iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Weather-Manmade Global Warming Link Builds, Study Says

First Posted: 03/25/2012 2:00 pm Updated: 03/26/2012 10:57 am


* Extreme rainfall, heatwaves linked to global warming

* Relationship between storms and warming less clear

By Nina Chestney

LONDON, March 25 (Reuters) - Extreme weather events over the past decade have increased and were "very likely" caused by manmade global warming, a study in the journal Nature Climate Change said on Sunday.

Scientists at Germany's Potsdam Institute for Climate Research used physics, statistical analysis and computer simulations to link extreme rainfall and heat waves to global warming. The link between warming and storms was less clear.

"It is very likely that several of the unprecedented extremes of the past decade would not have occurred without anthropogenic global warming," said the study.

The past decade was probably the warmest globally for at least a millennium. Last year was the eleventh hottest on record, the World Meteorological Organisation said on Friday.

Extreme weather events were devastating in their impacts and affected nearly all regions of the globe.

They included severe floods and record hot summers in Europe; a record number of tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic in 2005; the hottest Russian summer since 1500 in 2010 and the worst flooding in Pakistan's history.

Last year alone, the United States suffered 14 weather events which caused losses of over $1 billion each.
NOT NORMAL

The high amount of extremes is not normal, the study said.

Even between March 13 and 19 this year, historical heat records were exceeded in more than 1,000 places in North America.

For some types of extreme weather, there are physical reasons why they would increase in a warming climate. For example, if average temperature rises, then so will the number of heat records if all else remains equal, the study said.

Natural weather patterns like El Nino or La Nina can also cause highs in global temperature or increased precipitation which leads to floods.

"Single weather extremes are often related to regional processes, like a blocking high pressure system or natural phenomena like El Nino," said Stefan Rahmstorf, co-author of the study and chair of the institute's earth system analysis department.

"These are complex processes that we are investigating further. But now these processes unfold against the background of climatic warming. That can turn an extreme event into a record-breaking event."

Recent years have seen an exceptionally large number of record-breaking and destructive heatwaves in many parts of the world and research suggests that many or even most of these would not have happened without global warming.

Currently, nearly twice as many record hot days as record cold days are being observed both in the United States and Australia, the length of summer heatwaves in western Europe has almost doubled and the frequency of hot days has almost tripled over the period from 1880 to 2005.

Extremely hot summers are now observed in about 10 percent of the global land area, compared with only about 0.1-0.2 percent for the period 1951 to 1980, the study said.

The link between storms and hurricanes and global warming is less conclusive but at least some of recent rainfall extremes can be attributed to human influences on the climate, it added. (Reporting by Nina Chestney)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

* Extreme rainfall, heatwaves linked to global warming * Relationship between storms and warming less clear By Nina Chestney LONDON, March 25 (Reuters) - E...
* Extreme rainfall, heatwaves linked to global warming * Relationship between storms and warming less clear By Nina Chestney LONDON, March 25 (Reuters) - E...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,095
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (19 total)
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
11:59 AM on 04/10/2012
Antarctica and Greenland are Melting, and the Melting is Accelerating
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Greenland and Antarctica ice sheets have been melting over recent years, and the melting has been accelerating.

That melting is causing sea levels to rise. In a worst-case scenario said melting may contribute over 6 feet in sea level rise by 2100 (and higher in the next centuries).

http://www.nature.com/climate/2010/1004/full/climate.2010.29.html
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.170.8753&rep=rep1&type=pdf
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature10847.html
http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v2/n12/abs/ngeo694.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
Midnight Toker
01:07 AM on 03/31/2012
LOL..

NOLA was supposed to be hit again and wasn't.

and now cryosat says ice increasing:

Checking CryoSat reveals rising Antarctic blue ice
March 30th, 2012 in Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

Field measurements in the spectacular blue ice region of Antarctica not only provide confidence in the accuracy of ESA’s CryoSat mission, but have also shown that this part of the ice sheet has increased in height.
While the field experiments are designed for validation purposes, the analysis of measurements from two campaigns in 2008–09 and 2010–11 has shown some surprising results: it reveals that this part of Antarctica actually increased in height by an average of 9 cm between the two periods.
http://www.physorg.com/print252316403.html
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
12:16 PM on 04/10/2012
Fumes: "cryosat says ice increasing"

LOL..

