iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Senate Transportation Bill Passes With Bipartisan Support

Harry Reid Transportation Bill

First Posted: 03/14/2012 12:53 pm Updated: 03/14/2012 3:02 pm

The Senate passed a two-year, $109 billion bipartisan transportation bill in a 74-22 vote Wednesday, handing Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) significant bragging rights in the race to pass election-year job-creation legislation. Now all eyes turn to the House of Representatives and Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), who has struggled to bring his own caucus to terms on a highway bill.

Reid said his chamber's bill, cosponsored by Sens. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.), would help fix 70,000 failing bridges and save or create 2.8 million jobs.

"Really, I have to say that Senator Inhofe and I and our staffs really became close family as we worked through this. And I am so moved at the way we were able to come together, all of us," Boxer said on the Senate floor just before the bill's passage. "Let's get the House to pass our bill. This is a jobs bill."

Inhofe returned the compliment. "Yes, she and I are probably at the opposite extremes," Inhofe said. But, he added, "I've always said that conservatives should be big in two areas: national defense and infrastructure."

The Senate bill was one of few pieces of major legislation in recent memory to secure broad bipartisan support. The current transportation bill expires on March 31, which means that Congressional leaders are racing against time to get a new bill passed and prevent thousand of construction jobs from being put on hold.

The Senate vote came after weeks of intense backroom discussion over how many amendments Senate Republicans could bring up, and failed attempts by Republicans to attach approval for the Keystone XL pipeline to the bill, but the final votes on Tuesday and Wednesday were largely drama-free. One surprising development was the passage on a 50-47 vote Tuesday of an amendment sponsored by Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.) that would make it much more difficult to privatize existing highways and turn them into toll roads.

Truckers and the AAA have strongly opposed creating more toll roads. On the Senate floor, Bingaman said his amendment "would simply remove these privatized toll roads from consideration when we allocate highway funds."

Privatization watchdogs were enthusiastic. "I think it's a defeat for Wall Street interests that have counted on Congress being asleep at the wheel when it comes to their subsides for private projects," said Phineas Baxandall, federal tax and budget policy analyst at the consumer group U.S. PIRG. He credited rural Republicans and truckers for the amendment's narrow passage.

Another provision that was included in the bill, however, vastly expanded a federal loan program for new transportation projects that often involves so-called "public-private partnerships." Such arrangements often involve outsourcing the management of public infrastructure to Wall Street-backed private companies.

The Senate bill keeps transportation spending steady despite deficit concerns and rapidly dwindling gas tax revenues, which have traditionally filled the Highway Trust Fund, by piecing together a patchwork of unrelated taxes. And, while far from promoting sweeping changes for mass transit, the bill keeps public transportation funding level.

Senate conservatives complained that the bill spends down the Highway Trust Fund and relies on transfers from the general fund, instead of gas tax revenues alone, to pay for highways. They have also long argued that bicycle and pedestrian paths should not rely on drivers' gas taxes for funding.

Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) had argued that the federal transportation program be dismantled, spending reduced to gas tax revenue levels, and decision-making be devolved to the states. "Taxpayers have already bailed out the federal highway trust fund with $35 billion, and this highway bill would force them to provide another $13 billion bailout," he said in a statement. "We’ve got to stop the bipartisan spending spree and the federal government has to start letting go of programs that can be done better, faster, and less expensively at the state level."

DeMint's amendment to turn the Highway Trust Fund over to the states failed on a 30-67 vote Tuesday.

House members are currently back in their districts, but Boehner and his top lieutenants were quietly trying to see how many of their fellow House Republicans they could wrangle into supporting a transportation bill. One option under discussion was simply passing the bipartisan Senate bill, which would represent a notable defeat for Boehner's attempt to tie transportation funding to offshore drilling on the premise that the combination would create jobs.

With just 17 days until the expiration of the current transportation bill, Boehner is under major pressure to find some way to pass a bill. Whatever happens in the House, the passage of a short-term extension of the current bill may be necessary to create additional time for both chambers to agree on a compromise.

Boehner has suggested he might just take up the Senate bill, and Boxer urged him to do so.

"When you have a bill that gets 74 votes at a time when everything is so contentious ... they ought to take a serious look at taking this bill up and passing it," she said. "The House is away this week. When they come back, they are staring at two weeks of a timeframe. Why do they want to reinvent the wheel?"

The White House sounded a similar note in a statement, saying that the administration was "pleased that Senators have continued the tradition of working across the aisle to pass a bill [...] We are hopeful that the House will move swiftly and in similarly bipartisan fashion to do the same."

