iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Job Seekers' Facebook Passwords Asked For During U.S. Interviews

By MANUEL VALDES and SHANNON MCFARLAND 03/20/12 03:28 PM ET AP

Facebook

SEATTLE — When Justin Bassett interviewed for a new job, he expected the usual questions about experience and references. So he was astonished when the interviewer asked for something else: his Facebook username and password.

Bassett, a New York City statistician, had just finished answering a few character questions when the interviewer turned to her computer to search for his Facebook page. But she couldn't see his private profile. She turned back and asked him to hand over his login information.

Bassett refused and withdrew his application, saying he didn't want to work for a company that would seek such personal information. But as the job market steadily improves, other job candidates are confronting the same question from prospective employers, and some of them cannot afford to say no.

In their efforts to vet applicants, some companies and government agencies are going beyond merely glancing at a person's social networking profiles and instead asking to log in as the user to have a look around.

"It's akin to requiring someone's house keys," said Orin Kerr, a George Washington University law professor and former federal prosecutor who calls it "an egregious privacy violation."

Questions have been raised about the legality of the practice, which is also the focus of proposed legislation in Illinois and Maryland that would forbid public agencies from asking for access to social networks.

Since the rise of social networking, it has become common for managers to review publically available Facebook profiles, Twitter accounts and other sites to learn more about job candidates. But many users, especially on Facebook, have their profiles set to private, making them available only to selected people or certain networks.

Companies that don't ask for passwords have taken other steps – such as asking applicants to friend human resource managers or to log in to a company computer during an interview. Once employed, some workers have been required to sign non-disparagement agreements that ban them from talking negatively about an employer on social media.

Asking for a candidate's password is more prevalent among public agencies, especially those seeking to fill law enforcement positions such as police officers or 911 dispatchers.

Back in 2010, Robert Collins was returning to his job as a correctional officer at the Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services after taking a leave following his mother's death. During a reinstatement interview, he was asked for his login and password, purportedly so the agency could check for any gang affiliations. He was stunned by the request but complied.

"I needed my job to feed my family. I had to," he recalled.

After the ACLU complained about the practice, the agency amended its policy, asking instead for job applicants to log in during interviews.

"To me, that's still invasive. I can appreciate the desire to learn more about the applicant, but it's still a violation of people's personal privacy," said Collins, whose case inspired Maryland's legislation.

Until last year, the city of Bozeman, Mont., had a long-standing policy of asking job applicants for passwords to their email addresses, social-networking websites and other online accounts.

And since 2006, the McLean County, Ill., sheriff's office has been one of several Illinois sheriff's departments that ask applicants to sign into social media sites to be screened.

Chief Deputy Rusty Thomas defended the practice, saying applicants have a right to refuse. But no one has ever done so. Thomas said that "speaks well of the people we have apply."

When asked what sort of material would jeopardize job prospects, Thomas said "it depends on the situation" but could include "inappropriate pictures or relationships with people who are underage, illegal behavior."

In Spotsylvania County, Va., the sheriff's department asks applicants to friend background investigators for jobs at the 911 dispatch center and for law enforcement positions.

"In the past, we've talked to friends and neighbors, but a lot of times we found that applicants interact more through social media sites than they do with real friends," said Capt. Mike Harvey. "Their virtual friends will know more about them than a person living 30 yards away from them."

Harvey said investigators look for any "derogatory" behavior that could damage the agency's reputation.

E. Chandlee Bryan, a career coach and co-author of the book "The Twitter Job Search Guide," said job seekers should always be aware of what's on their social media sites and assume someone is going to look at it.

Bryan said she is troubled by companies asking for logins, but she feels it's not a violation if an employer asks to see a Facebook profile through a friend request. And she's not troubled by non-disparagement agreements.

"I think that when you work for a company, they are essentially supporting you in exchange for your work. I think if you're dissatisfied, you should go to them and not on a social media site," she said.

More companies are also using third-party applications to scour Facebook profiles, Bryan said. One app called BeKnown can sometimes access personal profiles, short of wall messages, if a job seeker allows it.

Sears is one of the companies using apps. An applicant has the option of logging into the Sears job site through Facebook by allowing a third-party application to draw information from the profile, such as friend lists.

Sears Holdings Inc. spokeswoman Kim Freely said using a Facebook profile to apply allows Sears to be updated on the applicant's work history.

The company assumes "that people keep their social profiles updated to the minute, which allows us to consider them for other jobs in the future or for ones that they may not realize are available currently," she said.

