iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Bo Morrison Killing And 'Castle' Law In Wisconsin Compared To Trayvon Martin Case

Bo Morrison

First Posted: 03/26/2012 8:59 pm Updated: 03/27/2012 12:01 pm


By Maria Rohde

MILWAUKEE, March 26 (Reuters) - The clearing of a homeowner who shot dead an unarmed African-American man in a small Wisconsin town three weeks ago has drawn scrutiny for the state's new castle doctrine law and comparisons to the Trayvon Martin shooting in Florida.

Authorities ruled the killing of Bo Morrison, 20, by a Slinger, Wisconsin, homeowner on his porch justifiable in possibly the first such case under an expanded castle doctrine law enacted late last year, prosecutors said.

The law allows homeowners facing imminent danger to their lives to protect themselves using deadly force if necessary.

About 150 people protested Sunday at the Washington County Courthouse in nearby West Bend, Wisconsin. A rally also was planned Tuesday in Madison for Morrison and Martin, 17, who was shot dead by a neighborhood watch volunteer, who has claimed self-defense and has not been charged in that case.

"Under a reasonable view of the evidence the homeowner acted reasonably in his use of force based on the facts and circumstances," county District Attorney Mark Bensen said.

According to Bensen's report clearing homeowner Adam Kind, Morrison attended a party in a garage adjacent to Kind's house with about 20 young adults the night of the shooting.

Kind, 35, called police at about 1 a.m. March 3 complaining of loud music coming from a car parked in his neighbor's driveway, pounded on the window of the car and asked a woman inside to turn down the music. She refused, the report said.

Police contacted the mother of the girls who were hosting the party. The mother was working but called her husband, who had been sleeping. He kicked in the garage door and told everyone to leave, the report said.

Morrison, who had previous run-ins with the police and had a blood-alcohol content more than twice the legal limit for driving in Wisconsin, was among those to flee.

Kind, who said his concern was elevated because his wife, two children and a child guest were in the house, retrieved a handgun after he heard noises on his porch, the report said.

Kind loaded the handgun, went to the porch and confronted Morrison, who was wearing dark clothing, the report said. Kind fired one shot as Morrison walked toward him, then yelled for his wife to call 911, the report said.

An attorney representing Kind said the shooting of Morrison in the enclosed porch would have been considered justifiable under Wisconsin's prior law as well.

"All the factors to prove self defense under the old law were present," lawyer Craig Mastantuono said.

Morrison's mother, Lauri Morrison, said he was trying to hide because he had previous tickets for underage drinking.

"He executed my son," Morrison said. "This cannot happen to another kid."

Morrison's sister, Kayla Morrison, said the former high school athlete had gotten in with the wrong crowd for a while, "But he was not a criminal. He was not a violent person."

He had gone back to school to get a carpentry qualification and was planning to take a construction course, she said.

"I'll never forget my last conversation with Bo," Kayla Morrison said. "He said he couldn't wait to see what the next two years would be like. He was so optimistic about his life." (Editing by David Bailey and Tim Gaynor)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CRIME

By Maria Rohde MILWAUKEE, March 26 (Reuters) - The decision by authorities not to charge a homeowner who shot dead an unarmed black man in a small Wisconsin town three weeks ago has d...
By Maria Rohde MILWAUKEE, March 26 (Reuters) - The decision by authorities not to charge a homeowner who shot dead an unarmed black man in a small Wisconsin town three weeks ago has d...
Filed by Michael McLaughlin  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 586
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
07:42 PM on 05/22/2012
i live in texas so if this woulda happened here it would def be justified.this case is nothing like the trayvon martin case.trayvon wasn't drunk or had any run ins with the law, this boy did. its sad that he had to go to that party and that he couldn't wait 1 more yr to drink. however if this was me i wouldn't confront the person i would call 911 and wait for the cops. if that person was breaking into my home that would be the only time i'd shoot.
12:25 PM on 04/22/2012
And we should thank all the civil lawsuits against homeowners who defended their houses against criminals for the expanded coverage which now gives immunity against civil action. It is ridiculous that a criminal or a criminal's family can successfully sue a homeowner for defending his/her property but that is exactly what has happened with sympathetic juries and some sob stories for witnesses about how great the criminal was. The homeowner ends up financially ruined because some thug tried to rob him and got shot for it. So this is what you get now.
12:03 PM on 04/22/2012
Simple stay out of other people's property. If you do get into other people's property by mistake do not hide. And if you are a criminal expect to get blown to bits for trying to enter someplace you have no right to be.
12:15 PM on 04/20/2012
Just another angryazz hillbilly.
11:18 AM on 04/20/2012
If you come into my house during the night while my family is sleeping I will not ask you what you're doing there...you will be dead.
07:39 PM on 04/20/2012
You better have REALLY good insurance because I would take everything you own, and I mean everything, if you shot one of my family because they came to your door due to car trouble. Think about it. Your remark is what is so frightening to the rest of us rational people.
09:05 PM on 04/20/2012
I specifically said come into my house...I'm not going to shoot someone who is at my front door with car trouble. It is not irrational to shoot an intruder inside your house.
04:01 PM on 04/21/2012
Then you better hope it happens in a state with patience for your breed of pansiness.
12:43 PM on 04/19/2012
My comments have been broken up into three parts because one, I have a lot to say and two, I type fast so it’s easy for me to get everything out quick!