Michael McAuliff contributed reporting.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
The Senate passed a two-year, $109 billion bipartisan transportation bill in a 74-22 vote Wednesday, handing Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) significant bragging rights in the race to pass electio...
The Senate passed a two-year, $109 billion bipartisan transportation bill in a 74-22 vote Wednesday, handing Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) significant bragging rights in the race to pass electio...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,688
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (39 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
springsm 12:55 AM on 03/15/2012
I am not able to read closely enough tonight to figure out what Reid gave up that is egregious to the health and welfare of the country. If imhofe is involved it was not an honest discussion. We will see..now that we have that passed the way the regressives requested...will they let the federal judge nominees take the bench? Seem doubtful. I know though, that the regressives NEVER do anything without  Read More...
01:06 AM on 05/19/2012
Interesting you missed this:

http://gonzalolira.blogspot.com/2012/04/you-are-free-to-travelif-irs-lets-you.html?utm_source=BP_recent

You Are Free To Travel—If The IRS Lets You

A bill that nobody is paying any attention to is sailing through Congress: Senate Bill 1813. It passed the Senate by 74 to 22, and is expected to sail through the House as well. It’s an act “[t]o reauthorize Federal-aid highway and highway safety construction programs, and for other purposes.”

It’s the “and for other purposes” part of the title that has me worried—specifically Section 40304: “Revocation or denial of passport in case of certain unpaid taxes.”

This section would give the IRS the power to keep a U.S. citizen from traveling—

—and it’s another example of Executive Power run amok. It’s another example of how the United States is turning into a police-state.

The right to travel freely is sacrosanct—it’s not some privilege that the government bestows on us: It’s one of our basic freedoms as citizens. In point of fact, the countries that have limited their citizens’ ability to travel—the Soviet Union, the People’s Republic of China, North Korea, Cuba—were all rightfully called “police-states”: It’s one of their defining characteristics—the fact that they were keeping their citizens hostage.
10:35 AM on 03/18/2012
Want to get more out of our Congress than sausage and pork? Let's keep them focused on one topic without all the incompatible amendments. That transportation bill should have been completed 3 years ago - way to go guys. So let's help the focus - Amendment 28:

The Senate and the House shall vote on bills that address a single topic or action and shall not amend or otherwise incorporate actions that are incompatible with the topic or action of such bills.

Sign the petition:
http://www.change.org/petitions/amendment-28-end-the-sausage-making-in-dc-congress-vote-on-single-actions-and-topics-no-non-compatible-amendments#
10:31 AM on 03/18/2012
Ever wonder why crazy laws get attached to good bills that most folks want like transportation? The sausage factory of DC. It is time to get more out of our Congress - start by keeping the shifty folks focused.

The Senate and the House shall vote on bills that address a single topic or action and shall not amend or otherwise incorporate actions that are incompatible with the topic or action of such bills.

