Story comes courtesy of California Watch.
Several state lawmakers are pushing for a tougher crackdown on California State University executive compensation in the wake of trustees' decision to approve the maximum allowable pay raises for new campus presidents.
CSU trustees in January approved a new executive compensation policy [PDF] that caps the amount of base pay new campus presidents can earn at no more than 10 percent above their predecessors' pay. In the first application of the new policy, trustees last week signed off on full 10 percent pay raises for two new presidents at CSU East Bay and CSU Fullerton.
The move came as CSU officials announced that they would limit spring admissions to all but a few hundred students due to state budget cuts, shutting out tens of thousands of would-be college-goers. If Gov. Jerry Brown's proposed tax measure fails, the system also might deny admission to up to 25,000 qualified applicants in fall 2013.
The day after trustees approved the pay increases, SB 952 from Sen. Elaine Alquist, D-San Jose, which would lock the 10 percent cap on CSU executive raises into statute for six years, passed out of the Senate Education Committee. As an urgency measure, it would take effect in July.
Both the Alquist bill and the new CSU policy cap the portion of executives' base salary that comes from the state general fund, as opposed to any supplemental funding from university foundations. CSU system Chancellor Charles B. Reed, as well as the presidents at San Diego State University, San Jose State University and Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, receive salary supplements from university foundations.
A bill from Sen. Leland Yee, D-San Francisco, that would have cut closer to the bone than SB 952 was killed last week. Yee's bill would have prohibited pay increases for top administrators during bad budget years or within two years of a student fee increase. In years when raises were allowable, they would have been capped at 5 percent above the predecessor's pay.
Yee said in a statement that by killing the bill, the Education Committee sent the wrong message.
"Rather than stand up for students and faculty, they protected the 1 percent and condoned CSU’s bad behavior. CSU students and California taxpayers deserve better than the status quo," Yee said.
In a statement, Alquist described her bill as just the starting point for reining in CSU pay, calling the hearing in the Education Committee "just the first step in the lengthy legislative process."
"My colleagues and I will continue to strengthen the bill as it moves through the process," she said.
Meanwhile, Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, called trustees "tone deaf" and called for legislators to take a stronger approach.
And CSU East Bay alum Sen. Ellen Corbett, D-San Leandro, called for a moratorium on pay raises, saying she was "shocked and dismayed" that her alma mater's new president is getting a significant pay raise at the same time that admissions are being cut and academic programs are being slashed.
Corbett isn't the only lawmaker whose alma mater is involved. Of the 97 California lawmakers who responded to a 2011 survey by The Chronicle of Higher Education, 26 of them – or 27 percent – attended a CSU school.
Yee, too, has an affiliation with CSU, having earned his master's degree from San Francisco State University, his bio says. Alquist and Steinberg studied elsewhere. According to her bio, Alquist earned her bachelor's degree from MacMurray College in Illinois and her master's from Washington University. Steinberg's bio indicates he attended UCLA for his bachelor's degree and UC Davis School of Law for his law degree.
Source: The Chronicle of Higher Education
Erica Perez is an investigative reporter focusing on higher education for California Watch and the Center for Investigative Reporting. To read more California Watch stories, click here.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.