Let me get this straight, there is a party going on in the garage next door to you home and YOU leave the safety of your house to approach the car in the driveway that has loud music playing and the driver refuses to turn it down. One parent is at work while her husband is upstairs sleeping..how loud is the music for the father of the girls throwing the party to not hear it and the cops had called the mother who told the father to go stop the party..why didn’t the cops come out there themselves?
12:42 PM on 04/19/2012
Anyway, so Bo is running away from the party with others and decides to hid in the next door neighbor’s porch..

This neighbor, depending on his bedroom location to the porch, whether on the first or second floor, has amazing hearing, hears this noise on the porch. Having so much concern for the well being of his wife, children and child guest, loads his firearm and proceeds to go out yet again from the safety of his home, tells his wife to call 911 while he goes to see what/who is creating the noise on his porch..

Now, I know some people on here will use that bull about him protecting his family because the person on the porch..and how large is the porch for the person to be able to “approach” him and he doesn’t have the time to ask a simple question like, “what the f are you doing on my porch?” or “get off my property”..whose to say that the person didn’t get to Kind quicker than he could fire his gun and they fight for it, it goes off and say the wife, who like her husband, could be one of those people who like to investigate what’s going on, and she ends up getting shot?

Wouldn’t turning on the lights have freaked the person that you suspect was trying to harm your family into taking off from your property?
12:41 PM on 04/19/2012
And this bull about protecting yourself is getting out of hand..who are these Americans that just okay these laws being passed? Oh yeah, the nut nuts that should NEVER possess a gun because they think illogically.

I could see, like in the Martin/Zimmerman case that Kind was approached by Morrison, sure, you can use force, even though it is an unarmed person and you should just man up and use your fists to knock someone the f out..but if you are the one doing the approaching, should this law still apply to you? In my personal opinion, no! We can’t get the “one that was up to no good” version of events because he is d-e-a-d!

The funny/sad thing is, who can really say Kind was approached by Morrison in a manner that “Morrison was determined to attack him or whatever”? For all we know, he kept watch of events that played out from the 911 call about the noise so who knows if Kind did not notice Morrison coming near his house and that’s when he loaded his gun. That’s like Zimmerman’s 911 call, whose to really say Martin was walking “suspiciously” and had his hand in his jeans, looking like he was on drugs or something..at night..in the rain..for all we know Zimmerman could have been sitting there, spotting Martin walking in his gated community and decided he wasn’t going to let “them get away with it.”
11:01 AM on 04/22/2012
I am all for Conceal and Carry permits, I am for being able to protect yourself if needed, however in this case the kid was on the porch. Kind could have locked the door, and called the police and told them someone was in his porch, which is what he should of done. If the kid broke into the house from that point, he should have every right to shoot him. When I took my 5 hour class for my conceal and carry permit, they spend about 3.5 hrs telling you about all the bad stuff that can happen to you if you use it! They stress trying to find a way out of a situation and to try to not have to use your weapon. In This case I think Kind could have chose a different path. He may not have been charged, but he may lose a lawsuit if one is brought. Now the Zimmerman case is still open in my book. We now have seen the photos of the head wound. With the way Florida law is, against public opinion, it may turn out he was justified in the shooting. Just don't know know enough to make a final call on that one yet.
11:59 AM on 04/22/2012
He is immune to civil lawsuits under the expanded castle doctrine.
01:49 PM on 04/22/2012
Welp, I'm not going to write about giving Kind and Zimmerman the benefit of the doubt..it's not as though they shot the two young men in the arm or leg. This "shoot to kill" method gives the okay according to law that if a person has a fear..to whichever degree they want it to be, they can go and shoot the person. Then there's this code of honesty on the part of the shooter/killer that America seems to have had hidden from my knowledge that it makes perfect sense to believe the person still breathing rather than doing an investigation. Until Zimmerman of 2012 came along, I've never heard of someone calling 911 and then going on their own to confront someone or Kind supposedly telling his wife to call 911 while he loads his gun and goes down to the indoor porch because he heard noises.