Your grossly misleading wording is again quite amusing, Fumes.

From what you quoted:

"part of the [Antarctic] ice sheet has increased in height."

"Part" is not all and "height" is not volume. 

But you knew that.. right, Fumes?

The total volume of the Antarctic ice sheet has been decreasing, and at an accelerating rate.

http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v2/n12/abs/ngeo694.html

---------------------------------
"When scientifically investigating the natural world, the only thing worse than a blind believer is a seeing denier."

-- Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
10:38 AM on 03/30/2012
Conservative Climate Scientist Dr. Barry Bickmore:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I’ve recently been involved with other scientists and scholars in Utah trying to stop the spread of outright lies, half-truths, abuses of data, and distortions about climate change...

I'm a Republican myself, and it galls me that my own party has locally fallen for a bunch of conspiracy theories and scientifically incompetent trash. In my opinion, something has to be done to save the party from disaster in the long run...

Democracy depends on accurate information being readily available to the public, and I see people who propagate such disinformation campaigns as enemies of Democracy.

http://bbickmore.wordpress.com/about-this-blog/
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zacky Ahmed
Astro-physics, Science, Politics
06:12 AM on 03/29/2012
You could come up with every evidence in the world, and some people would still be denying it,
they are not skeptics, they are deniers, it does not fit their view of the world.

US Senator James Inhofe (R-OK), minority leader of Committee on Environment, denies science; says man-made climate change is impossible because it says so in Genesis 8:22, and it's "outrageous" to believe humans are "able to change what God is doing in the climate"

Although I think he is using the bible as an excuse, later he said to Maddow, I thought climate change was real, until I saw how costly it is to fix the problem
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
05:00 PM on 03/28/2012
Reality has a well-known scientific bias.

U.S. National Academy of Sciences, 2010:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Human activities are influencing climate. As discussed in the following chapters, scientific evidence that the Earth is warming is now overwhelming. There is also a multitude of evidence that this warming results primarily from human activities, especially burning fossil fuels and other activities that release heat-trapping greenhouse gases (GHGs) into the atmosphere. Projections of future climate change indicate that Earth will continue to warm unless significant and sustained actions are taken to limit emissions of GHGs.

http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12782
02:41 PM on 03/28/2012
Rather than reading about AGW through the filter of environmental groups - go directly to the source and see what they are saying. Here is an easy read about storm damage during 2011. THe conclusions are not what you have been told.
http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/admin/publication_files/2012.01.pdf
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:45 PM on 03/28/2012
Their final paragraph read thusly:

"The 2011 tornado season resulted in the largest property loss of any tornado season on
record and has raised concerns for insurers about tornadoes as possible catastrophic
events. The challenge for public officials and for insurers is to find ways to model the
return frequency of these events to allow for the necessary preparations and to ensure
sufficient claim reserves. Normalised tornado damage, which provides a way to adjust
past losses for changes in population and wealth, suggest that the 2011 season is not
without precedent, but rather comparable to at least two prior years: 1953 and 1965. Thus
we can reasonably expect to see a repeat of the insured losses from this year at some point
in the future."

So, what was it that you thought we were being told?
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
04:59 PM on 03/28/2012
You seem confused again sunnsetter - what you cited is not a peer-reviewed scientific study, and it's only in relation to tornadoes in any event.

