iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Titanic Photos: New Images Released By "National Geographic" Magazine

Posted: 03/20/2012 6:47 pm Updated: 03/21/2012 4:36 pm

As the 100th anniversary of the sinking of the RMS Titanic approaches, National Geographic has released incredible views of the "unsinkable" ship sitting on the seabed.

On April 10, 1912, the Titanic launched her maiden voyage to New York from Southampton, England. On April 14, the ship collided with an iceberg and sank in the early hours of the following morning. According to the Smithsonian Institution, the Titanic's final resting place is 12,500 feet deep.

See the stunning, never-before-seen images from the April 2012 edition of National Geographic magazine in the slideshow below. From Hampton Sides' report:

The wreck sleeps in darkness, a puzzlement of corroded steel strewn across a thousand acres of the North Atlantic seabed. Fungi feed on it. Weird colorless life-forms, unfazed by the crushing pressure, prowl its jagged ramparts. From time to time, beginning with the discovery of the wreck in 1985 by Explorer-in-Residence Robert Ballard and Jean-Louis Michel, a robot or a manned submersible has swept over Titanic’s gloomy facets, pinged a sonar beam in its direction, taken some images—and left.

In recent years explorers like James Cameron and Paul-Henry Nargeolet have brought back increasingly vivid pictures of the wreck. Yet we’ve mainly glimpsed the site as though through a keyhole, our view limited by the dreck suspended in the water and the ambit of a submersible’s lights. Never have we been able to grasp the relationships between all the disparate pieces of wreckage. Never have we taken the full measure of what’s down there.

Until now. In a tricked-out trailer on a back lot of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI), William Lange stands over a blown-up sonar survey map of the Titanic site—a meticulously stitched-together mosaic that has taken months to construct. At first look the ghostly image resembles the surface of the moon, with innumerable striations in the seabed, as well as craters caused by boulders dropped over millennia from melting icebergs.

On closer inspection, though, the site appears to be littered with man-made detritus—a Jackson Pollock-like scattering of lines and spheres, scraps and shards. Lange turns to his computer and points to a portion of the map that has been brought to life by layering optical data onto the sonar image. He zooms in, and in, and in again. Now we can see the Titanic’s bow in gritty clarity, a gaping black hole where its forward funnel once sprouted, an ejected hatch cover resting in the mud a few hundred feet to the north. The image is rich in detail: In one frame we can even make out a white crab clawing at a railing.

Here, in the sweep of a computer mouse, is the entire wreck of the Titanic—every bollard, every davit, every boiler. What was once a largely indecipherable mess has become a high-resolution crash scene photograph, with clear patterns emerging from the murk. “Now we know where everything is,” Lange says. “After a hundred years, the lights are finally on.”

Below, see the images visible for the first time through sonar imaging. Click here to read the full report on National Geographic.

Loading Slideshow...
  • COPYRIGHT© 2012 RMS TITANIC, INC; Produced by AIVL, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute. Modeling by Stefan Fichtel.<br> Ethereal views of Titanic's bow (modeled) offer a comprehensiveness of detail never seen before.

  • As the starboard profile shows, the Titanic buckled as it plowed nose-first into the seabed, leaving the forward hull buried deep in mud--obscuring, possibly forever, the mortal wounds inflicted by the iceberg. <br> Photo appeared in the April issue of National Geographic magazine. COPYRIGHT© 2012 RMS TITANIC, INC; Produced by AIVL, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute.

  • Titanic's battered stern, captured here in profile, bears witness to the extreme trauma inflicted upon it as it corkscrewed to the bottom. <br> Photo appeared in the April issue of National Geographic magazine. COPYRIGHT© 2012 RMS TITANIC, INC; Produced by AIVL, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute.

  • Two of Titanic's engines lie exposed in a gaping cross section of the stern. Draped in "rusticles"--orange stalactites created by iron-eating bacteria--these massive structures, four stories tall, once powered the largest moving man-made object on Earth. <br> Photo appeared in the April issue of National Geographic magazine. COPYRIGHT© 2012 RMS TITANIC, INC; Produced by AIVL, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute.

