iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Scott Brown Cites Mother In Support For Renewal Of Violence Against Women Act

Scott Brown Violence Against Women Act

By STEVE LeBLANC   03/22/12 05:03 PM ET  AP

BOSTON -- U.S. Sen. Scott Brown is pointing to his mother's history of abusive relationships with men as he pushes for renewal of a domestic violence law that has met with opposition from some fellow Republicans over proposed expansions of its protections.

In recent days, Brown has released a radio ad and taken to the floor of the Senate to call for the renewal of the Violence Against Women Act. On Friday, the Massachusetts Republican and his sister plan to hold a news conference in Framingham, Mass., after touring a shelter.

Brown said he takes his support for the bill personally, describing himself as a victim of domestic violence.

"As a child I watched as my mother was beaten by abusive stepfathers. And I did what I could to protect my mom and sister, but as a young boy there was only so much I could do," Brown said Wednesday in comments delivered before the Senate.

"I remember vividly being a 6-year-old boy going to protect my mom and getting beaten on until the police came and it's something that still lives with me," he added.

Democrats say Brown's public support for the domestic violence law is in part an effort to distract women voters from his earlier support of an amendment that could have allowed employers to limit birth control coverage.

While the law has been widely supported by lawmakers of both parties since it was first signed in 1994, some Republicans in the Democrat-controlled Senate have objected to the expanded version of the law.

That version includes new provisions that would include protections for gay and transgender victims, allow illegal immigrants who have been victims of abuse to claim temporary visas and give tribes authority to prosecute non-Indians who commit violence against American Indian women.

Some Republicans say Democrats are trying to make it harder for them to back the expanded version of the law to add fuel to the argument that the GOP is engaged in a "war on women."

Democrats have already pointed to attempts by GOP lawmakers to reverse President Barack Obama's directive that health insurers pay for the cost of birth control pills or devices even if they object on moral or religious grounds.

Brown, who also supported a Senate amendment that would have given employers wide latitude to deny contraceptive coverage, said renewing the Violence Against Women Act has traditionally been "a glimmer of hope for an otherwise contentious and overly partisan atmosphere."

"I have been deeply troubled this year that this year's reauthorization has become once again partisan," Brown said. "There's no reason for it. There's excuse for it."

Brown's critics have suggested his public support for the extension of the domestic violence law is in part an effort to gain back any ground he may have lost with women voters for his backing of the so-called Blunt amendment, sponsored by Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo.

The amendment, which was defeated, would have let employers or health insurers deny coverage for services they say violate their moral or religious beliefs, including birth control.

Massachusetts Democratic Party activists on Thursday accused Brown of "trying to erase his support of the Blunt-Brown Amendment by highlighting his support for other legislation."

Brown defended the Blunt amendment, which he co-sponsored, saying it was intended to prevent the federal government from compelling individuals, including Catholics, from going against their religious beliefs.

Brown's chief Democratic opponent – consumer advocate and Harvard professor Elizabeth Warren – opposed the amendment, saying it would have allowed employers or insurers to claim a vague moral conviction to deny contraception or any other health care coverage.

Women voters, particularly those not enrolled in either political party, are critical to the success of any statewide candidate in Massachusetts. Both Brown and Warren have been playing up issues that might help sway women voters.

Warren has positioned herself as a defender of women's health care, while Brown has urged top defense officials to let women serve in front line combat.

"As a U.S. Senator, Elizabeth will be a leader working not only to renew the Violence Against Women Act with its strong protections ... but also to ensure women have access to the health care they need," Warren campaign press secretary Alethea Harney said Thursday.

The debate over the domestic violence law not only gives Brown a chance to make a more personal connection with women voters, but it also lets him again cast himself as a bipartisan bridge-builder.

Brown has embraced the role, highlighting areas where he agrees with Obama and issues where he's split with fellow Republicans. That independent streak is seen as critical for Brown's re-election in a state where Democrats dominate the congressional delegation.

Brown won the praise of Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, who thanked him for voicing his support of the domestic violence bill.

"I believe this bill will be before us shortly and Sen. Brown, we will count on your vote," she said Wednesday.

Brown is facing a tough re-election campaign to keep the Senate seat formerly held by the late Sen. Edward Kennedy until his death in 2009 from brain cancer. Brown won a special election to fill the seat in 2010.

Recent polls show a tight contest between Brown and Warren, both of whom have been stockpiled millions of dollars for what could turn out to be the costliest Senate race in Massachusetts history.

