iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Tennessee Science Bill Allowing Discussion Of Creationism In Schools Passes State Senate

Posted: 03/20/2012 5:22 pm Updated: 03/20/2012 5:22 pm

The Tennessee state Senate passed a bill Monday that protects teachers who allow student to question and criticize "controversial" scientific theories like evolution.

The Senate voted 24-8 for SB 893, which would allow teachers to help students "understand, analyze, critique and review in an objective manner the scientific strengths and scientific weaknesses of existing scientific theories" like "biological evolution, the chemical origins of life, global warming and human cloning."

"The idea behind this bill is that students should be encouraged to challenge current scientific thought and theory," Republican state Sen. Bo Watson told The Tennesseean. Watson is the bill's sponsor.

The proposal also instructs teachers on how to comfortably and appropriately "address students' concerns about certain scientific theories" within a curriculum established by the Board of Education. The bill would not affect the state's science curriculum.

Democratic opponents of the bill, however, question whether the motives behind the measure are more political than educational. Democratic Sen. Andy Berke said the bill would cast Tennessee in a negative light, referencing the state's historical battleground for evolution in education.

"We're simply dredging up the problems of our past with this bill that will affect our future," Berke told The Tennessean. "I'm a person of faith. If my children ask, 'How does that mesh with my faith?' I don't want their teacher answering that question."

The measure has also drawn staunch opposition from several groups, including the National Center for Science Education and the American Civil Liberties Union. In a statement to legislators, eight Tennesseans who are members of the National Academy of Science said the bill will likely lead to "scientifically unwarranted criticisms of evolution," the Knoxville News-Sentinel reports.

"By undermining the teaching of evolution in Tennessee's public schools, HB368 and SB893 would miseducate students, harm the state's national reputation, and weaken its efforts to compete in a science-driven global economy," the statement reads.

A version of the legislation passed the state House last April, and now the revised Senate version returns to the House for a vote. Gov. Bill Haslam said Monday he would discuss the bill with the state Board of Education.

"It is a fair question what the general assembly's role is," he said. "That's why we have a state board of education."

The move among Tennessee lawmakers is one of several across the country that seeks more wiggle room for discussion or of intelligent design in public schools. Indiana legislators in January moved forward on a bill that would allow school districts to decide whether to include creationism alongside teachings of evolution in science curriculum.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/26/indiana-senate-creationism-teaching-bill_n_1234185.html?ir=Education

Oklahoma, New Hampshire and Missouri have also considered similar bills designed to encourage critical examination of evolution theory.

Research from two Pennsylvania State University professors revealed last year that the majority of public school biology teachers in the U.S. shy away from teaching evolution because they're either unwilling or unprepared to teach it: some advocate creationism while others are afraid to address the topic for fear of controversy.

According to results of the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress, a federal test known as the Nation's Report Card, less than half of U.S. fourth-, eighth- and 12-th grade students were considered proficient in science.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW EDUCATION

The Tennessee state Senate passed a bill Monday that protects teachers who allow student to question and criticize "controversial" scientific theories like evolution. The Senate voted 24-8 for SB 8...
The Tennessee state Senate passed a bill Monday that protects teachers who allow student to question and criticize "controversial" scientific theories like evolution. The Senate voted 24-8 for SB 8...
Filed by Emmeline Zhao  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,862
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (75 total)
02:47 AM on 04/12/2012
Well all you creationist fools better heed my warning, if you live in a state that seriously teaches creationism your kids will be shunned by higher universities. They will be forced into state colleges and usually just the ones without major academic credentials. They will be marginalized to attending Bible Belt Sunday University or some other Private ripoff college with no recognized regional accreditation. So as long as they never want to leave the state and work at a chicken slaughtering plant or maybe work in a factory making dog food, creationism is A-ok. I live in TN and if I had kids I would either leave the state or homeschool them before I let them be taught that trash. Let your kids be ignorant if you want.