Facebook declined to comment except for issuing a brief statement declaring that the site forbids "anyone from soliciting the login information or accessing an account belonging to someone else."

Giving out Facebook login information also violates the social network's terms of service. But those terms have questionable legal weight, and experts say the legality of asking for such information remains murky.

The Department of Justice regards it as a federal crime to enter a social networking site in violation of the terms of service, but during recent congressional testimony, the agency said such violations would not be prosecuted.

Lori Andrews, a law professor at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law specializing in Internet privacy, is concerned about the pressure placed on applicants, even if they voluntarily provide access to social sites.

"Volunteering is coercion if you need a job," Andrews said.

Twitter did not respond to repeated requests for comment.

In New York, Bassett considered himself lucky that he was able to turn down the consulting gig at a lobbying firm.

"I think asking for account login credentials is regressive," he said. "If you need to put food on the table for your three kids, you can't afford to stand up for your belief."

___

McFarland reported from Springfield, Ill.

___

Manuel Valdes can be reached at . https://twitter.com/ByManuelValdes

Shannon McFarland can be reached at . https://twitter.com/shanmcf

FOLLOW BUSINESS

SEATTLE — When Justin Bassett interviewed for a new job, he expected the usual questions about experience and references. So he was astonished when the interviewer asked for something else: his ...
SEATTLE — When Justin Bassett interviewed for a new job, he expected the usual questions about experience and references. So he was astonished when the interviewer asked for something else: his ...
Filed by Maxwell Strachan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 821
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (25 total)
photo
psychophil
Don't listen to me.
06:26 PM on 03/24/2012
There's no worse idea than answering this question honestly. Once they're on your facebook page they can get your email info too. Since your facebook password may be the same, they're probably going to try to access your email too. Then with that they can access anything - bank accounts, personal records, etc.
lofttypeofaview
I pledge allegiance to the poor!
03:18 PM on 03/25/2012
Some even just ask for your email password, without trying to access it through any other means.
10:31 AM on 03/24/2012
To all of you who say that you "cannot afford to stand up" for yourselves, understand that you are empowering these people to continue to infringe upon us. You take away all the progress of those like this guy who stood up to these tyrants. Being unemployed is tough. Not being able to feed a family is tough. But what is even tougher is living in a world where we gave away all of our freedom. Go watch Braveheart and grow a pair. Pain is temporary, pride is forever.
lofttypeofaview
I pledge allegiance to the poor!
03:20 PM on 03/25/2012
What if you starve to death in the process because you can't buy food?
07:16 PM on 03/25/2012
It is unfortunate that you miss the point and that you think you will starve to death because you didn’t allow an employer to take advantage of you. Honestly, if you are that afraid of the “what if’s” you many be one of the many who are easily manipulated by authority figures, and are easily enslaved by propaganda and other forms of psychological and sociological manipulation. It’s a slippery slope and too many people give in to this S___T. There will always be those who rule and those who need to be ruled.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:08 AM on 03/23/2012
No one is getting my password to ANYTHING. Period. It's bad enough that there's always the possibility some hacker will access your passwords, so, yeah, let's just hand that information over voluntarily -- why? well, to prove that we're team players, and qualified candidates for employment, and worthy of oxygen, and ... bite me.
02:25 PM on 03/22/2012
If facebook would not come and its not popular as much as now what the would the interviewer would ask..We dont know why to no such a personal information from candidate. To earn selfly from stock market watch below given website and earn money.

http://intradayprofittips.com
photo
peacekitten
primum non nocere.
01:25 PM on 03/22/2012
a perfectly good comment sent to limbo for no reason?

it's really become a joke.
photo
peacekitten
primum non nocere.
01:24 PM on 03/22/2012
kudos to justin for walking out of the job interview.  he was absolutely right to do so.

i would NEVER consent to this kind of privacy invasion.

these people NEED to be prosecuted, and SHAME on the injustice department for refusing to enforce the law.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael747
01:21 PM on 03/22/2012
The disturbing trend over the last 15-20 years has been a developing attitude on the part of corporations, that they are not simply hiring a person for a set of skills for which that person will be paid, they feel that the are buying people, period! and as such they have total control over that person's life. Shameful. Here in Canada, a few years back, before Facebook, some employers were asking for hand writing samples to be taken to "experts" to determine one's character. WWII was fought for nothing- the poison will always find its way back, and humanity will always let it.
photo
peacekitten
primum non nocere.
01:53 PM on 03/22/2012
you are spot on.

it must be stopped.
12:31 PM on 03/22/2012
Interviewers of job applicants may not ask certain questions without suffering sanctions: one may not ask a prospect, for example, about the person's health or about the person's marital status.