And people keep forgetting that Trayvon was closer to where he was staying then Zimmerman was to his home yet I have yet to hear Trayvon having the right to defend himself when he felt his life was in danger. By the way, according to his family's exaggeration of Zimmerman being near death, where's a recent pic of stitches/why didn't the EMTs patch him up so he wouldn't get an infection? Where is that broken nose pic of his as well? For all we know, he could have inflicted his own head wound..unfortunately, the dead cannot talk!
11:04 PM on 04/23/2012
The Intruder had no business being in the mans porch period. It was part of a home regardless. All the rest is drivel. I Can and Will protect myself, my family and my property and I have a right to do so.
12:17 AM on 04/26/2012
Wow, that makes so much sense *rolls eyes* when the family is sleeping on the inside of the home yet the father decides to enter the indoor porch to investigate the noise..now if one really feels his family is in "danger" than that person would not only have the cops called but make sure that the family is all in one room and if he or she feels the need, proceed to go at their own free will to see what or who is making this fear creep into their system. Where was the real threat though? Have yet to hear Kind state that he heard Morrison trying to break into the home and what if Morrison was really up to something and he not only had a gun on him but was prepared to shoot as soon as the door was opened..the bull is the fact that one can call 911 under the pretense of fearing their lives just in case they do shoot and kill and this way, they cover their sorry asses!

And besides, by your logic, the mother of Morrison should go and kill Kind because he harmed her child. What the hell, might as well torture and kill one of his kids, show him what it feels like to lose a child by a senseless act..that whole "eye for an eye" motto..I mean *shrug* that's how I would do it!
07:37 PM on 04/18/2012
"The clearing of a homeowner who shot dead an unarmed AFRICAN-AMERICAN man in a small Wisconsin town three weeks ago has drawn scrutiny for the state's new castle doctrine law and comparisons to the Trayvon Martin shooting in Florida."

I know this may sound messed up, but can somebody please show me where on a world map is there a specific country or state named African-American? I tried looking all over my world map but I couldn't find one. I'll Western Union the person who can find it 50 bucks, I promise.

Bet you can't find it. Why? BECAUSE THERE's NO SUCH THING AS AFRICAN-AMERICAN PEOPLE! US SO-CALLED BLACK AFRICAN-AMERICAN PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY ARE MOORS! AFRICAN AMERICAN = CIVILITER MORTUUS, I.E. DEAD AT LAW! STOP BEING BLIND AND DEAF AND WAKE UP TO THE TRUTH! DO YOUR RESEARCH! PROCLAIM YOUR NATIONALITY, AND STOP FOLLOWING THESE BLACK LEADERS WHO CAN'T DO A DAMN THING TO FREE YOUR OUT OF LINE BUTT!

