iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Health Care Reform Mandate, How Does It Work?

Posted: 03/23/2012 3:03 pm Updated: 03/23/2012 3:35 pm

Health Care Reform Mandate
Sen. Mitch McConnell is an opponent of the Affordable Care Act, which would require uninsured individuals to pay a $95 tax penalty.

Health care reform's so-called individual mandate is either a crucial element in the plan to give nearly all Americans better access to medical care or the greatest threat to liberty since Abraham Lincoln suspended the writ of habeas corpus. Either way, it's the law of the land and barring a repeal by the Supreme Court or a Republican president, we're all going to have to deal with it come 2014.

When the biggest parts of the health care reform are in place in less than two years, almost every legal U.S. resident will have to prove they have some form of health insurance or they'll be subject to a tax penalty. The basic idea behind the mandate is that people shouldn't wait until they're sick to buy health insurance or expect the rest of us to foot the bill when they get treatments for which they can't pay.

The Supreme Court will hear arguments next week about whether the mandate and other elements of the law violate the Constitution.

Why the mandate? President Barack Obama and the Democrats who passed the bill two years ago wanted to force health insurance companies to offer coverage to anyone who applied and to limit their ability to charge older and sicker people more. Problem is, with those rules in place, young, healthy people would have no reason to buy health insurance until they got older and sicker.

If people don't buy into the system while they're healthy and only buy insurance when they're sick, it would increase premiums for everyone. These higher premiums would cause more healthy people with low medical bills to drop their insurance. This, in turn, would make premiums more expensive for those who kept their coverage because more of them would have high health care costs. In the insurance industry, they call it the "death spiral."

What gets lost in the political and legal debate over the mandate is that if the law works the way it's supposed to, the majority of Americans won't have to change much about what they do.

Most Americans already have some form of health benefits, whether it's private insurance or a government program like Medicare or Medicaid. The most common source of coverage is job-based insurance, which 154 million people have. That's nearly half of the total population of the United States. Another 25 million are covered under other kinds of insurance and 55 million have nothing.

Under health care reform, the government will cover 17 million more people on Medicaid. Practically everyone else will shop for health insurance on the law's state-based "exchanges" that are projected to cover 22 million between 2014 and 2022. Tax credits will subsidize coverage for people who earn between 133 percent and 400 percent of the federal poverty level (which is $30,657 to $92,200 for a family of four this year).

So what happens if you don't buy health insurance? You'd have to pay a tax penalty that is set at $95 or 1 percent of income, whichever is greater, in 2014. The amount rises until 2016, when it will be $695 for an individual and up to $2,085 for a family, or 2.5 percent of annual income, whichever is greater, and will increase over time based in inflation. Regardless of income, the penalty can't be higher than the cost of the cheapest health plan available. Health care reform exempts people with religious objections to health insurance or medicine. The law also allows people to obtain "hardship" waivers if they demonstrate they can't find a plan they can afford.

Photo by flickr user bradleygee

FOLLOW MONEY

Health care reform's so-called individual mandate is either a crucial element in the plan to give nearly all Americans better access to medical care or the greatest threat to liberty since Abraham Lin...
Health care reform's so-called individual mandate is either a crucial element in the plan to give nearly all Americans better access to medical care or the greatest threat to liberty since Abraham Lin...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 949
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
DRaymond 03:49 AM on 03/25/2012
You know, everybody says that if there is no individual mandate people will put off buying insurance until they are sick.  But in all honesty that premise has never really been tested.  Most people who are uninsured are so because they can't afford it.

Most people are smart enough to realize that, even if they are healthy they can get into an accident or be the victim of violence without  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CapSen
Empathy. The faculty to feel what the other feels.
07:42 AM on 03/28/2012
Are there any (big) mutual insurers in the US? In my country, they operate alongside for-profit insurance companies. Also, there are no insurance companies specializing in health insurance only here. All insurance companies offer a range of insurance products, from car insurance to health insurance and 'house insurances'.

We now have an interesting mix of gov't and private health insurance, whereby the gov't sets the minimum coverage and health insurance companies compete on price and additional, optional packages. This led to companies setting the premiums too low, so that they almost made a loss on health insurance, which they covered with the profits on other insurances. That was not what the gov't had in mind, so they forced companies to increase premiums.

Health care facilties are mainly not-for-profit, but independent, being mainly financed by contracts with insurers. People are still free in choosing GPs and hospitals, if their insurance company has a contract with them, which they almost invariably do.