Earlier on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
BOSTON -- U.S. Sen. Scott Brown is pointing to his mother's history of abusive relationships with men as he pushes for renewal of a domestic violence law that has met with opposition from some fellow ...
BOSTON -- U.S. Sen. Scott Brown is pointing to his mother's history of abusive relationships with men as he pushes for renewal of a domestic violence law that has met with opposition from some fellow ...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 59
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
03:17 AM on 03/26/2012
send this clown home.... hard right gop until election time... then he acts independent... what a pile of manure .... mitt and the playboy need to lose right now....
11:11 AM on 03/25/2012
Scott Brown is burning a candle at both ends.He is playing gender politics addressing womens issues at one end but visits with fathers rights froups on the other end. Scott Brown has talked about responsible scientific studies wich has shown WOMEN assault and abuse husbands and children at a higher rate.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
The National Inquire of Politics the GOP!
11:23 AM on 03/23/2012
Pandering for MA votes is not Senator Browns best traits he is like plastic Americans see right through him!
Clevelandinwi
Progressive is good; regressive, not so much.
10:41 AM on 03/23/2012
When do we start believing a 'liar'? Is braun capable of truth? Just asking.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
linnwood
10:30 AM on 03/23/2012
He watched his Mother being beaten,he has a sister,a wife,and two daughters...and still...he voted for the Blunt\Rubio bill......Talk to the hand Mr Brown.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GeoffreyF
Pragmatic Liberal in Massachusetts
10:27 AM on 03/23/2012
Interesting statement for one of the least pro-active, most do nothing Senators in Massachusetts history.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Oonagh
Old sins have long shadows
10:17 AM on 03/23/2012
Some people will reach low for votes but to use an issue like this is going beyond the realm
RonP58
A voice of reason, in a world of ignorance
09:57 AM on 03/23/2012
...........the "pandering" by Scott Brown is getting ludicrous.......WHY didn't you fight for these issues when it WASN'T popular, there Handsome?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janet Anderson
independent andy
09:54 AM on 03/23/2012
sounds like he is trying to prey on the goodness of mothers in his state. in effect saying"Please re elect me. Mothers are all forgiving"...too late Scott
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tangelan
You will not cast aspersions on my asparagus.
09:54 AM on 03/23/2012
I don't believe a word he says.
photo
MANOFCOMMONSENSE
The #1 Republican Team? Bush/Shady.WMD?$$
09:52 AM on 03/23/2012
Warren was behind in the polls last month? Last week or so. She came out ahead on one poll... And now Brown throws a long pass headed into the end zone? Hail Mary pass.. Will one of the Brown voters catch it?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:56 AM on 04/29/2012
Not this one!
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
nana4g
09:51 AM on 03/23/2012
There should be no debate or controversy over this renewal of the bill. It has become political, once again, over ideology, and the narrow, rigid scope of Conservative ideology. They cannot grasp that women brought in as sex slaves or domestic partners, children, and any person, including a man, in any relationship can potentially be a victim of domestic violence. There doesn't even need to be a pattern of repeated assualts; one time can do it, can maim and kill. Does the bill cost money? I don't think so. It is protection; it is an avenue to prosecute people who are trapped in relationships that are physically abusive, an area that Conservatives should consider "government intrusion" with this bill, rather than intrusion into the uteri of women. It is difficult to understand how they think; how they can push some bills such as "Stand Down", and those that practice medicine without a medical license to practice.
11:15 AM on 03/25/2012
Definitions Of Spousal Violence MINOR VIOLENT ACTS: SEVERE VIOLENT ACTS: 1. Threw something 1. Kicked/bit/hit with fist 2. Pushed/Grabbed/Shoved 2. Hit, tried to hit with something 3. Slapped or spanked 3. Beat up 4. Threatened with gun or knife 5. Used gun or knife

Spousal Assaults Expressed As Rate Per 1000 Couples Minor Assaults: Year Assault by Assault by husband wife 1975 98 98 1985 82 75 1992 92 94

Severe Assaults: 1975 38 47 1985 30 43 1992 19 44

Wives Report They Have been severely assaulted by husband 22 per 1000 severely assaulted husband 59 per 1000

Husbands Report They Have been severely assaulted by wives 32 per 1000 severely assaulted wives 18 per 1000

Husbands & Wives Both Report wife has been assaulted 20 per 1000 husband has been assaulted 44 per 1000

Violence against children by women is another issue where the public attitude is very different than the facts revealed by formal studies.
11:18 AM on 03/25/2012
With support from the National Institute of Mental Health, Murray Straus Ph.D., and Richard Gelles Ph.D. conducted a nationally representative survey from the Family Research Laboratory at the University of New Hampshire, of married and cohabiting couples regarding domestic violence. The results were first published in 1977 as was a book with co-author Suzanne Stienmetz Ph.D., in 1980. Straus & Gelles followed up the initial survey of more than two thousand couples, with a larger six-thousand-couple group in 1985. In minor violence (slap, spank, throw something, push, grab or shove) the incident rates were equal for men and women. In severe violence (kick, bite, hit with a fist, hit or try to hit with something, beat up the other, threaten with a knife or gun, use a knife or gun) more men were victimized than women.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nana-anne
just trying to make sense of the senseless
09:50 AM on 03/23/2012
OMG. Is he really going to use this terrible thing to garner sympathy as he used his childhood sexual abuse the last time? He has my sympathy but NOT my vote.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kneeanderthal
09:49 AM on 03/23/2012
Faltering in the polls and playing the sympathy card. Disgusting. Reminds me of the child of George and Barbara Bush who tragically passed away from leukemia. Every election time George H.W. figuratively exhumed her, for the sympathy votes. Well, Scott Brown and George H.W. certainly have my sympathy but no one should vote for them for that reason.
photo
MANOFCOMMONSENSE
The #1 Republican Team? Bush/Shady.WMD?$$
09:45 AM on 03/23/2012
He's having his Rubio moment..................................................................................................................................................Several times during his race for U.S. Senate, Rubio told reporters and voters his parents left Cuba in 1959, suggesting they had fled Castro's rule. In his campaign bio, and later in his official Senate biography, he said his parents "came to America following Fidel Castro's takeover."

Even after he stumbled over dates with a Miami Herald reporter and acknowledged his parents left before the revolution, his official Web bio stayed the same. After two news organizations reported his parents moved to the United States in 1956, his spokesman acknowledged that the bio was wrong. It was updated to say, "Marco was born in Miami in 1971 to Cuban exiles who first arrived in the United States in 1956." That puts everyone in agreement: The original statement is( False.)


http://www.politifact.com/search/?q=rubio