Sign the Petition at:
http://www.change.org/petitions/amendment-28-end-the-sausage-making-in-dc-congress-vote-on-single-actions-and-topics-no-non-compatible-amendments#
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
juicybrisket
true emancipation is a fantasy...
07:41 PM on 03/15/2012
this will either fail in the house, or they will attach poison pills to it, because they don't want to see the president succeed.
02:55 PM on 03/15/2012
Holy hell !!!!!! they ACTUALLY agreed to something ? So I guess the Know Nothing Party & the DO Nothing Party figured maybe they'd better do something, because from the looks of it many will probably be unemployed come November - in BOTH parties . If the general electorate is as sick of this bunch in Washington as I am the writing's on the wall !!!!
02:08 PM on 03/15/2012
The federal gas tax was left at 18.6 cents per gallon. This level
has not been raised in several years and is why the current
highway/gas taxes cannot fund all the necessary projects. Just
a 5 cent raise would cover the difference. With gas at $4 a gallon,
what's another nickel to have safe bridges and byways?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ken Koziol
02:22 PM on 03/15/2012
The problem is not whether the gas tax is raise, the problem is that the money which was intended for the highway ends up in the general fund now and therefore can and does get used in other areas.
All funding intened for specific item ends up in the general fund and use where it was not intended to go.
02:41 PM on 03/15/2012
like our FICA. Have a good day.
04:34 PM on 03/15/2012
No, that is not the problem, my friend. The problem is that for 30 yrs ( from 1970 -2000) federal revenues averaged 18.3% of GDP; in 2006 they fell to 16.6%...by 2010, 14.7%. And the GOP claims we have no revenue problem.
03:05 PM on 03/15/2012
The problem is the gov has collected these taxes for years but used the money on everything else but what it was intended for. If they were using the money correctly, these roads and bridges would have never gotten into the condition they are in now. The problem is not the tax rate, it comes back to one common thing, not spending money responsibly! Besides, with rising gas prices, do you think people are going to drive more or less? When people drive less, they buy less gas which means the gov collects less in taxes but the roads and bridges still continued to deteriorate with age.
04:38 PM on 03/15/2012
Well gee...you can't hand out massive tax cuts and launch 2 decade long wars...and then cover all the other bases. Now, everyone is just amazed to find that we're in Debt and the Country is falling apart. But, boy did we have a humdinger of a coupla-right-wing wars.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dneil55859
02:06 PM on 03/15/2012
dang I thought it was a bill about making congress ride the bus instead of in chauffered limos
01:51 PM on 03/15/2012
Yippee! Enough Pork for everyone.
04:41 PM on 03/15/2012
Pork? When we don't spend tax dollars on Bombs or on building infrastructure in Iran, is that called Pork, now?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
esqlevine
To be free is better than to be unfree – always
01:15 PM on 03/15/2012
This time they actually have a bridge to sell you.
mystercarlyle
Just one more thing.
01:08 PM on 03/15/2012
If recent history is any indication, Mr. Boehner will have a very tough road to hoe, no pun intended, with his ultra conservative Teabag contingent. They would rather stop any further job creation that might benefit Obama, regardless of the unemployed people it might assist.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rcapitalsim
RYAN
02:19 PM on 03/15/2012
this job creation?I thought it was just a way to tax all of us lots more.
mystercarlyle
Just one more thing.
03:54 PM on 03/15/2012
I guess having failing infrastructure doesn't mean much to you, but for the rest of us in the 21st century that depend upon high speed transportation and goods and services, it does. Also, in case you missed the day in Eco 101, more jobs, means more aggreegate demand, which leads to greater tax reveues.
photo
skipcat445
Smile...it keeps them guessing.
02:45 PM on 03/15/2012
The only jobs it will create is union jobs...and we all know the unions back the Democrats. What about the rest of the people who happen not to be in the favored group of supporters?
mystercarlyle
Just one more thing.
03:52 PM on 03/15/2012
First, there is no mention of union or non-union workers in the bill, so you are assuming something that is not there. Second, the reason why unions support Democrats revolves around the fact that the Democratic Party has traditionally supported workers who happen to be union members rather than big business, which the GOP's province. Good for you, if you happen to be one of the latter.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bgrobbins
01:00 PM on 03/15/2012
If you don't like Obama ,....... with a Republican President and Congress your gonna not like Public Highways being turned over to Private Corporations alot more.
12:42 PM on 03/15/2012
Seems like the Republicans are finally realizing that the people know what's going on. They think we are stupid, and that by voting "NO" on everything that will help the economy and the Middle Class, will hurt President Obama. THINK AGAIN IDIOTS.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rcapitalsim
RYAN
02:20 PM on 03/15/2012
this wont fly,this is too much money at the wrong time.Americans DO NOT need to be taxes to pieces to pay for this horrible idea..this is a terrible thing.
photo
skipcat445
Smile...it keeps them guessing.
02:47 PM on 03/15/2012
Its not the GOP voting no on them...its the leader of the Senate who refuses to bring any bill they do create to the floor for a vote. Try another talking point...this one doesn't fly. And while your at it tell them to get busy and pass their budget...its been long enough. Time to do their jobs and stop kicking the can down the road to keep their cushy jobs.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
lornejl 3
" no more hurting people "
12:28 PM on 03/15/2012
We spend less on infrastructure than any first world country.

Thanks a lot baggers.
02:46 PM on 03/15/2012
.
04:20 PM on 03/15/2012
Yea right if the congress would keep their hands out of the money that was to go to that project, then we would not have to pay more taxes for something we already paid for
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Unca Allen
Tyranny will rise when you do nothing
12:23 PM on 03/15/2012
I'm amazed this senate could pass anything. Maybe somebodly listened to our needing repaired or renewed infrastructure. Now....get it done!
12:21 PM on 03/15/2012
Wasn't that what gas taxes and all the other transportation taxes supposed to pay for that they spent on other things?Now that we are broke they want us to pay for that.I guess we can all sell our cars to help pay for the bridges.
12:37 PM on 03/15/2012
exactly...and they should be bringing it in royally with the price per gal currently