Still, people and the gov't complain of rising costs, but that's inevitable with an aging population that runs up 90% of life time health care expenditure in the last 10 years of their lives.

But I'd say this system is to be preferred over the American system, either the (previously) existing or ACA.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
afgail
Wise and strong.
10:22 AM on 03/27/2012
The individual mandate is the Heritage Foundation brain child. No way Scalia thomas, Roberts or Alito will deep six the individual mandate. They are all Heritage Foundation supporters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janzee12000
You're all individuals!
05:54 PM on 03/26/2012
'Health Care Reform Mandate, How Does It Work?' This is a great question. Let's ask the Heritage Foudation...
photo
santafesam
smart&snarky
05:20 PM on 03/26/2012
Eeeeewww. If I saw something that looked like that slithering across my floor, I'd squish it quick...well I'd probably scream and get my husband to get squish it. Ugh...
04:50 PM on 03/26/2012
I'm going to pay the penalty. If I get sick I'll buy health insurance. Otherwise, it's a he'll of a lot cheaper at $995 a year.
photo
demisfine
Often correct, NEVER right.
10:54 AM on 03/26/2012
15, or 2.5% increases are driving the GOP insane.
The very same reason they tweak over allowing the Bush Tax Cuts to expire.
A 4% increase in the top tax rate sends the GOP into apoplectic shock. But they want to cut benefits to the poor, cut welfare and education, cut SS and medicare.
The poor are used to doing without, so they can be asked to do without more.
The wealthy are used to being coddled, so they need to be handled very gently.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demotom
rebel with a cause
05:04 PM on 03/25/2012
Repeal the mandate in the ACA. Make health care a single payer system. Dump the present private health insurance system that is the foundation of the out-of-control healthcare costs in this country. Every insurance program that is mandated by either the law or by necessity causes rapid inflation in the costs related to what is being insured. All insurance companies provide high profits for themselves at the expense of those who buy their insurance products. Insurance is not a service, it is legalized theft. It is time that the theft stops.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
macrose83
We the People, Not Business
11:34 AM on 03/26/2012
fanned.
02:07 PM on 03/25/2012
The most obvious flaw in the current system is that insurance companies, driven by the profit motive, are not forced to offer a public option that would give middle class people bargaining power and make premiums affordable, and also, of course, lower profits. Oh no, can't have that.

Big Insurance is all for getting more poor people covered and mandating middle class people buy their overpriced products; they salivate at the idea of more clients paying their exorbitant premiums. What they will never allow, however, is any policy that causes a reduction in their greed-driven profits. Until people recognize this and demand not-for-profit universal health care, the situation will continue to benefit only the top 1% owners of Big Insurance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
giftsthatpurr
zestful life
04:43 PM on 03/25/2012
fanned
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
traceymarie
the President is black, deal with it
06:20 PM on 03/26/2012
ummmm, exchanges do just that. They allow individuals and small businessses to buy insurance at a lower rate already available to large corporations
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DIgnified
Hello hello again sh-boom & hoping well meet again
01:28 PM on 03/25/2012
Oh no! mandated heath insurance. That's terrible. let me go get in my car and drive, since I have the government required insurance to operate a vehicle, to clear my mind...
photo
muysuave41
Spanish Olive Oil Producer
12:09 PM on 03/25/2012
Great. Solicit the same health care insurers who have record profits annually by denying coverage to millions. The government sweetens their bottom-line even more by mandating everyone pay the insurers whether they need the insurance or not. Washington is looking out for you!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
babyspittle
Fox Fake News kills brain cells
01:28 PM on 03/25/2012
is that all you know of health reform?
i'd be mad too.