The HuffPo article above however IS in reference to a peer-reviewed sceintific study, which is moreover publiched in the preeminent science journal Nature. Here's the study:

---------------------

A Decade of Weather Extremes

Nature Climate Change (2012) doi:10.1038/nclimate1452
Published online 25 March 2012

Abstract

The ostensibly large number of recent extreme weather events has triggered intensive discussions, both in- and outside the scientific community, on whether they are related to global warming. Here, we review the evidence and argue that for some types of extreme — notably heatwaves, but also precipitation extremes — there is now strong evidence linking specific events or an increase in their numbers to the human influence on climate. For other types of extreme, such as storms, the available evidence is less conclusive, but based on observed trends and basic physical concepts it is nevertheless plausible to expect an increase.

http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate1452.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Yota Daga
HedgeHog Power!
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
04:24 PM on 03/28/2012
A Foxnews video is hardly credible. Why do you even bother with Fox?
05:30 PM on 03/28/2012
What makes them any less credible than CNN CBS NBC ABC?

this is a real question i would like to know.
ubrew12
that crazy uncle from Amarcord
09:04 PM on 03/28/2012
This video, to me, is a useful 'turnabout' for Faux News, which has done so much to demonize the Volt to kill its sales, by calling it the 'Obamawagon'. Sometimes, Faux' hatred for all things 'Obama' and all things 'climate change', causes it to hurt even its friends. I'm guessing the CEO of Ford/GM (the anti-AGW Lutz) called the CEO of Faux News (Ailes) and reminded him he was singlehandedly killing Lutz career (Lutz has put his entire reputation on the Volt). So now we're getting a Faux propaganda piece about how the Volt is going to 'win the war on terror' (or whatever). Its still propaganda, but in a twist of fate, its propaganda that works FOR us rather than against us. Again, probably as a favor from one of the 1% to another.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MyTake
Release the Hydrogen Economy now!
11:34 PM on 03/27/2012
Well, all these issues would be resolved if Americans just demanded that their Government release the Hydrogen and Hemp Economies.

Hydrogen does not pollute and those wonderful Hemp fibers, that can build your house and clothe the population, leave the TREES standing so they can do their job in nature of absorbing the CO2 molecule.

Converting your billion cars to Hydrogen Fuel powered electric motors would clobber a lot of the global pollution.

Get that UN "two-faced" monster to stop the global shipping from using EXXON's 4.5% Diesel Bunker Fuel and have them update their "International Maritime Organization" laws and regulations (haven't touched them since 1948) when the Rockefeller's set up the UN.

But, the UN does what The Pratt House (NY) tells them to do (David Rockefeller, Chairman Emeritus).

And Rockefeller told them to do "Earth Summits/Climate Change and tie it to Population Control" as noted here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClqUcScwnn8 .

Imagine that, The Rockefeller Oil Refining Monopoly has polluted the planet for over a CENTURY and won't install Hydrogen Gas Pumps on his EXXON service station lots!

And Dear David taught Gates about "philanthropy" and now Billy wants to VACCINATE the population downwards in (Africa, Asia and India)! Go Figure.
07:27 AM on 03/28/2012
Hydrogen is not an energy source. It's an energy storage mechanism. You still have to get the energy from somewhere.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Fanney
Scribbler
09:37 PM on 03/27/2012
Scientists have been making warnings about global warming for 60 years. The only reason why we haven't had concerted action is due to a massive, generations-long misinformation and lobbying campaign to stymie appropriate and needed responses:

http://robertscribbler.wordpress.com/2012/03/27/no-response-to-global-warming-after-60-years-of-scientific-warnings-would-we-really-take-away-our-childrens-hope/
ubrew12
that crazy uncle from Amarcord
02:35 AM on 03/28/2012
Right on and well said. I was AMAZED at how much about AGW scientists already knew by 1982. Compare:
1982: doubling of CO2 will increase temperatures by 3 C.
2012: doubling of CO2 will increase temperatures by 3 C.
1982: 66% of this warming will be due to feedbacks like water vapor and reduced ice cover.
2012: ditto.
1982: Earths current energy imbalance due to CO2 is 0.5 Watts/m2
2012: Earths current energy imbalance due to CO2 is 0.6 Watts/m2
1982: One signature of CO2 warming, as opposed to solar warming, is a lowered upper atmosphere temperature.
2012: ditto.
1982: One signature of CO2 warming, as opposed to solar warming, is an enhanced response in the Polar Regions.
2012: ditto.

