iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Abortion Causes Breast Cancer, New Hampshire House Declares

Posted: 03/14/2012 5:31 pm

Nh Breast Cancer Abortion

New Hampshire's Tea Party-controlled House of Representatives passed a bill Wednesday that would mandate a 24-hour waiting period before an abortion and require doctors to tell women that abortion causes breast cancer.

The bill, sponsored by Rep. Jeanine Notter (R-Merrimack), was immediately condemned by Democratic leaders, who it would require false information to be spread by doctors to patients. There is no proven breast cancer link to abortion, according to the World Health Organization and the American Cancer Society.

Notter could not be reached for comment Wednesday, but has said in the past she believes there is an abortion-cancer connection. In an interview last month with Merrimack Patch, Notter said she understood that abortion would cause spaces in breast duct tissue to allow for the growth of cancer cells. She said she believed birth control pills lead to the same issue. Notter last month also said that she believed that birth control pills taken by women cause prostate cancer in their male children.

The bill includes a full section on the supposed breast cancer link.

e) Materials that inform the pregnant woman that there is a direct link between abortion and breast cancer. It is scientifically undisputed that full-term pregnancy reduces a woman’s lifetime risk of breast cancer. It is also undisputed that the earlier a woman has a first full-term pregnancy, the lower her risk of breast cancer becomes, because following a full-term pregnancy the breast tissue exposed to estrogen through the menstrual cycle is more mature and cancer resistant. In fact, for each year that a woman’s first full-term pregnancy is delayed, her risk of breast cancer rises 3.5 percent. The theory that there is a direct link between abortion and breast cancer builds upon this undisputed foundation. During the first and second trimesters of pregnancy the breasts develop merely by duplicating immature tissues. Once a woman passes the thirty-second week of pregnancy (third trimester), the immature cells develop into mature cancer resistant cells. When an abortion ends a normal pregnancy, the woman is left with more immature breast tissue than she had before she was pregnant. In short, the amount of immature breast tissue is increased and this tissue is exposed to significantly greater amounts of estrogen—a known cause of breast cancer. Women facing an abortion decision have a right to know that such medical data exists. At the very least, women must be informed that it is undisputed that pregnancy provides a protective effect against the later development of breast cancer.

Among the provisions in the bill passed today are a 24-hour waiting period before an abortion is administered, with doctors providing information to the woman during this period. In addition to the breast cancer link, the information includes a series of fetal pictures taken at two-week intervals, a list of agencies that assist women during pregnancy and childbirth, a 24-hour state hotline number, material on paternal support obligations, a presentation on the possible medical side effects and a state website for information.

A woman would be required to fill out and sign a checklist saying she has reviewed the information.

The law allows the information to be waived in an emergency, with the doctor filling out a form attesting to the need. The law says ectopic pregnancies, removing a miscarried fetus and delivery a premature child to save the child's life do not count as abortion.

Joel Brind, an anti-abortion biology professor at Baruch College in New York and a leading proponent of what he calls the "abortion-breast cancer hypothesis," has said his research of scientific studies shows there is a link. Several states, including Alaska, Texas and Kansas have passed similar laws. A new bill pending in Kansas would reaffirm its law.

New Hampshire Democrats have attacked the bill, which would need Senate approval before heading to Gov. John Lynch (D).

"When House Republicans are not focused on repealing contraception coverage or defunding basic preventive health care services for thousands of New Hampshire women, they are spending their time legislating that women be given misinformation when exercising their right to have an abortion," House Minority Leader Terie Norelli (D-Portsmouth) said in a statement.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
New Hampshire's Tea Party-controlled House of Representatives passed a bill Wednesday that would mandate a 24-hour waiting period before an abortion and require doctors to tell women that abortion cau...
New Hampshire's Tea Party-controlled House of Representatives passed a bill Wednesday that would mandate a 24-hour waiting period before an abortion and require doctors to tell women that abortion cau...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 586
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (23 total)
11:37 PM on 04/11/2013
cancer.org; Linking these topics creates a great deal of emotion and debate. But scientific research studies have not found a cause-and-effect relationship between abortion and breast cancer.
11:15 PM on 04/11/2013
Michele Leonhart DEA chief Administrator and this woman;
two of a kind. The wrong kind.
02:21 PM on 02/20/2013
For the women suffering from breast cancer, my heart goes out to you. No information that could have possibly prevented this horrible disease, should ever be hidden. This might have saved lives. Any and all information concerning breast cancer risk and prevention should be made available to all women. Women deserve the right to know. Then they can make their own decision and additional research concerning the matter. The study and prevention of a disease is just as important as the cure.
The increase in breast cancer over the years and the increase in abortions should be reason enough to at least consider this research.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mgdoolin
01:50 AM on 11/28/2012
The logical application of the data cited in the bill would dictate that, if the N.H. House is truly concerned with lowering breast cancer rates in the State, schools and doctors should be required to encourage young females to get pregnant as soon as possible, certainly before they get out of high school.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chaifreak
12:12 PM on 03/22/2012
I just emailed the AMA asking them to comment on this matter. I encourage everyone to do this.
https://extapps.ama-assn.org/contactus/contactusMain.do
05:51 PM on 03/20/2012
thank you democrats for stating; There is no proven breast cancer link to abortion, according to the World Health Organization and the American Cancer Society.
05:44 PM on 03/20/2012
This is complete crap! Are they seriously linking ESTROGEN (a natural female reproductive hormone) as a cause of cancer????? Are they out of their damn minds?????