fortunately, its a lot more than that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DIgnified
Hello hello again sh-boom & hoping well meet again
01:38 PM on 03/25/2012
Hi, im sarcasim. we have never met. please go on and enlighten me.
photo
muysuave41
Spanish Olive Oil Producer
02:06 PM on 03/25/2012
Please elaborate. Let us know how the health care insurers will be rewarded at the government's behest.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
giftsthatpurr
zestful life
04:44 PM on 03/25/2012
Did you read the blog?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
P Alan Greene
12:05 PM on 03/25/2012
My son works part time for minimum wage. His employer provides him, of course, with no health coverage. He is looking for full time work, but without much success. The mandatory cost of health insurance or the penalty for not having it will be a real and problematic cost for him. I truly do not get how requiring the working poor of this country to shell out money for health insurance will help anybody other than health insurance companies.
12:41 PM on 03/25/2012
Tax credits will subsidize coverage for people who earn between 133 percent and 400 percent of the federal poverty level If you are working poor your health care will be subsidized by the rest of us. I think that's a good thing because we all already pay for the healthcare of people who go to the emergency room.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DIgnified
Hello hello again sh-boom & hoping well meet again
01:31 PM on 03/25/2012
I admire you. It must be a thrill to drive without car insurance. You know, because it's expensive, and the government says you have to have it. So it must be a bad thing, since it is the same as the health care mandate, right?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
P Alan Greene
01:44 PM on 03/25/2012
Not at all. Having a car to insure is a choice. Having a body to insure is not.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
festocking
11:59 AM on 03/25/2012
The Oligarchy in Washington, Democrat or Republican, cares only for their re-election.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
babyspittle
Fox Fake News kills brain cells
01:29 PM on 03/25/2012
false.
what a lame comment.
photo
FoxIslander
Fox Island...no relation to Fox News
11:38 PM on 03/25/2012
...not sure what the comment had to do with the post, but I wouldn't call it "false", or "lame". It's why election finance reform fixes the majority of our problems.
11:47 AM on 03/25/2012
Go to any emergency room on a Sat ..... It is FULL of people without insurance ... Who pays? You!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
giftsthatpurr
zestful life
04:47 PM on 03/25/2012
And it is a LOT more expensive that way, as well as the fact that prevention is covered in the ACA which will save tons of $.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
twin1616
Airborne 1st 325
04:33 AM on 03/26/2012
And to be totally honest, I am TIRED of paying extravagant rates for average srevices. Those of us that don't have insurance don't (or maybe some of them do) realize that WE do actually pay when someone comes in uninsured. The first thing that is asked is in such a pleasant voice, "and will you be filing any insurance today"? In other words "will you help us pay for those without"? Republicans don't mind that kind of socialism.
photo
arc23con
why would I?
11:34 AM on 03/25/2012
It's never been about the mandate. It's always been about Obama winning.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
giftsthatpurr
zestful life
04:47 PM on 03/25/2012
Obama 2012!
photo
FoxIslander
Fox Island...no relation to Fox News
11:39 PM on 03/25/2012
...bingo....there's the REAL problem with health care reform.
11:30 AM on 03/25/2012
the problem isnt with the mandate , its not allowing people to pick the insurance thats right for their family . im a 51 year old lifetime non smoker and have always saved money on my premiums by not having a smoking cessation program covered in my policy. in 2014, according to an aid in my congressmans office ( fattah, dem pa) i have to pay for a smoking cessation program in my policy, ie i cant pick and choose whats best for me to cover anymore . so now i will have to pay 33 bucks a month extra to include that . what a disgrace. i actually believed obama when he said "if you like your current policy , you can keep it" . hopefully this law will be overturned so i , and not the govt , can decide what i want and dont want included in my plan
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
giftsthatpurr
zestful life
04:49 PM on 03/25/2012
You may keep your current insurance if you like it. Who is telling you that is not true?
07:04 AM on 03/26/2012
an aid to my congressman (fattah, dem pa) . when the a.c.a passed , it mandated that all insurance policies include 7 or 8 benefits , a smoking cessation program among others that nearly all ins policies dont have. most peoples ins policies dont have these programs so in 2014 they wont be able to keep their current policy. even obama eventually admitted this when he said in responce to a question about people not being able to keep their policies, " well , if you need a more comprehensive policy , of course you will have to pay more" . im a 51 year old lifetime non smoker. its a disgrace that i have to pay for a smoking cessation program in 2014.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anne Rutherford
01:48 PM on 03/26/2012
Well most employer-sponsored plans also offer OB care, and I'm way past the age to worry about that, and they cover men's issues, which I will never use. By having a larger pool, cost containment begins to happen. Basically, since I pay for a policy that includes OB care, someone else gets the care they need, because of lots of folks who won't use that service. Of course, it cuts both ways, since I'm older, I may have more expenses than that 23 year old woman who needs the OB care. It's about creating a big enough pool of insureds (community rating) to spread expenses over a large group of policy holders. Until recently, all insurance was written that way. Under the current system, only the healthy are insured, and the rest fall into public insurance or emergency room treatment - and either way, you will still pay because your premiums will increase to cover the hospital losses.