The comparisons start out funny, then emerge rather troubling when you consider what it says about human nature (that nothing has been done).
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
09:56 AM on 03/28/2012
Jdey123 aka "curryandwebster":

"doubling of CO2 causes a temperature increase of 3C (aka climate sensitivity) remains unconfirmed today"

In fact, multiple studies indicate that climate sensitivity is 3 deg C +/- 1.5 deg C.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
01:21 PM on 03/28/2012
2008: James Hansen: Doubling of CO2 will increase temperatures by 6 C.
http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/2008/2008_Hansen_etal.pdf

2012: NASA: Earth's curent forcing due solely to CO2 is 1.50 W/m2 (2000), but is about 1.8 W/m2 in 2010.
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/modelforce/

Temperature should go up 1.5 degrees (1750-2010) due to CO2 alone.
http://www.pik-potsdam.de/~stefan/Publications/Book_chapters/Rahmstorf_Zedillo_2008.pdf
This American
An end to all this nonsense
01:08 AM on 03/30/2012
Most sane people like warmer weather. Government statistics prove this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Fanney
Scribbler
08:59 PM on 03/27/2012
Country-inundating floods and yearly tornadoes that wipe entire towns and cities off the map are not normal. Years and decade long droughts are not normal. The massive wildfires that are now occurring year-round are not normal. Anyone who says this is not normal is clearly not paying attention.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:25 PM on 03/27/2012
Actually there has been little trend in strong tornadoes over the last 50 years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
earthotter
micro-bio is a science course
10:22 PM on 03/27/2012
little trend in strong tornadoes? I realize you're "simpleperson" but you need to give more detail than that strange comment if you want to make a point.
photo
MichaelAKD
Be the change you wish to see in the world.
07:35 PM on 03/27/2012
it is beyond the point of debate, so why waste energy and effort trying to convince those who put their fingers in their ears, shut their eyes and pretend all is well with the world. rational human beings are fully aware that extreme weather events have become more the norm than "normal" weather patterns. islands in the pacific with whole populations are being moved because of rising sea levels. droughts of epic proportions devastating livestock and agriculture in the s.w. of the u.s. horrendous floods in asia, homes in alaska and canada falling apart because the permafrost is melting and their foundations are crumbling. glacier national park with no glaciers. these events are facts, if a few wish to waste time blithering about it being caused by the sun, natural cycles or that all of these events are somehow "normal" or even a scam,...you will never convince them otherwise. just as there are those who still believe the earth is but a few thousand years old and the holocaust was a fictional event, as said, these people are all of them lost causes, you can't fix stupid, sadly it is a life long affliction. in reference to climatological changes regardless of cause we have the power to mitigate and prepare and that is what we should be doing NOW, rather than being mired in pointless attempts to open the eyes and minds of those unable grasp the precepts of critical thinking.
12:46 AM on 03/28/2012
I wouldn't care to debate this issue except that mitigation requires political will and skill, both of which are dampened by the noise of those who can't see tomorrow.
04:54 AM on 03/28/2012
I agree 100%! But, as you ask, what do we do now, as what we have warned about is so visible, yet people DO NOT BELIEVE it? Are they going to believe anything purposeful? Or will people only believe when it is TOO late?
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
06:55 PM on 03/27/2012
National Academy of Sciences (2010):
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There is a strong, credible body of evidence, based on multiple lines of research, documenting that climate is changing and that these changes are in large part caused by human activities. While much remains to be learned, the core phenomenon, scientific questions, and hypotheses have been examined thoroughly and have stood firm in the face of serious scientific debate and careful evaluation of alternative explanations...

Some scientific conclusions or theories have been so thoroughly examined and tested, and supported by so many independent observations and results, that their likelihood of subsequently being found to be wrong is vanishingly small. Such conclusions and theories are then regarded as settled facts. This is the case for the conclusions that the Earth system is warming and that much of this warming is very likely due to human activities.

http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12782 
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nellre
growth is not sustainable
03:47 PM on 03/27/2012
I had a dream last night. Food shipments to my city were disrupted because violent storms knocked out the rail and roads needed to get it to the market. Come 2050, this could be real, and not a nightmare.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]