  • As the starboard profile shows, the Titanic buckled as it plowed nose-first into the seabed, leaving the forward hull buried deep in mud--obscuring, possibly forever, the mortal wounds inflicted by the iceberg. <br> Photo appeared in the April issue of National Geographic magazine. COPYRIGHT© 2012 RMS TITANIC, INC; Produced by AIVL, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute.

FOLLOW WORLD

Filed by Clare Richardson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 333
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
02:40 AM on 04/06/2012
Being one small voice I hope to be heard by many ... I pray let the ship Titanic and those who died be left in peace ... Lord hear my prayer
09:22 AM on 03/26/2012
Wow, that would be a crazy scuba trip to see that. I would like to go treasure hunting in all the rooms. You could probably find some great jewelry and coins and fancy cups and stuff.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patient Zero
That is not a picture of me.
11:08 AM on 03/24/2012
How much of this stuff can you take already? Let the dead rest.
07:00 PM on 03/23/2012
It has been said that if she had hit the iceberg head-on, the first 2 compartments would have been flooded, the watertight doors would have closed and they could have reversed the ship off the iceberg, and called for help. It would have stayed afloat much longer, if not indefinitely.

The problem was that as the ship hit the iceberg on the side, much like a car sideswiping a bus, the rivets tore loose and a whole bunch of compartments flooded, sealing its fate.
01:38 PM on 03/26/2012
There's a book on Amazon, "The Growler Conspiracy," that makes a good case for the fact that Titanic was sunk by terrorist bombs, not by the iceberg.
viciousvirago
Veritatum Dilexi
05:22 PM on 03/23/2012
I don't understand why people are so fascinated by the horrific deaths of all those people l00 years ago. Death is death. It is not glorious, not heroic. Let the bones (if there are any left, which I highly doubt) be. Let their spirits rest.
TOOO
Warning: Rabid Monty Python fan!
03:58 PM on 03/23/2012
Are we sure it's the Titanic... and not the Olympia?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patient Zero
That is not a picture of me.
11:09 AM on 03/24/2012
The Olympic was broken apart for scrap, like the Titanic eventually would have been.
03:52 PM on 03/23/2012
I think it's interesting. After reading some of these comments (admittedly not all of them), I've noticed that the comment "unsinkable" is used in describing the great lady. Yet, no one seems to have pointed out one minor detail. That is that the White Star line described her as "practically unsinkable". The media branded her "unsinkable" and unfortunately the people believed the media. Granted, the people also had way to much faith in the technology of the day...enough so that they forgot one detail. Troy was though to be impregnable. The Roman Empire was thought to be unbeatable.

Nothing lasts forever and anything can be destroyed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Brandon Mc
Both parties are screwing you
01:52 PM on 03/23/2012
How ironic that the only thing unsinkable about this ship are the tired stories about it sinking.
01:19 PM on 03/23/2012
When is the titanic supposed to completely evaporate? I remember reading something a few years ago that said it was going to disappear within 50 or 100 years.
02:47 PM on 03/23/2012
I've heard that, too. Not only that but all the expeditions to it are causing it to decay faster than it had been in the years before it was discovered.
10:44 AM on 03/23/2012
I'll admit that I've been fascinated with the story of the Titanic since I first read about it as a child in the 1960s. There's been worse shipwrecks with greater loss of life throughout history. So why does this liner garner so much attention even after 100 years? There are several reasons. The media hype prior to the maiden voyage and after the sinking, the passenger list of "who's who" on board, the cascade of failures that lead to the disaster, and the human drama that unfolded on board that night.