Since when are politicians Doctors and Scientists.

So most of the scientific evidence on global warming they brush off but this scientifically unsupported crap they make into law.....really have to wonder what this country is coming to.

So don't get abortions if you can't afford babies but also don't expect the government to help out either. Schools are closing because of lack of funds but will spend millions on crap laws like these and defending DOMA.....right
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carrie Arick
rawr.
11:20 AM on 03/19/2012
They want to mandate doctors tell patients, in essence, that ABORTION CAUSES BREAST ENLARGEMENT. Ha!!!

The way the law is written PROVES they haven't the faintest idea what they are legislating because they are not educated in reproductive health or the workings of the female body. Saying abortion permanently increases the amount of tissue in the breast-- the reasoning is because the pregnancy didn't go full term-- means ANY pregnancy that ends early causes the same. It means that spontaneous abortion (aka) miscarriage, chemical pregnancies, and premature birth result in higher cancer risk and a permanent increase breast tissue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
majorwiblit
Mr Natural says,,,"Don't mean Sheeet!"
06:42 AM on 03/19/2012
We really need to finally get rid of all these baggers
07:39 PM on 03/18/2012
Who was the moron that dreamed this bill up?! It does proove one good thing though. It prooves that the people who are in our State and Federal Governments are at least good for a laugh!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carrie Arick
rawr.
11:57 AM on 03/19/2012
I don't know who dreamed it up, but its primary sponsor is Jeannie Notter...

http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/member.aspx?member=376991

Representative Jeanine Notter (r)
Hillsborough- District 19
Seat #:3022
New
Home Address:
19 Whittier Road
Merrimack, NH 03054-4755
Phone: (603)423-0408
Email: jeanine.notter@leg.state.nh.us

Send her a note...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wombaticus
All new info is analyzed against our experiences.
11:32 AM on 03/18/2012
GOP... always for smaller regulations on virtual citizens, and always for more regulations on meat citizens. They have never found a bedroom they didn't want to control.
10:07 AM on 03/18/2012
The Rs want limited government - they don't want to limit government's ability to LIE if it advances a radical social agenda.
photo
myakkakat
Compromise is not a 4 Letter Word
07:52 AM on 03/18/2012
What the EFFFF is wrong with today's Republicans? The party of Richard M Nixon, who funded Planned Parenthood in 1970, is absolutely unrecognizable today. They've not only lost their ability to compromise, they've lost their FN minds!
07:42 AM on 03/18/2012
That is the biggest load of crap. If abortion causes breast cancer, then so does miscarriage. Even if their study about full term pregnancy is correct, then all it does is reduce the risk, not increase it. All this bill states is that women are cattle meant to be bred.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
be practical
I'll Never Understand the GOP Mind
05:00 AM on 03/18/2012
A couple anti-abortion groups issue a faulty study. Several medical groups, including the National Cancer Institute, have reported, after several studies, that abortion and miscarriages do not show any link to breast cancer.

But no one said that brains were required to be elected.
11:53 AM on 03/18/2012
Actually, I looked up the study that Joel Brind uses. The study does NOT actually say what he insists it says.

http://www.ceu.ox.ac.uk/research/29/collaborative-group-on-hormonal-factors-in-breast-cancer
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pamiejuneslp
12:32 PM on 03/18/2012
Interesting article - and a nod for breastfeeding - just another good reason to feed your baby the natural way.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sydneymoon
Dismiss what insults your own soul - WW
05:54 PM on 03/18/2012
The breastfeeding connection offering protection is something I had read before.