I don't agree with this. What is junk food? Sure there are some examples of food that could be classified as junk but there are many more that fall into a gray area. Everyday we hear reports about perfectly ordinary foods that can cause problems such as fruit juice if used to excess. Will those be taxed at some point too? What about all the health benefits of dark chocolate? Yet chocolate would automatically fall into the junk food category.

How much better would it be to offer "junk-free" food in the sense of eliminating weird ingredients and educate people to eat a variety of foods, in reasonable portions, and get some exercise.

Then you might actually be able to have a cookie and enjoy it without breaking the calorie bank.
photo
Parkite
Still haven't found what I'm looking for
07:19 AM on 03/13/2012
READ the entire story NOT just the headline. They do advocate eliminating/banning transfats, etc., not just taxing "junk".
mothergrace
If they knock you down, bite 'em on the ankle.
04:11 PM on 03/13/2012
Nothing I said indicates that I did not read the article.
04:38 PM on 03/12/2012
Why are some people so willing to let other's call them stupid, under the BS of calling it protection from evil food ingredients. So, yes please tax me because I don't understand that soda may cause weight gain.

And why would we need to raise tax money to help with insurance costs for the overweight? Can't we use the money we are saving form cutting out physcial education and activities from our schools? UN needs to go, then we can take that money and by everyone gym memeberships!
03:36 PM on 03/12/2012
What's next? Fat camps? F*** the UN.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
altheschrod
I'm pedaling hard.
03:29 PM on 03/12/2012
I agree with the U.N. It's been shown over and over that we're all paying for obesity in our health-care premiums, so why not those USING the product offsetting some of that cost (?)
04:36 PM on 03/12/2012
Here here!!
07:16 PM on 03/12/2012
well that is the republican argument, that each individual should have to pay for themselves and that the real problem with society is paying collective taxes paying the healthcare bills for poor people
photo
Parkite
Still haven't found what I'm looking for
07:32 AM on 03/13/2012
Do you really think only poor people get sick? Only poor people contribute to the cost of medical care & therefore to the cost of insurance? REALLY?!?
Let me explain health insurance/medical costs 101: John Q. Poor goes to the emergency room & can't afford to pay...his costs get spread to everyone else.
Johnny Got Bucks gets cancer from eating pesticides, his costs are $1,000,000, but he only paid $600/month for his insurance and another $5K - $10K out of pocket...where the blazes do you thinkg the the other $980,000+ comes from??? Huh, where? You, me and everyone one else in the system!
03:24 PM on 03/12/2012
So now the U.N. wants to tell us what to eat,screw them and while you'r at it srew obama you know he and his sorry excuse of a wife will jump on this and try to force this in the U.S.
04:37 PM on 03/12/2012
No one is telling you what to eat. Its a tax. If someone who is obese is going to eat more junk, increase my healthcare premiums, and not care...

The least they can do is pay a few more cents for their addiction.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:06 PM on 03/12/2012
Disban the U.N. Now, they are useless..what a freakin joke!
photo
Annieke
Rules are not necessarily sacred, principles are.
10:08 AM on 03/13/2012
It seems to me that the UN and the leading role it gave to the US has been pretty good for the US in the past. And it will be again in the future.

So when you don't agree with them, they are useless, and when you need their help, they are in your good graces once again.
That is SOOOOO GOTP.