And there ain't no such thing or place called White neither, so WAKE UP and stop being stuck on STUPID! WE ARE NOT COLORS/CONTINENTS. WE ARE A PEOPLE OF NATIONS. My comment may seem fanatical to the unawakened "eye," but if you think about it deep enough, no justice or peace in this country will come between the Moors and Europeans until we stop PASSIVELY letting ourselves be identified as continents or colors and start identifying ourselves with our ancestral homeland.
11:13 AM on 04/22/2012
ROFLMAO! This is one of the best and most accurate posts I have read on the Internet in a long time! I salute you my friend. It is unfortunate, but I was adopted and will never know my ancestral homeland, so if you don't mind, I will stick with just being an American. When I look at all my friends, I don't care what color their skin is, or where they came from. I chose them as my friends, because they have been a friend to me. In my book, that is all that counts. Things will never be perfect in this country, and we just need to accept that! God Bless!
09:14 PM on 04/23/2012
NO! You should NOT be content with just being an American! That is the most UNPATRIOTIC THING YOU COULD EVER SAY! And besides, if you're not indigineous person of this land i.e Moorish or their mixed descendants, then you are a EUROPEAN IMMIGRANT/COLONIST! No ifs ands or butts about it! People need to wake up and get out of this color-matirx. The powers that be set it up this way so we would have all these "racial" issues. Wake up, and man, know thyself.
07:12 PM on 04/18/2012
I really wish that more people would allow law enforcement to do their job. There is nothing wrong with protecting your family but going to approach certain dangers, guns a blazin' is not the way to do it. Well, in my opinion it's not the way to do it. How do we know this kid didn't state who he was? How do we know he didn't say, "Hey listen, I'm just hiding here from the cops because I've been in trouble before for underage drinking. I'll go now. I'm sorry." We don't know if he offered up an explanation or not because he's dead. Let the law do their job. If police officers were parked near or on the premises of Mr. Kind he should have waited until he heard them knock on the door. Take a peak outside and see if the cops are walking towards your door. Don't just go outside with a loaded gun. You're already scared and on high alert. You're bound to shoot anything that moves.
04:35 PM on 04/19/2012
If he'd accidentally or purposely shot a police officer who chased one of the kids onto his porch, he'd be up under the jail.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jamie461
04:29 PM on 04/18/2012
Why can't people just call the police instead of taking matters into their own hands like this? I don't think the comparisons to the Trayvon Martin case are correct at all, but it still sounds like this man was a little too quick to seek a confrontation with someone. If he had just called 911 FIRST, then this kid wouldn't be dead.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Henry Rolligns
02:48 AM on 04/11/2012
Those who fail to understand the reason behind Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground do not understand that these doctrines are not only for self defense from a potential life threatening act, but from potential financial burden as it provides immunity from civil lawsuits.
09:56 AM on 04/13/2012
Your comment underlines the absurdity of the CD and SYG laws. Self defense is already a legal defense, and to purport that the reduction of a "financial burden" from avoiding a lawsuit (criminal not civil) is a good thing is equally so.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Henry Rolligns
01:14 PM on 04/13/2012
Go defend yourself with a firearm. Then come back at me after you spend 20-40 years in prison because the statutes do not grant victims the right to defend themselves with necessary force in their own homes. Perhaps, you should have just thrown sand on the criminals face. Maybe you'd just get charged with assault instead. A better idea would be just to leave cookies and milk for the criminals.

It is absurd that you believe people should just take whatever the criminal gives if they refuse to turn their back and run away. The law shouldnt force someone to be a coward/victim to the criminal that intends to bring harm to you and your family. It is fine that you think you have no possession that is more valuable than another person's life. I prefer to view the person that intends to attack me as having no regard for life at all. I value my family and my life.

If people felt so strongly about private citizens using firearms incorrectly, why not disarm the police or even the military?
12:02 AM on 04/08/2012
If you are against my right to keep and bear arms and you think that Castle Doctrine Laws are not necessary, Ill ask you politely to go and talk with Mrs. Sandra Chacon and tell her that next time an intruder gets into her home and tries to inflict harm upon her and her daugther she has NO right to defend herself and her daugther of such attack and will have to endure ONCE AGAIN this hellish nightmare. I want to see you do that before I surrender my rights.

I really hope the little girl recuperates safely and promptly from all her injuries.

http://www.wmctv.com/story/17353099/17-year-old-charged-in-violent-mid-south-home-invasion#.T4EELonDZEs.facebook
08:28 PM on 04/07/2012
Meet Nancy and Bob Strait from Tulsa Ok. Next time someone says that Castle Doctrine does not work or is not necessary dont forget Nancy and Bob, point to a quick search on google for home invasion murders. This innocent and defenseless elderly couple was not shot but beaten to death by home invaders. Even a light and easy handling .22 cal revolver in their hands would have made the difference between having a chance to survive or just be executed in the worst gruesome way. For those that proclaim turning the other cheek or running is siffucient to try to save your life in your home, I guess this innocent couple did not turned the other cheek fast enough or ran hard enough?
According to many here, they did the right thing by doing nothing and let themselfs get kill. Because many here operate on the Gun control theory that - A woman raped and strangled is morally superior to a woman with a smoking gun and a dead rapist at her feet.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2117695/Brutal-home-invasion-Oklahoma-couple-ends-65-year-romance-meeting-blind-date.htm
04:41 PM on 04/19/2012
Yeah, a gun probably wouldn't have saved them. Let's be reasonable. Someone breaking in your house is a lot different than seeing a kid on your porch when you KNOW that there is a party going on next door with teenagers. So you seriously think that shooting everyone/anyone who startles you is justified? Really? You are serious? You people are so geeked to keep your precious guns that you will defend anything! So stupid!
11:44 PM on 04/05/2012
Is the only picture they could find was one with him wearing a hoodie? I mean seriously...