Its a shame non religious people who work all day have to RISK their children being indoctrinated without their approval.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:34 AM on 03/27/2012
and the rest of the world will continue to laugh at the lack of education in the United States of America. Very sad.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Thinking Conservative
To err is human to forgive is not my policy
08:31 AM on 03/27/2012
The move by tennessee is a necessary step toward producing more mcdonald drones. A country with a rapidly decreasing industrial, scientific, and research capacity has no need for properly educated people. When the powers that be need something new and innovative, they go to the outsourced entities in other countries. That way they get what they want done without having to put up with the presence of foreigners in this country and the overhead is minimal. The 1% do what is in their best interest.
05:27 PM on 03/26/2012
The wordplay (or plain ignorance?) over what the word 'theory' entails in a scientific context is as appalling as it is irritating. Orwell had seen it coming. *Sigh*
05:17 PM on 03/26/2012
Everything will come crashing down when a student raises their hand and asks

"Why do we constantly need to be vaccinated for the same thing (flu) every year?"

Teacher: *stunned silence*
05:15 PM on 03/26/2012
Perfectly OK to challenge science... with science, NOT with religious mumbo jumbo that can't be challenged itself. Oh, I'm sure I'm not getting it right...
01:05 AM on 03/26/2012
I am a liberal creationist who loves Science. What I don't get is why creationists or evolutionists give a %$#@ what other people believe. Everyone KNOWS they are right. If you know you are right (no matter what you believe) why can't you just be at peace and respect other people's rights instead of getting all defensive about it? Don't get your panties in a wad folks. You are not going to change anyone's mind about anything. Believe what you believe and be at peace with yourself.
03:36 PM on 03/26/2012
People don't care as long as people keep their personal faith beliefs to themselves where they belong. Start pushing personal faith belief at people, they'll push back. Proving once again the natural third law motion is indeed still a natural law without fail.

Some people are highly concerned that the more ignorant people become the more they demand to drag everyone else, choosing seeking knowledge instead, into their willful ignorance. The proof is now readily available in 21st century political arena. Politics plus religion never fails to equal totalitarian theocracy.
photo
Dimensio
I just don't know what went wrong!
10:35 AM on 03/27/2012
Encouraging the teaching of non-scientific claims as though they are science, and encouraging the challenging of scientific claims on a non-scientific basis devalues scientific education and weakens the overall intellect of the population of the United States of America.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rewith85man
Expressing Who I Am
04:26 PM on 03/25/2012
It is sad that people would come up with lousy and false theories instead of reading the Bible.
photo
Lorindol
I shall consider it . . .
04:32 PM on 03/25/2012
I know, right? Just read the bible, and you will realize how ridiculous creationism is.
09:09 PM on 03/26/2012
I read it cover-to-cover of my own volition. I found it completely lacking any facts. Now what?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MerryW
01:45 PM on 03/25/2012
Students have always been encouraged to discuss scientific theory. The whole Science Fair Projects fun is built on that. The Department of Education should take care of education.
We have become a land of personal preference laws. If the law makers had half a brain on intelligent they would be able to see that science proves the big bang which proves initial creation. Ok, then an intelligent God sets up a really interesting world where the strong and intelligent survive in the long term any given place.
We are being legislated to by people who do not understand the simple beauty of science. Natural selection of the dumbest is really a bad future of all. These law makers are people who do not want to evolve(excuse the pun) and who wish to run their state as the lowest common denominator of a cooperative growth community . . . the Feudal Society. I big strong male, I know what is good for me, you dumb and down trodden ... bring me wealth and power !!! oh yes and breed more uneducated followers I need mighty kingdom.
photo
lcr999
scientist
05:31 PM on 03/25/2012
Exactly. Theories should be questioned. That is what science is all about and is what scientists do. Take a theory that works, apply it to something new, something that hasn't been looked at before, see it is works.

But to do that you need a certain level of scientific background. You can't intelligently question something without knowing the current body of knowledge. And HS is not the place to try to refute a 100 year old theory that has been supported by 100s of thousands of experiments and observations.