Titanic was forgotten in the years that followed until Walter Lord tracked down 63 Titanic survivors and wrote a minute by minute account of the disaster. His book "A Night to Remember" was published in 1955 and became a number one seller. In 1958, a movie by the same name opened in theaters. Suddenly, the Titanic was an icon and a legend that would be retold over and over again.
09:43 AM on 03/23/2012
Amazing pics
12:49 AM on 03/23/2012
Why be interested in the Titanic? For me it's a lesson in hubris. A ship that could not be sunk. Remember bigger disasters, like the Great Depression, or the current Great Recession. Or the war in Iraq. The shipping company was betting on setting new speed records, and heck with the ice. In Iraq, we would be welcomed as liberators, and be out of there in 6 months. Or that banks and Wall Street types packaged garbage loans and passed them off as prime investments. There are consequences for not paying attention to what's actually going on around you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
04:44 AM on 03/23/2012
I think the Titanic is a good (negative) lesson in how to spend the next 4 hours after you finally realize you have a problem: Reworking things to buy yourself some breathing room, using all means at your disposal, or standing around drinking coffee/tea/whatever, assuming that everything's going to be OK because that's what the engineer told you. Overconfidence in the equipment. I think they could have saved the Titanic, it would have entailed doing some unorthodox stuff, like basically tearing the rest of the ship apart to cork up the holes, but you figure the bedsheets and cabin doors and other theoretically portable stuff including the deck planking itself and whatever else wasn't bolted/nailed down past the crew's capacity to work it loose in the 4-hour interval, could have gone over the side in semi-controlled fashion on ropes from the lifeboat davits, and slowed down the incoming water pretty substantially. You figure that the 'hits' were something like 5-10 ft. below the waterline initially, and while yes there'd be some pressure there, it could have been blocked with wooden boards for the most part. Crude, yet effective, stay afloat, extend the gangplank and board the Carpathia and drink coffee and stay dry, that kind of thing...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
04:47 AM on 03/23/2012
People are always talking about 'rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic', what if they'd just thrown them overboard right then and there in the vicinity of the incoming water? That probably would have slowed the flow down at least an hour's worth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TAIsabel
Suffer no fools.
08:47 PM on 03/22/2012
The obsession with this ship has become as annoying as the movie.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rav1267
Hare Krishna
10:34 PM on 03/22/2012
Look at the facts
1. One of the largest ship build in that era.
2. Very luxurious for it 's time
3. One of the biggest lose of life in a single maritime incident
4. It was made into severals TV movies
5. It's about ot celebrate it 100th anniversity.
Do I need to say more
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TAIsabel
Suffer no fools.
10:41 PM on 03/22/2012
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
04:55 PM on 03/22/2012
My husband's Great-Grandmother was supposed to be on the Titanic. She was a nurse/maid for a rich couple...the wife took ill at the last minute and couldn't travel.
If she had been on it, no telling if she would have survived... perhaps I wouldn't have my hubs or children.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patient Zero
That is not a picture of me.
11:13 AM on 03/24/2012
You would have had someone else and never have known the difference. How many people died in WWI? How many died in other maritime disasters?

It's a tregedy, but.....there are many others and worse.
04:19 PM on 03/24/2012
I DO know the difference, that's why I made the comment... because I am grateful for my family. A tragedy (whether big or small) is as important as the relevance to the people it effects. Do you think if a loved one of yours were to die, it would mean LESS to you because they didn't die in a so called tragedy? Naturally, when we hear of countless people perishing during the same event, we look at it as horrific. I had to watch my dear father suffer and die from Hodgkin's disease....does his death mean less because he didn't die in a war? I don't think so. He was a VET, a father, husband and grandfather who was loved dearly by a lot of people. The comment was to reflect on how sometimes we have no control over what happens in our lives and it's sometimes the small things that can change the course of our destiny. At the end of the day, no one likes death OR a tragedy, regardless of the form it comes. You sound like a VET. If you are, I appreciate your service.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
cobraxus
Defend The Innocent_Protect The Weak
01:58 PM on 03/22/2012
in response to the question "What Really Happened?" I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say it sank after hitting an iceberg.controversial,I know,but I stand behind it!