Put in your Facebook profile these questions and the answers:
Do you have a disability?
How many children do you have?
What is your religion?
What is your sexual orientation?
Are you married?
How old are you?
What is your ethnic group or race?
Tell the interviewer that the answers to certain questions that federal law prohibits are posted in your personal profile.

You have federal law on your side and maybe an opportunity to sue an overly curious prospective employer.
lofttypeofaview
I pledge allegiance to the poor!
03:23 PM on 03/25/2012
Awesome advice!
photo
puddintane
You are the weakest link!
11:34 PM on 03/21/2012
Everyone: Check these out:

http://www.change.org/petitions/the-president-of-the-united-states-asking-job-seekers-for-their-username-password-of-social-networks

http://www.change.org/petitions/private-profile-means-private-profile

A copy of the second one might be all you need to convince a potential employer this is a bad idea.
photo
puddintane
You are the weakest link!
11:07 PM on 03/21/2012
Sears can Kiss My A$$. I sure won't do business with them or K-Mart. Is there a boycott list for this egregious abuse?

If we do not rid ourselves of the GOPTPotty and the thugs on the Supreme Court, we as citizens are damned to suffer ever more indignities like this. Someone(s) need to outlaw employers abusing employees as is the norm now.

Somebody get a Union Resurrection movement going fast.
mzbecc
Loading..
08:10 PM on 03/21/2012
Facebook hasn't been cool since they started accepting emails that didn't end in .edu.
07:28 PM on 03/21/2012
"Yes sir. My Facebook username is DogRapist and my password is CrackSmoker69. Do I get the job or what?"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TimeMaster
I see A, You see B, C is Correct
07:16 PM on 03/21/2012
Someone had the bright idea (probably in HR) to ask for FB login or access to weed out candidates for jobs. Along with drug testing which is fine, but now the trend will be to dig deeper and maybe add other things along the way to differentiate people for pay raises or promotions. Why not just go through your postal mail, credit card and bank account statements while they have you captive?

So individuals will either lose more of their dignity for the sake of a job and career, or refuse and limit their prospects. It is best to just delete your FB, myspace, or social-whatever and just go back to the old fashioned letters and phone calls to interact with your friends and relatives. I can only interact this way now with a couple of friends - police officer and another in the military.

"You either stand for something or fall for everything." If everyone would refuse to accept this invasive procedure, the companies would not have any power and eventually this would go away.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
William1950
everything I say could be wrong.
09:51 PM on 03/21/2012
drug testing is NOT fine... it is having to prove oneself innocent... why not a blood test, or a complete gene workup?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TimeMaster
I see A, You see B, C is Correct
10:12 PM on 03/21/2012
Drug testing is already a given for most major corporations...do I like it? NO. Most people pass, those that don't, well - what did they expect since they knew what they were doing before they took the test. The only issue I would have is in jobs where safety is important where someone could make a mistake affecting someone's life - doctor, nurse, fireman, police officer, etc.

If given a choice to repeal that one, I would vote for it, but we don't get a choice in voting for the things that affect us anymore.
TSgtKF
watching liberals chase their tails
10:40 PM on 03/21/2012
You would be fine with a doctor on valium doing a surgical procedure? Sorry, drug testing is appropriate and not as personal and evasive as a social site.
lofttypeofaview
I pledge allegiance to the poor!
03:15 PM on 03/25/2012
It is best to just delete your FB, myspace, or social-whatever and just go back to the old fashioned letters and phone calls to interact with your friends and relatives.

Then they'll ask you if they can tap your phone!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TimeMaster
I see A, You see B, C is Correct
04:09 PM on 03/25/2012
I thought the phones were already tapped? Can't be sure what access has been given before and after the Patriot Act.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:56 PM on 03/21/2012
Remember, indentured servants and (wage) SLAVES have no privacy and no rights.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:53 PM on 03/21/2012
If you wouldn't trust your casual and even "good" FB friends with your username/password, WHY would you trust a potential employer, i.e. TOTAL STRANGER, with that same username/password?

Are employers totally 100% trustworthy just because they own a business?

Ask Wall Street how trustworthy they are.