So the bill is right in concept but certainly wrong in spirit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MerryW
06:05 PM on 03/25/2012
Icr999, that is sadly true.
10:30 AM on 03/25/2012
Teaching evolution means to teach natural selection. The strong traits will survive. This is necessary to teach to understand the specifics of disease and mutation.
09:12 PM on 03/26/2012
Thank you for properly applying and using the word mutation as hinderance to survival.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eddy joe
welcome to the machine
08:43 AM on 03/25/2012
Evolution has nothing to do with creation. Deal with it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rewith85man
Expressing Who I Am
04:29 PM on 03/25/2012
The #truth speaks for itself. If you ignore it, you will face it eventually.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eddy joe
welcome to the machine
08:24 AM on 03/25/2012
Since evolutionists themselves call it a theory, it is the logical thing to do. Who wants children that don't ask questions?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Laura Shelton
08:46 AM on 03/25/2012
The common definition of "theory" and the definition of scientific "theory" are very different. An example of the common definition would be, "I have a theory about who might have stolen my purse." A Scientific Theory is a set of principles that explain and predict phenomena. A scientific theory must be:

1. Natural: must have a material explanation based on the laws governing nature.

2. Observable: Science assumes the world is knowable through observations made with the senses or with extensions of the senses (i.e. microscopes, telescopes, etc.).

3. Consistent: A scientific explanation works to explain something in a consistent manner. The successful results of a single test are not meaningful in science.

4. Testable: When formulating an explanation for a phenomenon, science requires that one be able to test the explanation for it to have any validity. It also must be falsifiable; or testable in such a way that the outcome can disprove the hypothesis.

5. Predictable: Explanations that enable you to make predictions about your world that are consistently accurate are considered scientific.

6. Tentative: If a belief, even one that has a longstanding history, is not supported by new evidence, science says it must be altered or discarded. This means science holds its beliefs tentatively. If a belief cannot be altered, even in the face of evidence which refutes it, it is not considered scientific.

So, when someone says "Evolution is a Theory" this is what they mean. Evolution is a scientific theory.
09:57 AM on 03/25/2012
Great explanation. Thanks!
03:39 PM on 03/26/2012
You do realize that a legitimate theory requires actual physical proof making it a legitimate theory, don't you?
06:11 AM on 03/25/2012
Creationism / Intelligent Design is just tap dancing around using the word "God". Some supernatural or master planner designed everything.
Funny ancient alien theorists believe the almost the same thing.

Evolution is not a religion. God is not a science.

If this was a church, or private school there is not a problem. But public schools do not teach religion. Public schools are run by the government and paid for by the tax payers money. In public schools its alright to discuss Creationism, but not allowed "illegal" to teach it as a science. I am sure most are aware of the First Amendment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SalesmanForLife
Feed your intellectual appetite!
05:23 AM on 03/25/2012
I would yank my kids outta Tenn schools so fast. Seperate Church ideology from public schools. This is a disaster people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eddy joe
welcome to the machine
08:25 AM on 03/25/2012
Children shouldn't ask questions? How sad.
10:14 AM on 03/25/2012
Of course children should ask questions. But public schools should not be providing answers that are based on religious beliefs. Creationism and intelligent design are not science and should not be presented as such. If parents want their children taught from a religious perspective, they should send their children to a religious school, home school them, or simply leave it for their religious education classes.
photo
Lorindol
I shall consider it . . .
04:45 PM on 03/25/2012
I've never been ridiculed or shunned for asking science-related questions in a science class. When, in church, I once questioned Paul's rule that women should not speak in church, however, the result was very different.
photo
janmB
loves life
03:40 AM on 03/25/2012
If people were secure enough in their religious beliefs....they wouldn't feel threatened by studies based on evolution.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SalesmanForLife
Feed your intellectual appetite!
05:24 AM on 03/25/2012
A study? Oh dear, it is a fact and you know it.
photo
janmB
loves life
05:39 AM on 03/25/2012
Still studying the facts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eddy joe
welcome to the machine
08:27 AM on 03/25/2012
See what I mean? You are afraid to ask questions. You have psychosclerosis.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eddy joe
welcome to the machine
08:26 AM on 03/25/2012
If evolutionists are so insecure, that they can't answer questions, why believe them?
photo
janmB
loves life
10:10 AM on 03/25/2012
Questions ..I believe it because..there is a remarkable genetic similarity between humans and apes, somewhere in the neighborhood of 98 to 99 percent which is a much too "curious situation" plus structural similarity of their skeletons. It's either that or it's Adam/Eve's offspring committing incest.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fromageball
02:29 PM on 03/25/2012
Which questions are they not answering to your satisfaction?